Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

Five energy window scatter correction for 111In microSPECT

E. Kint, S. Staelens and S. Vandenberghe
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1469;
E. Kint
1Ghent University, ELIS,MEDISIP,IBBT, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Staelens
1Ghent University, ELIS,MEDISIP,IBBT, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Vandenberghe
1Ghent University, ELIS,MEDISIP,IBBT, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1469

Objectives In preclinical molecular imaging, large interest exists for absolute quantification, since this would allow for an accurate evaluation of disease progression. Photon scatter is one of the limiting factors for quantitative imaging. This study investigates a scatter correction (SC) method using five energy windows (FEW) for 111In µ-SPECT imaging. 111In can be used for in vivo evaluation of tumor selectivity, and hence the potential therapeutic performance, of a tracer. The monoclonal antibody 14C5, labeled to 111In-DOTA, has shown to be a selective tracer for pancreatic cancer.

Methods Our SC method uses 5 energy windows (EW): a 20% main EW around each photopeak, an 8% scatter EW at both sides of the 171keV photopeak and an 8% scatter EW at the left side of the 245keV photopeak. To evaluate the SC method, measurements were carried out on a U-SPECT-II camera (Milabs). A comparison between reconstructed uncorrected and corrected images was performed for the following parameters: (1) point spread function (PSF) of 1mm Ø cylinders in a resolution phantom; (2) contrast recovery for two 8mm Ø cold spots (air & water) in the small animal NEMA image quality phantom; (3) tumor-to-background ratio of a tumor bearing mouse injected with 111In-DOTA-14C5 .

Results The FEW SC gives rise to a mean improvement of 3.8% of the FWHM of the PSF for the cylinders of the resolution phantom. After SC, contrast improved with 4.3% and 2.8% for respectively the air and water filled cold spot of the NEMA phantom. In the preclinical mouse study, SC leads to a significant enhancement of the tumor-to-background ratio from 6.7 to 9.0.

Conclusions The FEW SC method will offer a significant improvement in the absolute quantification of 111In µ-SPECT images.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Five energy window scatter correction for 111In microSPECT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Five energy window scatter correction for 111In microSPECT
E. Kint, S. Staelens, S. Vandenberghe
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1469;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Five energy window scatter correction for 111In microSPECT
E. Kint, S. Staelens, S. Vandenberghe
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 1469;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • Exact emission SPECT reconstruction with truncated transmission data
  • Comparison of template-guided and calculated attenuation corrections in FDG brain PET imaging
  • Monte Carlo simulation of the Inveon microPET system using GATE
Show more Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

Image Generation Posters

  • Exact emission SPECT reconstruction with truncated transmission data
  • Comparison of template-guided and calculated attenuation corrections in FDG brain PET imaging
  • Monte Carlo simulation of the Inveon microPET system using GATE
Show more Image Generation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire