Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting Report

Comparison of quantitative and qualitative DaTscan results

Merissa Larson, Stacey Schmitz and Carlyn Johnson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3048;
Merissa Larson
1Nuclear Medicine Marshfield Medical Center Marshfield WI United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stacey Schmitz
1Nuclear Medicine Marshfield Medical Center Marshfield WI United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlyn Johnson
1Nuclear Medicine Marshfield Medical Center Marshfield WI United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3048

Objectives: Since our facility started performing DaTscan procedures in December 2017, Siemens Esoft workstations have been utilized to visually read the images. Recent implementation of MIM Neuro DaTscan software allows for quantitative functional evaluation. Computer automated regions of interest are drawn around the right and left putamen areas to yield a Z-score. The Z-score defines the number of standard deviations that a patient is from the mean when compared to a normal age-matched population in the MIM software database, which consists of 209 patients with a mean age of 61 +/- 11 years. The purpose of this study is to determine if the quantitative results from the MIM software correlate with our physicians’ visual evaluations.

Methods: Twenty patients, 12 males and 8 females with a mean age of 65 +/- 11 years, underwent a DaTscan procedure within the Marshfield Clinic Health System. Patient images were presented to two nuclear medicine physicians for a blind read and scored using a scale of normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, or significantly abnormal. In addition to the visual read, MIM software was utilized for each DaTscan to automatically identify the right and left putamen areas and provide a Z-score based on MIM’s normal age-matched patient database. The highest Z-score obtained between the two areas for each patient was categorized using the following scale: 1.65 = normal, 1.65 to 2 = mildly abnormal, 2 to 2.5 = moderately abnormal, and 2.5 or more = significantly abnormal. The visual grading between the two nuclear medicine physicians and the Z-scores obtained from the MIM software were compared.

Results: Of the twenty patients evaluated, 75% of the patients had the same results for both the quantitative and qualitative DaTscan evaluations. Both physicians and the MIM software did not correlate in 20% of the patients, while 5% had one physician and the MIM disagreeing.

Conclusions: It was determined that the quantitative results from the MIM software, when compared to the normal age-matched population in its database, correlated well with the qualitative visual evaluation performed by the physician. In fact, the MIM software is routinely utilized for reading DaTscan images as it has increased our physicians’ confidence levels.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of quantitative and qualitative DaTscan results
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of quantitative and qualitative DaTscan results
Merissa Larson, Stacey Schmitz, Carlyn Johnson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3048;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of quantitative and qualitative DaTscan results
Merissa Larson, Stacey Schmitz, Carlyn Johnson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3048;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
  • Radiolabeled hyaluronic acid (HA) fragments for lymphatic imaging
  • Simplifying and Confirming Ketosis: A Quality Improvement Initiative in Cardiac Sarcoid Assessment
Show more

Tech Students Papers I

  • Role of 99mTc-MDP Bone Scan in Staging Vertebral Chordoma
  • Difficult venous access in Nuclear Medicine: improving practice!
Show more Tech Students Papers I

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire