Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Clinical Trial Protocol for VIOLET: A Single-Center, Phase I/II Trial Evaluation of Radioligand Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T

James P. Buteau, Louise Kostos, Ramin Alipour, Price Jackson, Lachlan McInstosh, Brittany Emmerson, Mohammad B. Haskali, Jing Xie, Elizabeth Medhurst, Rajeev Ravi, Brian D. Gonzalez, Heidi Fettke, Benjamin Blyth, Luc Furic, Katie Owen, Shahneen Sandhu, Declan G. Murphy, Arun A. Azad and Michael S. Hofman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2024, 65 (8) 1231-1238; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267650
James P. Buteau
1Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise Kostos
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
3Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramin Alipour
1Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Price Jackson
1Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lachlan McInstosh
1Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brittany Emmerson
1Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammad B. Haskali
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
4Radiopharmaceutical Production and Research Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing Xie
5Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Medhurst
1Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rajeev Ravi
6Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian D. Gonzalez
7Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heidi Fettke
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
8Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Blyth
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
8Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luc Furic
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
8Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katie Owen
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
8Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shahneen Sandhu
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
3Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Declan G. Murphy
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
9Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arun A. Azad
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
3Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Hofman
1Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA is an effective class of therapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); however, progression is inevitable. The limited durability of response may be partially explained by the presence of micrometastatic deposits, which are energy-sheltered and receive low absorbed radiation with 177Lu due to the approximately 0.7-mm mean pathlength. 161Tb has abundant emission of Auger and conversion electrons that deposit a higher concentration of radiation over a shorter path, particularly to single tumor cells and micrometastases. 161Tb has shown in vitro and in vivo efficacy superior to that of 177Lu. We aim to demonstrate that [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T will deliver effective radiation to sites of metastatic prostate cancer with an acceptable safety profile. Methods: This single-center, single-arm, phase I/II trial will recruit 30 patients with mCRPC. Key eligibility criteria include a diagnosis of mCRPC with progression after at least one line of taxane chemotherapy (unless medically unsuitable) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitor; prostate-specific membrane antigen–positive disease on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 or [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT (SUVmax ≥ 20); no sites of discordance on [18F]FDG PET/CT; adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of no more than 2, and no prior treatment with another radioisotope. The dose escalation is a 3 + 3 design to establish the safety of 3 prespecified activities of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T (4.4, 5.5, and 7.4 GBq). The maximum tolerated dose will be defined as the highest activity level at which a dose-limiting toxicity occurs in fewer than 2 of 6 participants. The dose expansion will include 24 participants at the maximum tolerated dose. Up to 6 cycles of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T will be administered intravenously every 6 wk, with each subsequent activity reduced by 0.4 GBq. The coprimary objectives are to establish the maximum tolerated dose and safety profile (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T. Secondary objectives include measuring absorbed radiation dose (Gy), evaluating antitumor activity (prostate-specific antigen 50% response rate, radiographic and prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate), and evaluating pain (Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form) and health-related quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Radionuclide Therapy). Conclusion: Enrollment was completed in February 2024. Patients are still receiving [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T.

  • prostate cancer
  • PSMA
  • 161Tb
  • Auger electrons
  • theranostics

Although [177Lu]Lu-PSMA has been established as a safe and effective radiopharmaceutical therapy, enhancing overall survival and quality of life in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), disease progression remains inevitable (1). A likely contributing factor for the limited durability of response is the presence of micrometastatic deposits. Single tumor cells and micrometastases are considered energy-sheltered deposits. They receive vanishingly low absorbed radiation from 177Lu because of the approximately 0.7-mm mean pathlength (range, 0.04–1.8 mm). In comparison, the diameters of circulating tumor cells from prostate cancer patients and cultured prostate cancer cells measure on average 7.97 and 13.38 μm, respectively (2). Although a complete response of macroscopic disease is observed with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA, these small energy-sheltered deposits do not receive lethal radiation and eventually progress.

161Tb has physical properties that indicate it could be superior for medical use to the currently used 177Lu because of its abundant emission of Auger and conversion electrons. These ejected inner orbital electrons deposit their energy over a much shorter distance (nanometers to micrometers), with an order-of-magnitude higher linear energy transfer than β-electrons, resulting in greater cell death (3,4). 161Tb delivers higher radiation doses to single tumor cells and micrometastases than does 177Lu when calculating different scenarios of the radionuclide distribution (5). Several other studies have also supported theoretic dose calculations in favor of 161Tb (6–9). The physical characteristics of 161Tb and 177Lu are otherwise similar (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Decay Characteristics of 177Lu and 161Tb (5)

161Tb has been shown superior to 177Lu in tumor cell killing and growth suppression in vitro and in vivo (10–12), supporting an additional contribution of Auger and conversion electrons. [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 was evaluated in tumor-bearing murine models, and the in vitro properties, pharmacokinetics, and biodistribution profile were similar to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (10). Theoretic dose calculations also confirmed an additive therapeutic effect of 161Tb when comparing both radiopharmaceutical therapies. Whether the promising theoretic and preclinical data will translate into clinical benefit has yet to be determined. We hypothesize that [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T will deliver effective radiation to sites of metastatic prostate cancer with an acceptable safety profile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Design, Study Population, and Objectives

VIOLET is an investigator-initiated and -led, open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase I/II dose-escalation and -expansion study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC. The dose-escalation phase is a traditional 3 + 3 design, with 3 prespecified activity levels. Recruitment will be halted after each cohort of 3 patients is enrolled until the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) have been assessed (Table 2) and the activity for the next cohort of 3 patients has been determined. The DLT assessment period is 6 wk from cycle 1 day 1. Once the maximum tolerated dose or maximum administered dose has been determined, the trial will proceed to the dose-expansion stage. The trial schema is illustrated in Figure 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Definitions of DLTs

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Trial schema.

Patients with mCRPC who have progressed on at least one line of taxane chemotherapy (unless medically unsuitable) and an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor will be eligible for this study. Other key eligibility criteria include prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–positive disease on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 or [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT (SUVmax ≥ 20); no sites of discordance on [18F]FDG PET/CT; adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of no more than 2; and no prior treatment with another radioisotope (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Eligibility Criteria

The phase I primary objectives are to determine maximum tolerated dose, DLTs, and the recommended phase II dose of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC. The phase II primary objective is to evaluate its safety. Secondary and exploratory objectives include estimating the absorbed radiation dose in normal organs and metastases, evaluating antitumor activity (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] response rate, radiographic and PSA progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate), evaluating dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA, and evaluating pain (Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form) and health-related quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Radionuclide Therapy) (Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Study Objectives

The study protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and all participants will provide signed informed consent. The VIOLET trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05521412) and sponsored by the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. The funders of the study had no role in study design or writing of this article.

[161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T Production, Administration, and Posttherapy Dosimetry

PSMA-I&T will be radiolabeled with no-carrier-added 161Tb using the same chelator (DOTAGA) as [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in the onsite hospital radiopharmacy. The production of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T will be automated on the iPHASE MultiSyn radiochemistry module using a kit formulation (Isotopia Molecular Imaging) encompassing labeling buffer and a precursor/stabilizer combination. [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T production and quality control will undergo rigorous process validation leading to a product that meets all prerelease criteria matching or exceeding the Australasian Radiopharmaceutical Network production guidelines. This includes tests for radionuclidic purity, radiochemical purity, and radiochemical identity using high-pressure liquid chromatography and radio–thin-layer chromatography, as well as endotoxin and sterility testing.

[161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T will be administered by slow intravenous injection in an ambulatory treatment setting every 6 wk ± 1 wk, for a maximum of 6 cycles. A minimum of 500 mL of normal saline hydration over 1–2 h is recommended with radiopharmaceutical therapy, unless fluids are contraindicated. In the dose-escalation phase, there are 3 planned activity levels starting at 4.4, 5.5, and 7.4 GBq. The dose-escalation results will determine the activity of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T in the expansion phase. In both phases, the activity of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T will decrease by 0.4 GBq every cycle. All patients will receive androgen deprivation therapy continuously throughout the trial.

The subsequent activities of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T will be reduced by 20% for patients who have the following toxicities from the preceding cycle: dry mouth (grade 2), dry eyes (grade 2), nadir platelet count of less than 100 × 109/L, nadir neutrophil count of less than 1.0 × 109/L, or other significant dose-related toxicities (grade 3 or worse) that are considered both attributable to [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T and activity-related. A maximum of 3 activity reductions per patient is permitted, and there are no reescalations.

Posttherapy SPECT/CT imaging will be performed after each cycle. In the dose-escalation phase, 3-time-point SPECT/CT from vertex to mid thigh will be acquired at 4 h (±2 h), 24 h (±4 h), and 96 h (±24 h) after cycle 1 and optionally thereafter. Acquisitions will be obtained on low-energy high-resolution collimators, using a double energy window peaked at 74 keV with lower scatter limits (13–15). Retention of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T will be estimated from voxel-based time–activity curves based on a multiphase exponential clearance model and convolved using a Geant4 Application for Emission Tomography–derived voxel dose kernel based on decay of 161Tb in International Commission on Radiological Protection soft tissue to yield 3-dimensional absorbed dose maps (16–18).

Assessment of Safety, Efficacy, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

During the treatment phase, patients will have weekly safety reviews and a full blood count performed during cycle 1. Adverse events will be graded and causality assigned according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 at each clinical review. For subsequent cycles, safety reviews and blood tests (full blood count, urea, creatinine, electrolytes, liver function tests, and PSA) will be repeated on day 22 and within 3 d before the next cycle. If the platelet count is less than 50 × 109/L, it will be rechecked 1 wk later and every week thereafter until it is rising. Administration of the next cycle can proceed if pretreatment bloods show a platelet level of at least 75 × 109/L and rising (≥100 × 109/L for cycle 1), a hemoglobin level of at least 80 g/L, and an absolute neutrophil count of at least 1.5 × 109/L. [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T can be delayed for a maximum of 6 wk. Treatment will be withheld during grade 3 or 4 adverse events with the exception of fatigue or lymphocytopenia and not restarted until improvement to grade 0–2 or baseline.

Contrast-enhanced CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, as well as whole-body bone scans, will be performed every 12 wk ± 1 wk from cycle 1 day 1, until radiologic progression. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 or [18F]DCFPyL, and [18F]FDG PET/CT, will be repeated 12 wk ± 1 wk from cycle 1 day 1, and before cycle 3 day 1. Peripheral blood for translational research will be collected immediately before day 1 for cycles 1, 2, and 4 and within 10 d after unequivocal progression.

Three patient-reported outcome measure instruments will be used in this study. The Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form (19) will assess the location and severity of pain; the impact of pain on, or its interference with, daily functions; and the extent of pain relief. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate (20) will assess health-related quality of life in patients with prostate cancer, including physical, functional, emotional, and social well-being, as well as additional concerns specific to prostate cancer. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Radionuclide Therapy is a 15-item questionnaire that has been developed for use with patients receiving radiopharmaceutical therapy and provides information about treatment-specific symptoms. Validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Radionuclide Therapy and determination of the optimal subscales remain ongoing (21).

Statistical Considerations

This study will assess the toxicities associated with [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T, recruiting 30–36 patients. Between 12 and 18 patients will be enrolled in the dose-escalation phase, with the number of enrolled patients dependent on the number of activity levels evaluated and the number of patients at each activity level. An additional 18 patients will be recruited in the dose-expansion phase, with a total of 24 patients treated at the maximum tolerated dose.

For the dose-escalation phase, analysis will focus primarily on adverse events, particularly DLTs. These will be tabulated descriptively for each activity level separately. The probability of observing toxicity in at least one patient is 90% for toxicities with true DLT incidence rates of 4.2% (95% CI, 0.3%–13.4%). The safety analysis will include all patients who received at least one cycle of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T. Safety will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and the maximum toxicity grade per patient of each adverse event will be derived and presented in tabular form. All adverse events will be described overall and separately by activity level. The safety analysis will be reported once for all adverse events regardless of relatedness to treatment and once considering only adverse events related to treatment. The efficacy analysis will be reported for all patients who received at least one cycle of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T. PSA response rate and objective response rate will be described as percentages with 95% CIs using exact methods.

DISCUSSION

Targeting PSMA-expressing prostate cancer cells with 161Tb is a potent alternative to 177Lu. The additional clustered damage from Auger and conversion electrons within micrometastases may improve the durability of the response (Fig. 2). Preclinical data form the strong rationale for in-human investigation of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T. The VIOLET trial will establish the recommended activity and safety profile and provide the preliminary efficacy of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC. The first patient was recruited on October 9, 2022 (Fig. 3). The VIOLET trial is named in honor of Dr. John Violet (22), who passed away unexpectedly in 2020 and had an enduring interest in Auger electron therapy.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

High radiation delivery to micrometastases with [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T Auger and conversion electrons from [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T have high linear energy transfer, delivering more radiation to micrometastases as illustrated in enlarged prostate cancer cell (right). In contrast, β-particles deposit their energy over greater distance (left) and have lower probability of causing lethal damage to micrometastases.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Screening [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and 3-time-point SPECT after cycle 1 of first patient recruited.

Limited use of terbium isotopes in humans has not reported any adverse events. Two studies using 152Tb, a positron emitter, provided important data because 161Tb has identical chemical characteristics and resultant pharmacokinetics. In these first-in-human studies, [152Tb]Tb-DOTATOC was administered to a patient with a metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (23), and [152Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 was administered to a patient with mCRPC (24). When terbium-labeled tracers were compared with their respective 68Ga-labeled tracers, all known metastases were visualized. The imaging procedures had no adverse events noted during or after the infusion. The first-in-human administration using 161Tb reported single-cycle administrations (596 and 1,300 MBq) of [161Tb]Tb-DOTATOC radiopharmaceutical therapy in 2 patients, without adverse events or significant laboratory abnormalities reported (25). After commencement of the VIOLET trial, 2 case reports of patients with mCRPC have described administration of single cycles (6.5 GBq and 5,550 MBq) of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 (26,27). In both case reports, no immediate adverse events were reported. Posttherapy planar imaging and SPECT/CT were performed, without dosimetry calculations. To our knowledge, VIOLET is the first prospective clinical trial assessing [161Tb]Tb-PSMA in patients with mCRPC. A German prospective registry (REALITY; NCT04833517) is assessing various radionuclide therapies, including [161Tb]Tb-PSMA, in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The only other registered clinical trial investigating 161Tb is a Swiss randomized, crossover, prospective, single-center, open-label phase 0 study comparing the dosimetry of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 (Beta plus; NCT05359146) in 16 patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

We expect [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T to be well tolerated, analogous to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA (28). The delivery of radiation is expected to mirror [177Lu]Lu-PSMA to off-target PSMA-expressing tissues including salivary glands, lacrimal glands, duodenum, and kidneys. The additional Auger emission from 161Tb is not expected to cause adverse events because of its subcellular (2–500 nm) pathlength range. Furthermore, 161Tb decays to the stable isotope 161Dy, which would not lead to subsequent radiation. Unbound 161Tb is not expected but would be tightly bound to diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid with renal excretion. [161Tb]Tb-folate and [177Lu]Lu-folate have been compared to assess long-term renal damage in nude mice (29). The additional Auger and conversion electrons at similar activities did not worsen renal damage in this model. In the VIOLET trial population, delayed renal toxicity is not anticipated to be clinically relevant, as patients with mCRPC have a life expectancy in the 15- to 18-mo range after effective radiopharmaceutical therapy (30). The 6-wk DLT period chosen for VIOLET mirrors our definition in other clinical trials evaluating [177Lu]Lu-PSMA. The rationale is that hemotoxicity is expected in this window, as the nadir after 177Lu is less than 30 d. On the basis of the preclinical and clinical data available, we expect a similar nadir for 161Tb and all potential hematologic toxicities to be resolved or improving by the end of the 6-wk period.

The absorbed electron energy fraction per decay dose differs between 161Tb and 177Lu. On the basis of the biodistribution results and Monte Carlo simulations, the absorbed radiation dose from β-emission of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 is approximately 35%–40% higher per decay than that of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (10,31). In the VIOLET trial, the starting activities of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T for each level are 4.4, 5.5, and 7.4 GBq, which are approximately equivalent to 5.9, 7.4, and 10.0 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA, respectively, and do not account for additional radiation from Auger and conversion electrons. Before the TheraP and VISION trials, few dose-escalation studies of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA were performed (32). The activities and cycle schedules were largely empiric based on experience using [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in neuroendocrine tumors and dosimetry safety data from [177Lu]Lu-PSMA. Nevertheless, we took a conservative approach by adopting a dose-escalation design to enable clinical evaluation for adverse effects and performing multiple-time-point posttherapy quantitative SPECT/CT enabling robust calculation of the actual radiation dose delivered to normal organs and tumors. This provides a significant layer of safety oversight that is not possible with conventional drugs. We chose PSMA-I&T as the small-molecule inhibitor to target PSMA, as [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T is considered radioequivalent to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine procedure guidelines for 177Lu-labeled PSMA ligands consider the current available data and do not indicate differences in efficacy between [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T (33) because of equivalent clinical responses and toxicities (34).

The VIOLET trial will generate robust data for appropriate activities of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA in patients with mCRPC. High yields of no-carrier-added 161Tb can be produced for clinical application by neutron irradiation of 160Gd targets, analogous to the production of 177Lu (35,36). Upscaling the production is expected to be feasible, similar to 177Lu production (37). Since the physical properties of 161Tb and 177Lu are similar, no additional radioprotection measures would be required. The question of greatest interest is whether 161Tb will be superior to 177Lu in humans, particularly for killing micrometastases. In similar cohorts of patients with mCRPC treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA, median progression-free survival was 5.1 mo (95% CI, 3.4–5.7 mo) and overall survival was 16.4 mo (95% CI, 13.7–19.4 mo) in TheraP (38), and median radiographic PFS was 8.7 mo and median overall survival was 15.3 mo in VISION (30). This study will provide initial data on PFS and OS with [161Tb]Tb-PSMA but is not designed to enable direct comparison with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA.

CONCLUSION

VIOLET is a phase I/II clinical trial with enrollment completed in February 2024. Patients are still receiving [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T.

DISCLOSURE

This study is funded by the Challenge Award from the Prostate Cancer Foundation through funds from CANICA AS and the Peter MacCallum Foundation. Isotopia is supplying [161Tb]Tb and PSMA-I&T kits as part of a commercialization agreement with the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. James Buteau receives support from a Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award and PhD support through an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Louise Kostos received PhD support through an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Michael Hofman is supported through an NHMRC investigator grant. Shahneen Sandhu is supported through an NHMRC investigator grant. Brian Gonzalez received fees unrelated to this work from Sure Med Compliance and Elly Health. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Is [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T a safe and effective radiopharmaceutical therapy for patients with mCRPC?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: We describe the protocol for the VIOLET trial, an investigator-initiated and -led, open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase I/II dose-escalation and expansion study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T. Recruitment was completed in February 2024.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: The VIOLET trial will generate robust data on the appropriate activity of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA in patients with mCRPC.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The protocol of this study was presented as a poster at the ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, San Francisco, February 16–18, 2023. We thank the participating patients and their families; Annette Van Der Heyden (ProsTIC program manager); Claire Martin and Richelle Linklater (trial coordination with the Parkville Cancer Clinical Trials Unit); Petra Opar (clinical trial project management with the Centre of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials); the cancer imaging nuclear medicine and radiology consultants, technologists, and nurses; and Nicole Ng, Maria Docanto, and Patricia Bukczynska (Cancer Research Division).

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online Jul. 11, 2024.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Violet J,
    2. Sandhu S,
    3. Iravani A,
    4. et al
    . Long-term follow-up and outcomes of retreatment in an expanded 50-patient single-center phase II prospective trial of 177Lu-PSMA-617 theranostics in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:857–865.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Park S,
    2. Ang RR,
    3. Duffy SP,
    4. et al
    . Morphological differences between circulating tumor cells from prostate cancer patients and cultured prostate cancer cells. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85264.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ku A,
    2. Facca VJ,
    3. Cai Z,
    4. Reilly RM
    . Auger electrons for cancer therapy: a review. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2019;4:27.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bolcaen J,
    2. Gizawy MA,
    3. Terry SYA,
    4. et al
    . Marshalling the potential of Auger electron radiopharmaceutical therapy. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:1344–1351.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Alcocer-Ávila ME,
    2. Ferreira A,
    3. Quinto MA,
    4. Morgat C,
    5. Hindié E,
    6. Champion C
    . Radiation doses from 161Tb and 177Lu in single tumour cells and micrometastases. EJNMMI Phys. 2020;7:33.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hindié E,
    2. Zanotti-Fregonara P,
    3. Quinto MA,
    4. Morgat C,
    5. Champion C
    . Dose deposits from 90Y, 177Lu, 111In, and 161Tb in micrometastases of various sizes: implications for radiopharmaceutical therapy. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:759–764.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    1. Uusijärvi H,
    2. Bernhardt P,
    3. Rösch F,
    4. Maecke HR,
    5. Forssell-Aronsson E
    . Electron- and positron-emitting radiolanthanides for therapy: aspects of dosimetry and production. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:807–814.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.
    1. Champion C,
    2. Quinto MA,
    3. Morgat C,
    4. Zanotti-Fregonara P,
    5. Hindié E
    . Comparison between three promising β-emitting radionuclides, 67Cu, 47Sc and 161Tb, with emphasis on doses delivered to minimal residual disease. Theranostics. 2016;6:1611–1618.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bernhardt P,
    2. Svensson J,
    3. Hemmingsson J,
    4. et al
    . Dosimetric analysis of the short-ranged particle emitter 161Tb for radionuclide therapy of metastatic prostate cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:2011.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Müller C,
    2. Umbricht CA,
    3. Gracheva N,
    4. et al
    . Terbium-161 for PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1919–1930.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.
    1. Müller C,
    2. Reber J,
    3. Haller S,
    4. et al
    . Direct in vitro and in vivo comparison of 161Tb and 177Lu using a tumour-targeting folate conjugate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:476–485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Grünberg J,
    2. Lindenblatt D,
    3. Dorrer H,
    4. et al
    . Anti-L1CAM radioimmunotherapy is more effective with the radiolanthanide terbium-161 compared to lutetium-177 in an ovarian cancer model. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1907–1915.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Juget F,
    2. Talip Z,
    3. Buchillier T,
    4. et al
    . Determination of the gamma and X-ray emission intensities of terbium-161. Appl Radiat Isot. 2021;174:109770.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.
    1. Marin I,
    2. Rydèn T,
    3. Van Essen M,
    4. et al
    . Establishment of a clinical SPECT/CT protocol for imaging of 161Tb. EJNMMI Phys. 2020;7:45.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. McIntosh L,
    2. Jackson P,
    3. Emmerson B,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative calibration of Tb-161 SPECT/CT in view of personalised dosimetry assessment studies. EJNMMI Phys. 2024;11:18.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Jackson P,
    2. McIntosh L,
    3. Hofman MS,
    4. Kong G,
    5. Hicks RJ
    . Technical note: rapid multiexponential curve fitting algorithm for voxel-based targeted radionuclide dosimetry. Med Phys. 2020;47:4332–4339.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.
    1. Jackson PA,
    2. Beauregard J-M,
    3. Hofman MS,
    4. Kron T,
    5. Hogg A,
    6. Hicks RJ
    . An automated voxelized dosimetry tool for radionuclide therapy based on serial quantitative SPECT/CT imaging. Med Phys. 2013;40:112503.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Jackson PA,
    2. Hofman MS,
    3. Hicks RJ,
    4. Scalzo M,
    5. Violet J
    . Radiation dosimetry in 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy using a single posttreatment SPECT/CT scan: a novel methodology to generate time- and tissue-specific dose factors. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:1030–1036.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Cleeland CS
    . The Brief Pain Inventory User Guide. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; 2009.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Esper P,
    2. Mo F,
    3. Chodak G,
    4. Sinner M,
    5. Cella D,
    6. Pienta KJ
    . Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument. Urology. 1997;50:920–928.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gudenkauf LM,
    2. Chavez MN,
    3. Maconi ML,
    4. et al
    . Developing a patient-reported outcome measure for radionuclide therapy for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:869–872.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Yamey G
    . John Violet: radiation oncologist and physician scientist who pioneered targeted radionuclide therapy for prostate cancer. BMJ. 2020;371:m4803.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Baum RP,
    2. Singh A,
    3. Benešová M,
    4. et al
    . Clinical evaluation of the radiolanthanide terbium-152: first-in-human PET/CT with 152Tb-DOTATOC. Dalton Trans. 2017;46:14638–14646.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Müller C,
    2. Singh A,
    3. Umbricht CA,
    4. et al
    . Preclinical investigations and first-in-human application of 152Tb-PSMA-617 for PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2019;9:68.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Baum RP,
    2. Singh A,
    3. Kulkarni HR,
    4. et al
    . First-in-humans application of 161Tb: a feasibility study using 161Tb-DOTATOC. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:1391–1397.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Rosar F,
    2. Maus S,
    3. Schaefer-Schuler A,
    4. Burgard C,
    5. Khreish F,
    6. Ezziddin S
    . New horizons in radioligand therapy: 161Tb-PSMA-617 in advanced mCRPC. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48:433–434.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Al-Ibraheem A,
    2. Doudeen RM,
    3. Juaidi D,
    4. Abufara A,
    5. Maus S
    . 161Tb-PSMA radioligand therapy: first-in-humans SPECT/CT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:1322–1323.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hofman MS,
    2. Emmett L,
    3. Sandhu S,
    4. et al
    . [177Lu] Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397:797–804.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Haller S,
    2. Pellegrini G,
    3. Vermeulen C,
    4. et al
    . Contribution of Auger/conversion electrons to renal side effects after radionuclide therapy: preclinical comparison of 161Tb-folate and 177Lu-folate. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6:13.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Sartor O,
    2. de Bono J,
    3. Chi KN,
    4. et al
    . Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1091–1103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Verburg FA,
    2. de Blois E,
    3. Koolen S,
    4. Konijnenberg MW
    . Replacing Lu-177 with Tb-161 in DOTA-TATE and PSMA-617 therapy: potential dosimetric implications for activity selection. EJNMMI Phys. 2023;10:69.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Tagawa ST,
    2. Osborne JR,
    3. Hackett A,
    4. et al
    . Preliminary results of a phase I/II dose-escalation study of fractionated dose 177Lu-PSMA-617 for progressive metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [abstract]. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(suppl 5):v329–v330.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Kratochwil C,
    2. Fendler WP,
    3. Eiber M,
    4. et al
    . EANM procedure guidelines for radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-labelled PSMA-ligands (177Lu-PSMA-RLT). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2536–2544.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Schuchardt C,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Kulkarni HR,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Müller D,
    6. Baum RP
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy using 177Lu-PSMA I&T and 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: comparison of safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:1199–1207.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Gracheva N,
    2. Müller C,
    3. Talip Z,
    4. et al
    . Production and characterization of no-carrier-added 161Tb as an alternative to the clinically-applied 177Lu for radionuclide therapy. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2019;4:12.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Lehenberger S,
    2. Barkhausen C,
    3. Cohrs S,
    4. et al
    . The low-energy β− and electron emitter 161Tb as an alternative to 177Lu for targeted radionuclide therapy. Nucl Med Biol. 2011;38:917–924.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Müller C,
    2. van der Meulen NP,
    3. Schibli R
    . Opportunities and potential challenges of using terbium-161 for targeted radionuclide therapy in clinics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50:3181–3184.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Hofman MS,
    2. Emmett L,
    3. Sandhu S,
    4. et al
    . Overall survival with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): secondary outcomes of a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25:99–107.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication February 21, 2024.
  • Accepted for publication May 28, 2024.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 8
August 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Trial Protocol for VIOLET: A Single-Center, Phase I/II Trial Evaluation of Radioligand Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Clinical Trial Protocol for VIOLET: A Single-Center, Phase I/II Trial Evaluation of Radioligand Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T
James P. Buteau, Louise Kostos, Ramin Alipour, Price Jackson, Lachlan McInstosh, Brittany Emmerson, Mohammad B. Haskali, Jing Xie, Elizabeth Medhurst, Rajeev Ravi, Brian D. Gonzalez, Heidi Fettke, Benjamin Blyth, Luc Furic, Katie Owen, Shahneen Sandhu, Declan G. Murphy, Arun A. Azad, Michael S. Hofman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2024, 65 (8) 1231-1238; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267650

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical Trial Protocol for VIOLET: A Single-Center, Phase I/II Trial Evaluation of Radioligand Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T
James P. Buteau, Louise Kostos, Ramin Alipour, Price Jackson, Lachlan McInstosh, Brittany Emmerson, Mohammad B. Haskali, Jing Xie, Elizabeth Medhurst, Rajeev Ravi, Brian D. Gonzalez, Heidi Fettke, Benjamin Blyth, Luc Furic, Katie Owen, Shahneen Sandhu, Declan G. Murphy, Arun A. Azad, Michael S. Hofman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2024, 65 (8) 1231-1238; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267650
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • PSMA
  • 161Tb
  • Auger electrons
  • theranostics
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire