Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Compared Performance of High-Sensitivity Cameras Dedicated to Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phantom and Human Images

Laetitia Imbert, Sylvain Poussier, Philippe R. Franken, Bernard Songy, Antoine Verger, Olivier Morel, Didier Wolf, Alain Noel, Gilles Karcher and Pierre-Yves Marie
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2012, 53 (12) 1897-1903; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.107417
Laetitia Imbert
1CRAN–UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine–CNRS, Vandoeuvre, France
2Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre, France
3Nancyclotep Experimental Imaging Platform, Nancy, France
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU–Nancy, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sylvain Poussier
3Nancyclotep Experimental Imaging Platform, Nancy, France
5INSERM, U947, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe R. Franken
6Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard Songy
7Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antoine Verger
3Nancyclotep Experimental Imaging Platform, Nancy, France
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU–Nancy, Nancy, France
5INSERM, U947, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Morel
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU–Nancy, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Didier Wolf
1CRAN–UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine–CNRS, Vandoeuvre, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Noel
1CRAN–UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine–CNRS, Vandoeuvre, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gilles Karcher
3Nancyclotep Experimental Imaging Platform, Nancy, France
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU–Nancy, Nancy, France
5INSERM, U947, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre-Yves Marie
3Nancyclotep Experimental Imaging Platform, Nancy, France
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU–Nancy, Nancy, France
8INSERM, U961, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Images of cardiac phantom provided by CT and by DSPECT camera, as well as representation of background (blue) and myocardial (yellow) regions of interest, which were used for determining contrast-to-noise ratio.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Example, on median short-axis slice, of determination of maximal slope of epicardial border of left lateral wall, representing sharpness index. Distance is expressed in centimeters, and voxel intensity is expressed in percentage of maximal myocardial voxel value.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Comparison of the 4 cameras. Count sensitivity was determined for phantom (top left) and indirectly assessed for human (top right) SPECT images by normalizing counts to recording time and injected activity. Spatial resolution was determined for phantom insert (middle left) and indirectly assessed for human (middle right) SPECT images using sharpness index for myocardial contours. Contrast-to-noise ratio was determined for phantom (bottom left) and human (bottom right) SPECT images. Conv = conventional SPECT; DSP = DSPECT; IQ = IQ⋅SPECT; NM = Discovery NM 530c; c = central resolution; r = radial resolution; t = tangential resolution.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Representative SPECT images obtained with 4 different cameras: with phantom after simulation of small parietal defect (insertion of small solid cube 15 mm in length) (left) and in subjects involved in clinical part of study (right).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Parameters Commonly Used for SPECT Recording and Reconstruction

    ParameterDiscovery NM 530cDSPECTIQ⋅SPECTConventional SPECT
    Recording
     CollimatorMultipinholeWide-angle parallel holeAstigmaticLEHR or parallel hole
     Energy window140 keV ± 10%140 keV ± 10%140 keV ± 7.5%140 keV ± 7.5%
     Number of projections19120 (×9 blocks)17 (×2 heads)16 (×2 heads)
     Detector angle between consecutive projectionsNone (fixed detector)0.4°–7°*6°3°
    Reconstruction
     MethodIterative 3DIterative 3DIterative 3DIterative 3D
     Number of iterations607108
     Number of subsets13234
     Interiteration filter—Kernel (0.125)——
     Final filterButterworth (order, 7; cutoff, 0.37 cm−1)Normalizing filter†Gaussian (10 mm FWHM)Gaussian (10 mm FWHM)
     Pixel size (mm)4.04.924.86.6
    • ↵* Angles are approximately 0.4° for projections passing through cardiac region (as defined by adjusted region of interest on prescan images) and up to 7° for other projections.

    • ↵† Way in which normalizing filter works is proprietary information of Spectrum Dynamics.

    • LEHR = low-energy high-resolution; 3D = 3-dimensional; FWHM = full width at half maximum.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Main Characteristics of the 4 Camera Groups Involved in Clinical Study

    CharacteristicDiscovery NM 530cDSPECTIQ⋅SPECTConventional SPECT
    Number of subjects12121212
    Age (y)53 ± 1056 ± 1053 ± 857 ± 7
    Body weight (kg)80 ± 1080 ± 784 ± 1383 ± 13
    Study protocol1-d stress–rest1-d stress–rest1-d stress–rest1-d rest–stress
    TracerSestamibiSestamibiSestamibiSestamibi
    Activity injected at exercise (MBq)*132 ± 22168 ± 62318 ± 341,073 ± 177
    Maximal heart rate at exercise (%†)93 ± 895 ± 491 ± 791 ± 4
    Recording time (min)1064.516
    Patient positionProneSemirecliningProneSupine
    Total myocardial counts (×103)447 ± 96625 ± 198214 ± 601,019 ± 190
    • ↵* Corrected for physical decay at half-time of SPECT recording.

    • ↵† Expressed in percentage of maximal predicted value (220 – age).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 53 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue 12
December 1, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Compared Performance of High-Sensitivity Cameras Dedicated to Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phantom and Human Images
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Compared Performance of High-Sensitivity Cameras Dedicated to Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phantom and Human Images
Laetitia Imbert, Sylvain Poussier, Philippe R. Franken, Bernard Songy, Antoine Verger, Olivier Morel, Didier Wolf, Alain Noel, Gilles Karcher, Pierre-Yves Marie
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2012, 53 (12) 1897-1903; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.107417

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Compared Performance of High-Sensitivity Cameras Dedicated to Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phantom and Human Images
Laetitia Imbert, Sylvain Poussier, Philippe R. Franken, Bernard Songy, Antoine Verger, Olivier Morel, Didier Wolf, Alain Noel, Gilles Karcher, Pierre-Yves Marie
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2012, 53 (12) 1897-1903; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.107417
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • SPECT/CT: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants, It Is Time to Reach for the Sky!
  • Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications
  • Solid-State Detector SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Assessment of Myocardial CZT SPECT Recording in a Forward-Leaning Bikerlike Position
  • Determination of the Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio of 123I-MIBG Uptake Using Dual-Isotope (123I-MIBG/99mTc-Tetrofosmin) Multipinhole Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride SPECT in Patients with Heart Failure
  • Validation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction with the IQ*SPECT System in Small-Heart Patients
  • CZT-SPECT: Reaching its Potential
  • Left Ventricular Function Assessment Using 2 Different Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Cameras Compared with a {gamma}-Camera with Cardiofocal Collimators: Dynamic Cardiac Phantom Study and Clinical Validation
  • SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease: Correlation with Angiographic Findings and Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements
  • Radiation Dose and Prognosis of Ultra-Low-Dose Stress-First Myocardial Perfusion SPECT in Patients with Chest Pain Using a High-Efficiency Camera
  • IQ SPECT Allows a Significant Reduction in Administered Dose and Acquisition Time for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Evidence from a Phantom Study
  • Ischaemia testing in patients with stable angina: which test for whom?
  • Comparison of Image Quality, Myocardial Perfusion, and Left Ventricular Function Between Standard Imaging and Single-Injection Ultra-Low-Dose Imaging Using a High-Efficiency SPECT Camera: The MILLISIEVERT Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • CZT-cameras
  • high-speed SPECT
  • myocardial perfusion imaging
  • count sensitivity
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire