Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticlePersonalizing Cancer Therapy with FDG PET: From RECIST to PERCIST

The Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Therapy Response in Cancer of the Cervix and Ovaries

Julie K. Schwarz, Perry W. Grigsby, Farrokh Dehdashti and Dominique Delbeke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (Suppl 1) 64S-73S; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.057257
Julie K. Schwarz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Perry W. Grigsby
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Farrokh Dehdashti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominique Delbeke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    18F-FDG PET of complete metabolic response in 52-y-old woman with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IVA squamous cell cancer of cervix. (A) At initial staging, sagittal (top) and transaxial (bottom) CT (left), fused PET/CT (middle), and PET (right) demonstrate intense 18F-FDG uptake (SUV, 13.3) within large cervical mass. (B) Three months later, after concurrent radiochemotherapy, sagittal (top) and transaxial (bottom) CT (left), fused PET/CT (middle), and PET (right) demonstrate resolution of cervical mass and only mild, diffuse (similar to background [SUV, 2.0]) 18F-FDG uptake within cervix, consistent with complete metabolic response.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    18F-FDG PET of partial metabolic response in 54-y-old woman with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III squamous cell carcinoma of cervix. (A) At initial staging, sagittal (top) and transaxial (bottom) CT (left), fused PET/CT (middle), and PET (right) demonstrate intense 18F-FDG uptake (SUV, 15.3) within large cervical mass. (B) Three months later, after concurrent radiochemotherapy, sagittal (top) and transaxial (bottom) CT (left), fused PET/CT (middle), and PET (right) show that 18F-FDG uptake has improved but remains focally increased (SUV, 5.4) within residual cervical mass, consistent with partial metabolic response.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    Kaplan–Meier curves showing survival outcome based on follow-up posttherapy 18F-FDG PET in 378 patients: 269 patients had complete metabolic response, 52 had persistent abnormal 18F-FDG uptake, and 57 had new sites of disease (log-rank P value < 0.0001 for all plots).

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    A 68-y-old woman presented with rising CA-125 levels and normal findings on CT. (A and B) At restaging, transaxial PET/CT slice through chest (A) demonstrates moderate (same as blood pool) 18F-FDG uptake in right hilum, corresponding to 1.6-cm lymph node, consistent with metastasis; transaxial PET/CT slice through focus of 18F-FDG uptake in right lower quadrant (B) demonstrates moderate 18F-FDG uptake in 0.5-cm right serosal implant, consistent with metastasis. This lesion was identified on CT retrospectively because of 18F-FDG uptake. (C and D) Three months after chemotherapy, transaxial PET/CT slice through chest (C) demonstrates more intense (greater than blood pool) 18F-FDG uptake in right hilar lymph node and slight increase in size, consistent with progressive disease; transaxial PET/CT slice through pelvis (D) demonstrates more intense 18F-FDG uptake in right serosal implant, consistent with progressive disease.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Cervical Cancer Staging System of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    Carcinoma typeStageDescription
    Preinvasive0Carcinoma in situ; intraepithelial carcinoma
    InvasiveICarcinoma strictly confined to cervix
    IAInvasive cancer identified only microscopically (all gross lesions, even with superficial staging, are stage IB cancers); invasion is limited to measured stromal invasion with maximum depth of 5.0 mm and no wider than 7.0 mm
    IA1Measured invasion of stroma no greater than 3.0 mm in depth and no wider than 7.0 mm
    IA2Measured invasion of stroma greater than 3.0 mm in depth but no greater than 5.0 mm and no wider than 7.0 mm
    IBClinical lesions confined to cervix or preclinical lesions greater than stage IA
    IB1Clinical lesions no larger than 4.0 cm
    IB2Clinical lesions larger than 4.0 cm
    IICarcinoma extends beyond cervix but not to pelvic wall; carcinoma involves vagina but not lower third
    IIANo obvious parametrial involvement
    IIBObvious parametrial involvement
    IIICarcinoma has extended to pelvic wall; on rectal examination, there is no cancer-free space between tumor and pelvic wall; tumor involves lower third of vagina; all cases with hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney are included
    IIIANo extension to pelvic wall
    IIIBExtension to pelvic wall or hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney
    IVCarcinoma has extended beyond true pelvis or has clinically involved mucosa of bladder or rectum; bullous edema does not permit a case to be allotted to stage IV
    IVASpread of growth to adjacent organs
    IVBSpread to distant organs
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    18F-FDG PET for Monitoring Response of Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma to Therapy

    AuthorYearNumber of patientsCriteria for response on PETOutcome measureDesignP
    Avril (39)20053320% decrease in SUV after first cycleOverall survivalProspective study0.008
    55% decrease in SUV after third cycleOverall survival0.005
    Nishiyama (40)200821SUV after completion, <3.8Detection of responders: sensitivity 90%, specificity 64%, accuracy 76%Retrospective study<0.005
    >65% change in SUV between baseline and after completionDetection of responders: sensitivity 90%, specificity 82%, accuracy 86%
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    18F-FDG PET Compared with Second-Look Laparotomy for Ovarian Carcinoma

    AuthorYearNumber of PatientsModalitySensSpecAccPPVNPVDesignOutcomeP
    Rose (42)200122 with complete clinical responsePET: lesion-based10%42%NANANAProspective: compared with second-look surgeryNANA
    Cho (43)200221PET + CTRetrospective: compared with second-look surgeryNANA
     Lesion-based58%99%92%97%92%
     Patient-based100%92%95%92%100%
    PET
     Lesion-based36%100%89%95%88%
     Patient-based81%90%86%90%82%
    CT
     Lesion-based54%100%82%97%92%
     Patient-based100%90%95%92%100%
    Sironi (44)200431 (15 patients with CA-125 > 35 U/mL)PET/CT: lesion-based78%75%77%89%57%Prospective studyNANA
    PET/CT: patient-based53%86%
    Kim (45)200455PETNANANANANARandomized: 18F-FDG PET vs. second-look surgeryProgression-free survivalNS
    Kurosaki (46)200618PET ± CA-125 high/normalNANANANANARetrospective study2-y survival0.025
    • Sens = sensitivity; Spec = specificity; Acc = accuracy; PPV = positive-predictive value; NPV = negative-predictive value; NA = not available; NS = not significant.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    18F-FDG PET for Detection of Recurrence of Ovarian Carcinoma

    AuthorYearNumber of patientsModalitySensSpecAccPPVNPVDesignChange of management
    Smith (57)1999Simulation studyPETNANANANANASimulation analysis of cost with and without PETDecrease of unnecessary surgery from 70% to 5%
    Bristow (51)200322 with rising CA-125 and equivocal CTPET/CT for detection of tumor > 1 cm83%NA82%94%Prospective studyComplete cytoreduction to no gross residual tumor: 72%
    Havrilesky (47)200510 studies between 1966 and 2003PET90%86%NANANAReviewNA
    CT68%58%
    PET when CA-125 high94%80%NANANANA
    PET when CA-125 normal54%73%NANANANA
    Ruiz (49)200517 studies between 1972 and 2003PET94%65%NANANAMetaanalysisNA
    Simcock (52)200655 for surveillance or suspicion of relapsePET/CTNANANANANAProspective58%
    Garcia (50)200780 for suspicion of relapsePET87%79%85%92%68%Retrospective studyNA
    CT53%82%61%89%39%
    CA-12558%94%67%
    Mangili (53)200732 for suspicion of relapsePET/CT; CTNANANANANARetrospective study44%
    Chung (54)200777PET/CT93%97%94%98%91%Retrospective study25%
    Kitajama (56)2008132PET/contrast-enhanced CT79%91%85%NANARetrospective study39%
    PET/unenhanced CT74%9183%NANANA
    Contrast-enhanced CT61%85%73%NANANA
    Soussan (55)200829PET/CTNANANANANAQuestionnaire33%
    • Sens = sensitivity; Spec = specificity; Acc = accuracy; PPV = positive-predictive value; NPV = negative-predictive value; NA = not available.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 50 (Suppl 1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue Suppl 1
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Therapy Response in Cancer of the Cervix and Ovaries
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Therapy Response in Cancer of the Cervix and Ovaries
Julie K. Schwarz, Perry W. Grigsby, Farrokh Dehdashti, Dominique Delbeke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (Suppl 1) 64S-73S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057257

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Therapy Response in Cancer of the Cervix and Ovaries
Julie K. Schwarz, Perry W. Grigsby, Farrokh Dehdashti, Dominique Delbeke
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (Suppl 1) 64S-73S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057257
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • CERVICAL CANCER
    • OVARIAN CANCER
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET Radiomic Features in Cervical Cancer
  • 89Zr-anti-{gamma}H2AX-TAT but not 18F-FDG Allows Early Monitoring of Response to Chemotherapy in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT for Therapy Control in Vascular Graft Infections: A First Feasibility Study
  • Pathway-Specific Analysis of Gene Expression Data Identifies the PI3K/Akt Pathway as a Novel Therapeutic Target in Cervical Cancer
  • Assessing Tumor Response to Therapy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PET Monitoring of Therapy Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Assessing Response to Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
  • Radiopharmaceuticals in Preclinical and Clinical Development for Monitoring of Therapy with PET
Show more Personalizing Cancer Therapy with FDG PET: From RECIST to PERCIST

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire