Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBrief Communication

PSMA PET for the Assessment of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Volume of Disease

Francesco Barbato, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Isabel Rauscher, Ken Herrmann, Axel Wetter, Justin Ferdinandus, Robert Seifert, Michael Nader, Kambiz Rahbar, Boris Hadaschik, Matthias Eiber, Andrei Gafita and Manuel Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2021, 62 (12) 1747-1750; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262120
Francesco Barbato
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang P. Fendler
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabel Rauscher
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Herrmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Axel Wetter
3Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin Ferdinandus
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Seifert
4University of Münster and Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Nader
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kambiz Rahbar
4University of Münster and Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Hadaschik
5Department of Urology, University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrei Gafita
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Weber
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg–Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    mHSPC disease extent as stratified by CT using CHAARTED criteria and PET using tumor volume and miTNM. Criteria for combined (miTNM and volume) PET volume-of-disease assessment are shown. Dashed line indicates area under curve for approximate 40-cm3 cutoff between PET LVD and PET HVD. Three-year overall survival is given for 40 patients (0 = alive; † = died; all others alive and 3 y after PET not yet reached). diss = disseminated; oligo = oligometastatic; uni = unifocal.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    mHSPC Disease Extent by CT Versus PSMA PET

    PSMA PET
    CTUnifocalOligometastaticDisseminatedAny M1c
    Unifocal25 (24%)19 (18%)*7 (7%)*2 (2%)*
    Oligometastatic016 (15%)14 (13%)*0
    Disseminated0014 (13%)0
    Any M1c0008 (8%)
    • ↵* PET upstaging in 42 of 105 (40%) patients.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 62 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue 12
December 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PSMA PET for the Assessment of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Volume of Disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PSMA PET for the Assessment of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Volume of Disease
Francesco Barbato, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Isabel Rauscher, Ken Herrmann, Axel Wetter, Justin Ferdinandus, Robert Seifert, Michael Nader, Kambiz Rahbar, Boris Hadaschik, Matthias Eiber, Andrei Gafita, Manuel Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2021, 62 (12) 1747-1750; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262120

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PSMA PET for the Assessment of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Volume of Disease
Francesco Barbato, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Isabel Rauscher, Ken Herrmann, Axel Wetter, Justin Ferdinandus, Robert Seifert, Michael Nader, Kambiz Rahbar, Boris Hadaschik, Matthias Eiber, Andrei Gafita, Manuel Weber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2021, 62 (12) 1747-1750; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262120
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Low- and High-Volume Disease in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: From CHAARTED to PSMA PET--An International Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Tumor Sink Effect: Myth or Reality?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Measuring Total Metabolic Tumor Volume from 18F-FDG PET: A Reality Check
  • Bioanalytic Hybrid System Merging 3-Dimensional Cell Culture and Chromatographic Precision for Unprecedented Preclinical Insights in Molecular Imaging
  • Radiances of Cerenkov-Emitting Radionuclides on the In Vivo Imaging System
Show more BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PSMA
  • prostate cancer
  • mHSPC
  • metastasis-directed treatment
  • CHAARTED
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire