Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleRadiochemistry

Cyclotron Production and Separation of Scandium Radionuclides from Natural Titanium Metal and Titanium Dioxide Targets

C. Shaun Loveless, Jose R. Blanco, George L. Diehl, Rawdah T. Elbahrawi, Tommaso S. Carzaniga, Saverio Braccini and Suzanne E. Lapi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2021, 62 (1) 131-136; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.242941
C. Shaun Loveless
1Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
2Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jose R. Blanco
3Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George L. Diehl III
4Department of Chemistry, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rawdah T. Elbahrawi
5Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tommaso S. Carzaniga
6Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saverio Braccini
6Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzanne E. Lapi
1Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
3Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Theranostic strategies involve select radionuclides that allow diagnostic imaging and tailored radionuclide therapy in the same patient. An example of a Food and Drug Administration–approved theranostic pair is the 68Ga- and 177Lu-labeled DOTATATE peptides, which are used to image neuroendocrine tumors, predict treatment response, and treat disease. However, when using radionuclides of 2 different elements, differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of the agent can occur. Theranostic agents that incorporate the matched-pair radionuclides of scandium—43Sc/47Sc or 44Sc/47Sc—would guarantee identical chemistries and pharmacologic profiles. The aim of this study was to investigate production of 43,44,47Sc via proton-induced nuclear reactions on titanium nuclei using a 24-MeV cyclotron. Methods: Aluminum, niobium, and tantalum target holders were used with titanium foils and pressed TiO2 to produce scandium radionuclides with proton energies of up to 24 MeV. Irradiated targets were digested using NH4HF2 and HCl in a closed perfluoroalkoxy alkane vessel in 90 min. Scandium radionuclides were purified via ion-exchange chromatography using branched N,N,N′,N′-tetra-2-ethylhexyldiglycolamide. The titanium target material was recovered via alkali precipitation with ammonia solution. Results: Titanium foil and TiO2 were digested with an average efficiency of 98% ± 3% and 95% ± 1%, respectively. The typical digestion time was 45 min for titanium foil and 75 min for TiO2. The average scandium recovery was 94% ± 3%, and the average titanium recoveries from digested titanium foil and TiO2 after precipitation as TiO2 were 108% ± 8% and 104% ± 5% of initial mass, respectively. Conclusion: This work demonstrated a robust method for the cyclotron production of scandium radionuclides that could be used with natural or enriched TiO2 target material.

  • 43Sc
  • 44Sc
  • 47Sc
  • titanium digestion
  • BDGA
  • cyclotron production

The element scandium has 3 radionuclides with properties suitable for diagnostic and therapeutic applications in nuclear medicine. 43Sc (half-life [t1/2] = 3.89 h) and 44Sc (t1/2 = 3.97 h) undergo positron decay, with β+mean energies of 476.0 keV (88.1%) and 632.0 keV (94.3%), respectively, making them well suited for PET (1). 47Sc (t1/2 = 3.35 d) undergoes β-decay, with a β−mean energy of 162 keV to 47Ti, followed by emission of a 159-keV γ-ray (68.4%) (1). Thus, 47Sc might be used for targeted radionuclide therapy and SPECT. These radionuclides of scandium might be used to create theranostic agents for diagnostic imaging and targeted radiotherapy in the same patient.

Interest in these radionuclides is partly motivated by the recent clinical success of DOTATATE and results in clinical trials investigating small-molecule inhibitors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). DOTATATE, a somatostatin analog, labeled with 68Ga (t1/2 = 67.7 min) or 177Lu (t1/2 = 6.7 d) can be used in theranostics to diagnose and treat SSTR-expressing neuroendocrine tumors (2,3). Similarly, inhibitors of PSMA such as PSMA-11, PSMA-617, DCFPyL, and MIP-1072 labeled with 68Ga, 177Lu, 18F (t1/2 = 109.7 min), 131I (t1/2 = 8.0 d), 123I (t1/2 = 13.2 h), or 99mTc (t1/2 = 6 h) can be used for diagnosis and treatment of PSMA-positive prostate cancer (1,4). Theranostic agents that incorporate radionuclides of different elements can have differences in their in vivo kinetics (5). The selection of a matched pair (e.g., 43/47Sc), guarantees identical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles and provides the truest picture of in vivo distribution before radionuclide therapy. Further, the t1/2 of 43Sc and 44Sc, in contrast to 68Ga, could allow for imaging at extended time points (6). Therefore, development of efficient methods to produce 43,44,47Sc is an important first step to translating these matched-pair radionuclides of scandium to the clinic.

43Sc and 44Sc can be produced via multiple routes. Accelerator production using α-particles, protons, and deuterons on calcium and titanium nuclei has been investigated for the natCa(α,x)43,44,47Sc, 42Ca(d,n)43Sc, 43Ca(p,n)43Sc, 44Ca(p,2n)43Sc, 46Ti(p,α)43Sc, 47Ti(p,α)44Sc, 44Ca(p,n)44Sc, natCa(p,n)44Sc, and 44Ca(d,2n)44Sc nuclear reactions (7–13). The use of calcium and titanium has been shown to provide gigabecquerels and hundreds of megabecquerels of 43Sc and 44Sc, depending on beam current and irradiation time; however, 44Sc produced by these reactions will result in the coproduction of its nuclear isomer, 44mSc (t1/2 = 58.6 h). The presence of this longer-lived metastable state may complicate patient dosimetry. 44Sc may be obtained without its nuclear isomer from a 44Ti (t1/2 = 59.2 y) generator (14).

47Sc can also be produced via multiple routes. Reactor production of 47Sc has been investigated using fast neutrons on enriched titanium via the 47Ti(n,p)47Sc reaction (neutron energy > 1 MeV) or thermal neutrons (neutron energy = 0.025eV) on enriched calcium via the 46Ca(n,γ)47Ca→47Sc reaction for a 47Ca-47Sc (t1/2 = 4.5 d) generator system (15). One challenge facing development of a 47Ca-47Sc generator is the natural abundance of 46Ca (0.004%). 47Sc may also be produced by the 48Ti(γ,p)47Sc reaction using bremsstrahlung radiation, and accelerator production by the 48Ca(p,2n)47Sc reaction was investigated at 18 MeV and resulted in a saturation yield of 12 GBq/μA (16–19).

Unlike production routes using calcium, the use of titanium could allow production on a single proton accelerator using a unified separation methodology that applies identical targetry and target-processing chemistries and results in better radionuclidic purity for 43,44,47Sc. However, the magnitude of the cross section for reactions on titanium are much less than those on calcium at lower energies (16–18 MeV). Favorably, the cross-section values increase at the higher energies (≤24 MeV) used in this study. Multiple challenges must be addressed to produce scandium radionuclides from stable nuclei of titanium using this unified approach. First, the powdery TiO2 targets require a holder that encapsulates the irradiated material to prevent radiologic contamination. Next, the slow TiO2 digestion kinetics and short t1/2 of 43Sc/44Sc necessitate development of a rapid digestion method. Lastly, 43,44,47Sc with high radionuclidic purity can be obtained only using enriched titanium, since 46,47,50Ti has natural abundances of 8.25%, 7.44%, and 5.18%, respectively. Thus, efficient recycling chemistry must be developed to recover and reuse the enriched target material.

To address these challenges, methods were developed to investigate 43,44,47Sc yields and purification chemistry using natural titanium and TiO2. The results from this work suggest that 43,44,47Sc might be produced at energies of up to 24 MeV using enriched TiO2 and purified using a unified methodology to supply quantities needed for the preclinical evaluation of these matched-pair radionuclides.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents

All chemicals were of analytic or trace metals grade. Deionized 18.2 MΩ-cm water (Milli-Q System; Millipore) was used unless otherwise specified. Ammonium bifluoride (NH4HF2, 99.999%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37% by weight, 99.999%), 25% ammonia solution (NH4OH, EMSURE; Merck), TiO2 (anatase form, 99.8%), periodic table analytic standards (mix 1, 10 mg/L, TraceCERT; Sigma-Aldrich), ammonium acetate (CH3CO2NH4, 99.999%), and nitric acid (HNO3, 70% by weight, 99.999%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Analytic standards containing titanium (1,000 mg/L) and scandium (1,000 mg/L) were purchased from Agilent. Analytic-grade N,N,N′,N′-tetra-2-ethylhexyldiglycolamide (branched DGA resin) was purchased from Eichrom Technologies. DOTA was purchased from Macrocyclic. All glassware was cleaned in a 50% HNO3 bath overnight.

Target Holders

Multiple target holders were developed to mount and irradiate titanium foil and TiO2 target materials. The disk-shaped 2-mm-thick target holders fabricated from aluminum, tantalum, and niobium are shown in Figure 1. The aluminum target holder had a circular base and cap secured by samarium-cobalt magnets. A fluoroelastomer o-ring was integrated between the base and cap to enclose the target material. A bore (∅ = 7 mm) was centered in the base. The niobium target holder contained a centered bore (∅ = 10 mm) holding titanium foil, which was secured against the base using a 10.1-mm single-turn spiral internal retaining ring (Smalley). The tantalum target holder contained a centered bore (∅ = 10 mm) with an integrated o-ring between the base and cap to enclose the target material. The bore held a TiO2 disk that was secured by placing a 100-μm titanium disk atop the bore and o-ring. The titanium disk was held in place by a 14.3-mm spiral retaining ring (Rotor Clip). Stopping and range of ions in matter (SRIM) was used to determine the optimal thickness of each target holder to stop 17- or 24-MeV protons (20).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Target holder assemblies tested in this work.

Preparation of Target Material

Titanium foil targets were prepared using a 10-mm punch and die (Precision Brand Products). Before pressing, TiO2 was dried overnight at 230°C in a vacuum oven at 0.3 Pa. Approximately 35 or 70 mg of TiO2 were transferred into a clean 7- or 10-mm die (Specac) and pressed for 5 min at 4 tons of pressure on a manual press (Carver). Additional TiO2 was iteratively added and pressed. This process was repeated twice, with a final target mass of approximately 52 or 110 mg.

Cyclotron Parameters

Irradiation was conducted on a TR-24 cyclotron (Advanced Cyclotron Systems). 43Sc, 44Sc, and 47Sc were produced via the natTi(p,x) nuclear reaction at 17 and 24 MeV. Titanium and TiO2 targets were mounted at a 90° angle and bombarded at beam currents of up to 40 and 30 μA, respectively. The targets were cooled by high-pressure, low-flow helium gas (275–345 kPa, 1 L/min) on the front and pumped water (2–3 L/min) on the back. Bombarded targets were allowed to decay for 1–5 h to allow for the decay of coproduced 47V (t1/2 = 32.6 min).

Production Yields

The radionuclidic yields were determined using a high-purity germanium detector. Predicted yields were calculated using nuclear data retrieved from the Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data database (21,22). The code SRIM was used to model the entrance and exit proton energies. End-of-bombardment yields were determined using Mathcad (version 14.0) and Equation 1, where NA is the Avogadro constant (atoms/mol), I is incident particle flux (particles/s), AT is the atomic weight (g/mol), λ is the decay constant (1/s), t is the irradiation time (s), E0 is the initial proton energy, Ee is the exit proton energy, σ(E) is the energy-dependent reaction cross section (cm2), and S(E) is the total stopping power (MeV/cm2/g) (23).Embedded ImageEq. 1

Determination of Equilibrium Dissociation Constant

The equilibrium dissociation constant was determined following a previously reported method (24). The dissociation constants were calculated using Equation 2, where Cresin is the concentration of radioactivity adsorbed onto the resin, Caqueous is the concentration of radioactivity in the solvent, Ai is the radioactivity in filtered supernatant (Bq), V is the volume of the filtered supernatant (mL), and m is the mass of the resin (g).Embedded ImageEq. 2

Digestion of Titanium Foil and TiO2

Irradiated titanium was transferred into a conical 15-mL screw-cap perfluoroalkoxy alkane vial (Savillex) containing approximately 200 mg of NH4HF2 dissolved in 3 mL of 12.1 M HCl. The vial was capped and heated at 230°C for 45 min. Irradiated TiO2 was transferred into a conical 15-mL screw-cap vial and mixed with NH4HF2 (1:3 ratio). The vial was capped and heated to 230°C for 45 min. After heating, the dry residue was dissolved by adding 5 mL of 12.1 M HCl and heating the closed vessel for 45 min in a silicone-oil bath at 160°C. For both digestion methods, samples were taken in triplicate, filtered, and diluted in 2% HNO3 for trace metal analyses. The digestion methods are illustrated in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Methods for digestion of titanium foil and TiO2. PFA = perfluoroalkoxy alkane.

Branched DGA Resin Separation

Approximately 110 mg of branched DGA resin were stirred in a vortex mixer with 5 mL of 7 M HNO3. The mixture was transferred into a 0.8 × 9 cm polypropylene column (Bio-Rad), the HNO3 was eluted, and a glass wool plug was placed on the resin bed (7-mm height). A flow rate of 1.0 mL/min was used for each eluent. The resin was washed with 5 mL each of 7 M HNO3, water, 0.1 M HCl, and 7 M HCl. The digestant was loaded onto the column in approximately 7–8 M HCl. Eluent 1 (20 mL, 7 M HCl), eluent 2 (10 mL, 7 M HNO3), and eluent 3 (10 mL, 0.1 M HCl) were passed through the column and collected. The final eluate containing the scandium radionuclides was collected into a 10-mL conical vial and evaporated to dryness under vacuum at 100°C. After evaporation, the purified scandium was reconstituted in 0.5 M CH3CO2NH4 buffer (pH 4.7). The separation method is shown in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Schematic of 43,44,47Sc separation.

Samples were taken from each eluate and analyzed to determine the distribution of titanium and vanadium and the percentage recovery of scandium. The decontamination factor (DA,B), a measure of the scandium purification, was determined using Equation 3, giving the change in ratio of constituent 1 (A) to constituent 2 (B), QA,0 is the initial amount of A, QA is the final amount of A, QB,0 is the initial amount of B, and QB is the final amount of B (25).Embedded ImageEq. 3

43,44,47Sc-PSMA-617 Radiolabeling and Cell Uptake Studies

The bioconjugate PSMA-617 was labeled with 43,44,47Sc (10 MBq/nmol) and characterized by high-performance liquid chromatography using 2 solvents. Solvent A was acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and solvent B was water with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The linear gradient was 5% A:95% B to 80% A:20% B over 15 min at 0.7 mL/min. The specific uptake of the radioligand to PSMA receptors was demonstrated via a blocking study using the PSMA inhibitor 2-(phosphonomethyl)pentanedioic acid. The PSMA-negative PC3 cell line was used as a control. The concentration of the inhibitor was 100 μM.

Alkali Precipitation of Titanium

Eluate containing titanium was diluted to 500 mL with water and heated for 45 min at 160°C. While it was being stirred, the pH was adjusted to 8 by dropwise addition of 19 mL of 25% ammonia solution. The stir bar was removed, and the precipitate was allowed to settle for 1 h. The mixture was vacuum-filtered with a grade 43 ashless filter paper (Cytiva) and rinsed twice with 10 mL of 1% aqueous ammonia solution. The precipitate was washed with 10 mL of acetone. The filter paper was transferred to a zirconia crucible and combusted in a tube furnace at 1,000°C for 24 h.

High-Purity Germanium Spectroscopy

Radioactive samples were characterized by γ-ray spectroscopy using a Canberra GC2018 high-purity germanium detector with an intrinsic efficiency of 24.5% connected to a DSA-100 multichannel analyzer. Canberra Genie 2000 software was used for data acquisition and analysis. An energy and efficiency calibration was performed using a mixed nuclide source in a sealed 1.5-mL microcentrifuge vial prepared by Eckert and Ziegler Analytics. Efficiency-calibration spectra with a minimum photopeak area of 2 × 105 counts were collected and fit to determine the relative detector efficiency. For all measurements, aliquots of sample material were diluted to 1 mL in a 1.5-mL vial and suspended in an acrylic holder at a distance of 5 or 25 mm from the high-purity germanium detector. These geometries were maintained for all sample measurements.

Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)

Samples containing stable elements were preserved and analyzed via ICP-MS. Multielement standards in 2% HNO3 at 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1,000 μg/L were used for instrument calibration. Samples were diluted in 2% HNO3 and measured on an Agilent Technologies 7700 ICP-MS device. Agilent Technologies MassHunter software (version 4.3) was used for data acquisition and analyses.

RESULTS

Target Irradiations

The niobium target holder was used to irradiate 250-μm-thick titanium foils (ρ = 4.506 g/cm3) at 24 MeV and tolerated beam currents of up to 40 μA. The average (n = 3 ± 1σ) mass of a titanium foil was 91.5 ± 0.3 mg. A 2-piece aluminum target holder was used to irradiate a 400-μm-thick pressed TiO2 (ρ = 4.23 g/cm3) disk at 17 MeV. The average (n = 3 ± 1σ) mass of the disk target was 52.2 ± 0.4 mg. The magnetization of the samarium-cobalt magnets was confirmed after each irradiation (n = 6). At a beam current of 20 μA, thermal damage was observed on the aluminum cap and base; thus, subsequent irradiations were limited to 15 μA. The tantalum target holder was used to irradiate a 400-μm-thick pressed TiO2 disk at 24 MeV at beam currents of up to 40 μA for 30 min with no damage to the target holder or material. The average (n = 3 ± 1σ) mass of the disk target was 110.1 ± 0.5 mg.

Digestion Methods

Typical digestion times for titanium foils and pressed TiO2 disks were 45 and 90 min, respectively. Titanium foils were digested at 160°C using a mixture of NH4HF2 and 12.1 M HCl. Trace metal analysis of the digestant via ICP-MS showed that the average (n = 3 ± 1σ) percentage of titanium foil dissolved in solution was 98% ± 3%. TiO2 disks were digested in 2 steps, and the average (n = 3 ± 1σ) percentage of TiO2 dissolved in solution was 95% ± 1%. These methods were developed using nonirradiated titanium target material, and data from initial experiments are shown in Supplemental Figure 1 (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org).

43Sc, 44g,44mSc, 47Sc, and 48V Yields from natTi Targets

The radionuclides, measured by a high-purity germanium detector, were 48V (t1/2 = 15.97 d, γ1 = 944.1, γ2 = 983.5, γ3 = 1,312.1 keV), 43Sc (372.9 keV), 44gSc (1,157.0 keV), 44mSc (271.2 keV) and 47Sc (159.4 keV). The sample counting time was varied to achieve a minimum photopeak area of 500 counts, and dead time was kept below 5%. The average end-of-bombardment production rate (n = 9 ± 1σ) and predicted rate for each radionuclide are shown in Table 1. These experimental rates were normalized to 1 μA.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Average (n = 9 ± 1σ) Measured and Predicted Radioactivity of Radionuclides, and Average Production Rate Normalized to 1 μA (21,22)

Branched DGA Resin Separation

The digestant containing titanium ions, scandium radionuclides, and 48V was loaded onto branched DGA resin. The bulk titanium target material was eluted from the resin and resulted in an average (n = 6 ± 1σ) titanium recovery factor of 96% ± 5% in 12 mL of the load eluate and 20 mL of eluate 1. In contrast, scandium radionuclides were strongly adsorbed onto the resin in 7–8 M HCl. No scandium radionuclides were detected in the eluates from the load, eluent 1, or eluent 2. The scandium radionuclides were desorbed from the resin in 10 mL of eluent 3 (0.1 M HCl). The isolated scandium radionuclides (eluate 3) were free of radionuclidic impurities, including 48V. These data are summarized in Table 2, and they show an average (n = 3 ± 1σ) scandium recovery from titanium foil and TiO2-irradiated targets of 94% ± 1% and 94% ± 3%, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Average (n = 3 ± 1σ) Initial 47Sc and 48V Radioactivity and Its Recovery in Each Eluate

Samples taken from the final scandium product after reconstitution showed the presence of nonradioactive contaminants. The identity and average (n = 3 ± 1σ) concentration of contaminants in 400 μL of 0.5 M CH3CO2NH4 were iron (1.0 ± 0.3 mg/L), copper (0.8 ± 0.3 mg/L), zinc (1.3 ± 0.3 mg/L), vanadium (0.5 ± 0.3 mg/L), and aluminum (0.8 ± 0.3 mg/L). Scandium was not detected or was below the detection limits of the ICP-MS used in this work. The complete separation and concentration of scandium radionuclides required approximately 180 min.

43,44,47Sc-PSMA-617 Radiolabeling and Specific Uptake in LNCaP Tumor Cells

PSMA-617 was labeled with 43,44,47Sc in 0.5 M NH4CH3CO2 at 95°C for 30 min. A more than 99% radiochemical purity (10 MBq/nmol) was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (Fig. 4). The average (n = 4 ± 1σ) percentage of 43,44,47Sc-PSMA-617 associated with LNCaP cells (Supplemental Fig. 2) was 16.6% ± 1.5% after 2 h and 21.9% ± 1.7% after 4 h of incubation at 37°C. The average (n = 4 ± 1σ) nonspecific uptake in PC3 cells (control) and in the presence of 2-(phosphonomethyl)pentanedioic acid was less than 0.5%.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Solid line shows radiochromatogram of 43,44,47Sc-PSMA-617. Dashed line shows absorbance of natSc-PSMA-617 at 280 nm. AU = arbitrary units.

Titanium Recycling

The combined eluates containing titanium were diluted and pH-adjusted. Near pH 8 (verified by pH strip test), a fine white, cloudy precipitate formed. After filtration and combustion, the average (n = 4 ± 1σ) percentage recoveries of titanium were 103% ± 5% and 108% ± 8% from titanium foil and TiO2, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Targets were created for the irradiation of TiO2 at a beam current of up to 40 μA and an energy of up to 24 MeV. The samarium-cobalt magnets (aluminum target) did not lose their magnetism and could play a role in the design of compact cyclotron targets. The tantalum target was robust, and future work will be performed to define the maximum tolerated beam current on TiO2. Further, these data show that 43,44,47Sc can be produced via TiO2 at beam currents greater than those currently used for cyclotron production via CaO or CaCO3 (∼20 μA).

The end-of-bombardment production rate of scandium radionuclides and coproduced 48V at 24 MeV in titanium foils agreed with the predicted rate based on published nuclear datasets for the natTi(p,x) reaction (Table 1). Using the same methodology, the end-of-bombardment yields of 43,44,47Sc from enriched TiO2 target material were predicted for the 46,47,50Ti(p,α) nuclear reactions (Supplemental Fig. 3) at 1, 4, and 24 h (7,26,27). These yields (MBq–GBq) obtained from enriched titanium nuclei would be suitable for preclinical and in some cases clinical investigations.

Previously reported methods for digestion of TiO2 used concentrated hydrogen fluoride, with some methods requiring hours to reach completion (2–6 h). These methods could result in the loss of at least one 43,44Sc t1/2. The digestion methods in this work use pressure, heat, and the in situ generation of approximately 1.0 M hydrogen fluoride via the reaction of NH4HF2 with 12.1 M HCl (28). The results showed that greater than 95% of titanium foil and TiO2 was dissolved in 45 and 90 min, respectively. The closed perfluoroalkoxy alkane vessels used in this work were inexpensive and durable at temperatures of up to 250°C. These data support future efforts to characterize and optimize the digestion parameters to further decrease digestion times for titanium foil and TiO2.

Branched DGA and DGA resins have been used to purify scandium in multiple reports (8,17,29). On the basis of the equilibrium dissociation constants determined in this work for scandium, titanium, and vanadium (Supplemental Fig. 4), the separation method developed in this work was predicted to separate scandium from titanium and vanadium and was confirmed by determining the scandium decontamination factor relative to each contaminant. On the basis of Table 2, the decontamination factor for 47Sc relative to 48V was greater than 6 × 106 and 3 × 106 for scandium isolated from titanium foil and TiO2, respectively. Similarly, titanium present in the recovered scandium fractions was below the ICP-MS detection limits (∼1 μg/L); thus, the data show that the decontamination factor of 47Sc relative to titanium was greater than 2.8 × 105 and 1.6 × 105 for titanium foil and TiO2, respectively. These data show that scandium was isolated with little contamination from titanium and vanadium. The overall scandium recovery factors agreed with previously reported procedures using DGA resins (8,17,30). Trace metal analyses via ICP-MS of the titanium-containing digestants and recovered scandium fractions showed the presence of iron, copper, zinc, vanadium, and aluminum. These transition metal contaminants can reduce radiolabeling yield by competing with scandium radionuclides for ligand binding. The sources of these impurities can be from the target material or environmental contamination. The average concentrations of these impurities were between 0.5 and 1.3 mg/L, which compared well with previous reports (17,30).

To demonstrate the efficacy of these methods, a proof-of-concept study was conducted using PSMA-617 radiolabeled with scandium. The results showed specific targeting of the PSMA receptors on LNCaP cells using 43,44,47Sc-PSMA-617 at a molar activity of 10 MBq/nmol.

Historically and in recent reports, titanium has been precipitated with aqueous ammonia solutions at pH 8 (8,31). In this work, a titanium precipitant was obtained using an aqueous ammonia solution to adjust the bulk medium to pH 8. After sufficient time for aggregation and sedimentation, the precipitate was filtered and combusted. The typical concentration of titanium in the filtrate was below 100 μg/L (∼50 μg), which indicated that the percentage loss of titanium after precipitation was less than 0.1%. The mass recoveries of titanium exceeded 100%, as may be attributed to 2 factors: etching of glass wool by hydrogen fluoride generated in situ, and incomplete combustion of the filter paper or presence of water. These data show that the recovery of titanium in the oxide form with aqueous ammonia solution is an effective approach to recycling titanium. Additional work will be performed to reduce the introduction of impurities so as to avoid buildup of contaminants during iterative uses of this method.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we investigated the feasibility of producing the theranostic radionuclides of scandium on a proton accelerator using a robust and unified process. Results from this work showed that routine production of 43,44,47Sc could be accomplished using enriched TiO2. Importantly, our findings showed that TiO2 targets may tolerate beam currents greater than 30 μA using the target holders designed in this work, that TiO2 can be digested via a 2-step process in 90 min, and that digested titanium may be efficiently recovered via alkali precipitation with aqueous ammonia solution. Future work should investigate the maximum tolerated beam current on TiO2 using these target holders and any impact on downstream chemistry that may be caused by the increased heat deposition in the target material. Additionally, these efforts should seek to better understand and optimize the digestion methods developed in this work in order to further reduce digestion times. Finally, the method to precipitate titanium should be modified to remove sources of silicon. Ultimately, the results in this work showed the potential promise in using enriched titanium targets to produce these matched-pair theranostic radionuclides of scandium.

DISCLOSURE

This work was supported by the Department of Energy Isotope Program under grant DESC0020197. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

  • QUESTION: Is production of the theranostic radionuclides of scandium feasible using enriched TiO2 as a target material?

  • PERTINENT FINDINGS: The theranostic radionuclides of scandium were produced using naturally isotopic TiO2 on a proton accelerator at energies of up to 24 MeV. These targets were rapidly digested in 90 min, followed by scandium purification using ion-exchange chromatography. This work showed a 94% recovery of scandium radionuclides and demonstrated a simple method to recover digested target material.

  • IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: The findings add to efforts at identifying easily adoptable methods to produce theranostic radionuclides of scandium, which are increasingly being used in clinical and preclinical studies.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the UAB Cyclotron Facility for TR24 irradiations.

Footnotes

  • Published online Jul. 3, 2020.

  • © 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    NuDat 2.8. Brookhaven National Laboratory website. https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/. Data extracted February 17, 2020. Accessed August 24. 2020.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Maurer T,
    2. Eiber M,
    3. Schwaiger M,
    4. Gschwend JE
    . Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13:226–235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hennrich U,
    2. Kopka K
    . Lutathera®: The first FDA- and EMA-approved radiopharmaceutical for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2019;12:114.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wester HJ,
    2. Schottelius M
    . PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals for imaging and therapy. Semin Nucl Med. 2019;49:302–312.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Müller C,
    2. Domnanich KA,
    3. Umbricht CA,
    4. van der Meulen NP
    . Scandium and terbium radionuclides for radiotheranostics: current state of development towards clinical application. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20180074.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Eppard E,
    2. de la Fuente A,
    3. Benešová M,
    4. et al
    . Clinical translation and first in-human use of [44Sc]Sc-PSMA-617 for PET Imaging of metastasized castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Theranostics. 2017;7:4359–4369.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Carzaniga TS,
    2. Auger M,
    3. Braccini S,
    4. et al
    . Measurement of 43Sc and 44Sc production cross-section with an 18MeV medical PET cyclotron. Appl Radiat Isot. 2017;129:96–102.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Domnanich KA,
    2. Eichler R,
    3. Müller C,
    4. et al
    . Production and separation of 43Sc for radiopharmaceutical purposes. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2017;2:14.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.
    1. Walczak R,
    2. Krajewski S,
    3. Szkliniarz K,
    4. et al
    . Cyclotron production of 43Sc for PET imaging. EJNMMI Phys. 2015;2:33.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.
    1. Krajewski S,
    2. Cydzik I,
    3. Abbas K,
    4. et al
    . Cyclotron production of 44Sc for clinical application. Radiochim Acta. 2013;101:333–338.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.
    1. Duchemin C,
    2. Guertin A,
    3. Haddad F,
    4. Michel N,
    5. Métivier V
    . Production of scandium-44m and scandium-44g with deuterons on calcium-44: cross section measurements and production yield calculations. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:6847–6864.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.
    1. Severin GW,
    2. Engle JW,
    3. Valdovinos HF,
    4. Barnhart TE,
    5. Nickles RJ
    . Cyclotron produced 44gSc from natural calcium. Appl Radiat Isot. 2012;70:1526–1530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Szkliniarz K,
    2. Sitarz M,
    3. Walczak R,
    4. et al
    . Production of medical Sc radioisotopes with an alpha particle beam. Appl Radiat Isot. 2016;118:182–189.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Frank R
    . Scandium-44: benefits of a long-lived PET radionuclide available from the 44Ti/44Sc generator system. Curr Radiopharm. 2012;5:187–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Domnanich KA,
    2. Müller C,
    3. Benešová M,
    4. et al
    . 47Sc as useful β−-emitter for the radiotheragnostic paradigm: a comparative study of feasible production routes. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2017;2:5.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Loveless CS,
    2. Radford LL,
    3. Ferran SJ,
    4. Queern SL,
    5. Shepherd MR,
    6. Lapi SE
    . Photonuclear production, chemistry, and in vitro evaluation of the theranostic radionuclide 47Sc. EJNMMI Res. 2019;9:42.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Rotsch DA,
    2. Brown MA,
    3. Nolen JA,
    4. et al
    . Electron linear accelerator production and purification of scandium-47 from titanium dioxide targets. Appl Radiat Isot. 2018;131:77–82.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.
    1. Mamtimin M,
    2. Harmon F,
    3. Starovoitova VN
    . Sc-47 production from titanium targets using electron linacs. Appl Radiat Isot. 2015;102:1–4.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Carzaniga TS,
    2. Braccini S
    . Cross-section measurement of 44mSc, 47Sc, 48Sc and 47Ca for an optimized 47Sc production with an 18 MeV medical PET cyclotron. Appl Radiat Isot. 2019;143:18–23.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ziegler JF,
    2. Ziegler MD,
    3. Biersack JP
    . SRIM: the stopping and range of ions in matter. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2010;268:1818–1823.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Zerkin VV,
    2. Pritychenko B
    . The experimental nuclear reaction data (EXFOR). Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2018;888:31–43.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Khandaker MU,
    2. Kim K,
    3. Lee MW,
    4. et al
    . Investigations of the natTi(p,x)43,44m,44g,46,47,48Sc,48V nuclear processes up to 40MeV. Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67:1348–1354.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Otuka N,
    2. Takács S
    . Definitions of radioisotope thick target yields. Radiochim Acta. 2015;103:1–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Radchenko V,
    2. Engle JW,
    3. Medvedev DG,
    4. et al
    . Proton-induced production and radiochemical isolation of 44Ti from scandium metal targets for 44Ti/44Sc generator development. Nucl Med Biol. 2017;50:25–32.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Sandell EB
    . Meaning of the term “separation factor.” Anal Chem. 1968;40:834–835.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Levkovski VN
    . Middle Mass Nuclides Activation Cross-Sections by Medium Energy Protons and α Particles. Moscow, Russia: Inter-Vesi; 1991.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Gadioli E,
    2. Gadioli Erba E,
    3. Hogan JJ,
    4. Burns KI
    . Emission of alpha particles in the interaction of 10–85 MeV protons with 48,50Ti. Z Phys A At Nucl. 1981;301:289–300.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Zhang W,
    2. Hu Z,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. Chen H,
    5. Gao S,
    6. Gaschnig RM
    . Total rock dissolution using ammonium bifluoride (NH4HF2) in screw-top Teflon vials: a new development in open-vessel digestion. Anal Chem. 2012;84:10686–10693.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Valdovinos HF,
    2. Hernandez R,
    3. Barnhart TE,
    4. Graves S,
    5. Cai W,
    6. Nickles RJ
    . Separation of cyclotron-produced 44Sc from a natural calcium target using a dipentyl pentylphosphonate functionalized extraction resin. Appl Radiat Isot. 2015;95:23–29.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Alliot C,
    2. Kerdjoudj R,
    3. Michel N,
    4. Haddad F,
    5. Huclier-Markai S
    . Cyclotron production of high purity 44m,44Sc with deuterons from 44CaCO3 targets. Nucl Med Biol. 2015;42:524–529.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Gooch FA
    . On the separation of titanium and aluminum, with a note on the separation of titanium and iron. Proc Am Acad Arts Sci. 1884;20:435–447.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication February 4, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication May 28, 2020.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 62 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue 1
January 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cyclotron Production and Separation of Scandium Radionuclides from Natural Titanium Metal and Titanium Dioxide Targets
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Cyclotron Production and Separation of Scandium Radionuclides from Natural Titanium Metal and Titanium Dioxide Targets
C. Shaun Loveless, Jose R. Blanco, George L. Diehl, Rawdah T. Elbahrawi, Tommaso S. Carzaniga, Saverio Braccini, Suzanne E. Lapi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2021, 62 (1) 131-136; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.242941

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cyclotron Production and Separation of Scandium Radionuclides from Natural Titanium Metal and Titanium Dioxide Targets
C. Shaun Loveless, Jose R. Blanco, George L. Diehl, Rawdah T. Elbahrawi, Tommaso S. Carzaniga, Saverio Braccini, Suzanne E. Lapi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2021, 62 (1) 131-136; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.242941
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cyclotron-Produced 132La as a PET Imaging Surrogate for Therapeutic 225Ac
  • Synthesis of the PET Tracer 124I-Trametinib for MAPK/ERK Kinase Distribution and Resistance Monitoring
Show more Radiochemistry

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 43Sc
  • 44Sc
  • 47Sc
  • titanium digestion
  • BDGA
  • cyclotron production
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire