Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

Impact of the image spatial sampling on tumour detection in 18F-FDG PET

Renaud Maroy, Luc Saint-Christophe, Carole Lartizien, Pascal Merlet, Claude Comtat and Regine Trebossen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 463;
Renaud Maroy
1CEA, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luc Saint-Christophe
1CEA, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carole Lartizien
2CREATIS-UMR5515 CNRS-U630 INSERM, Lyon, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pascal Merlet
1CEA, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claude Comtat
1CEA, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Regine Trebossen
1CEA, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

463

Objectives Lesion early detection may change the therapy strategy and thus the patient’s outcome. To our knowledge, the impact of images spatial sampling on small lesion detection has not been assessed. The objective of the work is to compare lesion detection performance for images reconstructed either with a 128´128 (most often used in oncology) or a 256´256 grid in the transaxial plane.

Methods 50 18F-FDG PET acquisitions of torso anthropomorphic phantoms were simulated using an analytical simulator with realistic noise [Comtat, 1999]. Each phantom contained 8 tumors of 0.5mm radius at random locations inside three structures. Two datasets of 50 images each were generated and reconstructed using the AWOSEM method with a spatial sampling of either 128´128 grid of 4.1mm (dataset S128) or 256´256 grid of 2.05mm (dataset S256). Detection performance between S128 and S256 was compared using an AFROC with 2 sets of 4 observers each. The S128 and S256 areas Az under the ROC curves were compared using a Student’s t-test.

Results The figure shows the ROC curves for the lesion detection on the S128 and S256 datasets. Results obtained using S256 are significantly better than using S128 for the liver (Az128=0.54<Az256=0.73,p<0.05) and the soft tissue (Az128=0.56<Az256=0.73,p<0.05) and seem better for the lung (Az128=0.76<Az256=0.81,p=0.15).

Conclusions The use of a fine spatial sampling (e.g. a transaxial plane 256´256 grid with 2.05mm) significantly improves the lesion detection task performance for small nodules with a low contrast. This work suggests a fine spatial sampling should systematically be used in place of 128x128 grid in the transaxial plane in oncology PET.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of the image spatial sampling on tumour detection in 18F-FDG PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Impact of the image spatial sampling on tumour detection in 18F-FDG PET
Renaud Maroy, Luc Saint-Christophe, Carole Lartizien, Pascal Merlet, Claude Comtat, Regine Trebossen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 463;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of the image spatial sampling on tumour detection in 18F-FDG PET
Renaud Maroy, Luc Saint-Christophe, Carole Lartizien, Pascal Merlet, Claude Comtat, Regine Trebossen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 463;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • Study of MR head and neck coils for its use in an integrated MR/PET scanner
  • Five energy window scatter correction for 111In microSPECT
  • Quantification of the change in SUV due to the presence of defective detector blocks in clinical FDG PET imaging
Show more Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

PET-Reconstruction, Optimization and Evaluation

  • System matrix parameterization for HRRT reconstruction
  • Reproducibility of SUVmax in serial PET studies
  • Does resolution modeling during reconstruction improve the DAT measurement on a high resolution PET?
Show more PET-Reconstruction, Optimization and Evaluation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire