Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting Report

Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging

James Case, Staci Courter, Paul Case, Brett Sperry, Eric Burgett and Timothy Bateman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242494;
James Case
1CVIT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Staci Courter
1CVIT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Case
2Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brett Sperry
3Saint-Lukes Health System, Mid America Heart Institute
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Burgett
4Saint Luke's Hospital-Kansas City
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy Bateman
3Saint-Lukes Health System, Mid America Heart Institute
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

242494

Introduction: Availability of highly efficient digital PET/CT systems have led to faster imaging Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET/CT protocols and lower patient radiation dosages. Though there are several advantages to these rapid protocols, shorten9ng the time between the rest and stress dosages may introduce contamination stress dynamic study with counts from the resting dosage. Because of the lower extraction fraction at high flow rates, this small contribution of counts from the resting study can have a disproportionate effect on the blood flow calculation. We tested a methodology for measuring the impact of rest dosage that is present in the stress blood flow study and performed a correction of the stress blood flow study. We then examined the impact of these corrections on stress myocardial blood flow and blood flow reserve.

Methods: A group of 25 consecutive clinical patients (n(male)=12) were imaged using a Siemens Vision 450 digital PET/CT. Patient were first imaged using a low-dose CT for attenuation correction followed immediately by an injection of 25 mCi of Rb-82. Patients were then imaged in list mode for 7 minutes. Patients were then immediately stressed and injected at the peak of stress with a second dose of 25 mCi of Rb-82 followed by an additional 7 minutes of PET imaging. Following PET imaging, patients received a low dose stress CT for attenuation correction. Data was rebinned into dynamic (8 x 12 secs, 2 x 27 secs), summed (90 second post injection delay) and gated data (8 time gates). Data were reconstructed using time-of-flight reconstruction. Myocardial blood flow and rest spillover correction was performed using the ImagenQ software package (CVIT, Kansas City, MO). This blood flow package uses a net retention model for blood flow calculation. This spillover correction uses a first frame measurement of the residual activity and applies that activity measurement to correct later uptake frames for rest residual resting dosage.

Results: The average time between the start of the rest scan and start of the stress scan was 577±32 seconds. This corresponds to an average decay factor of 0.0052±0.0013. Measurements of the residual dose at the start of stress imaging were 1.1±0.7% of the activity in the myocardium at 136 seconds into imaging (mean of the uptake frame used in the retention model).

Conclusions: This simple initial activity spillover correction technique can be employed to remove the influence of rest spillover activity for the calculation of blood flow in highly efficient digital PET. Because the rest spillover correction only needs to be applied on the final frame, this initial activity spillover correction is robust when using the retention model. Furthermore, though the effect of spillover in Rb-82 imaging is relatively low, quantitative studies using longer lived radionuclides like F18 flurpiridaz and Tc-99m SPECT tracers may benefit from this initial activity spillover correction.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
James Case, Staci Courter, Paul Case, Brett Sperry, Eric Burgett, Timothy Bateman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242494;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
James Case, Staci Courter, Paul Case, Brett Sperry, Eric Burgett, Timothy Bateman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242494;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Manual and Computer-Generated Methods for Segmentation of the Aorta in Lymphoma Patients from PET/CT Imaging
  • Radiolabeled hyaluronic acid (HA) fragments for lymphatic imaging
Show more

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire