Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Cellular Dosimetry of 111In Using Monte Carlo N-Particle Computer Code: Comparison with Analytic Methods and Correlation with In Vitro Cytotoxicity

Zhongli Cai, Jean-Philippe Pignol, Conrad Chan and Raymond M. Reilly
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2010, 51 (3) 462-470; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.063156
Zhongli Cai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Philippe Pignol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Conrad Chan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond M. Reilly
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Schematic cell geometry and 111In distributions used in MCNP simulation.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Effects of cell and nucleus radii on self-dose S values in comparison to those reported by Goddu et al. (8,9) or Farragi et al. (11): dependence of SN→N (A) and of SCy→N and SCS→N (B) on nucleus radius with constant cell radius of 8 μm, and dependence of SCy→N and SCS→N (C) on cell radius with constant nucleus radius of 5 μm.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    Effect of cell radius (A) and cell cluster size (B) on cross-dose S values in comparison to those reported by Goddu et al. (12) or Farragi et al. (11). Effect of cell cluster size was studied using cells with cell and nucleus radii of 5 and 4 μm, respectively.

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    Live cell images (central slices) of 6 breast cancer (BC) cell lines (MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-361, MCF-7, BT-474, and SKBr-3). Cell surfaces (red) were stained by wheat germ agglutinin-Alexa Fluor 594 conjugate, whereas cell nuclei (blue) were stained by Hoechst 33342 dye. RC and RN are mean cell and nucleus radii, respectively.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    S Values (mGy·Bq−1·s−1) Calculated by MCNP and Using 3 Cell Models

    Single cellCell clusterCell monolayer
    RC (μm)RN (μm)SN→NSCy→NSCS→NSN→NSCy→NSCS→NCross-dose S valueSN→NSCy→NSCS→N
    5219.3050.4420.25524.365.595.405.0619.600.7950.557
    536.1390.3810.24511.285.625.365.146.460.7820.562
    542.7850.3410.2387.995.615.395.203.160.7650.570
    636.1390.2950.1699.063.253.082.926.320.5180.327
    642.7850.2520.1625.733.233.062.942.970.4820.336
    651.5230.2240.1614.503.243.092.971.740.4690.347
    736.1380.2310.1077.972.091.901.846.250.3640.192
    742.7850.1970.1084.612.031.891.832.900.3370.200
    751.5230.1680.1083.372.041.911.841.650.3170.204
    760.9310.1510.1112.792.041.931.861.070.3190.217
    842.7850.1550.0674.011.401.261.222.870.2520.138
    851.5230.1340.0712.731.361.271.211.610.2370.145
    860.9310.1150.0752.151.361.281.221.020.2240.155
    870.6130.1060.0791.851.371.301.240.710.2210.163
    942.7850.1220.0383.640.990.870.862.850.1970.098
    951.5230.1060.0452.380.960.890.851.590.1780.107
    960.9310.0930.0491.780.950.890.851.000.1690.111
    970.6130.0820.0531.470.830.900.860.680.1440.118
    980.4250.0770.0581.290.960.910.870.500.1610.128
    1051.5240.0840.0262.140.710.630.611.580.1410.070
    1060.9310.0740.0311.550.700.640.620.980.1320.076
    1070.6130.0660.0351.230.700.640.620.670.1240.081
    1080.4250.0600.0391.050.690.650.620.480.1220.085
    1090.3080.0570.0440.940.690.660.630.370.1220.092
    1151.5240.0660.0142.000.530.480.481.570.1120.051
    1160.9310.0590.0181.390.520.470.460.970.1030.054
    1170.6130.0540.0221.080.520.480.470.660.0990.058
    1180.4250.0490.0260.890.520.480.470.470.0940.062
    1190.3080.0460.0300.770.520.490.470.350.0950.068
    11100.2300.0440.0340.700.520.500.420.270.0850.072
    1260.9310.0470.0101.290.410.360.360.970.0840.039
    1270.6130.0430.0130.970.400.360.360.650.0810.040
    1280.4250.0400.0170.780.400.370.360.460.0770.044
    1290.3080.0370.0200.660.400.370.360.340.0750.047
    12100.2300.0350.0230.590.400.370.360.270.0740.052
    12110.1760.0350.0270.540.400.380.360.210.0750.056
    • RC and RN are cell and nucleus radii, respectively.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    S Values (mGy·Bq−1·s−1) for Individual Breast Cancer Cell Lines

    Single cellCell monolayerCell cluster
    Cell lineSN→NSCy→NSCS→NSN→NSCy→NSCS→NSN→NSCy→NSCS→N
    MDA-MB-4681.300.1430.0891.400.260.182.781.661.56
    By Auger electron1.250.1270.0771.260.150.0801.270.160.09
    By internal conversion electron0.040.0170.0110.140.110.1021.491.471.46
    S (Auger electron)/S (all electrons)0.9630.8880.8640.8990.5730.440.4550.0970.059
    MDA-MB-3611.020.1000.0531.090.170.121.931.030.95
    MCF-70.890.0970.0570.960.180.081.841.060.99
    BT-4740.890.0860.0440.950.150.101.660.870.81
    SKBr-30.820.0840.0440.870.150.061.590.870.81
    MDA-MB-2311.300.0880.0341.360.150.082.000.790.72
    Acentric MDA-MB-2311.300.0690.0451.360.140.102.000.780.74
    S (acentric)/S (concentric)1.000.781.331.000.931.241.000.981.02
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Comparison of Projected SF* Using Various Dose Calculation Methods

    Cell geometryDose calculation methodCalculated dose to cell nucleus (Gy)Dose-projected SFCorrected SFRE (%)
    Cell monolayerMCNP0.590.750.643.1
    Single cellMCNP0.470.800.678.1
    Goddu et al. (8)0.460.800.678.1
    Goddu et al. (9)0.450.800.678.1
    Farragi et al. (11)0.490.790.678.1
    Cell clusterMCNP2.20.330.28−54
    Farragi et al. (11)2.80.240.20−67
    • ↵* MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with 111In-DTPA-hEGF (3.2 MBq/mL; 21 nM) for 1 h and had experimental SF of 0.62 (2).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Tables
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 51 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue 3
March 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cellular Dosimetry of 111In Using Monte Carlo N-Particle Computer Code: Comparison with Analytic Methods and Correlation with In Vitro Cytotoxicity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Cellular Dosimetry of 111In Using Monte Carlo N-Particle Computer Code: Comparison with Analytic Methods and Correlation with In Vitro Cytotoxicity
Zhongli Cai, Jean-Philippe Pignol, Conrad Chan, Raymond M. Reilly
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2010, 51 (3) 462-470; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063156

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cellular Dosimetry of 111In Using Monte Carlo N-Particle Computer Code: Comparison with Analytic Methods and Correlation with In Vitro Cytotoxicity
Zhongli Cai, Jean-Philippe Pignol, Conrad Chan, Raymond M. Reilly
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2010, 51 (3) 462-470; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063156
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Targeting Micrometastases: The Effect of Heterogeneous Radionuclide Distribution on Tumor Control Probability
  • Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) Modeling of the Cellular Dosimetry of 64Cu: Comparison with MIRDcell S Values and Implications for Studies of Its Cytotoxic Effects
  • Lognormal Distribution of Cellular Uptake of Radioactivity: Monte Carlo Simulation of Irradiation and Cell Killing in 3-Dimensional Populations in Carbon Scaffolds
  • Cellular Dosimetry Using the Geant4 Monte Carlo Toolkit
  • Reply: Cellular Dosimetry Using the Geant4 Monte Carlo Toolkit
  • The Monte Carlo Method in Nuclear Medicine: Current Uses and Future Potential
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor Uptake of Anti-CD20 Fabs Depends on Tumor Perfusion
  • How Sensitive Is the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract to 90Y Radioembolization? A Histologic and Dosimetric Analysis in a Porcine Model
  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire