Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherState-of-the-Art (Invitation Only)

Nuclear Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: Best Practices for Evaluation (the RELAINCE guidelines)

Abhinav K. Jha, Tyler J. Bradshaw, Irène Buvat, Mathieu Hatt, Prabhat KC, Chi Liu, Nancy F. Obuchowski, Babak Saboury, Piotr J. Slomka, John J. Sunderland, Richard L. Wahl, Zitong Yu, Sven Zuehlsdorff, Arman Rahmim and Ronald Boellaard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, jnumed.121.263239; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.263239
Abhinav K. Jha
1 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tyler J. Bradshaw
2 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irène Buvat
3 LITO, Institut Curie, Université PSL, U1288 Inserm;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mathieu Hatt
4 LaTiM, INSERM, UMR 1101, Univ Brest;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prabhat KC
5 Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chi Liu
6 Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nancy F. Obuchowski
7 Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Babak Saboury
8 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Piotr J. Slomka
9 Department of Imaging, Medicine, and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John J. Sunderland
10 Departments of Radiology and Physics, University of Iowa;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Wahl
1 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zitong Yu
11 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven Zuehlsdorff
12 Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Hoffman Estates;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arman Rahmim
13 Departments of Radiology and Physics, University of British Columbia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Boellaard
14 Dept of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

An important need exists for strategies to perform rigorous objective clinical-task-based evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for nuclear medicine. To address this need, we propose a four-class framework to evaluate AI algorithms for promise, technical task-specific efficacy, clinical decision making, and post-deployment efficacy. We provide best practices to evaluate AI algorithms for each of these classes. Each class of evaluation yields a claim that provides a descriptive performance of the AI algorithm. Key best practices are tabulated as the RELAINCE (Recommendations for EvaLuation of AI for NuClear medicinE) guidelines. The report was prepared by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging AI taskforce Evaluation team, which consisted of nuclear-medicine physicians, physicists, computational imaging scientists, and representatives from industry and regulatory agencies.

  • Image Processing
  • Image Reconstruction
  • PET
  • Research Methods
  • SPECT
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Clinical task-based evaluation
  • Clinical utility
  • Generalizability
  • Post-deployment monitoring
  • Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nuclear Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: Best Practices for Evaluation (the RELAINCE guidelines)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Nuclear Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: Best Practices for Evaluation (the RELAINCE guidelines)
Abhinav K. Jha, Tyler J. Bradshaw, Irène Buvat, Mathieu Hatt, Prabhat KC, Chi Liu, Nancy F. Obuchowski, Babak Saboury, Piotr J. Slomka, John J. Sunderland, Richard L. Wahl, Zitong Yu, Sven Zuehlsdorff, Arman Rahmim, Ronald Boellaard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, jnumed.121.263239; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263239

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Nuclear Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: Best Practices for Evaluation (the RELAINCE guidelines)
Abhinav K. Jha, Tyler J. Bradshaw, Irène Buvat, Mathieu Hatt, Prabhat KC, Chi Liu, Nancy F. Obuchowski, Babak Saboury, Piotr J. Slomka, John J. Sunderland, Richard L. Wahl, Zitong Yu, Sven Zuehlsdorff, Arman Rahmim, Ronald Boellaard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, jnumed.121.263239; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263239
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Is the Clinical Implementation of In-House Artificial Intelligence-Developed Algorithms Happening?
  • Large Language Models and Large Multimodal Models in Medical Imaging: A Primer for Physicians
  • Navigating the Future of Prostate Cancer Care: AI-Driven Imaging and Theranostics Through the Lens of RELAINCE
  • Is Automatic Tumor Segmentation on Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET Images a Clinical Reality?
  • Need for Objective Task-Based Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms for Quantitative PET: A Study with ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 Multicenter Clinical Trial Data
  • Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Data Collection, Development, and Evaluation
  • Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Deployment and Governance
  • An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence-Based Denoising of Low-Dose 64Cu-DOTATATE PET Imaging in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
  • An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence-Based Denoising of Low-Dose 64Cu-DOTATATE PET Imaging in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
  • Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine: Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities Toward a Trustworthy Ecosystem
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Image Processing
  • Image Reconstruction
  • PET
  • research methods
  • SPECT
  • artificial intelligence
  • Clinical task-based evaluation
  • Clinical utility
  • generalizability
  • Post-deployment monitoring
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire