Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

18F-Fluoroacetate: A Potential Acetate Analog for Prostate Tumor Imaging—In Vivo Evaluation of 18F-Fluoroacetate Versus 11C-Acetate

Datta E. Ponde, Carmen S. Dence, Nobuyuki Oyama, Joonyoung Kim, Yuan-Chuan Tai, Richard Laforest, Barry A. Siegel and Michael J. Welch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2007, 48 (3) 420-428;
Datta E. Ponde
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carmen S. Dence
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nobuyuki Oyama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joonyoung Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuan-Chuan Tai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Laforest
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry A. Siegel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Welch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Rodent biodistribution study. (A) Biodistribution of 11C-ACE in Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 5 per group) at 20 min and 1 h after injection. (B) Biodistribution of 18F-FAC in Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 5 per group) at 20 min and 1, 2, and 4 h after injection. (C) Comparison of biodistribution of 11C-ACE vs. 18F-FAC in CWR22 tumor-bearing male nu/nu mice (n = 4 per group) at 30 min after injection. Changes in biodistribution for 18F-FAC from 30 min to 2 h after injection are also shown.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Small-animal PET images of mouse show 18F-FAC uptake in CWR22 tumors implanted in left flank: 18F-FAC uptake in mouse at 30 min and 1 h and 2 h after injection of about 10.7 MBq (290 μCi). Transverse, coronal, and sagittal images are shown. Images were reconstructed by the MAP method (β = 0.1). Arrows indicate localization of tumors.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    (A) PET of baboon (coronal, right; transaxial, left) taken at 1 h after administration of 370 MBq (10 mCi) of 18F-FAC. PET was performed with ECAT EXACT HR+ tomograph (Siemens CTI Corp.). (B) ROIs were placed on iliac bone and femur and SUVs were calculated. Biodistribution data of rodents showed that 18F-FAC uptake into bone increased over time (Fig. 2), whereas in baboon 18F-FAC uptake in bone was low.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Comparison of 11C-ACE and 18F-FAC Tumor-To-Organ Ratios After Biodistribution Study in CWR22 Tumor-Bearing Male nu/nu Mice

    Tumor-to-organ ratio11C-ACE, 30 min18F-FAC, 30 min18F-FAC, 2 h
    Blood1.60 ± 0.270.93 ± 0.171.11 ± 0.18
    Lung0.66 ± 0.091.15 ± 0.231.47 ± 0.27
    Liver0.40 ± 0.091.36 ± 0.131.65 ± 0.37
    Spleen0.22 ± 0.021.45 ± 0.171.82 ± 0.44
    Kidney0.54 ± 0.111.45 ± 0.221.70 ± 0.34
    Muscle2.32 ± 0.321.43 ± 0.141.80 ± 0.46
    Fat5.45 ± 2.683.45 ± 1.042.67 ± 1.00
    Heart1.10 ± 0.241.18 ± 0.161.33 ± 0.36
    Brain0.95 ± 0.211.49 ± 0.151.69 ± 0.32
    Bone0.72 ± 0.171.57 ± 0.240.69 ± 0.23
    Prostate1.37 ± 0.441.58 ± 0.301.55 ± 0.44
    • Animals were injected with 925 kBq (25 μCi) of 11C-ACE (n = 4) and 444 kBq (12 μCi) of 18F-FAC (n = 4).

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Organ-to-Muscle Ratios (with Background Correction) After Injection of 18F-FAC to Male nu/nu Mice (n = 2) Implanted with CWR22 Minced Tumor Tissue in Left Flank

    Organ-to-muscle ratioMouse 1Mouse 2
    30 min1 h2 h30 min1 h2 h
    Heart1.531.461.571.631.351.48
    Vertebrae1.211.271.671.421.221.68
    Tumor1.391.191.441.561.281.40
    • About 10 MBq (270 μCi) of 18F-FAC in saline were injected.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 48 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 48, Issue 3
March 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-Fluoroacetate: A Potential Acetate Analog for Prostate Tumor Imaging—In Vivo Evaluation of 18F-Fluoroacetate Versus 11C-Acetate
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-Fluoroacetate: A Potential Acetate Analog for Prostate Tumor Imaging—In Vivo Evaluation of 18F-Fluoroacetate Versus 11C-Acetate
Datta E. Ponde, Carmen S. Dence, Nobuyuki Oyama, Joonyoung Kim, Yuan-Chuan Tai, Richard Laforest, Barry A. Siegel, Michael J. Welch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2007, 48 (3) 420-428;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-Fluoroacetate: A Potential Acetate Analog for Prostate Tumor Imaging—In Vivo Evaluation of 18F-Fluoroacetate Versus 11C-Acetate
Datta E. Ponde, Carmen S. Dence, Nobuyuki Oyama, Joonyoung Kim, Yuan-Chuan Tai, Richard Laforest, Barry A. Siegel, Michael J. Welch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2007, 48 (3) 420-428;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • [18F]Fluorocholine and [18F]Fluoroacetate PET as Imaging Biomarkers to Assess Phosphatidylcholine and Mitochondrial Metabolism in Preclinical Models of TSC and LAM
  • Bacterial infection imaging with [18F]fluoropropyl-trimethoprim
  • Preclinical Evaluation of 3-18F-Fluoro-2,2-Dimethylpropionic Acid as an Imaging Agent for Tumor Detection
  • Metabolism and Quantification of [18F]DPA-714, a New TSPO Positron Emission Tomography Radioligand
  • Prostate Cancer: PET with 18F-FDG, 18F- or 11C-Acetate, and 18F- or 11C-Choline
  • 1-11C-Acetate Versus 18F-FDG PET in Detection of Meningioma and Monitoring the Effect of {gamma}-Knife Radiosurgery
  • 2-18F-Fluoropropionic Acid as a PET Imaging Agent for Prostate Cancer
  • 2-18F-Fluoroacetate: A Useful Tool for Assessing Gliosis in the Central Nervous System?
  • PET of Glial Metabolism Using 2-18F-Fluoroacetate
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor Uptake of Anti-CD20 Fabs Depends on Tumor Perfusion
  • How Sensitive Is the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract to 90Y Radioembolization? A Histologic and Dosimetric Analysis in a Porcine Model
  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire