Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation
Open Access

[18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04–Directed Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Patients with High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Kerstin Michalski, Aleksander Kosmala, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Marieke Heinrich, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Andreas K. Buck, Alexander Meining, Rudolf A. Werner and Alexander Weich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2024, jnumed.124.268288; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268288
Kerstin Michalski
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aleksander Kosmala
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp E. Hartrampf
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
2NET-Zentrum Würzburg, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marieke Heinrich
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian E. Serfling
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wiebke Schlötelburg
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas K. Buck
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Meining
2NET-Zentrum Würzburg, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
3Department of Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rudolf A. Werner
2NET-Zentrum Würzburg, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; and
5Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Weich
2NET-Zentrum Würzburg, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
3Department of Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Maximum-intensity projection (MIP), CT, PET, and fused images of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT of patient 2. Images show concordant high uptake in multiple lymph node metastases and advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. In addition, [18F]FDG PET shows osseous metastases not seen on [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET (arrows). Time difference between scans was 1 d.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS of patients with (n = 9, red line) or without (n = 11, blue line) discordant FDG+/FAPI− lesions. Patients with discordant lesions showed significantly shorter median PFS (4 mo) than patients without (9 mo, P = 0.0063).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Patient Characteristics

    Patient no.Age (y)SexPrimary tumorHistologyKi-67 (%)IndicationPrevious therapyTherapy until progression
    159FColonMiNEN80Primary staging—Carboplatin/etoposide
    263FColonMiNEN>85Primary staging—Carboplatin/etoposide
    369MCUPNEC>80Primary staging—Radiotherapy (bone metastasis)
    481MCUPNEC>80Primary staging—Carboplatin/etoposide/atezolizumab
    556MPancreasG370RestagingCisplatin/etoposideOctreotide, PRRT
    638FPancreasG360Primary staging—Octreotide, PRRT
    775FSmall intestineG320RestagingSurgery, TACE, everolimusTemozolomide/capecitabine
    857MCUPNECUnknownPrimary staging—Carboplatin/etoposide
    942MPancreasG340Primary staging—Streptozocin/5-fluorouracil
    1053MStomachMiNEN90RestagingCisplatin/etoposideSurgery, cisplatin/etoposide
    1149FBreastNEC90Primary staging—Surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy
    1264MBladderNEC90Primary staging—Carboplatin/etoposide
    1366FCUPNEC70Primary staging—Carboplatin/etoposide
    1460FColonMiNEN90Primary staging—Carboplatin/etoposide
    1559MPancreasNEC14RestagingOctreotide, PRRT, TACE, FOLFOXCarboplatin/etoposide
    1653MPancreasG340RestagingOctreotide, streptozocin/ 5-fluorouracil, temozolomide/capecitabineOctreotide, PRRT
    1768MStomachNEC90Primary staging—Carboplatin/etoposide
    1868MPancreasMiNEN80Primary staging—FOLFIRINOX
    1967FCUPNEC70Primary staging—Surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy, carboplatin/etoposide/atezolizumab
    2058FColonMiNEN75RestagingCisplatin/etoposideCisplatin/etoposide
    • CUP = cancer of unknown primary; PRRT = peptide receptor radionuclide therapy; TACE = transarterial chemoembolization; FOLFOX = folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin; FOLFIRINOX = folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Univariate Analysis

    ParameterHazard ratio95% CIP
    [18F]FDG TV (per 10 cm3)1.0241.007–1.0460.0204
    [18F]FDG TLU (per 10 cm3)1.0041.001–1.0070.0135
    [18F]FDG SUVmean1.1140.9721–1.2620.0961
    [18F]FDG SUVmax1.0630.9799–1.1450.1190
    [18F]FDG SUVpeak1.1000.9644–1.2480.1419
    [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 TV (per 10 cm3)1.0321.001–1.0620.0277
    [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 TLU (per 10 cm3)1.0011.002–1.0030.5262
    [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 SUVmean1.0280.9040–1.1530.6463
    [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 SUVmax1.0200.9579–1.0810.5101
    [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 SUVpeak1.0150.9278–1.0930.7173
    FDG+/FAPI− lesions5.6731.619–26.160.0110
    Histology (G3 NET, NEC, MiNEN)1.3860.7465–2.6090.2977
    Age (y)1.0571.003–1.1210.0477

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
[18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04–Directed Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Patients with High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
[18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04–Directed Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Patients with High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Kerstin Michalski, Aleksander Kosmala, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Marieke Heinrich, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Andreas K. Buck, Alexander Meining, Rudolf A. Werner, Alexander Weich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2024, jnumed.124.268288; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268288

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
[18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04–Directed Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Patients with High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Kerstin Michalski, Aleksander Kosmala, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Marieke Heinrich, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Andreas K. Buck, Alexander Meining, Rudolf A. Werner, Alexander Weich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2024, jnumed.124.268288; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268288
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Erratum
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 177Lu-PSMA-617 Consolidation Therapy After Docetaxel in Patients with Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial
  • Transarterial Radioembolization in the TACOME Trial: Dosimetric Analysis and Clinical Features in Predicting Response and Overall Survival
  • Retreatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients with 223Ra Therapy in Daily Practice
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • dual-tracer PET/CT
  • FAPI and FDG
  • discordant lesions
  • neuroendocrine neoplasms
  • outcome prediction
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire