Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

Cancer Screening Using 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Asymptomatic Subjects: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Liling Peng, Mingxiang Sun, Gang Feng, Mu Lin and Xin Gao
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 493;
Liling Peng
1PET/MRI Universal Imaging Diagnostic Center Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mingxiang Sun
2Shanghai Universal Medical Imaging Diagnostic Center Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gang Feng
3Universal Imaging diagnostic center Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mu Lin
4Siemens Healthineers Ltd. Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xin Gao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

493

Introduction: Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. The diagnosing and treating of the tumor at its early stage is the best way to improve prognosis. The advantages of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) are better soft-tissue contrast, low-dose radiation, simultaneous acquisition of functional MRI and PET data, allowing multi-parametric tumor evaluation. However, PET/MRI as a whole-body cancer screening method has not been studied on a large population of healthy subjects. We collected data of two PET/MRI scanners at different centers and investigated the clinical values of PET/MRI for cancer screening in a large cohort of asymptomatic subjects.

Methods: Two imaging diagnostic centers in east China, located in Shanghai and Hangzhou, were enrolled in this study. Screening modalities included were whole-body FDG-PET/MRI and lung computed tomography (CT) with different vendors. 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Shanghai and Hangzhou were performed on a whole-body PET/MRI scanner (Biograph mMR, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and a whole-body PET/MRI scanner (TOF PET/MR, GE SIGNA, WI, USA) respectively with 5 bed positions. PET data acquisition started 40-45 min after the injection of 18F-FDG (3.7 MBq/Kg). The MRI protocols included whole-body (WB) T1WI, WB T2WI, WB DWI(b=800), brain T2 FLAIR, and spinal T2 TSE. The local ethics committee has approved this study. Written, informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Individuals who took FDG PET/MRI examination from January 1st 2017 to December 31st 2018 in the two centers were retrospectively selected after excluding individuals with a history of malignant tumors or incomplete data. Subjects who had no positive findings in the following 12 months or longer were considered as cancer negative.

Results: In the 3010 subjects in Shanghai center, PET/MRI with lung CT detected 83 suspicious lesions, 69 of them(36 cases of the early stage of lung cancer can only found by CT but not PET/MRI) were diagnosed as malignant tumors (true positive) and 14 of them were benign (false positive) (Figure 1). The cancer type distribution of the subjects is shown in Table 1. 5 malignant tumors were missed but detected by other modalities (false negative). The false-positive cases and false-negative cases are summarized in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively. While among the total 1080 subjects in Hangzhou center, 28 of them were found with suspicious lesions, 21 of them(11 cases of early stage of lung cancer can only found by CT) were diagnosed as malignant tumors and 7 of them were benign(Figure 2).1 malignant tumor was missed but detected by other modalities. When considering the two centers together,4090 subjects in total were enrolled, the detection rates of the complete screening program and PET/MRI-only screening were 2.71% and 1.57%, respectively.The sensitivity,specificity,PPV and NPV of PET/MRI screening program were 93.75%, 99.47%, 81.08% and 99.85%,respectively.The statistical results of multicenter is shown in Table 4. Discussions:To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on evaluating the clinical values of FDG PET/MRI for cancer screening in different centers in a large cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. In this study, the cancer detection rate of PET/MRI with lung CT was 2.71%, which is much higher than the rate of PET/CT ranging from 0.9% to 1.3% in previous studies. It should be noted that most of the malignant cases were lung cancer, for which CT has a very high detecting accuracy. Therefore, a supplementary CT examination is necessary for PET/MRI screening.

Conclusions: Based on the findings in this study, we suggest that FDG PET/MRI might be an effective cancer screening modality, especially in combination with lung CT.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 1.The cancer type distribution of the subjects

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 2. False positive cases detected by PET/MR

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 3.False negative cases missed by PET/MR

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 4. Statistical results of multicenter by PET/MRI

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cancer Screening Using 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Asymptomatic Subjects: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Cancer Screening Using 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Asymptomatic Subjects: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Liling Peng, Mingxiang Sun, Gang Feng, Mu Lin, Xin Gao
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 493;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cancer Screening Using 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Asymptomatic Subjects: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Liling Peng, Mingxiang Sun, Gang Feng, Mu Lin, Xin Gao
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 493;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

  • Added value of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) / Computed Tomography (CT) with radioiodine whole body scan in follow up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer
  • Simultaneous PET/MR reveals significant correlation between the intravoxel incoherent motion parameters and standardized uptake values in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients
  • Accuracy of 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET for detecting high grade glioma recurrence: size matters
Show more Oncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

Miscellaneous

  • Automated Esophageal Gross Tumor Volume Segmentation in 18F-FDG PET and CT for Radiotherapy using Two-Stream 3D Deep Network Fusion
  • The Diagnostic Contribution of 18F-FDG PET/CT SCAN in Cancer of BMUO
  • Role of 18F-FDG PET-CT in Epitheloid Hemangioendothelioma
Show more Miscellaneous

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire