Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherINVITED PERSPECTIVE

2-18F-Fluoroacetate: A Useful Tool for Assessing Gliosis in the Central Nervous System?

Brian J. Lopresti and N. Scott Mason
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2009, 50 (6) 841-843; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.058875
Brian J. Lopresti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Scott Mason
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Inflammation of the central nervous system (CNS) is a nearly ubiquitous consequence of neuropathologic processes involved in a spectrum of brain disorders, including brain trauma, ischemia, infection, and autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases. CNS inflammation has seemingly paradoxical roles, responsible for both exacerbating and resolving tissue damage resulting from CNS insult. It is not only the primary mechanism by which tissue pathogens are sequestered and neutralized but also that which mitigates tissue repair and regeneration. CNS inflammation is characterized bySee page 982the activation of intrinsic immune cells, such as microglia and astrocytes, and the induction of a plurality of inflammatory mediators including cytokines, cell necrosis factors, and prostaglandins (1). Infiltration of peripheral immune cells, particularly T lymphocytes, may be a consequence of blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption. These same mechanisms may promote the destruction of intact or distressed neurons. In multiple sclerosis, T lymphocytes penetrate a compromised BBB and attack the CNS directly, resulting in a progressive loss of oligodendrocytes and subsequent axonal demyelination and degeneration. Similarly, brain infiltration of leukocytes after ischemic stroke may result in collateral neuron loss in the lesion penumbra through the secretion of the same proinflammatory mediators that promote a positive immune response. Conversely, inhibition of neutrophils and the adhesion molecules that facilitate their entry into the brain is associated with improved neurologic outcome after stroke (2). It is unclear under what conditions the immune response leads to these deleterious effects, although evidence suggests that the outcome of CNS injury may be related to familiar factors that include age, genetics, and the environment. Imaging technologies that enable the visualization of specific inflammatory processes in the brain could greatly promote a better understanding of their role in the pathophysiology of CNS diseases and guide the development of more effective therapies inhibiting specific inflammatory mediators, such as interleukin-1, cyclooxygenase, tumor necrosis factor-α, and complement (1).

Imaging CNS inflammation with acceptable specificity and sensitivity has proven to be a considerable challenge. Many PET and SPECT inflammation imaging agents with peripheral applications, including polyclonal immunoglobulins, monoclonal antibodies targeting leukocyte surface antigens, cytokines, and chemotactic peptides, are too large to achieve significant BBB penetration. Imaging approaches with potential applications for CNS inflammation include edema agents indicating BBB compromise (e.g., 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid), direct labeling of leukocytes with either 111In or 99mTc, or indirect labeling of immune cells using low-molecular-weight probes capable of brain entry through diffusion or facilitated transport (3). The specificity of edema agents for CNS inflammation remains undemonstrated, whereas the use of radiolabeled leukocytes for assessing CNS inflammation has been limited by the risk of sepsis, loss of the radiolabel in vivo, and the long half-life of 111In (67 h). For these reasons, recent radiopharmaceutical development efforts have focused on methods to indirectly label immune cells in the CNS with greater specificity. Activated immune cells express a plurality of cell surface antigens and receptors that play a role in mediating the immune response. The peripheral benzodiazepine receptor, or translocater protein 18 kDa (TSPO), is one such receptor that has been widely investigated in a variety of CNS diseases (4). TSPO is located on the outer mitochondrial membrane and has many proposed functions that include transmembrane cholesterol transport, steroid and heme biosynthesis, and immunocompetent cell modulation (5–7). In the periphery, TSPO expression is rich in steroidogenic tissues, such as the adrenal glands. In the brain, TSPO sites are found predominantly in activated microglia. The utility of TSPO as a putative target for molecular imaging probes is based on the observations that constitutive expression of TSPO is low in the normal brain but selectively upregulated in activated microglia (4,5,8). The isoquinoline carboxamide derivative PK11195 is the most thoroughly characterized TSPO-specific ligand and also the first to be labeled with 11C for PET studies. Although several neuroimaging studies have reported increases in R-[N-methyl-11C]PK-11195 (11C-PK-11195) binding in various CNS afflictions, a low specific binding signal has raised concerns regarding the sensitivity of 11C-PK11195 (3,4). Nevertheless, TSPO continues to be an attractive target for radioligand development, with many new classes of TSPO-specific ligands identified (9).

Other approaches that are used to indirectly label activated immune cells in the CNS have focused on metabolic pathways that are relatively suppressed in normal brain tissue but locally enhanced in areas of immune cell activation. Immune cells, like cancer cells, have the ability to concentrate and rapidly proliferate in response to CNS insult, resulting in locally increased metabolic demands. Elevated glycolysis in both proliferating cancer cells and activated immune cells has been observed, supporting the use of the radiolabeled glucose analog 18F-FDG as an index of energy metabolism in either case. However, because of the high levels of 18F-FDG uptake in the normal brain and an activation-dependent distribution, the application of 18F-FDG in CNS inflammation is limited. Consequently, radiolabeled substrates for other metabolic pathways that are relatively suppressed in normal brain tissue, such as protein and lipid synthesis, have been explored as more sensitive and specific indicators of disease. Methionine, for example, is preferentially taken up by glial cell tumors through the action of the L-type amino acid transporter family and is incorporated into proteins or converted to S-adenosylmethionine, a substrate for transmethylation reactions. The uptake of 11C-methionine in the brain has been shown to reflect cellular proliferation activity, and 11C-methionine may be a useful agent for grading glial cell neoplasms (10).

Acetate has been radiolabeled with 11C for PET studies of oxidative metabolism in the myocardium and prostate tumor imaging. Acetate is transported into the cell via the monocarboxylic acid transporter where it is converted in mitochondria to acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA). Acetyl-CoA is a substrate for several biochemical pathways, most notably the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and in lipid synthesis. In the first stage of the TCA cycle, acetyl-CoA condenses with oxaloacetate to form citrate. α-Ketoglutarate is another TCA cycle intermediate that may be transaminated to form glutamate, a precursor to the neurotransmitter glutamine. Although glucose and acetate are both precursors to acetyl-CoA, earlier studies have established that acetate is preferentially taken up by astrocytes (rather than neurons) and used for the biosynthesis of glutamine (11–13). Additional studies have demonstrated that the preferential use of acetate by astrocytes is mediated by transport, although the exact mechanism is not fully understood (14).

The utility of 14C-acetate and 13C-acetate as tools to study glial metabolism using autoradiography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy is well established and, consequently, acetate labeled with a positron-emitting radionuclide such as 11C may be similarly useful as a noninvasive indicator of reactive astrocytosis for PET. Indeed, recent PET studies of 1-11C-acetate in glioma have demonstrated its potential for differentiating tumor grades, and it may be superior to 11C-methionine in this regard (15,16). The analog 2-fluoroacetate (FAC) is a metabolic toxin that has been proposed as a PET agent on the basis of its shared mechanism of uptake with acetate. FAC is metabolized by acetate thiokinase to fluoroacetyl-CoA and then to fluorocitrate after a reaction with oxaloacetate catalyzed by citrate synthase. Unlike citrate, which is achiral, there are 4 isomers of fluorocitrate. (−)-erythro-2-fluorocitrate is transformed to fluoro-cis-aconitate by aconitase, a key component of the TCA cycle. Subsequent release of fluoride ion and hydroxylation form 4-hydroxy-trans-aconitate (HTA). HTA has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of aconitase, and the resulting impairment of TCA cycle–mediated oxidative metabolism is the direct mechanism of fluoroacetate toxicity (17). FAC, like acetate, is preferentially taken up by astrocytes relative to neurons (18), and it follows that 2-18F-fluoroacetate (18F-FAC) could be a potentially useful noninvasive indicator of glial cell metabolism.

The use of 18F-FAC as an indicator of glial cell metabolism may have several advantages over 1-11C-acetate. One obvious advantage is the longer half-life, which would make a radiofluorinated analog of acetate more practical for clinical use. A second advantage is that although much of the radiolabel associated with 1-11C-acetate is released as 11C-CO2 by oxidative metabolism in the TCA cycle, TCA cycle metabolism of 18F-FAC is incomplete and results in the accumulation of radioactivity in tissue. However, it is not entirely clear whether 18F-FAC or some metabolite is responsible for the observed accumulation of radioactivity in the brain. In rodents, it is likely that some of the label exists as intracellular 18F-F− released in the transformation of 18F-fluoro-cis-aconitate to HTA and in the less active isomers of 18F-fluorocitrate. Earlier 18F-FAC studies reported significant uptake of the 18F-F− ion in rodent bone, suggesting that some aconitase inactivation had occurred. However, baboon studies did not exhibit detectible bone uptake of 18F-F− and suggest that the accumulation of radioactivity in tissue is the result of a slower rate of 18F-FAC metabolism before aconitase inactivation, although it is not clear which is the rate-limiting step (19). This is a potentially important detail, as the slow transformation of 18F-FAC to 2-18F-fluoroacetyl-CoA would emphasize the influence of 18F-FAC transport and this initial metabolic step on the overall radiotracer kinetics rather than oxidative metabolism by the TCA cycle. It is also possible that some of the radiolabel associated with the injection of 18F-FAC is associated with lipid synthesis and not oxidative metabolism. In tumor cells, the mechanism of increased uptake of 1-11C-acetate (and presumably 18F-FAC) has been shown to be related to enhanced lipid synthesis (20). It is also well established that lipid synthesis is one of the major roles of astrocytes, supplying essential cholesterol to neurons and fatty acids (e.g., palmitate and oleate) required for the synthesis of brain phospholipids (21). Evidence suggests that other types of glial cells and some neurons are involved in fatty acid biosynthesis, particularly myelin-producing oligodendrocytes, so it is likely that uptake of 18F-FAC may not be limited to astrocytes (22,23). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that glioma tumors express high levels of fatty acid synthase, an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of palmitate from acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA (24). Therefore, it is possible that the relative amounts of radioactivity after the injection of 18F-FAC associated with oxidative metabolism and lipid biosynthesis differs between brain regions and pathologic substrates.

The work of Marik et al. (25), presented in this issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, is the first study, to our knowledge, to examine the utility of 18F-FAC as a noninvasive index of glial cell metabolism. The study provides an intriguing first look at what might represent a novel and potentially useful application for imaging CNS inflammation. What must follow is a careful validation of the proposed technique. A critical first step should be to verify that the cellular source of the signal is indeed reactive astrocytes and to characterize the potential importance of other cell types, such as microglia and T lymphocytes, which are tightly associated with astrocytes. A validation must also examine the metabolic fate of the tracer and establish the relative importance of the pathways of oxidative metabolism and lipid biosynthesis across CNS pathologies. This information will guide the development of a model of 18F-FAC brain kinetics in support of future quantitative analyses in human subjects. It will also be important to establish the sensitivity of the method, as presumably it will be of interest to apply this technique to study CNS inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease, with a modest presentation but possibly significant role in this disease pathology. The validation of an astrocyte-specific probe for noninvasive imaging could significantly enhance the understanding of CNS inflammation in disease and would complement similar investigations of microglial activation using TSPO-specific radioligands such as 11C-PK11195.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Lucas SM, Rothwell NJ, Gibson RM. The role of inflammation in CNS injury and disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147(suppl 1):S232–S240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Zheng Z, Yenari MA. Post-ischemic inflammation: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Neurol Res. 2004;26:884–892.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Mason NS, Lopresti BJ, Mathis CA. Imaging inflammation. In: Lotze MT, Thomson AW, eds. Measuring Immunity. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005:445–461.
  4. 4.↵
    Venneti S, Lopresti BJ, Wiley CA. The peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (translocator protein 18kDa) in microglia: from pathology to imaging. Prog Neurobiol. 2006;80:308–322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Casellas P, Galiegue S, Basile AS. Peripheral benzodiazepine receptors and mitochondrial function. Neurochem Int. 2002;40:475–486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    Gavish M, Bachman I, Shoukrun R, et al. Enigma of the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:629–650.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Papadopoulos V, Baraldi M, Guilarte TR, et al. Translocator protein (18kDa): new nomenclature for the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor based on its structure and molecular function. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2006;27:402–409.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Banati RB, Newcombe J, Gunn RN, et al. The peripheral benzodiazepine binding site in the brain in multiple sclerosis: quantitative in vivo imaging of microglia as a measure of disease activity. Brain. 2000;123:2321–2337.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Chauveau F, Boutin H, Van Camp N, Dolle F, Tavitian B. Nuclear imaging of neuroinflammation: a comprehensive review of [11C]PK11195 challengers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:2304–2319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Kato T, Shinoda J, Oka N, et al. Analysis of 11C-methionine uptake in low-grade gliomas and correlation with proliferative activity. AJNR. 2008;29:1867–1871.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Muir D, Berl S, Clarke DD. Acetate and fluoroacetate as possible markers for glial metabolism in vivo. Brain Res. 1986;380:336–340.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    Norenberg MD, Martinez-Hernandez A. Fine structural localization of glutamine synthetase in astrocytes of rat brain. Brain Res. 1979;161:303–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Badar-Goffer RS, Bachelard HS, Morris PG. Cerebral metabolism of acetate and glucose studied by 13C-n.m.r. spectroscopy: a technique for investigating metabolic compartmentation in the brain. Biochem J. 1990;266:133–139.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Waniewski RA, Martin DL. Preferential utilization of acetate by astrocytes is attributable to transport. J Neurosci. 1998;18:5225–5233.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Tsuchida T, Takeuchi H, Okazawa H, Tsujikawa T, Fujibayashi Y. Grading of brain glioma with 1-11C-acetate PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35:171–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Kimura N, et al. 11C-acetate PET in the evaluation of brain glioma: comparison with 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008;10:281–287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Lauble H, Kennedy MC, Emptage MH, Beinert H, Stout CD. The reaction of fluorocitrate with aconitase and the crystal structure of the enzyme-inhibitor complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:13699–13703.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Keyser DO, Pellmar TC. Synaptic transmission in the hippocampus: critical role for glial cells. Glia. 1994;10:237–243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Ponde DE, Dence CS, Oyama N, et al. 18F-fluoroacetate: a potential acetate analog for prostate tumor imaging—in vivo evaluation of 18F-fluoroacetate versus 11C-acetate. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:420–428.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Yoshimoto M, Waki A, Yonekura Y, et al. Characterization of acetate metabolism in tumor cells in relation to cell proliferation: acetate metabolism in tumor cells. Nucl Med Biol. 2001;28:117–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Cakir T, Alsan S, Saybasili H, Akin A, Ulgen KO. Reconstruction and flux analysis of coupling between metabolic pathways of astrocytes and neurons: application to cerebral hypoxia. Theor Biol Med Model. 2007;4:48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Kusakabe T, Maeda M, Hoshi N, et al. Fatty acid synthase is expressed mainly in adult hormone-sensitive cells or cells with high lipid metabolism and in proliferating fetal cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 2000;48:613–622.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Tansey FA, Thampy KG, Cammer W. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase in rat brain. II. Immunocytochemical localization. Brain Res. 1988;471:131–138.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Zhao W, Kridel S, Thorburn A, et al. Fatty acid synthase: a novel target for antiglioma therapy. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:869–878.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Marik J, Ogasawara A, Martin-McNulty B, et al. PET of glial metabolism using 2-18F-fluoroacetate. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:982–990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication December 1, 2008.
  • Accepted for publication December 3, 2008.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 50 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue 6
June 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
2-18F-Fluoroacetate: A Useful Tool for Assessing Gliosis in the Central Nervous System?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
2-18F-Fluoroacetate: A Useful Tool for Assessing Gliosis in the Central Nervous System?
Brian J. Lopresti, N. Scott Mason
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2009, 50 (6) 841-843; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.058875

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
2-18F-Fluoroacetate: A Useful Tool for Assessing Gliosis in the Central Nervous System?
Brian J. Lopresti, N. Scott Mason
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2009, 50 (6) 841-843; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.058875
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Synergy Between Radiopharmaceutical Therapy and Immune Response: Deciphering the Underpinning Mechanisms for Future Actions
  • Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Imaging and Therapy in the Era of Personalized Medicine
  • Perspective on Pattern of Failure in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After PSMA Radioguided Surgery
Show more INVITED PERSPECTIVE

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire