Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPhysics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences

Comparison of Linear and Non-linear Total-Body PET Parametric Imaging

Xuezhu Zhang, Zhaoheng Xie, Guobao Wang, Jeffrey Schmall, Hongcheng Shi, Simon Cherry, Ramsey Badawi and Jinyi Qi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 206;
Xuezhu Zhang
1University of California, Davis Davis CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhaoheng Xie
2Biomedical Engineering University of California, Davis Davis CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guobao Wang
3University of California - Davis Saramento CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Schmall
4United Imaging Healthcare America Houston TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongcheng Shi
5Zhongshan Hospital Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Cherry
1University of California, Davis Davis CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramsey Badawi
6UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinyi Qi
7UC DAVIS BIOMEDICAL ENG Davis CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

206

Introduction: The world’s first 2-meter long PET/CT scanner (uEXPLORER) has been developed to offer ultra-sensitive total-body molecular imaging for biomedical research and clinical applications. It provides opportunities for tracer kinetic analysis of the human body in terms of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. We have previously developed a linear parametric imaging method using the Patlak model. In this work, we investigate a nonlinear kinetic analysis method based on a two-tissue compartment model and compare the results with the Patlak model for total-body parametric imaging using dynamic PET data. Methods: We conducted human total-body dynamic PET study using the uEXPLORER scanner. A one-hour 18F-FDG scan was performed and the dynamic dataset was divided into temporal frames to capture the change of tracer distribution over time with protocol of 60×1 s, 30×2 s, 20×3 s, 12×10 s, 50×30 s, and 15×120 s. Quantitative image reconstruction was performed using our total-body kernel-based algorithm with corrections for attenuation, detector response, scatters and randoms. We implemented total-body parametric imaging using the nonlinear two-tissue compartment method (2TC). The irreversible model was adapted on FDG kinetics for glucose metabolism. and for comparison with the linear Patlak model. The dynamic data of the last 30-min of the scan and the full 60-min of dynamic data were used for Patlak and 2TC analyses, respectively. An image derived input function was extracted using the time activity curves (TAC) from a region placed over the descending aorta. Parametric images of the FDG influx rate Ki and distribution volume b were generated using both Patlak and 2TC models and compared. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn in the gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), myocardium and liver. The mean and standard deviation of the estimated parameters over voxels within each ROI were calculated and compared. The correlation between the Patlak and 2TC results was also investigated.

Results: Total-body parametric images reconstructed by the Patlak and 2TC models showed good image quality. Both models fitted the last 30-min of the TACs well. The Ki values estimated by 2TC and Patlak models were highly correlated (R2=0.98), while also demonstrated heterogeneity across regions. The correlation for the intercept b was lower because of the intrinsic model difference. ROI analysis showed that the mean values of the estimated Ki between the two models were close. The 2TC model resulted in lower spatial variation within each ROI because it used the full dynamic scan. However, the 2TC model was also sensitive to subject motion during the scan and resulted in outliers near the boundaries of brain, arms, and legs. In contrast, the Patlak estimation was insensitive to subject motion during the first 30-min of the scan and resulted in far fewer outliers. Conclusion: We have demonstrated total-body parametric imaging using nonlinear kinetic analysis and cross-validated with the Patlak model. Our results show that the 2TC model produces parametric images with lower noise than the Patlak model, but is more susceptible to artifacts caused by subject motion during the scan. Acknowledgements: Support for this work includes NIH grant R01 CA206187 and a UC Davis Innovative Development Award. We acknowledge the contributions of all team members from UC Davis, United Imaging Healthcare and Zhongshan Hospital.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Linear and Non-linear Total-Body PET Parametric Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Linear and Non-linear Total-Body PET Parametric Imaging
Xuezhu Zhang, Zhaoheng Xie, Guobao Wang, Jeffrey Schmall, Hongcheng Shi, Simon Cherry, Ramsey Badawi, Jinyi Qi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 206;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Linear and Non-linear Total-Body PET Parametric Imaging
Xuezhu Zhang, Zhaoheng Xie, Guobao Wang, Jeffrey Schmall, Hongcheng Shi, Simon Cherry, Ramsey Badawi, Jinyi Qi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 206;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Whole-Body Parametric Imaging of 18F-FDG PET Using uEXPLORER with Reduced Scanning Time
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences

  • AI-based methods for nuclear-medicine imaging: Need for objective task-specific evaluation
  • Keel-Edge Height Selection for Improved Multi-Pinhole 123I Brain SPECT Imaging
  • Ultra-Fast Reconstruction of Short List-Mode PET Data Frames for Real-Time Visualization and Processing
Show more Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences

Total body PET, dedicated PET and dynamic PET (Data Analysis & Management)

  • Blood pool selection for quantifying lung inflammation via [18F]NOS uptake in nicotine users and healthy humans
  • Multiphase Patlak Plot Enabled by High Temporal Resolution Total-body Dynamic PET
  • Dose reduction in 18F-FDG high-resolution dedicated breast PET
Show more Total body PET, dedicated PET and dynamic PET (Data Analysis & Management)

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire