Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

Reproducibility of SUVmax in serial PET studies

Jazmin Schwartz, S.A. Nehmeh, N.Y. Lee, H. Schoder, S.M. Larson and J.L. Humm
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 464;
Jazmin Schwartz
1MSKCC, NY, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.A. Nehmeh
1MSKCC, NY, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N.Y. Lee
1MSKCC, NY, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Schoder
1MSKCC, NY, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.M. Larson
1MSKCC, NY, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.L. Humm
1MSKCC, NY, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

464

Objectives SUVs quantitatively measure tumor uptake and may be used to monitor tumor response.Here we assess reproducibility and uncertainty of SUVmax and establish minimum criteria for determining the significance of SUVmax changes in serial PET studies.

Methods A PET-ACR phantom background and spheres were filled with 18F 1-to-5 concentration ratio, and scanned for 5 hrs in list-mode. The data were parsed into 10 runs of equal total counts,corresponding to those obtained in a 4min clinical liver scan.3D ROIs were placed over each sphere and the background,and compared to determine the correlation between runs.The maximum activity pixel position in the spheres was calculated for all 10 runs to determine the statistical uncertainty of the SUVmax position.Two consecutive PET/CT scans were obtained for 10 SCC patients. Lesion ROIs were compared pixel-by-pixel; correlation coefficients and position uncertainties were determined.

Results Average correlation across 10 runs for each sphere was: 96.4±0.8% 96.4±0.6% 95±1%.The uniform background ROI average correlation was 95.6±0.6%.The correlation between image sets averaged over all the patients was 96.6±0.9%.The inter-scan change in position of SUVmax,averaged over all the patients,was 11.1±1.5mm (~ 3 pixels), and the average inter-run SUVmax difference was 6.5±2.5%.

Conclusions Inter-scan reproducibility is high for both phantom and patients at clinical scan times. However, there can be significant displacement and variation of the value of the SUVmax even between consecutive scans.This can have a significant impact when using SUVmax as a metric for determining treatment outcome,especially if the difference in SUV’s is less than 6%.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reproducibility of SUVmax in serial PET studies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Reproducibility of SUVmax in serial PET studies
Jazmin Schwartz, S.A. Nehmeh, N.Y. Lee, H. Schoder, S.M. Larson, J.L. Humm
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 464;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reproducibility of SUVmax in serial PET studies
Jazmin Schwartz, S.A. Nehmeh, N.Y. Lee, H. Schoder, S.M. Larson, J.L. Humm
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 464;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • Motion frozen of dual gated (cardiac and respiratory) PET images
  • Impact of time-of-flight on quantitative accuracy and volume determination in non-uniform phantoms
  • Monte Carlo study on the impact of timing resolution on PET image quality
Show more Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

PET-Reconstruction, Optimization and Evaluation

  • System matrix parameterization for HRRT reconstruction
  • Does resolution modeling during reconstruction improve the DAT measurement on a high resolution PET?
Show more PET-Reconstruction, Optimization and Evaluation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire