Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleMethodology

Optimum Scanning Protocol for FDG-PET Evaluation of Pulmonary Malignancy

Val J. Lowe, David M. DeLong, John M. Hoffman and R. Edward Coleman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 1995, 36 (5) 883-887;
Val J. Lowe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. DeLong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Hoffman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Edward Coleman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
PDF extract preview

This is a PDF-only article. The first page of the PDF of this article appears above.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 36, Issue 5
May 1, 1995
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optimum Scanning Protocol for FDG-PET Evaluation of Pulmonary Malignancy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Optimum Scanning Protocol for FDG-PET Evaluation of Pulmonary Malignancy
Val J. Lowe, David M. DeLong, John M. Hoffman, R. Edward Coleman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 1995, 36 (5) 883-887;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Optimum Scanning Protocol for FDG-PET Evaluation of Pulmonary Malignancy
Val J. Lowe, David M. DeLong, John M. Hoffman, R. Edward Coleman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 1995, 36 (5) 883-887;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Performance of Digital PET Compared with High-Resolution Conventional PET in Patients with Cancer
  • Development of a SPECT Tracer to Image c-Met Expression in a Xenograft Model of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Optimizing 18F-FDG Uptake Time Before Imaging Improves the Accuracy of PET/CT in Liver Lesions
  • Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments
  • Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a Multicenter Phase I Study of Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies
  • Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis
  • Evaluation of Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET for Staging in Patients with Lung Cancer
  • Consensus Recommendations for the Use of 18F-FDG PET as an Indicator of Therapeutic Response in Patients in National Cancer Institute Trials
  • Respiratory Gating for 3-Dimensional PET of the Thorax: Feasibility and Initial Results
  • Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules
  • Current role of positron emission tomography in thoracic oncology
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A “Hybrid” Method for Measuring Myocardial Wall Thickening from Gated PET/SPECT Images
  • No-Carrier-Added Iodine-131-FIBG: Evaluation of an MIBG Analog
  • Weighted Summation of Oxygen-15-Water PET Data to Increase Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Activation Studies
Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire