HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jnumed.107.039792v1 48/7/1112    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gould, K. L. Articles by Sdringola, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gould, K. L. Articles by Sdringola, S.

Frequent Diagnostic Errors in Cardiac PET/CT Due to Misregistration of CT Attenuation and Emission PET Images: A Definitive Analysis of Causes, Consequences, and Corrections

¹ The Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis, University of Texas Medical School and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas; ² Imaging Physics Department, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas; ³ The Weatherhead PET Center and Division of Cardiology, The Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas; ⁴ Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Northwestern Medical School, Chicago, Illinois; ⁵ Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas; and ⁶ The Weatherhead PET Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: K. Lance Gould, MD, The Weatherhead PET Center, University of Texas Medical School, 6431 Fannin St., Room 4.256MSB, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: K.Lance.Gould{at}uth.tmc.edu

Cardiac PET combined with CT is rapidly expanding despite artifactual defects and false-positive results due to misregistration of PET and CT attenuation correction data—the frequency, cause, and correction of which remain undetermined. Methods: Two hundred fifty-nine consecutive patients underwent diagnostic rest–dipyridamole myocardial perfusion PET/CT using ⁸²Rb, a 16-slice PET/CT scanner, helical CT attenuation correction with breathing and also at end-expiratory breath-hold, and averaged cine CT data during breathing. Misregistration on superimposed PET/CT fusion images was objectively measured in millimeters and correlated with associated quantitative size and severity of PET defects. Misregistration artifacts were defined as PET defects with corresponding misregistration on helical CT-PET fusion images that resolved after correct coregistration using a repeat CT scan, cine CT averaged attenuation during normal breathing, or shifted cine CT data that coregistered with PET data. Results: Misregistration of standard helical CT PET images caused artifactual PET defects in 103 of 259 (40%) patients that were moderate to severe in 59 (23%) (P = 0.0000) and quantitatively normalized on cine or shifted cine CT PET (P = 0.0000). Quantitative misregistration was a powerful predictor of artifact size and severity (P = 0.0000), particularly for transaxial misregistration >6 mm occurring in anterior or lateral areas in 76%, in inferior areas in 16%, and at the apex in 8% of 103 artifactual defects. Conclusion: Misregistration of helical CT attenuation and PET emission images causes artifactual defects with false-positive results in 40% of patients that normalize on cine CT PET using averaged CT attenuation data during normal breathing comparable to normal breathing during PET emission scanning and shifting cine CT images to coregister visually with PET.

Key Words: PET • image registration • heart • attenuation • artifact

COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2007 48: 11a-12a. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. M. Bengel, T. Higuchi, M. S. Javadi, and R. Lautamaki Cardiac positron emission tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1): 1 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Gould Coronary flow reserve and pharmacologic stress perfusion imaging beginnings and evolution. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 664 - 669. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Slomka, L. Le Meunier, S. W. Hayes, W. Acampa, M. Oba, G. G. Haemer, D. S. Berman, and G. Germano Comparison of Myocardial Perfusion 82Rb PET Performed with CT- and Transmission CT-Based Attenuation Correction J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2008; 49(12): 1992 - 1998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Buck, S. Nekolla, S. Ziegler, A. Beer, B. J. Krause, K. Herrmann, K. Scheidhauer, H.-J. Wester, E. J. Rummeny, M. Schwaiger, et al. SPECT/CT J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1305 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Townsend Dual-Modality Imaging: Combining Anatomy and Function J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 938 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, and S. Sdringola Reducing Radiation Dose in Rest-Stress Cardiac PET/CT by Single Poststress Cine CT for Attenuation Correction: Quantitative Validation J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 738 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Gould Not All Randomized Trials Are Equal J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 13, 2007; 50(20): 2013 - 2015. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Gould and T. Pan Reply: Attenuation Correction for Stress and Rest PET 82Rb Myocardial Perfusion Images J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1913 - 1914. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Eisner and R. E. Patterson Attenuation Correction for Stress and Rest PET 82Rb Myocardial Perfusion Images J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1912 - 1913. [Full Text] [PDF]