Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPoster - PhysicianPharm

Kinetic modelling of dynamic 18F-FDG datasets from long axial field-of-view PET scanner

Hasan Sari, Jimin Hong, Lars Eriksson, Kuangyu Shi, Maurizio Conti, Ian Alberts, Paul Cumming and Axel Rominger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1405;
Hasan Sari
1Siemens Healthineers AG Bern Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jimin Hong
2University of Bern Bern Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Eriksson
3Siemens Molecular Imaging Inc. Knoxville TN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kuangyu Shi
2University of Bern Bern Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Conti
3Siemens Molecular Imaging Inc. Knoxville TN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Alberts
4Inselspital Bern Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Cumming
4Inselspital Bern Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Axel Rominger
4Inselspital Bern Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1405

Objectives: Quantitative information from dynamic PET studies can be extracted by using kinetic modelling and parametric imaging. These methods require an accurate knowledge of the available tracer concentration in the plasma as a function of time, known as the arterial input function (AIF). Arterial blood sampling is currently the gold standard method to measure AIF in brain PET studies, but is usually avoided due to its invasiveness. Estimation of an image derived input function (IDIF) is a non-invasive alternative but suffers from limited spatial resolution of PET scanners and partial volume effects when measured from carotid arteries in brain PET studies. The AIF peak can also be missed when PET sampling frequency is not sufficient. Recently introduced long axial FOV PET scanners allow short frame durations for better temporal resolution and also enable use of an IDIF from a larger blood pool (i.e. aorta) for whole body kinetic modelling. In this work, we explore use of an IDIF extracted from aorta for kinetic modelling of TACs extracted from multiple organs and brain structures. Methods: Dynamic 18F-FDG data (mean activity: 242.5 MBq, mean weight: 73.5 kg) were acquired from three oncologic patients using Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers) PET/CT scanner. Data were acquired for 65 minutes from injection and were sorted using the following frame durations: 2 × 10 s, 30 × 2 s, 4 × 10 s, 8 × 30 s, 4 × 60 s, 5 × 120 s, and 9 × 300 s. The PET images were reconstructed using ToF PSF reconstruction with a 2-mm Gaussian filter applied. Attenuation correction was performed using information from a CT scan. The CT images were used to automatically define organs of interests: whole brain, lungs, liver, aorta, spleen, kidneys and aorta, using a deep-learning based software prototype for organ segmentation. Furthermore, carotid arteries, grey matter and white matter structures were segmented using PMOD (PMOD Technologies, Switzerland). TACs were extracted from these regions with no partial volume correction applied. 2-tissue compartmental irreversible model was used to model whole brain, gray matter and white matter TACs using IDIFs derived from aorta (IDIFAORTA) and carotid arteries (IDIFCAROTIDS).

Results: Figure 1 shows PET image of a representative subject, averaged over first 2 minutes post injection, together with IDIFs from aorta, carotids and TACs from different organs. It is seen that IDIFCAROTIDS suffers from spill out effects and have a lower peak and tail compared to IDIFAORTA curve. Table 1 shows a summary of kinetic rate constants estimated using both input functions. Compared to influx constant Ki estimated using IDIFAORTA, Ki estimated using IDIFCAROTIDS was 23.2%, 27.0% and 24.0% higher for grey matter, white matter and whole brain respectively. These differences are in similar range to previously reported differences between Ki values computed using IDIFCAROTIDS and AIF derived from arterial samples. Estimates of individual micro-parameters K1 were higher by 50.6%, 52.9% and 53.1% in grey matter, white matter and whole brain when computed using IDIFCAROTIDS instead of IDIFAORTA. Conclusion: This preliminary study indicates significant differences between kinetic macro-parameters and micro-parameters estimated by IDIFs derived from aorta and carotid arteries. These results suggest that IDIFs derived from aorta can be used to estimate kinetic parameters in neuroimaging studies.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Kinetic parameter estimates

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Kinetic modelling of dynamic 18F-FDG datasets from long axial field-of-view PET scanner
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Kinetic modelling of dynamic 18F-FDG datasets from long axial field-of-view PET scanner
Hasan Sari, Jimin Hong, Lars Eriksson, Kuangyu Shi, Maurizio Conti, Ian Alberts, Paul Cumming, Axel Rominger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1405;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Kinetic modelling of dynamic 18F-FDG datasets from long axial field-of-view PET scanner
Hasan Sari, Jimin Hong, Lars Eriksson, Kuangyu Shi, Maurizio Conti, Ian Alberts, Paul Cumming, Axel Rominger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1405;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Validation of cardiac image derived input functions for functional PET quantification
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Poster - PhysicianPharm

  • Preliminary result of Texture Analysis on prediction of overall outcome of neuroendocrine tumors based on pre-therapy heterogeneity of somatostatin receptors on 68Ga Dotatate PET/CT scans.
  • The Incremental Value of 18F FDG Labelled Leukocytes PET/CT Over 18F FDG PET/CT Scan in the Detection of Occult Infection
  • Respiratory motion correction reduces differences between immediate and delayed SPECT myocardial perfusion images
Show more Poster - PhysicianPharm

PIDS - Data Analysis and Management

  • An empirical update of left ventricular 3D segmentation algorithm in myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging
  • Using radiomics feature to distinguish malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules on dual time point PET/CT images
  • Inter-pass motion correction for whole-body dynamic parametric PET imaging
Show more PIDS - Data Analysis and Management

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire