|
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
4 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
5 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitaire Catholique Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
6 Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
7 Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: somatostatin somatostatin receptor radionuclide therapy gastroenteropancreatic tumors
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-interferon, however, is seldom successful in terms of CT- or MRI-assessed tumor size reduction (1). A new treatment modality for inoperable or metastasized GEP tumors is the use of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. The majority of GEP tumors possess somatostatin receptors and therefore can be visualized in vivo with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog [111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)0]octreotide (OctreoScan; Mallinckrodt Medical). A logical extension of this tumor visualization in patients therefore is to try to treat these patients with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs.
| STUDIES WITH [111In-DTPA0]OCTREOTIDE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| STUDIES WITH [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]OCTREOTIDE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Otte et al. (4) and Waldherr et al. (5,6) reported on various phase 1 and phase 2 studies in patients with neuroendocrine GEP tumors. In their first reports, with a dose-escalating scheme of 4 treatment sessions up to a cumulative dosage of 6 GBq (160 mCi)/m2 and without renal protection with amino acid infusion for half of the patients, renal insufficiency developed in 4 of 29 patients (Table 2). The overall response rate in GEP tumor patients who were treated either with 6 GBq (160 mCi)/m2 (5) or, in a later study, with 7.4 GBq (200 mCi)/m2 in 4 doses (6), was 24% (Table 1). In a subsequent study, with the same dosage of 7.4 GBq (200 mCi)/m2 administered in 2 sessions, complete remission (CRs) and PRs were found in 33% of 36 patients (Table 1) (7). It should be emphasized, however, that this trial was not a randomized trial comparing 2 dosage schemes.
Chinol et al. (8) described dosimetric and dose-escalating studies with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide with and without the administration of kidney-protective agents. No major acute reactions were observed up to an administered dose of 5.6 GBq (150 mCi) per cycle. Reversible grade 3 hematologic toxicity was found in 43% of patients injected with 5.2 GBq (140 mCi), which was defined as the maximum tolerated dose per cycle. None of the patients developed acute or delayed kidney nephropathy, although follow-up was short. PRs and CRs were reported by the same group for 28% of 87 patients with neuroendocrine tumors (9).
In a more detailed publication, Bodei et al. (10) reported the results of a phase 1 study of 40 patients with somatostatin receptorpositive tumors, of whom 21 had GEP tumors. Cumulative total treatment dosages ranged from 5.9 to 11.1 GBq (from 160 to 300 mCi) given in 2 treatment cycles. Six of 21 patients (29%) had tumor regression (Table 1). The median duration of the response was 9 mo.
Another study with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide was a multicenter phase 1 study performed in Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Brussels, Belgium; and Tampa, Florida, in which 60 patients received escalating doses of up to 14.8 GBq (400 mCi)/m2 in 4 cycles or up to 9.3 GBq (250 mCi)/m2 in a single dose, without the maximum tolerated single dose being reached (11). The cumulative radiation dosage to the kidneys was limited to 27 Gy. All patients received amino acids concomitantly with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide for kidney protection. Three patients had dose-limiting toxicity: 1 had liver toxicity, 1 had grade 4 thrombocytopenia (<25 x 109/L), and 1 had MDS. Four of 54 patients (8%) who received their maximum allowed dose had PRs, and 7 patients (13%) had minor responses (MRs) (25%50% tumor volume reduction) (Table 1). The median time to progression in the 44 patients who had stable disease, MRs, or PRs was 30 mo.
Bushnell et al. (12) reported a favorable clinical response, as determined by a scoring system that included weight, a patient-assessed health score, a Karnofsky performance score, and tumor-related symptoms, for 14 of 21 patients who were treated with a total cumulative dosage of 13.3 GBq (360 mCi) of [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide in 3 treatment cycles.
Despite differences in the protocols used, CRs and PRs in most of the studies with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide were in the same ranges, 10%30%; these ranges were higher than those obtained with [111In-DTPA0]octreotide.
| STUDIES WITH [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]OCTREOTATE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-particleemitting radionuclide 177Lu, was reported to be very successful in terms of tumor regression and animal survival in a rat model (14). Reubi et al. (15) reported a 9-fold increase in the affinity for the subtype 2 somatostatin receptor of [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate compared with [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide and a 6- to 7-fold increase in affinity in a similar comparison of their yttrium-loaded counterparts. In a comparison in patients, it was found that the uptake of radioactivity, expressed as a percentage of the dose of [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate injected, was comparable to that after [111In-DTPA0]octreotide injection in the kidneys, spleen, and liver but was 3- to 4-fold higher in 4 of 5 tumors (Fig. 1) (16). Therefore, [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate potentially represents an important improvement because of the higher absorbed doses that can be achieved for most tumors with about equal doses to potentially dose-limiting organs and because of the lower tissue penetration range of 177Lu than of 90Y, a feature that may be especially important for small tumors.
|
The effects of the therapy on tumor size could be evaluated for 34 patients. At 3 mo after the final administration, CR was found in 1 patient (3%), PRs were found in 12 patients (35%), stable disease was found in 14 patients (41%), and PD was found in 7 patients (21%), including 3 patients who died during the treatment period. The side effects of therapy with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate were few and mostly transient, with mild bone marrow suppression being the most common finding.
In a more recent update of this treatment in 76 patients with GEP tumors (18), CR was found in 1 patient (1%), PRs were found in 22 patients (29%), MRs were found in 9 patients (12%), stable disease was found in 30 patients (40%), and PD was found in 14 patients (18%) (Table 1). Six of 32 patients who had initially stable disease or tumor regression after therapy and who were also evaluated after 12 mo (mean from the start of therapy, 18 mo) had PD; in the other 26 patients, the tumor response was unchanged. The median time to progression was not reached at 25 mo from the start of therapy. Serious side effects in the entire group of patients who had been treated or who were being treated up to that time consisted of MDS in a patient who had had chemotherapy with alkylating agents 2 y before study entry and renal insufficiency in another patient who had had unexplained rises in serum creatinine concentrations in the year preceding the start of therapy and who had a urinary creatinine clearance of 41 mL/min at study entry.
Tumor regression was positively correlated with a high level of uptake on OctreoScan imaging, a limited hepatic tumor mass, and a high Karnofsky performance score.
| COMPARISON OF VARIOUS TREATMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This situation can be illustrated with 3 examples. In the combined data from 2 studies by Waldherr et al. (5,6) with 4 cycles of [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide treatment, the tumor response rate (CRs and PRs) was 24%. In their report on 33 patients to whom they administered 2 cycles of treatment, the response rate was 33% (Table 1) (7). In their first series of patients, 30 of 74 had either intestinal or bronchial carcinoids, which showed a response rate of 10%, whereas the other patients had either endocrine pancreatic tumors or neuroendocrine tumors of unknown origin, which regressed after therapy in 34%. In their second series, the response rates for endocrine pancreatic tumors and neuroendocrine tumors of unknown origin were the same (10/29 patients, or 34%), but because only 4 patients with carcinoids were included, the results seemed much more promising (Table 3). In a series of patients treated with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate, the response rate reported for the first group of 34 patients was 38% (17); in a later update with 76 patients, the response rate fell to 30% (18). Much of this change can be accounted for by the fact that in the first report, 3 gastrinoma patients (9% of total) who all had PRs were included, whereas in the later update, 5 gastrinoma patients (7% of total) who had PRs were included. Also, the relatively high percentage of tumor regression reported by the Milan group (G. Paganelli, written communication, April 2004) can be explained mainly by the large number of patients with endocrine pancreatic tumors whom they treated (Table 3). Other factors that may have contributed to the different results that were found in trials with the same compounds at various centers include differences in tumor response criteria and centralized versus decentralized follow-up CT scoring. Therefore, to establish which treatment scheme and which radiolabeled somatostatin analog or combination of analogs is optimal, randomized trials are needed.
|
| OPTIONS FOR IMPROVING PRRT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to combinations of analogs labeled with various radionuclides, future directions for improving this type of therapy should include efforts to upregulate somatostatin receptor expression on tumors as well as studies of the effects of the use of radiosensitizers.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
For correspondence or reprints contact: Dik J. Kwekkeboom, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Hospital Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E-mail: d.j.kwekkeboom{at}erasmusmc.nl
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J Kwekkeboom, B. L Kam, M. van Essen, J. J M Teunissen, C. H J van Eijck, R. Valkema, M. de Jong, W. W de Herder, and E. P Krenning Somatostatin receptor-based imaging and therapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors Endocr. Relat. Cancer, January 29, 2010; 17(1): R53 - R73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kayani, B. G. Conry, A. M. Groves, T. Win, J. Dickson, M. Caplin, and J. B. Bomanji A Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2009; 50(12): 1927 - 1932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Andersson, C. Sward, G. Stenman, H. Ahlman, and O. Nilsson High-resolution genomic profiling reveals gain of chromosome 14 as a predictor of poor outcome in ileal carcinoids Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2009; 16(3): 953 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Mankoff, J. M. Link, H. M. Linden, L. Sundararajan, and K. A. Krohn Tumor Receptor Imaging J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 149S - 163S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Khanna, D. Bushnell, and M. S. O'Dorisio Utility of Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Analogues for Staging/Restaging and Treatment of Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Pediatric Tumors Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(4): 382 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. G. Oyen, L. Bodei, F. Giammarile, H. R. Maecke, J. Tennvall, M. Luster, and B. Brans Targeted therapy in nuclear medicine current status and future prospects Ann. Onc., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 1782 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cremonesi, M. Ferrari, L. Bodei, G. Tosi, and G. Paganelli Dosimetry in Peptide Radionuclide Receptor Therapy: A Review J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1467 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Vegt, J. F.M. Wetzels, F. G.M. Russel, R. Masereeuw, O. C. Boerman, J. E. van Eerd, F. H.M. Corstens, and W. J.G. Oyen Renal Uptake of Radiolabeled Octreotide in Human Subjects Is Efficiently Inhibited by Succinylated Gelatin J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 432 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G A Kaltsas, D Papadogias, P Makras, and A B Grossman Treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2005; 12(4): 683 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Valkema, S. A. Pauwels, L. K. Kvols, D. J. Kwekkeboom, F. Jamar, M. de Jong, R. Barone, S. Walrand, P. P.M. Kooij, W. H. Bakker, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Renal Function After Peptide Receptor Radiation Therapy with 90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3-Octreotide and 177Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3-Octreotate J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1_suppl): 83S - 91S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Barone, F. Borson-Chazot, R. Valkema, S. Walrand, F. Chauvin, L. Gogou, L. K. Kvols, E. P. Krenning, F. Jamar, and S. Pauwels Patient-Specific Dosimetry in Predicting Renal Toxicity with 90Y-DOTATOC: Relevance of Kidney Volume and Dose Rate in Finding a Dose-Effect Relationship J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1_suppl): 99S - 106S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |