Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop a treatment protocol for 225Ac-PSMA-617 α-radiation therapy in advanced-stage, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–positive tumor phenotype. Methods: A dosimetry estimate was calculated on the basis of time–activity curves derived from serially obtained 177Lu-PSMA-617 scans extrapolated to the physical half-life of 225Ac, assuming instant decay of unstable daughter nuclides. Salvage therapies empirically conducted with 50 (n = 4), 100 (n = 4), 150 (n = 2), and 200 kBq/kg (n = 4) of 225Ac-PSMA-617 were evaluated retrospectively regarding toxicity and treatment response. Eight of 14 patients received further cycles in either 2- or 4-mo intervals with identical or deescalated activities. Results: Dosimetry estimates for 1 MBq of 225Ac-PSMA-617 assuming a relative biologic effectiveness of 5 revealed mean doses of 2.3 Sv for salivary glands, 0.7 Sv for kidneys, and 0.05 Sv for red marrow that are composed of 99.4% α, 0.5% β, and 0.1% photon radiation, respectively. In clinical application, severe xerostomia became the dose-limiting toxicity if treatment activity exceeded 100 kBq/kg per cycle. At 100 kBq/kg, the duration of prostate-specific antigen decline was less than 4 mo, but if therapy was repeated every 2 mo patients experienced additive antitumor effects. Treatment activities of 50 kBq/kg were without toxicity but induced insufficient antitumor response in these high-tumor-burden patients. Remarkable antitumor activity by means of objective radiologic response or tumor marker decline was observed in 9 of 11 evaluable patients. Conclusion: For advanced-stage patients, a treatment activity of 100 kBq/kg of 225Ac-PSMA-617 per cycle repeated every 8 wk presents a reasonable trade-off between toxicity and biochemical response.
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting with 177Lu-labeled PSMA ligands presents a promising new option for salvage therapy of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) (1–3).
However, only 45% of patients biochemically respond (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] decline > 50%) to PSMA ligands labeled with β-emitting 177Lu, and 40% of patients do not respond at all (2). Targeted α-therapy (TAT) has been shown to be able to overcome resistance to β-emitters in clinical application (4). After binding at the tumor cell surface, PSMA ligands are internalized (5), which is considered particularly beneficial for short-range Auger (6) and α-particle radiation (7) and is especially important for radionuclides that decay into unstable daughter nuclides. The shorter tissue range of α-radiation also offers the potential of targeting tumor cells infiltrating bone marrow with reduced toxicity compared with β-emitters. In comparison to β-emitting bone seekers such as 89SrCl2, the α-emitting 223RaCl2 demonstrated improved survival of mCRPC patients while simultaneously reducing hematologic toxicity (8). Remarkably low hematologic toxicity has also been observed during TAT of a patient with diffuse bone metastases of neuroendocrine differentiated prostate cancer treated with 213Bi-DOTATOC (4). Dosimetry studies demonstrated that the salivary glands and kidneys might be dose-limiting organs for 177Lu-PSMA-617 (1,9–11). This is in accordance with histologic immunostainings, reporting weak physiologic PSMA expression in these tissues (12). If salivary gland uptake would be predominantly PSMA-specific, the microdosimetry of short range α-radiation offers promise to spare wide parts of the surrounding salivary gland tissue. Thus, based on theoretic considerations, PSMA TAT with 225Ac-PSMA-617 offers the promise to enhance treatment efficacy and simultaneously reduce toxicity. Therefore, PSMA TAT was introduced to our clinic as a salvage therapy for patients with advanced mCRPC who had exhausted approved therapies. Here we retrospectively report our clinical experience with the first patients receiving PSMA TAT with different dosing regimens of 225Ac-PSMA-617 and share the rationale of our derived treatment protocol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
225Ac-PSMA-617 was offered as salvage therapy in accordance with the updated Declaration of Helsinki, paragraph-37 “Unproven Interventions in Clinical Practice,” and in accordance with German regulations for medical indication of an unapproved drug in patients who exhausted approved treatments, in particular with regard to German pharmaceutical act §13(2b). All patients had a PSMA-positive tumor phenotype as demonstrated in a preceding PSMA PET/CT scan with 68Ga-PSMA-11 or PSMA SPECT/CT scan with 99mTc-MIP1427. Patients were informed about the experimental nature of this therapy and gave written informed consent. Detailed patient characteristics are summarized in (Table 1). The ethical committee approved the retrospective evaluation as an observational study.
Patient Characteristics
Dosimetry Estimate
A low probability for γ-coemission and overlapping Bremsstrahlung due to β-emitters in the 225Ac decay chain (Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) preclude treatment concomitant dosimetry. Therefore, organ-absorbed doses for 225Ac-PSMA-617 were approximated by extrapolating preexisting 177Lu-PSMA-617 data. Methods for 177Lu-PSMA-617 dosimetry were already described in the supplement of a previous publication (1). A strength of this protocol was the inclusion of a late imaging time point 5–10 d after administration. Meanwhile these results were confirmed by other groups (9–11) and can be considered representative. The counts within the regions of interest of whole body and delineable organs from all imaging time points as well as activities measured in blood samples were extrapolated from the 6.7-d half-life of 177Lu to the half-life of 9.9 d of 225Ac. Time–activity curves and related area under the curve were then fitted, integrated, and normalized to residence times as already described (13). The kidneys, liver, spleen, bladder, red marrow, and whole-body remainder were used as source organs in OLINDA (13), using the adult male model with organ masses of the original phantom. The residency times of 225Ac were then forwarded as residency times of 221Fr, 217At, 213Bi, 213Po, 209Tl, and 209Pb for OLINDA calculations, assuming instant decay of the daughter nuclides without translocation during the delay between succeeding disintegrations. The relative biologic efficacy (RBE) for the α-particles emitted from 225Ac, compared with β-radiation, was assumed to be 5 according to literature (14). Finally, the absorbed dose of all decay steps was summed up, with weighting factors of 2% for 209Tl and 98% for 213Po to account for the 2 possible pathways in the 225Ac decay chain (Supplemental Fig. 1). The spheric model of OLINDA was used to calculate the doses for the salivary glands for individual gland volumes derived from baseline PET/CT images.
PSMA Immunhistochemistry
PSMA immunohistochemistry was performed with a series of tissue bank samples from salivary glands, kidneys, and prostate cancer using a standard protocol analogous to the detailed description in a previous publication (15).
Radiopharmaceuticals
The precursors for PSMA-11 and PSMA-617 were obtained from ABX. The precursor for MIP1427 (16) was synthesized in-house, 225Ac was produced by radiochemical extraction from 229Th (17,18), and 68Ga and 99mTc were eluted from commercial generator systems on-site. The labeling conditions and imaging protocols for 68Ga-PSMA-11 (19), 99mTc- MIP1427 (1), and posttherapeutic 225Ac-PSMA-617 emission scans (20) have been described previously.
Determination of Treatment Activity
Because the reported patients were not treated according to a prospectively defined protocol inside a clinical trial but under the paragraph “unproven intervention in clinical practice,” the treatment activity was not escalated in a systematic manner but was tailored individually by the physicians in charge, taking into account the estimated spontaneous prognosis (site of metastasis, progression velocity) and baseline laboratory tests of the respective patient. The individually administered activities and prognostic profiles for tailoring the patients into their particular escalation level are summarized in Table 1. According to German radiation protection regulations the patients were hospitalized as in-patients until 48 h after injection. Clinical examination was done before and 1 d after therapy. Patients received intravenous hydration (2,000 mL of 0.9% NaCl; flow, 333 mL/h) starting 30 min before therapy. The therapy solution was administered with a slow (30–60 s) freehand injection through a 0.20-μm sterile filter with low protein binding (Filtropur S 0.2). Androgen-deprivation therapy was maintained during PSMA TAT; other treatments were discontinued.
Follow-up
Blood cell count, creatinine, blood-urea-nitrogen, liver enzymes, PSA, clinical examination, and patient anamnesis were done every 4 wk and classified into toxicity grades using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (21). Imaging follow-up was performed with the identical modality (PSMA PET/CT or PSMA SPECT/CT) as baseline. The follow-up exam was scheduled after 3 cycles in patients with biochemical response or already earlier in the case of clinical indication.
RESULTS
Patients
The selection of end-stage patients who had already exhausted approved options led to a heavily pretreated patient cohort. Seventy-one percent of the patients had previously received docetaxel, which is a larger fraction than the 56% patients considered suitable for chemotherapy in the ALSYMPCA trial (22). Secondary hormone manipulations (abiraterone, enzalutamide) and in the bone-confined patients 223Ra had also been used regularly. Patients were also included into regular clinical trials (cabozantinib, tasquinimod, sorafenib) with priority; some had history of less common second-line chemotherapeutics such as estramustine, cabazitaxel, or vinorelbine. The cohort is also unfavorable in regard to visceral metastasis, which is associated with poor prognosis (23), as well as extent of bone and bone marrow involvement (superscan pattern: n = 6) and reduced blood cell count at baseline. In this adverse setting, we observed a median overall survival of 8.5 mo (Table 2, last column).
Observed Toxicities and Further Proceedings
Dosimetry
For 225Ac-PSMA-617, salivary glands (2.3 SvRBE5/MBq), kidneys (0.7 SvRBE5/MBq), and red marrow (0.05 SvRBE5/MBq) are potentially dose-limiting organs. These values are similar to those reported for 131I-MIP-1095 (24) and 177Lu-PSMA-617 (1) as presented in Table 3 but for MBq instead of GBq activities. Other OLINDA results can be found in the Supplemental Table 1. All organ-absorbed doses consist of about 99.4% α- (considering RBE = 5), 0.5% β-, and 0.1% photon radiation, respectively.
Dosimetry of Dose-Limiting Organs with Different PSMA Ligands
Microscopic PSMA Distribution Within Dose-Limiting Organs
A representative example of PSMA immunochemistry staining of salivary glands, kidneys, and prostate cancer is presented in (Fig. 1). In the salivary glands, staining of PSMA protein is found in focal hot spots of acinar cells preferably along their luminal border but not homogeneously dispersed within the parenchyma (Fig. 1A). In the kidneys, the PSMA protein is found in a selected subset of tubular cells again with a predominant luminal staining pattern (Fig. 1B). As a control, prostate cancer presents with intense PSMA staining (Fig. 1C).
PSMA immunochemistry staining of salivary glands (A), kidney parenchyma (B), and prostate cancer (C).
Empiric Dose Finding
No measurable changes in liver and kidney laboratory tests were observed. Acute hematologic and other side effects are summarized in Table 2. Two patients were excluded from hematologic toxicity analysis due to overlap with chemotherapy; 1 of them presented with grade 3 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia and 1 patient even died by neutropenic complications (grade 5). No treatment-related hematologic grade 3/4 and only 1 combined grade 2 thrombocytopenia/leucopenia occurred in the 200 kBq/kg group. Diffuse type red marrow infiltration was no predictor for increased hematologic toxicity as illustrated by the casuistic of a patient who had to discontinue 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy due to hematologic toxicity but demonstrated remarkable response and tolerability to 223Ra and also tolerated 225Ac-PSMA-617 well after restratification due to PSMA-positive brain lesions (Fig. 2). Xerostomia was regularly reported with 100 kBq/kg or more per cycle and was considered intolerable with greater than 150 kBq/kg. Typically, first symptoms of xerostomia were observed 2–5 d after therapy injection, enduring for about 2 mo. If no succeeding cycle was indicated at this time there was a partial recovery, but some loss of secretion function appeared to be chronic. One patient in the 200 kBq/kg group reported dry eyes that had to be palliated by eye drops. This patient also reported fatigue and unspecific epigastric discomfort and was also the patient with the highest absolute treatment activity (patient 14). Despite promising antitumor activity, all patients in the 200 kBq/kg group and 1 of 2 patients in the 150 kBq/kg group discontinued therapy or insisted on dose reduction. Three patients initiated high caloric supplemental nutrition, because of weight loss, which was considered consecutively to the xerostomia by patient’s self-reporting; however, no parenteral nutrition (grade 4 toxicity) had to be applied. Thus, we consider 100 kBq/kg of body weight (kgBW) the maximum tolerable dose, with xerostomia/xerophtalmia being the dose-limiting factor.
(A) At baseline, a patient presented with diffuse-type red marrow infiltration visualized with 99mTc-MIP1427 PSMA scintigraphy (top) and brain metastasis (bottom). (B) Imaging follow-up 8 mo later presented partial response in bone (top) and brain (bottom).
For 2 patients with PSA-negative tumor at baseline and the patients who overlappingly received other treatments, biochemical response assessment was not possible. The PSA-negative patients were reevaluated with PSMA PET/CT. One patient, treated with 50 kBq/kg activities, demonstrated progression, and the other patient, treated with 200 kBq/kg, showed a promising radiologic response (Fig. 3). For evaluable subjects, wk-8 PSA response demonstrated a tumor marker decline for all patients treated with more than 50 kBq/kg (Fig. 4).
Baseline (A) and restaging (B) for a PSA-negative patient with histologically proven lung and liver metastases of prostate cancer was done with 68Ga-PSMA‐11 PET (maximum-intensity projection, top) and CT (bottom), respectively. Promising antitumor activity in bone, liver, and pulmonal lesions have been observed, but also atrophy of salivary glands. Brain lesions were simultaneously treated with percutaneous radiotherapy.
Waterfall graph of PSA response in evaluable patients. PSA response was observed in 75% of patients. No dose–response correlation was observed the 100–200 kBq/kgBW treatment activities.
With the limitation of small patient number, 100 kBq/kgBW was considered the treatment activity with the highest therapeutic range for this kind of patient (Fig. 5). However, because treatment activities were chosen depending on clinical risk factors, no reliable dose–response relationship can be derived.
Reasonable treatment corridor between insufficient treatment response (red: patient died before reevaluation; orange: PSA progression; green: imaging or PSA response) and intolerable toxicity (red: xerophthalmia; orange: xerostomia G2; green: no or only G1 xerostomia). During repeated therapies, insufficient PSA response was observed at 4-mo interval.
Effect of Repeated Dosing
Dose and timing of succeeding cycles are summarized in the last column of Table 2. In sum, 8 patients had further applications of 225Ac-PSMA-617. The therapeutic management was not defined prospectively but on individual decisions. One patient (patient 8) had favorable response after 2 cycles, and further applications were postponed until clinical demand ethically justified another application of experimental therapy. However, response to the second series, performed 1 y after first application, was short and the patient soon became resistant. A similar effect was observed in a patient who was treated in 4-mo intervals; after favorable biochemical response to the first cycle, succeeding cycles postponed until PSA relapse were remarkably less effective than the original course (individual course of PSA presented as Supplemental Fig. 2A). In contrast, applications every 2 mo in at least 100 kBq/kg doses resulted in a continuous decline of PSA (Supplemental Fig. 2B) over 2–4 cycles (patients 8, 9, and 10). Patients starting with or reducing to 50 kBq/kg became resistant after 1–2 cycles. No statistical analysis was reasonable with this low patient number and individualized treatment regimens.
DISCUSSION
The aim of this work was to establish a treatment protocol for clinical application of 225Ac-PSMA-617 TAT in advanced-stage mCRPC, taking into account dosimetry considerations amended by empiric observations derived during first clinical experiences.
Recently a German multicenter study reported promising initial results for a subgroup of patients treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 (2), but 40% of the patients presented with no PSA response at all. TAT with 213Bi-DOTATOC already demonstrated a potential to break radio-resistance against 90Y-/177Lu-DOTATOC (4), making it also highly reasonable that 225Ac-PSMA-617 will further improve the response rate in comparison to 177Lu-PSMA-617. The high rate of biochemical or radiologic responses in our cohort of heavily pretreated patients is already promising. Nevertheless, because of low patient number and variable treatment regimens it is not yet legitimate to start a discussion about efficacy in comparison to 177Lu-PSMA-617.
The radiobiologic specifics of TAT have already been reviewed in-depth (14). Specific background information relevant for understanding the characteristics of 225Ac are provided in the supplemental materials.
Preliminary considerations of safety dosimetry were done to define the appropriate dimension for starting activity before the first application of 225Ac-PSMA-617. For this reason, time–activity curves of representative 177Lu-PSMA-617 dosimetry scans were extrapolated to the half-life of 225Ac under the assumption that all daughter nuclides decay without relevant translocation. This can be assumed due to the rapid cellular internalization and storage of the carrier molecule PSMA-617 after binding to PSMA (25) and preclinical findings with an internalizing PSMA antibody that the intracytosolic-generated daughter nuclides predominantly remain inside the tumor (26). Although the simplification of instant decay may be widely true for 221Fr (half-life, 4.8 min) and 217At (half-life, 33 ms), a small percentage of 213Bi (half-life, 45.6 min) might leave the targeted cell by passive diffusion, introducing 1 source of uncertainty. Another critical point is that clinical imaging modalities are limited to millimeter resolution; thus, the nonuniform biodistribution of the radiopharmaceutical on the microscopic level cannot be evaluated in human beings and has to be discussed on the basis of preclinical data.
Assuming homogeneous distribution, we calculated a red marrow dose of 0.05 SvRBE5/MBq. For cell level microdosimetry, the radionuclide–to–cell nucleus geometry, that is, if the α-particle is emitted from extracellular or intracellular compartments, can be relevant. According to the pharmacokinetics of PSMA-617 (1), we consider passive diffusion into the extracellular body water fraction of the red marrow but no specific binding. Thus, the radiation geometry should be similar to an already preclinically evaluated α-radiopharmaceutical for which an RBE of only approximately 1 was suggested in regard to marrow toxicity (27) and the RBE of 5 used for the dosimetry estimate presented in Table 3 may be overcautious, which vice versa is well in line with the remarkably low hematologic toxicity observed in patients. Diffuse‐type red marrow infiltration was considered a risk factor for increased hematologic toxicity during 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy (1). Conventional dosimetry neglects the dose contribution of bone metastases to the red marrow because it cannot easily be modeled. However, in the case of red marrow carcinosis this effect may be of particular impact with the mean/maximum of 0.5/2 mm (20/80 cell diameters) tissue range of 177Lu β-particles. In contrast, the 47- to 85-μm (2–3 cell diameters) tissue ranges of 225Ac α-particles (Supplemental Fig. 3) theoretically offer selective tumor cell kill. Both effects provide an explanation that a patient with suggestive red marrow infiltration (Fig. 2) and history of myelosuppression after 4 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA-617 (0.12 Gy taking into account only perfusion-dependent effects) could still tolerate 13.4 MBq of 225Ac-PSMA-617 (0.67 SvRBE5); this case exquisitely illustrates the methodical limitations of dosimetry and warns about an uncritical reliance on dosimetry estimates of dose-limiting organs (Table 3). We also want to point out our unpleasant experience with 2 patients (G3 and G5 toxicity) in whom chemotherapy was initiated with less than an 8-wk interval after TAT (assumed prudent by their oncologists due to nonmeasurable hematologic toxicity) because low hematologic toxicity might also tempt other physicians/researchers into combination therapies, but they should be prepared for the possibility of overadditive toxicity.
Average kidney-absorbed dose was calculated with 0.7 SvRBE5/MBq. Suborgan distribution acquired with an α-camera and microscale dosimetry modeling have already been published for a 211At-labeled urea-based PSMA ligand in the kidneys of mice (7). The authors reported dose-limiting nephropathy as validated with histopathology and laboratory tests. In their suborgan dosimetry, hot spots in the proximal tubules were 3-fold higher than in glomeruli (123 vs. 42 Gy/MBq) and 5-fold higher than average organ dose, illustrating the limitations of imaging-based dosimetry in regards to TAT. The mean kidney-absorbed dose for the 211At-PSMA TAT in mice was 24.6 Gy/MBq (123 SvRBE5/MBq in our nomenclature), 0.037 MBq were nontoxic, and the treatment dose lethal to 10% of the exposed kidneys was 0.111 MBq, which would correspond to 4.6–13.7 SvRBE5. Mild proteinuria developed after therapy, but resolved over time; therefore, this maximum-tolerated dose of mice only reflects a single treatment cycle but not the maximum cumulative dose. In our patient collective, we did not exceed this dose range and no acute or subacute renal toxicity was observed. However, kidneys are well-known late reacting organs to radiation therapy and onset of radiation-induced renal dysfunction can appear years later and might be missed with our short follow-up period. Therefore, we cannot rule out that cumulative kidney dose is the limiting factor for PSMA TAT, requiring thoroughly long-term follow-up of renal function, especially once PSMA TAT might be used in earlier tumor stages.
Immunostainings of salivary glands (Fig. 1A) reveal rather spot-type than disseminated distribution of PSMA-positive cells, and wide parts of gland parenchyma are spatially well separated from these hot spots, with distances easily exceeding the penetration depth of the α-particle. If uptake of 225Ac-PSMA-617 would be only PSMA-specific, we would expect less toxicity for salivary glands than with β-emitters. However, this was opposed by clinical findings when severe xerostomia and in 1 case dry eyes became the dose-limiting factor for 225Ac-PSMA-617, exceeding the clinical toxicities of 131I-MIP1095 at comparable effective absorbed dose (Table 3). Probably the high uptake in salivary glands is not PSMA-dependent but might be caused by small-molecule transporters. This thesis is supported by an imaging study of radiolabeled PSMA antibodies that present much lower uptake in salivary glands (28). Moreover, the long retention time of PSMA-617 in glands implies internalization, and for disintegrations closely related to the nucleus, an RBE of 5 might present an underestimation. Unfortunately, xerostomia was partially irreversible. Chronic G1 toxicity (coping water) is typically tolerated by most patients but already the need for saliva-substitution sprays and gels is rated a remarkable loss of quality of life by some patients.
Because the preliminary dosimetry modeling contains relevant uncertainties, an empiric dose escalation was necessary to exploit the ideal therapeutic range of 225Ac-PSMA-617. Empiric dose finding is the typical approach for conventional chemotherapy and was also applied in early phase 223Ra trials (29) when safety was evaluated using adverse events, which then were used to define the maximum-tolerated dose. Similar to all early phase dose finding studies, 1 limitation of this report is low patient number and eventually some adverse events might have been observed or missed rather by chance than after robust statistics. However, the good tolerability also of 225Ac-PSMA-617 is well in line with the few adverse events observed under 177Lu-PSMA-617 (30). It is important to note that the patients receiving 50 kBq/kgBW were the most challenging ones from the very start and the low treatment activity was chosen by the responsive physician, for example, due to grade 4 myelosuppression at baseline. On the other hand, the highest treatment activity was offered only to patients with brain or liver metastases, who present the most adverse prognostic factors. Therefore, it is reasonable that in regard to PSA response no dose–response relationship was observed. Thus, it is premature to conclude that the 50 kBq/kgBW dose is completely ineffective. However, the patient collective currently qualified for experimental therapy presents with high tumor burden and aggressive metastasis. Consequently, early onset of positive treatment effects is necessary to ameliorate these challenging patients at all. Once 225Ac-PSMA-617 is investigated for treatment of earlier tumor stages, the efficacy of low-dose regimens should be reevaluated in respect to reduction of side effects.
On the basis of our preliminary data, a treatment activity of 100 kBq/kg administered every 2 mo was found to provide promising response with tolerable side effects (Fig. 4). Evaluation of response rate and duration of tumor control is out of the scope of this study. Nevertheless, when the unfavorable prognostic profile of the patient cohort is taken into account, the observed antitumor activity of 225Ac-PSMA-617 is more than promising.
CONCLUSION
On the basis of our initial clinical experience with advanced patients, a treatment activity of 100 kBq/kg of 225Ac-PSMA-617 is tolerable and presents promising antitumor activity. Repeated treatments in intervals of 8 wk may lead to continuing tumor control. This protocol is now routinely applied for salvage therapy of end-stage mCRPC patients in our clinic. Formal clinical trials in larger patient cohorts are warranted to further investigate the potential of 225Ac-PSMA-617 TAT in a prospective manner.
DISCLOSURE
A patent application for PSMA-617 (regardless of the radiolabeling nuclide) is held by Uwe Haberkorn. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Tissue Bank of the National Center of Tumor Diseases (NCT) for the supply of tissue samples from salivary glands, kidneys, and prostate cancer. We thank Mike Reiss for graphical support.
Footnotes
Published online Apr. 13, 2017.
- © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
REFERENCES
- Received for publication February 13, 2017.
- Accepted for publication April 3, 2017.
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- First-in-Human Phase 0 Study of AB001, a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted 212Pb Radioligand, in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
- 225Ac/89Zr-Labeled N4MU01 Radioimmunoconjugates as Theranostics Against Nectin-4-Positive Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- Deescalated 225Ac-PSMA-617 Versus 177Lu/225Ac-PSMA-617 Cocktail Therapy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 233 Patients
- [225Ac]Ac/[89Zr]Zr-labeled N4MU01 radioimmunoconjugates as theranostics against nectin-4 positive triple negative breast cancer
- Current Status of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted Alpha Radioligand Therapy in Prostate Cancer
- Preclinical Evaluation of a Radiotheranostic Single-Domain Antibody Against Fibroblast Activation Protein {alpha}
- Tandem Isotope Therapy with 225Ac- and 177Lu-PSMA-617 in a Murine Model of Prostate Cancer
- Clinical Translation of Targeted {alpha}-Therapy: An Evolution or a Revolution?
- Clinical Translation of Targeted {alpha}-Therapy: An Evolution or a Revolution?
- Combined Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy and Immune Checkpoint Blockade: From Preclinical Advances to the Clinic
- mCRPC Patients Receiving 225Ac-PSMA-617 Therapy in the Post-Androgen Deprivation Therapy Setting: Response to Treatment and Survival Analysis
- Effects of 225Ac-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
- Dosimetry in Clinical Radiopharmaceutical Therapy of Cancer: Practicality Versus Perfection in Current Practice
- The Impact of Monosodium Glutamate on 68Ga-PSMA-11 Biodistribution in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Randomized, Controlled Imaging Study
- Darolutamide Potentiates the Antitumor Efficacy of a PSMA-targeted Thorium-227 Conjugate by a Dual Mode of Action in Prostate Cancer Models
- Preclinical Evaluation of 213Bi- and 225Ac-Labeled Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy of Prostate Cancer
- First Clinical Results for PSMA-Targeted {alpha}-Therapy Using 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in Advanced-mCRPC Patients
- PSA-Targeted Alpha-, Beta-, and Positron-Emitting Immunotheranostics in Murine Prostate Cancer Models and Nonhuman Primates
- The Effects of Monosodium Glutamate on PSMA Radiotracer Uptake in Men with Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Intraindividual Imaging Study
- PSA-targeted Alpha-, Beta- and Positron Emitting Immuno-Theranostics in Murine Prostate Cancer Models and Non-Human Primates
- Genetic signature of prostate cancer mouse models resistant to optimized hK2 targeted {alpha}-particle therapy
- JHU-2545 Selectively Shields Salivary Glands and Kidneys during PSMA-Targeted Radiotherapy
- Preclinical Efficacy of a PSMA-Targeted Thorium-227 Conjugate (PSMA-TTC), a Targeted Alpha Therapy for Prostate Cancer
- Theranostics Targeting Fibroblast Activation Protein in the Tumor Stroma: 64Cu- and 225Ac-Labeled FAPI-04 in Pancreatic Cancer Xenograft Mouse Models
- Preclinical Evaluation of 203/212Pb-Labeled Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds for Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy of Prostate Cancer
- Impact of 18F-PSMA-1007 Uptake in Prostate Cancer Using Different Peptide Concentrations: Preclinical PET/CT Study on Mice
- Imaging Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A Anti-STEAP1 Antibody
- Genetic signature of prostate cancer resistant to optimized hK2 targeted alpha-particle therapy
- The Future of Nuclear Medicine as an Independent Specialty
- First Clinicopathologic Evidence of a Non-PSMA-Related Uptake Mechanism for 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Salivary Glands
- Melanocortin 1 Receptor-Targeted {alpha}-Particle Therapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
- Drugs That Modify Cholesterol Metabolism Alter the p38/JNK-Mediated Targeted and Nontargeted Response to Alpha and Auger Radioimmunotherapy
- Phase I Study of CTT1057, an 18F-Labeled Imaging Agent with Phosphoramidate Core Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Prostate Cancer
- A Single Dose of 225Ac-RPS-074 Induces a Complete Tumor Response in an LNCaP Xenograft Model
- Evaluation of 111In-DOTA-5D3, a Surrogate SPECT Imaging Agent for Radioimmunotherapy of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen
- Leveraging Bioorthogonal Click Chemistry to Improve 225Ac-Radioimmunotherapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
- Feasibility of CXCR4-Directed Radioligand Therapy in Advanced Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
- Monosodium Glutamate Reduces 68Ga-PSMA-11 Uptake in Salivary Glands and Kidneys in a Preclinical Prostate Cancer Model
- Detection Threshold and Reproducibility of 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT in a Mouse Model of Prostate Cancer
- Intraindividual Comparison of 99mTc-Methylene Diphosphonate and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand 99mTc-MIP-1427 in Patients with Osseous Metastasized Prostate Cancer
- Effects of Fasting on 18F-DCFPyL Uptake in Prostate Cancer Lesions and Tissues with Known High Physiologic Uptake
- {alpha}-Emitters for Radiotherapy: From Basic Radiochemistry to Clinical Studies--Part 2
- Targeted {alpha}-Therapy of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with 225Ac-PSMA-617: Swimmer-Plot Analysis Suggests Efficacy Regarding Duration of Tumor Control
- PSMA-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy and Salivary Gland Toxicity: Why Does It Matter?
- PET Radiopharmaceuticals: Whats New, Whats Reimbursed, and Whats Next?
- Why Targeting PSMA Is a Game Changer in the Management of Prostate Cancer