Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT for Predicting Benefit from Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

Ashwin Singh Parihar, Sofia Vaz, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Niharika Pant, Jan W. Schoones and Gary A. Ulaner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2025, 66 (5) 692-699; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.269163
Ashwin Singh Parihar
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri;
2Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sofia Vaz
3Nuclear Medicine-Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal;
4Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siobhan Sutcliffe
2Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;
5Division of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niharika Pant
6Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan W. Schoones
4Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary A. Ulaner
7Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Irvine, California; and
8Departments of Radiology and Translational Genomics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) PET/CT has been investigated as a potential biomarker to predict response to endocrine therapies in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer. Although previous findings were promising, most had limited statistical significance because of small individual sample sizes. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and metaanalysis of the 18F-FES PET/CT literature to increase our power to evaluate the utility of 18F-FES PET/CT as a biomarker for prediction of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive breast cancer. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE via OVID, Embase, Web of Science, Emcare, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through November 1, 2024, for studies that included patients with ER-positive breast cancer who received an 18F-FES PET/CT at baseline and received subsequent endocrine therapy. For each eligible study, data were extracted using a predesigned data extraction form. Random effects models were used to estimate the likelihood of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy after a positive 18F-FES PET scan, the likelihood of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy after a negative 18F-FES PET scan, and the risk ratio of clinical benefit from endocrine therapy comparing those who were 18F-FES–positive to those who were 18F-FES–negative. Results: From 1,105 database records retrieved, 12 studies were included in the metaanalysis (n = 308 participants with data on 18F-FES PET results and response to endocrine therapy). The likelihood of clinical benefit after a positive 18F-FES PET scan was 66% (95% CI, 51%–79%; I2 = 76.6%; n = 227 participants) and the likelihood after a negative 18F-FES PET scan was 11% (95% CI, 3.5%–22%; I2 = 0.0%; n = 81 participants). The risk ratio of response that compared those who were 18F-FES–positive with those who were 18F-FES–negative was 3.21 (95% CI, 1.96–5.25; I2 = 0.0%; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: 18F-FES PET is a successful biomarker for predicting the likelihood of success of endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive breast cancer. There is strong evidence that patients with 18F-FES–negative disease are unlikely to derive clinical benefit from endocrine therapies, despite the presence of ER-positive disease on pathology. This supports a role for 18F-FES PET in identifying patients for whom endocrine therapy may or may not be an appropriate treatment option.

  • 18F-fluoroestradiol
  • FES
  • PET/CT
  • estrogen
  • estrogen receptor
  • breast cancer
  • endocrine therapy

Footnotes

  • Published online Mar. 13, 2025.

  • © 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT for Predicting Benefit from Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT for Predicting Benefit from Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Ashwin Singh Parihar, Sofia Vaz, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Niharika Pant, Jan W. Schoones, Gary A. Ulaner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2025, 66 (5) 692-699; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.269163

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT for Predicting Benefit from Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Ashwin Singh Parihar, Sofia Vaz, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Niharika Pant, Jan W. Schoones, Gary A. Ulaner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2025, 66 (5) 692-699; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.269163
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 177Lu-PSMA-617 Consolidation Therapy After Docetaxel in Patients with Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial
  • Transarterial Radioembolization in the TACOME Trial: Dosimetric Analysis and Clinical Features in Predicting Response and Overall Survival
  • Retreatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients with 223Ra Therapy in Daily Practice
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-fluoroestradiol
  • FES
  • PET/CT
  • estrogen
  • estrogen receptor
  • breast cancer
  • endocrine therapy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire