Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations

Prognostic Implications of Combined Prone and Supine Acquisitions in Patients with Equivocal or Abnormal Supine Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

Sean W. Hayes, Andrea De Lorenzo, Rory Hachamovitch, Sanjay C. Dhar, Patrick Hsu, Ishac Cohen, John D. Friedman, Xingping Kang and Daniel S. Berman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2003, 44 (10) 1633-1640;
Sean W. Hayes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea De Lorenzo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rory Hachamovitch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanjay C. Dhar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Hsu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ishac Cohen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John D. Friedman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xingping Kang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel S. Berman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Postexercise 99mTc-sestamibi MPS images of 83-y-old asymptomatic man. Perfusion defect is noted in inferior and inferoapical walls in poststress supine images. Poststress prone images are normal, demonstrating that apparent perfusion defect is secondary to soft-tissue attenuation. Normal wall motion was noted on gated SPECT.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Injection and acquisition protocol for prone and supine MPS study. *15 min for exercise, 1 h for no walk adenosine (adapted and reprinted with permission of (24)).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Risk-adjusted hard event rates in patients undergoing supine-only or prone and supine acquisition, according to MPS interpretation. P < 0.0001 across scan categories; P > 0.05 for comparisons between supine-only or prone and supine. Mod-sev = moderately to severely abnormal.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Risk-adjusted total event rates in patients undergoing supine-only or prone and supine acquisition, according to MPS interpretation. P < 0.0001 across scan categories; P > 0.05 for comparisons between supine-only or prone and supine. Mod-sev = moderately to severely abnormal.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Characteristics

    CharacteristicProne and supine (n = 655)Supine-only (n = 3,179)
    Age (y)66.7 ± 11.165.7 ± 12.3
    Male sex487 (74.4)1,899 (59.7)*
    Hypertension319 (48.7)1,499 (47.2)
    Diabetes100 (15.3)467 (14.7)
    Hypercholesterolemia328 (50.1)1,466 (46.1)
    Smoking81 (12.4)381 (12.0)
    Family history of CAD169 (25.8)862 (27.1)
    History of MI155 (23.7)800 (25.2)
    History of revascularization216 (33.0)1,044 (32.8)
    Digitalis use44 (6.7)269 (8.5)
    Angina246 (37.6)1,216 (38.3)
    Shortness of breath35 (5.3)178 (5.6)
    Adenosine stress217 (33.1)1,071 (33.7)
    Prescan likelihood of CAD0.39 ± 0.360.36 ± 0.34*
    Abnormal rest ECG464 (70.8)2,308 (72.6)
    SSS6.3 ± 8.86.5 ± 9.3
    • ↵* P < 0.05.

    • MI = myocardial infarction.

    • Values in parentheses are percentage.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Patient Characteristics by MPS Acquisition Types and Normal or Abnormal MPS Results

    CharacteristicProne and supine (n = 655)Supine-only (n = 3,179)
    Normal (n = 368)Abnormal (n = 287)Normal (n = 1,880)Abnormal (n = 1,299)
    Age (y)64.4 ± 11.369.7 ± 10.163.0 ± 12.669.7 ± 10.6*
    Male sex260 (70.7)227 (79.1)*958 (51.0)†941 (72.4)*‡
    Hypertension172 (46.7)147 (51.2)799 (42.5)700 (53.9)
    Diabetes38 (10.3)62 (21.1)205 (10.9)262 (20.2)
    Hypercholesterolemia183 (49.7)145 (50.5)847 (45.1)619 (47.7)
    Smoking44 (12.0)37 (12.9)228 (12.1)153 (11.8)
    Family history of CAD92 (25.0)77 (26.8)495 (26.3)367 (28.3)
    History of MI23 (6.3)132 (46.0)144 (7.7)656 (50.5)
    History of revascularization56 (15.2)160 (55.7)165 (8.8)799 (61.5)*‡
    Digitalis use24 (6.5)20 (7.0)108 (5.7)161 (12.4)*‡
    Angina128 (34.8)118 (41.1)756 (40.2)460 (35.4)
    Shortness of breath16 (4.3)19 (6.6)82 (4.4)96 (7.4)
    Adenosine stress97 (26.4)120 (41.8)490 (26.1)581 (44.7)
    Prescan likelihood of CAD0.34 ± 0.300.44 ± 0.34*0.33 ± 0.290.45 ± 0.35*
    Abnormal rest ECG228 (62.0)236 (82.2)*1,164 (61.9)1,144 (88.1)*‡
    SSS0.5 ± 0.913.8 ± 8.7*0.5 ± 0.915.2 ± 9.1*‡
    • ↵* P < 0.05 normal vs. abnormal scan in acquisition category.

    • ↵† P < 0.05 normal prone and supine vs. normal supine-only.

    • ↵‡ P < 0.05 abnormal prone and supine vs. abnormal supine-only.

    • MI = myocardial infarction.

    • Values in parentheses are percentage.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Annualized Event Rates

    RateProne and supine (n = 655)Supine-only (n = 3,179)
    NormalMildly abnormalModerately to severely abnormalNormalMildly abnormalModerately to severely abnormal
    Total
     Hard events (%)0.70.52.9*0.51.64.8*
     Total events (%)2.87.99.3*1.87.711.9*
     n368971901,880382917
    Exercise
     Hard events (%)0.60.92.8*0.40.73.2*
     Total events (%)2.610.09.9*1.57.010.1*
     n271571101,390231487
    Adenosine
     Hard events (%)1.003.11.13.36.8*
     Total events (%)3.25.18.52.68.914.2*
     n974080490151430
    • ↵* P < 0.05 across scan categories.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Univariate Predictors of Hard Events

    PredictorWith hard events (n = 132)Without hard events (n = 3,702)
    Age (y)72.1 ± 11.565.7 ± 12.0*
    Male sex98 (74.2)2,288 (61.8)*
    Hypertension73 (55.3)1,745 (47.1)
    Diabetes31 (23.5)536 (14.5)*
    Hypercholesterolemia46 (34.8)1,748 (47.2)*
    Smoking18 (13.6)444 (12.0)
    Family history of CAD39 (29.5)992 (26.8)
    Digitalis use32 (24.2)281 (7.6)*
    History of MI71 (53.8)884 (23.9)*
    History of revascularization70 (53.0)1,190 (32.1)*
    Angina50 (37.9)1,412 (38.1)
    Shortness of breath19 (14.4)194 (5.2)*
    Adenosine stress78 (59.1)1,210 (32.7)*
    Prescan likelihood of CAD0.46 ± 0.340.37 ± 0.31
    Position
     Prone17 (12.9)638 (17.2)
     Supine115 (87.1)3,064 (82.8)
    Abnormal rest ECG16 (12.1)111 (3.0)*
    SSS16.5 ± 11.46.1 ± 8.9*
    • ↵* P < 0.05.

    • MI = myocardial infarction.

    • Values in parentheses are percentage.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Univariate Predictors of Total Events

    PredictorWith total events (n = 375)Without total events (n = 3,459)
    Age (y)69.5 ± 10.465.5 ± 12.2*
    Male sex277 (73.9)2,109 (61.0)*
    Hypertension197 (52.5)1,621 (46.9)*
    Diabetes85 (22.7)482 (13.9)*
    Hypercholesterolemia177 (47.2)1,617 (46.7)
    Smoking46 (12.3)416 (12.0)
    Family history of CAD106 (28.3)925 (26.7)
    Digitalis use52 (13.9)261 (7.5)*
    History of MI170 (45.3)785 (22.7)*
    History of revascularization222 (59.2)1,038 (30.0)*
    Angina142 (37.9)1,320 (38.2)
    Shortness of breath27 (7.2)186 (5.4)
    Adenosine stress170 (45.3)1,118 (32.3)*
    Prescan likelihood of CAD0.50 ± 0.340.37 ± 0.31*
    Position
     Prone67 (17.9)588 (17.0)
     Supine308 (82.1)2,871 (83.0)
    Abnormal rest ECG53 (14.1)263 (7.6)
    SSS13.2 ± 10.65.7 ± 8.7*
    • ↵* P < 0.05.

    • MI = myocardial infarction.

    • Values in parentheses are percentage.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 44, Issue 10
October 1, 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Implications of Combined Prone and Supine Acquisitions in Patients with Equivocal or Abnormal Supine Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Implications of Combined Prone and Supine Acquisitions in Patients with Equivocal or Abnormal Supine Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
Sean W. Hayes, Andrea De Lorenzo, Rory Hachamovitch, Sanjay C. Dhar, Patrick Hsu, Ishac Cohen, John D. Friedman, Xingping Kang, Daniel S. Berman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2003, 44 (10) 1633-1640;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prognostic Implications of Combined Prone and Supine Acquisitions in Patients with Equivocal or Abnormal Supine Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
Sean W. Hayes, Andrea De Lorenzo, Rory Hachamovitch, Sanjay C. Dhar, Patrick Hsu, Ishac Cohen, John D. Friedman, Xingping Kang, Daniel S. Berman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2003, 44 (10) 1633-1640;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications
  • Evaluating the Role of Routine Prone Acquisition on Visual Evaluation of SPECT Images
  • Are Shades of Gray Prognostically Useful in Reporting Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography?
  • Stress Thallium-201/Rest Technetium-99m Sequential Dual Isotope High-Speed Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Assessment of Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis in a Canine Model Using the PET Agent 18F-Fluorobenzyl Triphenyl Phosphonium: Comparison with 99mTc-Tetrofosmin
  • The Prognostic Value of Normal Exercise Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Exercise Echocardiography: A Meta-Analysis
  • Combined Supine and Prone Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: Method Development and Clinical Validation in Patients with No Known Coronary Artery Disease
  • Prone Versus Supine Patient Positioning During Gated 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT: Effect on Left Ventricular Volumes, Ejection Fraction, and Heart Rate
  • The year in cardiac imaging
  • False-Positive Findings on Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
  • Automatic Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion Stress-Rest Change: A New Measure of Ischemia
  • Implication of Prognostically Significant Negative Results on Prone SPECT
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire