Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

Safety outcomes and pain responses in the REASSURE observational study of radium-223 (Ra-223) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Peter Conti, Saby George, Jeffrey Tomaszewski, Daniel Song, Lauren Harshman, Luke Nordquist, Per Sandstrom, Inga Bayh, Svetlana Babajanyan and Oliver Sartor
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 185;
Peter Conti
1Molecular Imaging Center Keck School of Medicine of USC Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saby George
2Department of Medicine Roswell Park Cancer Institute Buffalo NY United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Tomaszewski
3Department of Surgery Cooper Medical School of Rowan University Camden NJ United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Song
4Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Harshman
5Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luke Nordquist
6Genitourinary Research Network Omaha NE United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Per Sandstrom
7Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Whippany NJ United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inga Bayh
8Bayer AG Wuppertal Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Svetlana Babajanyan
7Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Whippany NJ United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver Sartor
9Tulane Cancer Center Tulane University School of Medicine New Orleans LA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

185

Objectives: Ra-223, a targeted alpha therapy, has shown a survival benefit and a favorable safety profile over a 3-year follow-up period in pts with mCRPC enrolled in the phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial. REASSURE (NCT02141438) is a global, prospective, single-arm, observational study investigating the safety of Ra-223 in routine clinical practice in pts with mCRPC and is planned to cover a 7-year follow-up period.

Methods: The primary outcome measures for REASSURE were incidence of second primary malignancy (SPM) and short- and long-term safety in pts who received ≥1 Ra-223 dose; secondary outcomes included pain severity and pain assessment over time using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire. A clinically meaningful pain response was determined by the worst pain item on the BPI-SF (defined as an improvement [decrease] of ≥2 points from baseline). Concomitant radiotherapy, treatments for hematologic adverse events (AEs) up to 6-months after last administration of Ra-223, and subsequent chemotherapy use were also recorded. Herein, results from the second prespecified interim analysis are presented.

Results: A total of 1465 pts were included in the safety analysis; median follow up was 11.5 months. The median number of Ra-223 doses received by pts was 6. Overall, 14/1465 pts (1%) developed ≥1 SPM. 160/1465 pts (11%) received radiotherapy concomitant with Ra-223; of these, 125/160 pts (78%) received conventional external beam radiotherapy. Other radiotherapy modalities included brachytherapy (n=14 [8.8%]), gamma knife (n=8 [5.0%]), missing (n=19 [11.9%]), and other (n=2 [1.3%]). 316/1465 pts (22%) received chemotherapy subsequent to Ra-223 and 1149/1465 (78%) did not; 128/316 pts (41%) and 269/1149 pts (23%) received ≥1 treatment for hematologic AEs, respectively. Furthermore, 214/1465 pts (15%) experienced a post-Ra-223 grade 3-4 hematologic AE (Table); out of these, 26/214 had grade 4. Rates of abnormal platelet and neutrophil counts were similar between pts who received subsequent chemotherapy and those who did not (Table). At treatment 6, the mean change from baseline in BPI pain severity score was −0.36 in 653 evaluable pts. 222/657 pts (34%) had a clinically meaningful pain response in the BPI-SF worst pain item, at treatment 6.

Conclusions: Up to the second prespecified interim analysis of the REASSURE study, there was a low overall incidence of SPM, including in pts receiving concomitant radiotherapy or subsequent chemotherapy, and low overall rates of post-Ra-223 grade 3-4 hematologic AEs. Pts were able to achieve an improvement in pain after treatment with Ra-223. This study confirms that Ra-223 can be utilized in routine clinical practice as part of standard therapy for mCRPC, with meaningful impact on bone pain. No new safety concerns were observed. AE, adverse event; Ra-223, radium-223.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety outcomes and pain responses in the REASSURE observational study of radium-223 (Ra-223) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Safety outcomes and pain responses in the REASSURE observational study of radium-223 (Ra-223) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Peter Conti, Saby George, Jeffrey Tomaszewski, Daniel Song, Lauren Harshman, Luke Nordquist, Per Sandstrom, Inga Bayh, Svetlana Babajanyan, Oliver Sartor
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 185;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Safety outcomes and pain responses in the REASSURE observational study of radium-223 (Ra-223) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Peter Conti, Saby George, Jeffrey Tomaszewski, Daniel Song, Lauren Harshman, Luke Nordquist, Per Sandstrom, Inga Bayh, Svetlana Babajanyan, Oliver Sartor
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 185;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

  • Added value of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) / Computed Tomography (CT) with radioiodine whole body scan in follow up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer
  • Simultaneous PET/MR reveals significant correlation between the intravoxel incoherent motion parameters and standardized uptake values in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients
  • Accuracy of 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET for detecting high grade glioma recurrence: size matters
Show more Oncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

Prostate: PSMA PET and others

  • A preliminary study of18F-DCFPyL PET/CT or PET/MRI and ultrasound (PET/CT-US or PET/MRI-US) fusion targeted prostate biopsy for intraprostatic PET positive lesion
  • COMPARISON OF 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT AND 18F-FLUORIDE PET/CT IN DETECTION OF SKELETAL METASTASIS IN HIGH RISK PROSTATE CARCINOMA
Show more Prostate: PSMA PET and others

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire