Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Prognostic Value of Tumor Volume Assessment on PSMA PET After 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Evaluated by PSMA PET/CT Consensus Statement and RECIP 1.0

Felix Kind, Ann-Christin Eder, Cordula A. Jilg, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Philipp T. Meyer, Juri Ruf and Kerstin Michalski
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2023, 64 (4) 605-610; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264489
Felix Kind
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann-Christin Eder
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;
2Radiopharmaceutical Development, German Cancer Consortium, Freiburg, Germany, and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cordula A. Jilg
3Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp E. Hartrampf
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp T. Meyer
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;
5German Cancer Consortium, Freiburg, Germany, and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juri Ruf
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;
5German Cancer Consortium, Freiburg, Germany, and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerstin Michalski
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Maximum-intensity projections of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (A) and 18F-PSMA-1007 (B) PET scans of patients with metastasized prostate cancer before PSMA RLT. PSMA-positive prostate cancer lesions were delineated semiautomatically and highlighted in blue. Lesion-specific threshold of 50% was used. Intensity-scale bar is SUV.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Kaplan–Meier curves of OS of all patients (n = 70) classified by PSMA PET/CT consensus statement (A) and RECIP 1.0 (B).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Response Assessment According to PSMA PET/CT Consensus Statement (10) and RECIP 1.0

    ResponsePSMA PET/CT consensus statementRECIP 1.0
    PRDecline in tumor volume > 30%No new lesions* and decline in tumor volume > 30%
    SDChange in tumor volume ≤ ±30%Change in tumor volume of −30% to +20%, or ≥1 new  lesion* and decline in tumor volume ≥ 30%, or no  new lesions* and increase in tumor volume ≥ 20%
    PDPolymetastatic prostate cancer: increase  in tumor volume > 30%≥1 new lesion* and increase in tumor volume > 20%
    • ↵* On either PET or CT images

    • SD = stable disease.

    • Lesion and tumor volume assessed on PSMA PET.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Patient Characteristics at Baseline (n = 70)

    CharacteristicAll patients (n = 70)Patients with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (n = 33)Patients with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT (n = 37)P*
    Age (y)73 (53–90)72 (53–88)74 (57–90)0.383
    Time since initial diagnosis (y)9.0 (0.7–26.9)9.4 (0.7–22.2)8.3 (1.2–26.9)0.609
    Prostate-specific antigen (ng/mL)338.3 (0.1–3,129)416.1 (0.1–3,129)269.0 (5.8–2,980)0.348
    Gleason score0.695
     <825 (36)11 (44)14 (56)
     ≥845 (64)22 (49)23 (51)
    Previous treatment†
     Prostatectomy38 (54)22 (66)16 (43)0.059
     Radiotherapy to prostate/prostate bed50 (71)26 (79)24 (6)0.449
     Androgen deprivation therapy70 (100)33 (100)37 (100)0.935
     Abiraterone42 (60)16 (48)26 (70)0.063
     Enzalutamide24 (34)11 (33)13 (35)0.874
     Docetaxel40 (57)18 (54)22 (59)0.678
     Cabazitaxel9 (13)2 (6)7 (19)0.109
     223Ra-dichloride9 (13)8 (24)1 (3)0.007‡
    Sites of metastatic disease†
     Lymph node56 (80)30 (91)26 (70)0.062
     Bone61 (87)30 (9)31 (84)0.374
     Liver2 (3)1 (3)1 (3)0.935
     Lung15 (21)9 (27)6 (16)0.26
     Local recurrence22 (31)9 (27)13 (35)0.479
     Other13 (19)3 (9)10 (27)0.054
    • ↵* Difference between patients with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT according to independent t test or χ2 test.

    • ↵† Multiple namings possible.

    • ↵‡ Statistically significant.

    • Nominal data are presented as number and percentage; continuous data are presented as mean and range.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Comparison of Response According to PSMA PET/CT Consensus Statement (10) and RECIP 1.0

    RECIP 1.0PSMA PET/CT consensus statement
    PRSDPD
    PR11 (16)00
    SD3 (4)15 (21)4 (6)
    PD02 (3)35 (50)
    • SD = stable disease.

    • Data are number of patients, with percentage in parentheses.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 4
April 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Value of Tumor Volume Assessment on PSMA PET After 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Evaluated by PSMA PET/CT Consensus Statement and RECIP 1.0
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Value of Tumor Volume Assessment on PSMA PET After 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Evaluated by PSMA PET/CT Consensus Statement and RECIP 1.0
Felix Kind, Ann-Christin Eder, Cordula A. Jilg, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Philipp T. Meyer, Juri Ruf, Kerstin Michalski
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2023, 64 (4) 605-610; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264489

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prognostic Value of Tumor Volume Assessment on PSMA PET After 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Evaluated by PSMA PET/CT Consensus Statement and RECIP 1.0
Felix Kind, Ann-Christin Eder, Cordula A. Jilg, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Philipp T. Meyer, Juri Ruf, Kerstin Michalski
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2023, 64 (4) 605-610; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264489
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • RECIP 1.0: A Roadmap for Clinical Implementation
  • The Role of PSMA PET Parameters as Biomarkers for Response to PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Prognostic Performance of RECIP 1.0 Based on [18F]PSMA-1007 PET in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • radioligand therapy
  • PSMA PET/CT
  • PSMATV50
  • response assessment
  • RECIP 1.0
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire