Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-46 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Evaluation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Exploratory Study

Chetsadaporn Promteangtrong, Dheeratama Siripongsatian, Attapon Jantarato, Anchisa Kunawudhi, Peerapon Kiatkittikul, Sukanya Yaset, Natphimol Boonkawin and Chanisa Chotipanich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (8) 1155-1161; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262831
Chetsadaporn Promteangtrong
National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dheeratama Siripongsatian
National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Attapon Jantarato
National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anchisa Kunawudhi
National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peerapon Kiatkittikul
National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sukanya Yaset
National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natphimol Boonkawin
National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chanisa Chotipanich
National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Flowchart of study design.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    18F-FDG PET/CT (A) and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT (B) images of 69-y-old woman with left oropharyngeal cancer, stage IVA, who underwent PET/CT for initial staging. 18F-FDG PET/CT detected involved lymph nodes on left side at levels IIA and IIB, whereas 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT did not detect level IIB node (arrows). Left IIB node was confirmed as nodal metastasis by anatomic abnormality criteria.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    18F-FDG PET/CT (A) and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT (B) images of 49-y-old woman with nasopharyngeal cancer after concurrent chemoradiation who underwent PET/CT for recurrence detection. 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT showed focal uptake, without corresponding 18F-FDG uptake, in small sclerotic lesion at ninth right lateral rib, which was suspected of being bone metastasis (arrows).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    18F-FDG PET/CT (A) and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT (B) images of 60-y-old man with glottic cancer who underwent PET/CT for recurrence detection. Recurrent tumor avid for 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46 was seen at right side of oropharynx (arrows). MTV was 19.37 cm3. FTV was 33.75 cm3.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Characteristics of Study Patients

    Patient no.Age (y)SexPrimary tumorIndication
    148MTongueRecurrence detection
    265FLipRecurrence detection
    365MPyriform fossaRecurrence detection
    457MTongueRecurrence detection
    565MBase of tongueInitial staging
    657FNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    749FExternal ear canalRecurrence detection
    835FNasal cavityRecurrence detection
    954FNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    1062MNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    1169FOropharynxInitial staging
    1262FTongueInitial staging
    1358MPyriform fossaInitial staging
    1479MTongueRecurrence detection
    1567MPyriform fossaRecurrence detection
    1677MRetromolar trigoneRecurrence detection
    1745FOral mucosaInitial staging
    1851MNasopharynxInitial staging
    1959MNasopharynxInitial staging
    2055MBase of tongueRecurrence detection
    2150MTongueInitial staging
    2232FNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    2360MBase of tongueRecurrence detection
    2460MGlottisRecurrence detection
    2561MPyriform fossaRecurrence detection
    2669MNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    2763MFloor of mouthRecurrence detection
    2862MPyriform fossaInitial staging
    2974MNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    3086MNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    3155MNasopharynxInitial staging
    3249FNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    3353MNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    3447MNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    3523MNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    3642FTongueRecurrence detection
    3746MNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    3832FNasopharynxRecurrence detection
    3951MNasopharynxInitial staging
    4072FTongueInitial staging
    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Comparative 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT Results for Initial Staging

    Patient no.Primary tumorTNMStage
    18F-FDG68Ga-FAPI-4618F-FDG68Ga-FAPI-46
    5Base of tongueT2N2cM0T2N2cM0IVAIVA
    11OropharynxT1N2bM0T1N2bM0IVAIVA
    12TongueT3N2cM0T3N2cM0IVAIVA
    13Pyriform fossaT1N3bM0T1N3bM0IVBIVB
    17Oral mucosaT3N1M0T3N1M0IIIIII
    18NasopharynxT3N2M0T3N2M0IIIIII
    19NasopharynxT3N1M0T3N1M0IIIIII
    21TongueT3N0M0T3N0M0IIIIII
    28Pyriform fossaT3N2bM0T3N2bM1IVAIVC
    31NasopharynxT2N2M1T2N1M1IVBIVB
    39NasopharynxT2N0M0T2N0M0IIII
    40TongueT2N0M0T2N0M0IIII
    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Comparative 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT Results for Recurrence Detection

    Patient no.Primary tumorRecurrence site18F-FDG avidity68Ga-FAPI-46 avidityPET/CT result
    1TongueNoneYYFP
    2LipPrimary, LNYYTP
    3Pyriform fossaPrimary, LNYYTP
    4TonguePrimary, LNYYTP
    6NasopharynxNoneNNTN
    7External ear canalPrimary, LNYYTP
    8Nasal cavityNoneNNTN
    9NasopharynxPrimaryYYTP
    10NasopharynxLungYYTP
    14TongueNoneYYFP
    15Pyriform fossaPrimaryYYTP
    16Retromolar trigonePrimary, LNYYTP
    20Base of tonguePrimary, LN, lung, thyroidYYTP
    22NasopharynxLN, boneYYTP
    23Base of tongueNoneNNTN
    24GlottisPrimary, LNYYTP
    25Pyriform fossaLN, liver, adrenal glandYYTP
    26NasopharynxPrimary, LN, lungYYTP
    27Floor of mouthPrimary, LN, bone, muscleYYTP
    29NasopharynxNoneNNTN
    30NasopharynxLN, lungYYTP
    32NasopharynxBoneNYFN for 18F-FDG; TP for 68Ga-FAPI
    33NasopharynxNoneNNTN
    34NasopharynxLN, nasal turbinateYYTP
    35NasopharynxNoneNNTN
    36TongueNoneNNTN
    37NasopharynxNoneNNTN
    38NasopharynxLN, lung, pleuraYYTP
    • FP = false positive; LN = lymph node; TP = true positive; TN = true negative; FN = false negative.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT

    Diagnostic accuracy (%)18F-FDG68Ga-FAPI-46
    Sensitivity100100
    Specificity5050
    Positive predictive value94.194.1
    Negative predictive value100100
    Accuracy94.494.4
    • View popup
    TABLE 5.

    Comparisons of Semiquantitative Parameters Between 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT of Primary Tumor and Distant Metastasis

    Parameter18F-FDG68Ga-FAPI-46P
    Primary tumor
     SUVmax18.59 ± 9.61 (7.15–43.11)19.28 ± 7.45 (6.40–42.39)0.65
     SUVmean10.82 ± 6.10 (2.54–24.64)11.10 ± 4.83 (4.17–28.07)0.78
     T/B10.21 ± 5.89 (1.54–26.37)11.04 ± 5.03 (2.21–23.51)0.45
     MTV vs. FTV7.36 ± 5.07 (1.34–21.66)10.33 ± 9.44 (0.86–35.37)0.03
     TLG vs. TLF94.91 ± 117.20 (7.14–517.65)122.58 ± 132.85 (8.88–500.50)0.06
    Distant metastasis
     SUVmax13.59 ± 7.64 (3.86–31.69)16.89 ± 9.96 (3.09–34.22)0.09
     SUVmean7.82 ± 4.45 (2.23–18.42)9.74 ± 5.67 (1.80–18.18)0.09
     T/B30.39 ± 55.85 (1.53–254.4)20.54 ± 13.57 (1.69–52.63)0.44
     MTV vs. FTV10.52 ± 19.41 (0.18–81.23)9.02 ± 15.27 (0.25–54.42)0.33
     TLG vs. TLF109.87 ± 255.52 (1.43–1151.59)135.92 ± 260.12 (0.78–976.03)0.36
    • TLF = total lesion FAP expression (68Ga-FAPI); TLG = total lesion glycolysis (18F-FDG).

    • Data are mean ± SD followed by range.

    • View popup
    TABLE 6.

    Semiquantitative Comparisons Between 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for Nodal Metastasis

    SiteMedian size (cm)No. of detected nodesSUVmax
    18F-FDG68Ga-FAPI-4618F-FDG68Ga-FAPI-46P
    Neck1.3855613.67 ± 7.3816.91 ± 9.350.08
    Supraclavicular0.8549.97 ± 3.477.16 ± 2.01
    Mediastinal0.830229.21 ± 4.228.64 ± 4.54
    Axillary1.13318.64*10.98*
    Intraabdominal0.95915.83 ± 7.0231.84 ± 9.00
    All1.11289412.55 ± 6.6815.04 ± 10.25
    • ↵*No SD because the SUVmax was derived from 1 patient’s data.

    • P value is for SUVmax. SUVmax is mean ± SD.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 8
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-46 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Evaluation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Exploratory Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-46 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Evaluation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Exploratory Study
Chetsadaporn Promteangtrong, Dheeratama Siripongsatian, Attapon Jantarato, Anchisa Kunawudhi, Peerapon Kiatkittikul, Sukanya Yaset, Natphimol Boonkawin, Chanisa Chotipanich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (8) 1155-1161; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262831

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-46 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Evaluation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Exploratory Study
Chetsadaporn Promteangtrong, Dheeratama Siripongsatian, Attapon Jantarato, Anchisa Kunawudhi, Peerapon Kiatkittikul, Sukanya Yaset, Natphimol Boonkawin, Chanisa Chotipanich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (8) 1155-1161; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262831
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of FAPI PET/CT in Oncologic Studies: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
  • Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of FAPI PET/CT in Oncologic Studies: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • FAPI
  • FDG
  • PET/CT
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire