|
|
|||||||||
Clinical Investigations |
1 Division of Nuclear Medicine, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
2 Division of Body CT, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: 18F-FDG PET/CT supraclavicular area lymph nodes brown fat muscle
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18F-FDG PET is well suited to the evaluation of malignant involvement in the supraclavicular region. The typical appearance of a malignant lymph node on 18F-FDG PET images is a round focus of intense metabolic activity that can be single, multiple, or bilateral and is sometimes accompanied by other distant abnormal foci of uptake. Nonpathologic supraclavicular uptake is well known and often attributed to muscle uptake. Muscle uptake of 18F-FDG is a well-known cause of findings on PET imaging (1,2) and is a potential cause of false-positive findings on images of patients with cancer (3,4). Uptake can affect virtually all muscles. It is increased by increased endogenous or exogenous insulin, recent muscle activity (voluntary or not), and clinical orthopedic conditions. Segregating pathologic from normal variant 18F-FDG uptake can sometimes be challenging (5). The use of muscle relaxants and sedatives such as diazepam has been proposed to reduce such uptake. However, in some patients imaged with PET/CT, we observed that 18F-FDG activity in the supraclavicular area did not have a corresponding soft-tissue mass or lymph node or muscle uptake on the CT scan.
The recent introduction of PET/CT scanners (6), combining both PET and CT scanning devices, offers a unique opportunity to evaluate how patterns of 18F-FDG uptake in the supraclavicular region relate to CT findings.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CT Scanning
The CT portion of the Discovery LS scanner consists of a multidetector helical CT scanner (LightSpeed Plus; General Electric Medical Systems). The parameters for CT for a typical 5-bed-position acquisition were as follows: 140 kV, 80 mA, 0.8 s per CT rotation, a pitch of 6, a table speed of 22.5 mm/s, a 722.5-mm coverage, a 31.9-s acquisition time, and positioning of patients with their arms at their sides. The CT acquisition was done before the emission acquisition. Images were acquired with the patients positioned the same as for the emission scan by adjusting the table in linear increments. CT data were resized from a 512 x 512 matrix to a 128 x 128 matrix and were smoothed to match the PET data so that the images could be fused and the CT transmission map generated.
68Ge Transmission Scanning
68Ge transmissions scans were used to generate a transmission map. The transmission time for each bed position was 3 min. A segmented attenuation map was then generated. Emission PET images corrected with maps from 68Ge transmission scans were available for 250 patients.
PET Scanning
Emission data was acquired for 57 bed positions, typically from the base of the skull through the mid thigh. For patients referred because of melanoma, 2 sets of emission data were acquired, one from the vertex of the head through the mid thigh and another from the mid thigh to the toes. Emission data were acquired for 5 min at each bed position. Each bed had 35 scanning planes, with a 14.6-cm longitudinal field of view and a 1-slice overlap. PET images were reconstructed using CT for attenuation correction with the OSEM algorithm (2 iterations, 28 subsets) and an 8-mm gaussian filter using a 128 x 128 matrix.
Image Analysis
All PET scans were reviewed retrospectively by a single observer who was aware of the clinical data and the findings of other anatomic imaging modalities. All PET images were analyzed on an interactive computer display using commercial fusion software (eNTEGRA; ELGEMS, Haifa, Israel), which allowed review of PET, CT, and fused-image data.
PET images were first assessed visually, using transaxial, sagittal, and coronal displays, for any obviously abnormal foci of increased 18F-FDG uptake in the supraclavicular region. The intensity of uptake relative to the mediastinal blood pool was classified using 4 grades: 0 = no uptake, 1+ = faint uptake, 2+ = moderate uptake, and 3+ = intense uptake. Abnormal uptake was defined as any focus of increased uptake that was clearly grade 1+ or greater. With the fusion software, abnormal-uptake foci of grade 1+ or greater were classified according to their anatomic correlation using 3 patterns: A = uptake with no corresponding abnormal lymph nodes or soft-tissue mass on CT, B = muscle uptake, and C = abnormal uptake in lymph nodes or a soft-tissue mass. Uptake was also classified according to its appearance: focal or linear; unilateral or bilateral.
For each abnormal supraclavicular region, 18F-FDG uptake was evaluated semiquantitatively for the most 18F-FDG-avid abnormal focus using standardized uptake value, lean (SUVL), which represents decay-corrected tissue activity divided by the injected dose per patient lean body weight (as described previously (7)). SUVL was calculated from regions of interest (ROIs) that were placed manually on the maximal area (14-pixel circular area) of 18F-FDG uptake in the focus. Partial-volume effects were not systematically corrected. The maximal pixel value and average ROI value were obtained. The CT-measured density at the maximum focus of 18F-FDG uptake was obtained in Hounsfield units (HU) using the ROI drawn on the PET image superimposed on the CT image.
The CT scans of patients with abnormal supraclavicular uptake were carefully reviewed by an experienced radiologist. The review, limited to both supraclavicular regions, assessed for the presence of lymph nodes on the CT scan. Afterward, both the nuclear medicine physician and the radiologist identified the CT findings corresponding to the 18F-FDG activity (lymph node or soft-tissue mass; muscle or fat) and reached a consensus on the location of 18F-FDG uptake based on PET/CT.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. The unpaired t test was used to compare uptake intensity, standardized uptake value, age, and body mass index for the 3 patterns of uptake. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
All patients but 1 had known cancer. One patient had lung nodules that were most likely benign. Maximum SUVL (SUVL MAX) of the USA-fat was 7.1 ± 4 (range, 2.0817.35), and mean SUVL (SUVL MEAN) was 4.8 ± 3 (range, 1.4312.44). Review of the CT portion of the PET/CT scan showed no supraclavicular lymphadenopathy in 13 patients. In 1 patient, a small lymph node was noted in the supraclavicular region, without corresponding increased 18F-FDG activity. In all 14 patients, PET supraclavicular activity clearly localized into fatty tissue. In 10 of the 14 patients, PET showed active metabolic lesions suggestive of active cancer in other locations.
Follow-up, albeit of limited duration, was available for USA-fat patients. No pathologic involvement of the supraclavicular region was clinically demonstrated. Of the 10 patients who were followed up, 9 had positive PET findings elsewhere in the body. Six of these 9 patients underwent chemotherapy, 1 underwent surgery and was scheduled to receive chemotherapy, 1 had suspected recurrent ovarian cancer but no cancer revealed by surgery, and 1 had suspected recurrent thyroid cancer but was followed up before additional treatment. Two patients had no active disease during the follow-up. All patients with gynecologic cancers were postmenopausal.
Muscle Uptake (Pattern B)
Twenty patients showed abnormal foci of 18F-FDG uptake corresponding to muscle on the CT scan (Fig. 2). This represents 40.8% of patients with abnormal uptake, or 5.8% of total patients, 15 female and 5 male. Mean age was 54.7 ± 17 y (age range, 1877 y). The mean body mass index of patients with this finding was 23 ± 5. All but 1 patient had a history of cancer. In total, 34 abnormal regions were found. Uptake was typically bilateral (13 symmetric and 1 asymmetric) but was unilateral in 6 cases. Uptake was linear in 14 patients, but with some foci in 6 patients. Uptake was mild or mild to moderate in 8 patients, moderate in 8 patients, and moderate to intense or intense in 4 patients. The intensity of uptake was 1.66 ± 0.5 on a semiquantitative scale. SUVL MAX was 3.1 ± 1 (range, 1.456.17), and SUVL MEAN was 2.1 ± 0.7 (range, 1.033.82). The density of the muscles on CT was 31.9 ± 14 HU.
|
Lymph Nodes or Soft-Tissue Uptake (Pattern C)
Fifteen patients showed abnormal focal 18F-FDG uptake with corresponding lymph nodes on the CT scan (Fig. 3). This represents 30.6% of patients with abnormal uptake, or 4.3% of total patients, 5 female and 10 male. Mean age was 47.8 ± 15 y (age range, 1375 y). The mean body mass index of patients with this finding was 27.2 ± 6. All patients had cancer. In total, 19 abnormal regions were identified. Uptake was unilateral in 11 patients and bilateral in 4 (2 symmetric and 2 asymmetric). The pattern was typically focal (5 single and 10 multiple). Uptake was intense in 12 patients and mild to moderate or moderate to intense in the 3 other patients. The intensity of uptake was 2.82 ± 0.4 on a semiquantitative scale (03).
|
Abnormal pathologic uptake was confirmed in 7 of these patients by histopathology (4 biopsies, 3 surgeries). Two patients had no direct pathologic confirmation of the supraclavicular uptake; however, other positive sites underwent biopsy and revealed metastatic disease. One patient with known metastatic melanoma showed extensive metastatic disease including the supraclavicular area. None of the sites underwent biopsy. Five other patients had no confirmatory biopsy.
Comparison of the 3 Groups
Patient age was not significantly different among the 3 groups of patients (P > 0.05). Body mass index was not significantly different between group A and the 2 other groups (P > 0.05). However, body mass index was different between groups B and C (P = 0.02). The intensity of visual uptake did not allow differentiation between USA-fat and lymph node uptake (P = 0.4), but muscle uptake was significantly lower than USA-fat and lymph node uptake (P < 0.00001). SUVL MAX and SUVL MEAN tended to be higher for lymph nodes than for USA-fat, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05) (Fig. 4). SUVL MAX and SUVL MEAN were significantly lower for muscle than for the 2 other patterns (P < 0.001). The measured CT density of lesions was not significantly different between the muscle and lymph node patterns (P = 0.28) but was significantly different between these 2 patterns and USA-fat (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 5).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PET/CT allowed us to verify that these foci had no corresponding anatomic soft-tissue mass detectable by CT scanning. Rather, the 18F-FDG-avid focus fused to tissues of fat density. The corresponding measured HU were within the reported fat-density range (-150 to -50) (8). It seems improbable that malignant pathologic foci of this intensity and size shown by PET imaging could have no corresponding CT findings. The PET findings could help in recognizing this artifact. The intensity and standardized uptake value were not reliable tools for differentiating among these categories. Muscle uptake was more often linear and mild to moderate in intensity but could be intense, focal, and unilateral. Lymph node uptake was usually round, could be intense, and could be single or multiple. The supraclavicular artifact was more likely to be bilateral and symmetric and usually was intense. The exact etiology of the supraclavicular artifact is unknown. That it is pathologic is highly improbable. No corresponding soft-tissue abnormalities were found in these patients. The CT density corresponding to these foci was that of fat.
Brown-fat benign tumors, "hibernomas," have been reported in the supraclavicular region (9). However, these lesions are infrequent, with fewer than 100 cases reported in the literature. A recent case report showed intense 18F-FDG uptake in a hibernoma (10). A more likely explanation is that this activity is a reflection of an underlying physiologic process. Our hypothesis is that the uptake reflects the metabolic activity of brown fat. Brown fat has the ability to increase its blood flow with norepinephrine stimulation, has extensive ß-adrenergic innervation, and has a high content of mitochondria. In contrast to white fat, which stores energy, the main purpose of brown fat is to produce heat. This heat production is caused by an uncoupling protein, which produces heat in opposition to energy storage with adenosine triphosphate production. This tissue is highly metabolically active. Glucose is not the major energy supply for brown fat. However, glucose use by brown fat increases during cold stimulation (11). Glucose transporter 4 is increased in brown fat after exposure to cold (12). Insulin stimulation in rats can drastically increase glucose use by brown fat (13).
Brown fat is present in hibernating rodents and neonates. The typical site of deposition in rodents is interscapular. The presence of brown fat in adult humans is controversial. However, its having been reported in patients with pheochromocytomas (14,15) is perhaps understandable, since adrenergic stimulation causes thermogenesis in brown fat and its hyperplasia. Brown fat has also been reported in other adults on the basis of both general necropsy studies (16) and necropsy studies of outdoor workers who were exposed to the cold (17), in patients who died from chronic congestive heart failure (18), and in perirenal fat from donors operated on for nonmalignant conditions (19). Brown-fat-deprived mice are genetically prone to obesity. Our study did not show that USA-fat patients were leaner than the 2 other groups of patients. Activation of brown fat has been suggested as an explanation for cancer-induced cachexia (20). A study in rats showed that tumor necrosis factor increased the thermogenic activity of brown adipose tissue by stimulating sympathetic outflow to it (21). However, another study showed that tumor necrosis factor induced insulin resistance in fetal brown adipocytes in culture, decreased insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, but upregulated uncoupling protein gene expression (22). Ten of the 14 patients with USA-fat had active cancer according to PET imaging.
We observed a high female-to-male ratio (6:1) in the USA-fat group. In cold-exposed rats, the increase in glucose use by brown fat was less in adult male rats than in female rats because of the smaller amount of brown fat in older male rats (23). Female rats had an increased mass of brown fat with increasing age, whereas male rats showed a decreased mass (24). Female rats in a postcafeteria period (model of dietary obesity) showed a greater loss of body weight and a higher activation of thermogenic brown fat with increased expression of uncoupling proteins (25). Aged women have been reported to maintain higher rectal temperatures during exposure to cold than have men of similar age (26).
The in vivo demonstration of brown fat using noninvasive methods is difficult. The present study did not conclusively show that the activity seen in the supraclavicular area corresponded to brown fat, but on the basis of CT findings the tracer was clearly present in the fat. Two patients had a possible hyperthyroid state (1 patient with thyroid cancer, who is receiving levothyroxine sodium for suppression of thyroid-stimulating hormone, and 1 patient with Graves disease, who was treated with 131I therapy a few months before PET and is receiving methimazole). Hyperthyroidism is associated with a hyperadrenergic status.
A potential limitation of this study is that the patients were followed up over only the short term to confirm the benignity of the USA-fat. An additional limitation is that the pathologic etiology was not confirmed for all lymph nodes (pattern C). Increased tracer uptake did correspond to the CT observation of abnormal lymph nodes, almost certainly of inflammatory, infectious, or malignant etiology.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
For correspondence or reprints contact: Richard L. Wahl, MD, Division of Nuclear Medicine, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 N. Caroline St., Room 3223, Baltimore, MD 21287-0817.
E-mail: Rwahl{at}jhmi.edu
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Baba, H. A. Jacene, J. M. Engles, H. Honda, and R. L. Wahl CT Hounsfield Units of Brown Adipose Tissue Increase with Activation: Preclinical and Clinical Studies J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2010; 51(2): 246 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Skarulis, F. S. Celi, E. Mueller, M. Zemskova, R. Malek, L. Hugendubler, C. Cochran, J. Solomon, C. Chen, and P. Gorden Thyroid Hormone Induced Brown Adipose Tissue and Amelioration of Diabetes in a Patient with Extreme Insulin Resistance J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2010; 95(1): 256 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K K WONG, N ZARZHEVSKY, J M CAHILL, K A FREY, and A M AVRAM Hybrid SPECT-CT and PET-CT imaging of differentiated thyroid carcinoma Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2009; 82(982): 860 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Paidisetty and T. M. Blodgett Brown Fat: Atypical Locations and Appearances Encountered in PET/CT Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2009; 193(2): 359 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A AGRAWAL, N NAIR, and N S BAGHEL A novel approach for reduction of brown fat uptake on FDG PET Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2009; 82(980): 626 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saito, Y. Okamatsu-Ogura, M. Matsushita, K. Watanabe, T. Yoneshiro, J. Nio-Kobayashi, T. Iwanaga, M. Miyagawa, T. Kameya, K. Nakada, et al. High Incidence of Metabolically Active Brown Adipose Tissue in Healthy Adult Humans: Effects of Cold Exposure and Adiposity Diabetes, July 1, 2009; 58(7): 1526 - 1531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. D. van Marken Lichtenbelt, J. W. Vanhommerig, N. M. Smulders, J. M.A.F.L. Drossaerts, G. J. Kemerink, N. D. Bouvy, P. Schrauwen, and G.J. J. Teule Cold-Activated Brown Adipose Tissue in Healthy Men N. Engl. J. Med., April 9, 2009; 360(15): 1500 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Cypess, S. Lehman, G. Williams, I. Tal, D. Rodman, A. B. Goldfine, F. C. Kuo, E. L. Palmer, Y.-H. Tseng, A. Doria, et al. Identification and Importance of Brown Adipose Tissue in Adult Humans N. Engl. J. Med., April 9, 2009; 360(15): 1509 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goetze, W. C. Lavely, H. A. Ziessman, and R. L. Wahl Visualization of Brown Adipose Tissue with 99mTc-Methoxyisobutylisonitrile on SPECT/CT J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 752 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Williams and G. M. Kolodny Method for Decreasing Uptake of 18F-FDG by Hypermetabolic Brown Adipose Tissue on PET Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1406 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. M. Sung, K. S. Lee, B.-T. Kim, S. Kim, O J. Kwon, J. Y. Choi, and S.-O. Yang Nonpalpable Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes in Lung Cancer Patients: Preoperative Characterization with 18F-FDG PET/CT Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 246 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Metser, E. Miller, H. Lerman, and E. Even-Sapir Benign Nonphysiologic Lesions with Increased 18F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT: Characterization and Incidence Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1203 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Baba, J. M. Engles, D. L. Huso, T. Ishimori, and R. L. Wahl Comparison of Uptake of Multiple Clinical Radiotracers into Brown Adipose Tissue Under Cold-Stimulated and Nonstimulated Conditions J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 1715 - 1723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Thackeray, R. S. Beanlands, and J. N. DaSilva Presence of Specific 11C-meta-Hydroxyephedrine Retention in Heart, Lung, Pancreas, and Brown Adipose Tissue J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 1733 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nedergaard, T. Bengtsson, and B. Cannon Unexpected evidence for active brown adipose tissue in adult humans Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2007; 293(2): E444 - E452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hadi, C. C. Chen, M. Whatley, K. Pacak, and J. A. Carrasquillo Brown Fat Imaging with 18F-6-Fluorodopamine PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and 123I-MIBG SPECT: A Study of Patients Being Evaluated for Pheochromocytoma J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1077 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Blodgett, C. C. Meltzer, and D. W. Townsend PET/CT: Form and Function Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 360 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. L. Kasamon, R. J. Jones, and R. L. Wahl Integrating PET and PET/CT into the Risk-Adapted Therapy of Lymphoma J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 19S - 27S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Jackson, T. C. Schlarman, W. L. Hubble, and M. M. Osman Prevalence and Patterns of Physiologic Muscle Uptake Detected with Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET. J. Nucl. Med. Technol., March 1, 2006; 34(1): 29 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. von Schulthess, H. C. Steinert, and T. F. Hany Integrated PET/CT: Current Applications and Future Directions Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 405 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Kuester, A. J. Fischman, C.-M. Fan, E. F. Halpern, and S. L. Aquino Lipomatous Hypertrophy of the Interatrial Septum: Prevalence and Features on Fusion 18F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/CT Chest, December 1, 2005; 128(6): 3888 - 3893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Abouzied, E. S. Crawford, and H. A. Nabi 18F-FDG Imaging: Pitfalls and Artifacts J. Nucl. Med. Technol., September 1, 2005; 33(3): 145 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Blodgett, M. B. Fukui, C. H. Snyderman, B. F. Branstetter IV, B. M. McCook, D. W. Townsend, and C. C. Meltzer Combined PET-CT in the Head and Neck: Part 1. Physiologic, Altered Physiologic, and Artifactual FDG Uptake RadioGraphics, July 1, 2005; 25(4): 897 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Subhas, P. V. Patel, H. K. Pannu, H. A. Jacene, E. K. Fishman, and R. L. Wahl Imaging of Pelvic Malignancies with In-Line FDG PET-CT: Case Examples and Common Pitfalls of FDG PET RadioGraphics, July 1, 2005; 25(4): 1031 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Blodgett, B. Casagranda, D. W. Townsend, and C. C. Meltzer Issues, Controversies, and Clinical Utility of Combined PET/CT Imaging: What Is the Interpreting Physician Facing? Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5_supp): S138 - S145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kazama, S. C. Faria, V. Varavithya, S. Phongkitkarun, H. Ito, and H. A. Macapinlac FDG PET in the Evaluation of Treatment for Lymphoma: Clinical Usefulness and Pitfalls RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 191 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Groves, H. K. Cheow, T. Win, and K. K. Balan Extensive Skeletal Muscle Uptake of 18F-FDG: Relation to Immunosuppressants? J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2004; 32(4): 206 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Truong, J. J. Erasmus, R. F. Munden, E. M. Marom, B. S. Sabloff, G. W. Gladish, D. A. Podoloff, and H. A. Macapinlac Focal FDG Uptake in Mediastinal Brown Fat Mimicking Malignancy: A Potential Pitfall Resolved on PET/CT Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1127 - 1132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. V. Kavanagh, A. W. Stevenson, M. Y. Chen, and P. B. Clark Nonneoplastic Diseases in the Chest Showing Increased Activity on FDG PET Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1133 - 1141. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Pandit-Taskar, H. Schoder, M. Gonen, S. M. Larson, and H. W. D. Yeung Clinical Significance of Unexplained Abnormal Focal FDG Uptake in the Abdomen During Whole-Body PET Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1143 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Even-Sapir, Y. Parag, H. Lerman, M. Gutman, C. Levine, M. Rabau, A. Figer, and U. Metser Detection of Recurrence in Patients with Rectal Cancer: PET/CT after Abdominoperineal or Anterior Resection Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 815 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kostakoglu, R. Hardoff, R. Mirtcheva, and S. J. Goldsmith PET-CT Fusion Imaging in Differentiating Physiologic from Pathologic FDG Uptake RadioGraphics, September 1, 2004; 24(5): 1411 - 1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Weber Brown Adipose Tissue and Nuclear Medicine Imaging J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1101 - 1103. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tatsumi, J. M. Engles, T. Ishimori, O. Nicely, C. Cohade, and R. L. Wahl Intense 18F-FDG Uptake in Brown Fat Can Be Reduced Pharmacologically J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 1189 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-J. Min, S. Biswal, C. Deroose, and S. S. Gambhir Tetraphenylphosphonium as a Novel Molecular Probe for Imaging Tumors J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 636 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schoder, H. W. D. Yeung, M. Gonen, D. Kraus, and S. M. Larson Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Usefulness and Accuracy of PET/CT Image Fusion Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 65 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C.P. Cobben, B. F.A.M. van der Laan, B. Maas, W. Vaalburg, A. J.H. Suurmeijer, H. J. Hoekstra, P. L. Jager, and P. H. Elsinga 18F-FLT PET for Visualization of Laryngeal Cancer: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2004; 45(2): 226 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schoder, S. M. Larson, and H. W.D. Yeung PET/CT in Oncology: Integration into Clinical Management of Lymphoma, Melanoma, and Gastrointestinal Malignancies J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2004; 45(90010): 72S - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W.D. Yeung, R. K. Grewal, M. Gonen, H. Schoder, and S. M. Larson Patterns of 18F-FDG Uptake in Adipose Tissue and Muscle: A Potential Source of False-Positives for PET J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1789 - 1796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schiepers PET/CT in Colorectal Cancer J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1804 - 1805. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fukuchi, Y. Ono, Y. Nakahata, Y. Okada, K. Hayashida, and Y. Ishida Visualization of Interscapular Brown Adipose Tissue Using 99mTc-Tetrofosmin in Pediatric Patients J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 1582 - 1585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Okuyama, Y. Ushijima, T. Kubota, T. Yoshida, T. Nakai, K. Kobayashi, and T. Nishimura 123I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine Uptake in the Nape of the Neck of Children: Likely Visualization of Brown Adipose Tissue J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 1421 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cohade, K. A. Mourtzikos, and R. L. Wahl "USA-Fat": Prevalence Is Related to Ambient Outdoor Temperature--Evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2003; 44(8): 1267 - 1270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | RSS | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |