Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Bispecific Antibody Pretargeting PET (ImmunoPET) with an 124I-Labeled Hapten-Peptide

William J. McBride, Pat Zanzonico, Robert M. Sharkey, Carl Norén, Habibe Karacay, Edmund A. Rossi, Michele J. Losman, Pierre-Yves Brard, Chien-Hsing Chang, Steven M. Larson and David M. Goldenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2006, 47 (10) 1678-1688;
William J. McBride
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pat Zanzonico
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. Sharkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carl Norén
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Habibe Karacay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edmund A. Rossi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele J. Losman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre-Yves Brard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chien-Hsing Chang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven M. Larson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Goldenberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    RP-HPLC illustrates final radiolabeled products obtained under different radioiodination conditions. (A and C) 124I-Labeled products obtained using Na124I with (C) or without (A) addition of carrier-added iodide. Addition of carrier improved yields, with formation of both mono- and diiododinated forms. (B and D) 131I-Labeled products prepared using IODO-GEN–coated vials vs. microparticulate IODO-GEN. UnB = unbound radioiodine.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Whole-body γ-images of 131I-IMP-325 in animals given hBS14 bs-mAb 24 h earlier (+ bs-mAb) or animals given only peptide alone (− bs-mAb). Images on the right show pretargeting under the same conditions using 111In-IMP-288. T = tumor; UB = urinary bladder. Arrows show tumor location on photographs of animals.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    Focus 120 microPET images of 124I-IMP-325 pretargeted with hBS14 (A, C, and D) or alone (not pretargeted; B). (A) From left to right, photograph of AN1, 2 transverse slices (0.82 mm) at level of tumor (arrows) and kidneys (K), taken ∼2 h after injection, and coronal slices obtained at ∼2, 6, and 24 h after injection. (B) From left to right, sagittal and coronal views obtained 1.9 h after injection. (C) From left to right, photograph of AN3 and coronal slices obtained at ∼2, 6, and 24 h after injection. (D) From left to right, coronal slices obtained at ∼2, 6, and 24 h after injection. All pretargeted images are adjusted to same intensity as 2-h image for each animal to illustrate retention and clearance of 124I-IMP-325 over time. At 24-h necropsy, tumors were 0.448, 0.285, and 0.483 g in pretargeted animals and 0.472 g in animal given 124I-IMP-325 alone. H = heart; S = stomach; Thy = thyroid; UB = urinary bladder.

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    Focus 120 microPET images of 3 animals injected with 124I-hMN-14 Fab′. (A) Transverse slices (0.82-mm thick) in same plane to highlight tumor (arrows) localization at ∼2, 6, and 24 h, from top to bottom, respectively, for each animal. Six-hour images are taken at same intensity as 2-h images, but intensity was increased substantially for 24-h images. Coronal sections taken from 2-, 6-, and 24-h intervals (B, C, and D, respectively) illustrate elevated uptake of radiolabeled Fab′ initially in kidneys (K) and stomach (S). Uptake in these tissues was cleared over time, but there was persistent thyroid (Thy) uptake. Tumor weights at necropsy (24 h) were 0.596, 0.173, and 0.280 g, respectively.

  • FIGURE 5. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5. 

    Focus 120 microPET images of animals bearing LS174T human colorectal cancer xenografts 1.7 h after 18F-FDG. All images were taken at same maximum intensity and background set to 0.0. (A) Photographs of 3 tumor-bearing animals. (B) Coronal slice (0.82-mm thick) taken to highlight uptake in tumor (arrows), as well as in bone marrow (BM) of shoulder and in hind quarters. Heart (H) and brain can also be seen in some images. Bars represent planes used for transverse and sagittal sections. (C) Transverse sections that highlight tumor or heart wall uptake. Sagittal sections illustrate the side view of tumor (D) and a plane that highlights heart, bone marrow, and urinary bladder (UB) activity (E). Tumor weights were 0.425, 0.321, and 0.153 g, respectively.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Tissue Uptake and Targeting Ratios for Pretargeted or Nonpretargeted 131I-IMP-325 and Pretargeted 111In-IMP-288

    %ID/organ
    Pretargeted 131I-IMP-325131I-Peptide alone, 4 h (n = 2)Pretargeted 111In-IMP-288
    Tumor or organ1 h (n = 5)4 h (n = 5)24 h (n = 3)1 h (n = 5)24 h (n = 3)
    Tumor15.1 ± 4.6*13.9 ± 3.510.5 ± 2.60.19, 0.4718.7 ± 9.613.6 ± 2.6
    1.10 ± 0.26†1.15 ± 0.351.52 ± 0.651.1, 2.71.07 ± 0.551.40 ± 0.42
    Liver0.48 ± 0.060.32 ± 0.040.21 ± 0.020.15, 0.180.36 ± 0.090.18 ± 0.02
    1.22 ± 0.17(34.6 ± 5.9)‡(39.8 ± 2.9)(43.0 ± 9.2)(63.6 ± 24.8)(61.9 ± 9.8)
    Spleen0.04 ± 0.000.03 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.000.012, 0.0130.03 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.00
    0.10 ± 0.02(36.4 ± 4.3)(47.2 ± 6.9)(49.4 ± 18.6)(65.5 ± 22.3)(83.9 ± 15.2)
    Kidney0.67 ± 0.240.37 ± 0.060.24 ± 0.020.37, 0.350.48 ± 0.070.21 ± 0.02
    0.15 ± 0.02(3.4 ± 1.3)(4.8 ± 0.2)(4.6 ± 0.9)(6.1 ± 0.9)(6.7 ± 1.0)
    Lungs0.13 ± 0.010.05 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.000.02, 0.020.11 ± 0.030.02 ± 0.00
    0.17 ± 0.03(17.8 ± 3.3)(33.0 ± 1.9)(70.5 ± 20.6)(40.5 ± 3.7)(78.5 ± 9.3)
    Blood1.48 ± 0.16§0.44 ± 0.060.04 ± 0.010.30, 0.320.96 ± 0.510.03 ± 0.01
    22.7 ± 1.6‖(15.5 ± 2.6)(44.3 ± 3.9)(280 ± 10)(40.3 ± 24.0)(517 ± 42)
    Stomach¶1.0 ± 0.10.80 ± 0.110.05 ± 0.010.74, 0.770.07 ± 0.030.03 ± 0.02
    0.4 ± 0.05(5.7 ± 1.6)(4.5 ± 0.8)(56.8 ± 16.1)(188 ± 200)(179 ± 134)
    • ↵* Values represent mean ± SD, except for peptide alone, where individual animal data are provided.

    • ↵† Italicized values are tissue weights in grams; tumor weights for each group are given, whereas representative tissue weights are provided from group of animals necropsied at 1 h.

    • ↵‡ Tumor-to-nontumor ratios based on %ID/g.

    • ↵§ Total blood volume estimated as 7.4% of body weight.

    • ↵‖ Average body weight of animals necropsied at 1 h.

    • ↵¶ Includes contents.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    ROIs Derived from microPET Images of Animals Given Pretargeted 124I-IMP-325 or 124I-Humanized Anti-CEA Fab′

    Activity/volume (mean ± SD)Tumor/ kidney ratio
    Animal/timeTumorKidney
    Pretargeted 124I-IMP-325
    Animal 1 (tumor, 0.448 g)
     1.9 h2.58 ± 1.091.11 ± 0.242.3
     6.3 h2.44 ± 1.240.92 ± 0.232.6
     24 h2.44 ± 1.200.55 ± 0.244.4
    Animal 2 (tumor, 0.483 g)
     2.7 h1.82 ± 0.670.89 ± 0.382.0
     6.4 h1.67 ± 0.680.71 ± 0.262.4
     25 h1.85 ± 0.640.44 ± 0.164.2
    Animal 3 (tumor, 0.285 g)
     2.1 h2.06 ± 0.750.70 ± 0.252.9
     5.8 h1.89 ± 0.760.44 ± 0.194.3
     25 h1.90 ± 0.700.29 ± 0.086.6
    124I-Anti-CEA Fab′
    Animal 1 (tumor, 0.596 g)
     2.1 h1.77 ± 0.4111.28 ± 2.860.16
     6.5 h1.76 ± 0.433.85 ± 0.530.46
     26 h0.49 ± 0.090.09 ± 0.055.44
    Animal 2 (tumor, 0.173 g)
     1.8 h1.07 ± 0.498.14 ± 2.730.10
     6.5 h0.71 ± 0.331.68 ± 0.480.42
     27 h0.17 ± 0.090.10 ± 0.051.7
    Animal 3 (tumor, 0.280 g)
     2.9 h1.84 ± 0.5810.33 ± 3.220.18
     6.6 h1.03 ± 0.391.42 ± 0.700.73
     27 h0.36 ± 0.120.09 ± 0.044.00
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Comparative Biodistribution (%ID/g and Tumor-to-Nontumor Ratios) of Pretargeted 124I-Peptide Compared with 124I-Anti-CEA Fab′ and 18F-FDG Based on Necropsy Data

    %ID/g (mean ± SD)
    Pretargeted 124I-peptide124I-Anti-CEA Fab′ (12 μg)124I-Anti-CEA Fab′ (100 μg), 24 h (n = 4)18F-FDG*, 2.0 h (n = 3)
    Tumor or organ1 h (n = 5)3 h (n = 5)24 h (n = 5)1 h (n = 5)3 h (n = 5)24 h (n = 5)
    Tumor15.4 ± 3.118.2 ± 4.612.5 ± 1.15.7 ± 0.45.3 ± 0.60.8 ± 0.20.7 ± 0.24.8 ± 1.14
    0.15 ± 0.02†0.19 ± 0.030.20 ± 0.040.09 ± 0.010.10 ± 0.030.08 ± 0.020.08 ± 0.010.41 ± 0.11
    Liver0.6 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.028.2 ± 1.63.2 ± 0.50.3 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.030.6 ± 0.1
    (26.3 ± 7.8)‡(31.2 ± 5.5)(43 ± 6)(0.7 ± 0.2)(1.7 ± 0.3)(3.0 ± 1.1)(6.4 ± 1.9)(8.7 ± 1.1)
    Spleen0.6 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.20.2 ± 0.0317.7 ± 3.96.3 ± 1.60.2 ± 0.040.1 ± 0.021.9 ± 0.2
    (25.4 ± 6.4)(34.6 ± 8.9)(57 ± 10)(0.3 ± 0.1)(0.9 ± 0.2)(3.2 ± 0.6)(9.3 ± 1.9)(2.6 ± 0.8)
    Kidney4.8 ± 0.54.3 ± 1.52.7 ± 0.368.7 ± 7.69.2 ± 2.30.4 ± 0.20.2 ± 0.040.7 ± 0.2
    (3.3 ± 0.8)(4.5 ± 1.3)(4.6 ± 0.5)(0.1 ± 0.02)(0.6 ± 0.1)(2.6 ± 1.4)(3.0 ± 0.6)(7.1 ± 0.4)
    Lungs1.4 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.30.3 ± 0.032.9 ± 0.32.9 ± 0.30.05 ± 0.010.04 ± 0.021.7 ± 0.2
    (11.6 + 3.6)(17.1 ± 2.9)(44 ± 6)(2.0 ± 0.2)(1.8 ± 0.3)(16 ± 6)(20 ± 5)(2.9 ± 0.4)
    Blood1.7 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.40.05 ± 0.014.6 ± 0.34.9 ± 0.40.07 ± 0.000.05 ± 0.030.30 ± 0.06
    (9.1 ± 2.6)(17.9 ± 3.5)(238 ± 48)(1.3 ± 0.07)(1.1 ± 0.2)(11 ± 3)(15 ± 5)(16.0 ± 0.4)
    Stomach§3.9 ± 0.54.0 ± 2.20.2 ± 0.120.8 ± 4.232.4 ± 2.60.5 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.9
    (4.0 ± 0.9)(6.0 ± 3.9)(72 ± 24)(0.3 ± 0.05)(0.2 ± 0.02)(1.8 ± 1.0)(3.1 ± 1.0)(2.9 ± 0.4)
    • ↵* Data from MSKCC animals, whereas all other data were obtained from CMMI animals.

    • ↵† Italicized values are tumor weights in grams.

    • ↵‡ Nonitalicized values in parentheses are tumor-to-nontumor ratios.

    • ↵§ With contents.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    ROIs Derived from microPET Images for Animals Given 18F-FDG

    Activity/volume (mean ± SD)
    Animal/timeTumorHeart*BM†Tumor/heart ratioTumor/BM ratio
    Animal 1
     1.7 h3.92 ± 1.013.84 ± 0.875.21 ± 1.571.020.75
    Animal 2
     1.7 h4.17 ± 1.037.48 ± 1.437.15 ± 1.370.550.58
    Animal 3
     1.7 h3.80 ± 1.503.6 ± 0.544.40 ± 2.251.060.86
    • ↵* Activity taken from coronal slice showing heart wall.

    • ↵† BM = bone marrow as determined in shoulder seen in coronal slice shown in Figure 5.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 47 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 47, Issue 10
October 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bispecific Antibody Pretargeting PET (ImmunoPET) with an 124I-Labeled Hapten-Peptide
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Bispecific Antibody Pretargeting PET (ImmunoPET) with an 124I-Labeled Hapten-Peptide
William J. McBride, Pat Zanzonico, Robert M. Sharkey, Carl Norén, Habibe Karacay, Edmund A. Rossi, Michele J. Losman, Pierre-Yves Brard, Chien-Hsing Chang, Steven M. Larson, David M. Goldenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2006, 47 (10) 1678-1688;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Bispecific Antibody Pretargeting PET (ImmunoPET) with an 124I-Labeled Hapten-Peptide
William J. McBride, Pat Zanzonico, Robert M. Sharkey, Carl Norén, Habibe Karacay, Edmund A. Rossi, Michele J. Losman, Pierre-Yves Brard, Chien-Hsing Chang, Steven M. Larson, David M. Goldenberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2006, 47 (10) 1678-1688;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Pretargeting: A Path Forward for Radioimmunotherapy
  • {alpha}- Versus {beta}-Emitting Radionuclides for Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy of Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Expressing Human Colon Cancer Xenografts
  • Immuno-PET Using Anticarcinoembryonic Antigen Bispecific Antibody and 68Ga-Labeled Peptide in Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Clinical Optimization of the Pretargeting Parameters in a First-in-Human Trial
  • Diels-Alder Reaction for Tumor Pretargeting: In Vivo Chemistry Can Boost Tumor Radiation Dose Compared with Directly Labeled Antibody
  • Quantitative Immuno-SPECT Monitoring of Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy with a Bispecific Antibody in an Intraperitoneal Nude Mouse Model of Human Colon Cancer
  • Phase II Trial of Anticarcinoembryonic Antigen Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy in Progressive Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Biomarker Response and Survival Improvement
  • Immuno-PET of Cancer: A Revival of Antibody Imaging
  • Optimization of Hapten-Peptide Labeling for Pretargeted ImmunoPET of Bispecific Antibody Using Generator-Produced 68Ga
  • Pretargeted 177Lu Radioimmunotherapy of Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Expressing Human Colonic Tumors in Mice
  • Pretargeted Immuno-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Expressing Tumors with a Bispecific Antibody and a 68Ga- and 18F-Labeled Hapten Peptide in Mice with Human Tumor Xenografts
  • Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy of Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts: TF10-90Y-IMP-288 Alone and Combined with Gemcitabine
  • CD20-targeted tetrameric interferon-{alpha}, a novel and potent immunocytokine for the therapy of B-cell lymphomas
  • A Novel Method of 18F Radiolabeling for PET
  • Improved Therapeutic Results by Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma with a New Recombinant, Trivalent, Anti-CD20, Bispecific Antibody
  • A Novel Bispecific, Trivalent Antibody Construct for Targeting Pancreatic Carcinoma
  • Multifunctional Antibodies by the Dock-and-Lock Method for Improved Cancer Imaging and Therapy by Pretargeting
  • Bispecific Antibody Pretargeting of Radionuclides for Immuno-Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Immuno-Positron Emission Tomography Molecular Imaging: An Update
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor Uptake of Anti-CD20 Fabs Depends on Tumor Perfusion
  • How Sensitive Is the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract to 90Y Radioembolization? A Histologic and Dosimetric Analysis in a Porcine Model
  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire