Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

Does resolution modeling during reconstruction improve the DAT measurement on a high resolution PET?

Claire Leroy, Maria-Joao Ribeiro, Florent Sureau, Eric Artiges, Vincent Brulon, Jean-Luc Martinot, Regine Trebossen and Claude Comtat
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 466;
Claire Leroy
1CEA, I2BM, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria-Joao Ribeiro
1CEA, I2BM, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Florent Sureau
2VUB, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Artiges
3INSERM-CEA, I2BM, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Brulon
1CEA, I2BM, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Luc Martinot
3INSERM-CEA, I2BM, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Regine Trebossen
1CEA, I2BM, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claude Comtat
1CEA, I2BM, SHFJ, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

466

Objectives Resolution modeling is known to improve quantification in small structures by reducing the partial-volume effects. The aim of this work is to assess the impact of a fast reconstruction including resolution modeling on the BPND of 11C-PE2I to DAT using the high resolution HRRT PET scanner (Siemens) in Human.

Methods Fourteen healthy subjects were examined during one hour after injection of 11C-PE2I. ROI were delineated in striatum and cerebellum using T1 MRI images. Each PET acquisition was reconstructed twice using the ordinary Poisson OSEM algorithm with and without implementation of the resolution modeling during reconstruction. The number of OSEM iterations was determined such as to ensure convergence of the BPND in the striatum. The BPND was calculated in striatum using ROI and simplified method. Voxel-based BPND parametric maps were consecutively generated and normalized using SPM5 and 11C-PE2I templates. Paired t-tests between reconstructions were performed on ROI (p<0.05) and voxel-based (SPM5; p<0.05, FDR) approaches.

Results 12 and 20 OSEM iterations (16 subsets) were chosen respectively without and with resolution modeling. Resolution modeling results in a 20 +/- 6 % BPND increase in the dorsal striatum and a 14 +/- 3.5 % in the ventral striatum. The SPM analysis shows significant increase of BPND in the dorsal and ventral striatum, the midbrain and the parahippocampal area. No difference in DAT-free regions was observed.

Conclusions Resolution modeling during reconstruction increases consistently the BPND values in DAT-rich regions. This increase should allow the detection of small changes of biological parameters for clinical purpose.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does resolution modeling during reconstruction improve the DAT measurement on a high resolution PET?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Does resolution modeling during reconstruction improve the DAT measurement on a high resolution PET?
Claire Leroy, Maria-Joao Ribeiro, Florent Sureau, Eric Artiges, Vincent Brulon, Jean-Luc Martinot, Regine Trebossen, Claude Comtat
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 466;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Does resolution modeling during reconstruction improve the DAT measurement on a high resolution PET?
Claire Leroy, Maria-Joao Ribeiro, Florent Sureau, Eric Artiges, Vincent Brulon, Jean-Luc Martinot, Regine Trebossen, Claude Comtat
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 466;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • Evaluation of the respiratory motion effect on transmission scans using an ultra-low dose x-ray-derived source
  • Incorporating patient specific variability in a database of realistic simulated whole body 18F-FDG distributions for oncology applications
  • Three dimensional spatial resolution correction using frequency-distance-relationship in SPECT
Show more Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

PET-Reconstruction, Optimization and Evaluation

  • GPU-accelerated list-mode reconstruction for 3-D time-of-flight (TOF) PET
  • System matrix parameterization for HRRT reconstruction
  • Reproducibility of SUVmax in serial PET studies
Show more PET-Reconstruction, Optimization and Evaluation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire