Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting Report

Assessment of skeletal metastasis in prostate cancer staging: an intra-individual comparison of68Ga-PSMA PET/CT,68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT, and99mTc-MDP bone scan

Ismaheel Lawal, Thomas Ebenhan, Johncy Mahapane, Mariza Vorster, Kgomotso Mokoala, Marian Meckel, Frank Rosch and Machaba Sathekge
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 1256;
Ismaheel Lawal
2Steve Biko Academic Hospital Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI) Pretoria South Africa
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Ebenhan
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
2Steve Biko Academic Hospital Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI) Pretoria South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johncy Mahapane
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariza Vorster
2Steve Biko Academic Hospital Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI) Pretoria South Africa
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kgomotso Mokoala
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marian Meckel
3ITG GmbH Garching Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Rosch
4Institute of Nuclear Chemistry Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz Mainz Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Machaba Sathekge
2Steve Biko Academic Hospital Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI) Pretoria South Africa
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1256

Background: Zoledronate is a bisphosphonate that accumulates at sites of high bone turnover. Radiolabeled Zoledronate has been successfully demonstrated in clinical imaging of skeletal metastasis. 68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has, in recent times, joined 99mTc-MDP bone scan as radionuclide options for the assessment of skeletal metastasis. Bone is a common site of prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis. We aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT, and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in the detection of skeletal metastases in the staging of treatment-naïve men with intermediate- to high-risk PCa.

Methods: Men with newly diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland were prospectively recruited to undergo, within four weeks, imaging with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT, and 99mTc-MDP bone scan for the assessment of skeletal metastasis. Two experienced readers independently performed image analysis. Per patient and per lesion analyses were done and compared between imaging tests. The SUVmax of the most intense lesion was compared between 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT.

Results: Ten men were included with median age, Gleason score and PSA of 68.5 years (Interquartile range, IQR=63 - 74), 8 (IQR=8-9) and 119.29 ng/mL (IQR=25 - 280.58), respectively. On per-patient analysis, skeletal metastasis was detected in all patients on all three imaging tests. On a per lesion analysis, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT identified more lesions (n=213 skeletal metastases) compared with 68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT (n=174 skeletal metastases) and 99mTc-MDP bone scan (n=153 skeletal metastases), p=0.355. The mean SUVmax of the most intense lesion was 20.26 ± 7.56 for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT compared with 14.82 ± 7.93 for 68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT, p=0.227. Conclusion: On a per-patient basis, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT, and 99mTc-MDP bone scan have a comparable performance for the detection of skeletal metastases in men with intermediate- to high-risk PCa. On a per lesion analysis, the seeming better performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in detecting more skeletal metastases than 68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan did not reach statistical significance.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of skeletal metastasis in prostate cancer staging: an intra-individual comparison of68Ga-PSMA PET/CT,68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT, and99mTc-MDP bone scan
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Assessment of skeletal metastasis in prostate cancer staging: an intra-individual comparison of68Ga-PSMA PET/CT,68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT, and99mTc-MDP bone scan
Ismaheel Lawal, Thomas Ebenhan, Johncy Mahapane, Mariza Vorster, Kgomotso Mokoala, Marian Meckel, Frank Rosch, Machaba Sathekge
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 1256;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of skeletal metastasis in prostate cancer staging: an intra-individual comparison of68Ga-PSMA PET/CT,68Ga-NODAGA-Zoledronate PET/CT, and99mTc-MDP bone scan
Ismaheel Lawal, Thomas Ebenhan, Johncy Mahapane, Mariza Vorster, Kgomotso Mokoala, Marian Meckel, Frank Rosch, Machaba Sathekge
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 1256;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
  • Radiolabeled hyaluronic acid (HA) fragments for lymphatic imaging
  • Simplifying and Confirming Ketosis: A Quality Improvement Initiative in Cardiac Sarcoid Assessment
Show more

GU - PSMA PET (Poster Session)

  • 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for response assessment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing tyrosine-kinase and check-point inhibitor therapy - preliminary results
  • Extent of immunohistochemical PSMA-expression in primary prostate cancer shows a high correlation with tumor uptake on 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET.
  • Dynamic 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging of biopsy-proven high-risk primary prostate cancer patients
Show more GU - PSMA PET (Poster Session)

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire