Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportRadiopharmaceutical Science, Biology & Dosimetry

Considerations and Options When Renovating Hot Labs

Ed Sims
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 4107;
Ed Sims
1Cleveland Clinic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

4107

Introduction: The purpose of the presentation is to offer considerations and options in the renovation of a hot lab. Many Nuclear Medicine Departments and their hot labs are reaching the 50 year mark. Most have had little change to the hot lab in those 50 years with the exception of possibly a fresh coat of paint. A few have done a bit more. The idea of renovating a hot lab can be very exciting and overwhelming, but knowing where to start and how much money is available or needed for the project are two sizeable obstacles. There are commercial grade hot lab modules with impressive costs that make that option all but unlikely when trying to present a proposal to management of a community (small to larger hospitals) in this day of reduced reimbursement and cost containment. The size of the modules and the square footage of the current hot lab may also make their use prohibitive. Another problem is that many nuclear medicine technologists have only seen one to three hot labs in their career, which leaves them conceptually light when considering such a project. Desiring a renovation and designing a hot lab renovation are two significantly different concepts. Innovative thinking and customization of millwork or other customization options should be considered as part of the standard when designing the hot lab.

Methods: The technologist, management, the architect and contractor needs to objectively realize the available space and the options available to them in that limited area. The architect will need to be educated, in a limited way, of the basic needs of a hot lab and the technologist will need to consider the shielding needs that may have varied over the years based on the radionuclides being utilized in the department currently from what was used in the past and what may be needed in the future. Another realization is that you can use vertical space in your designs and not be locked into a horizontal design. Do not try to under-design for management’s sake. Explain the needs and the long term gains for the extra dollars.

Results: The input of key people, the massaging of the designs and a good working relationship with management, the architect and the contractor can give you the re-designed and functional hot lab you can be proud of and one that will accommodate the needs of the department and the nuclear medicine staff for the next few decades with an improved work flow.

Conclusions: Designing and renovating a hot lab to improve workflow, safety and better use of space will improve the functionality of a highly utilized area of the department. Developing the hot lab design, making clear the details desired with the architect proactively and working closely with the contractor can eliminate the after construction woes.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Considerations and Options When Renovating Hot Labs
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Considerations and Options When Renovating Hot Labs
Ed Sims
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 4107;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Considerations and Options When Renovating Hot Labs
Ed Sims
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 4107;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treating Renal Cell Carcinoma with SIRT
  • Comparison of purification methods for [13N]NH3 production
  • Optimization of astatine(211At) imaging for dosimetry in clinical trial using multidetector cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) SPECT/CT
Show more Radiopharmaceutical Science, Biology & Dosimetry

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire