Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Measurement of Cerebral Perfusion Indices from the Early Phase of [18F]MK6240 Dynamic Tau PET Imaging

Nicolas J. Guehl, Maeva Dhaynaut, Bernard J. Hanseeuw, Sung-Hyun Moon, Cristina Lois, Emma Thibault, Jessie Fanglu Fu, Julie C. Price, Keith A. Johnson, Georges El Fakhri and Marc D. Normandin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2023, 64 (6) 968-975; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265072
Nicolas J. Guehl
1Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maeva Dhaynaut
1Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard J. Hanseeuw
1Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
2Department of Neurology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sung-Hyun Moon
1Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Lois
1Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Thibault
1Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessie Fanglu Fu
3Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie C. Price
3Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith A. Johnson
1Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georges El Fakhri
1Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc D. Normandin
1Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Comparison of direct R1 estimates obtained from SRTM2 and indirect blood-based R1 estimates obtained from 1T2kv model with [18F]MK6240. (A) Correlation plot. Red line represents total-least-square regression, and black line is line of identity. (B) Corresponding Bland–Altman plot showing agreement in R1 estimates between 2 methods. Solid red line represents mean difference, dashed red lines show mean difference ± 1.96 SD, and black line is zero line for reference. Blue dots represent CN subjects, and orange dots represents MCI/AD subjects. Data points are for all subjects, and brain time–activity curves were surveyed using atlases in MNI template space.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Comparison of SRTM2 R1 estimates obtained from [18F]MK6240 and [11C]PiB paired scans. (A and B) Correlation and Bland–Altman plots of R1 estimates for all paired [18F]MK6240 and [11C]PiB scans (49 pairs). (C and D) Correlation and Bland–Altman plots of R1 estimates for paired scans acquired within 15 d (29 pairs). (E and F) Correlation and Bland–Altman plots of R1 estimates for paired scans acquired on same day (18 pairs). In correlation plots (A, C, and E), solid red lines represent total-least-square regressions and black lines are lines of identity. In Bland–Altman plots (B, D, and F), solid red lines represent mean difference, dashed red lines show mean difference ± 1.96 SD, and black lines are zero lines for references. Blue and orange dots represent brain regions corresponding to CN subjects and MCI/AD subjects, respectively. Data points are for all subjects, and brain time–activity curves were surveyed using atlases in MNI template space.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Bar plots showing differences in regional R1 measurements among CN, MCI, and AD groups for analysis performed using FreeSurfer parcellation. (A) Plots with CN, MCI, and AD groups presented separately. (B) Plots presented while grouping MCI and AD groups. Asterisks indicate differences that were statistically significant between groups as assessed from unpaired 2-tailed t test assuming unequal variance and after Bonferroni adjustment (P < 0.0013). Asterisks in A resulted from comparison between CN and AD groups. Asterisk in B resulted from comparison between CN and MCI/AD groups. Error bars represent SD measured within each group.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Parametric maps and corresponding MR structural images in CN subject and AD subject. First row shows magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo as anatomic reference. Second row shows parametric [11C]PiB DVR images as measure of amyloid burden. Third row shows late [18F]MK6240 SUV ratio for images from 90 to 120 min as measure of tau load. Fourth row shows parametric images of R1 computed from [18F]MK6240 dynamic data. Arrows indicate areas of reduced cerebral perfusion and corresponding to high tau load. MPRAGE = magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo; DVR = distribution volume ratio; SUVR = SUV ratio; SUVR90–120 = SUV ratio for images from 90 to 120 min.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Group-average images of [18F]MK6240 R1 in CN, MCI, and AD subjects. Images are presented in MNI template space. Corresponding slices of MNI template are shown for anatomic reference.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Participant Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

    CharacteristicAllCNMCIAD
    Total patients (n)4925177
     HR+18882
     DMI311795
    Arterial blood sampling (n)241482
     HR+10451
     DMI141031
    Age (y)69.3 (11.8)68.7 (12.5)71.5 (11.3)65.6 (9.9)
    Weight (kg)80.5 (18.0)79.5 (19.3)82.0 (17.0)80.0 (16.4)
    Sex (n)
     Male2910136
     Female201541
    MMSE26.7 (3.9)28.8 (1.3)26.4 (2.7)19.9 (4.5)
    MMSE range13–3025–3020–3013–24
    Education (y)16.4 (2.8); 13*16.5 (3.14); 5*16.0 (2.7); 7*17.0 (2.4); 1*
    PiB status (n)
     Positive258107
     Negative241770
    Time between [11C]PiB and [18F]MK6240 scans (d)0–3920–950–3920–200
    • ↵* Number of participants for which information was not available.

    • HR+ = number of participants scanned on ECAT EXACT HR+ scanner; DMI = number of participants scanned on Discovery MI scanner; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination.

    • Data in parentheses are SD.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 6
June 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measurement of Cerebral Perfusion Indices from the Early Phase of [18F]MK6240 Dynamic Tau PET Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Measurement of Cerebral Perfusion Indices from the Early Phase of [18F]MK6240 Dynamic Tau PET Imaging
Nicolas J. Guehl, Maeva Dhaynaut, Bernard J. Hanseeuw, Sung-Hyun Moon, Cristina Lois, Emma Thibault, Jessie Fanglu Fu, Julie C. Price, Keith A. Johnson, Georges El Fakhri, Marc D. Normandin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (6) 968-975; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265072

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Measurement of Cerebral Perfusion Indices from the Early Phase of [18F]MK6240 Dynamic Tau PET Imaging
Nicolas J. Guehl, Maeva Dhaynaut, Bernard J. Hanseeuw, Sung-Hyun Moon, Cristina Lois, Emma Thibault, Jessie Fanglu Fu, Julie C. Price, Keith A. Johnson, Georges El Fakhri, Marc D. Normandin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (6) 968-975; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265072
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • [18F]MK-6240 Radioligand Delivery Indices as Surrogates of Cerebral Perfusion: Bias and Correlation Against [15O]Water
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0
  • Imaging Efficacy of [18F]CTT1057 PET for the Detection of PSMA-Positive Tumors Using Histopathology as Standard of Truth: Results from the GuideView Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study
  • Meeting Upcoming Clinical and Diagnostic Needs in Oncologic Imaging: A Structured Reporting System for Fibroblast-Activation-Protein–Targeted Imaging—FAP-RADS Version 1.0
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • [18F]MK6240
  • PET imaging
  • cerebral perfusion
  • Alzheimer’s disease
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire