Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting Report

Evaluation of Automatic Lung Lobe Segmentation for SPECT/CT LungVQ Image Analysis

Fei Gao, Guenther Platsch, Michal Cachovan, Guillaume Chabin, Alexander Vija, Guillaume Nicolas, Alin Chirindel, Damian Wild, Zhoubing Xu, Sasa Grbic, Bruce Spottiswoode and Sven Zuehlsdorff
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 1489;
Fei Gao
1Siemens Medical Solutions, USA Knoxville TN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guenther Platsch
2Siemens Healthcare GmbH Erlangen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michal Cachovan
3Siemens Healthcare GmbH Forchheim Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillaume Chabin
4Siemens Healthineers Princeton NJ United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Vija
5Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Molecular Ima Hoffman Estates IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillaume Nicolas
6Nuclear Medicine Dpt, University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alin Chirindel
7University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damian Wild
7University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhoubing Xu
4Siemens Healthineers Princeton NJ United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sasa Grbic
4Siemens Healthineers Princeton NJ United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce Spottiswoode
8Siemens Healthcare Knoxville TN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven Zuehlsdorff
9Siemens Healthineers Knoxville TN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1489

Objectives: SPECT/CT Lung Ventilation/Perfusion (LungVQ) images with lung lobe segmentation provide the ability to analyze lung function at lung lobe level, where the segmentation and image analysis used to be a very time-consuming manual process. We designed and developed a fully automatic research prototype LungVQ analysis workflow using fast automatic thoracic landmark detection [1] and deep learning-based segmentation [2] trained for lung fissure delineation on over 5000 chest CT image volumes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of the proposed workflow on patient data with abnormal anatomy or images with limited lung fissure visibility from lower dose CT acquisitions. Methods: A total of 15 anonymized lung perfusion SPECT/CT patient scans, acquired using Symbia Intevo 16 SPECT/CT scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Hoffman Estates, IL, United States) were used for evaluation. The pitch factor of CT acquisition was 0.8 for 12 patients and 1.5 for 3 patients. Each patient dataset included at least one set of SPECT perfusion image and CT series reconstructed with B70 kernel at 1.5mm slice thickness. Five patient scans had an additional CT series reconstructed with B31 or equivalent soft kernel at 1.0mm slice thickness. These total 20 cases were used for lung lobe segmentation evaluation. For comparison, each dataset was manually segmented by an annotation specialist and reviewed by a board-certified nuclear medicine physician. Quantitative evaluation was performed by calculating the Dice score between manual and automatic segmentation results. Results: The automatic LungVQ analysis workflow completed successfully for all patient datasets. The total processing time for each patient was less than 30 seconds (HP ZBook 15 G3, Intel Core i7-6820HQ, 16GB RAM), which is significantly shorter than the manual lung fissure identification (>1 hour). Of the 15 patients, 7 patients had sufficient delineation of lung fissure, including 3 patients with two CT series, these 10 cases composed “group 1”; 5 patients could not be reliably performed a manual delineation of interlobar borders by the physician or had limited visibility of the horizontal fissure, including 2 patients with two CT series, these 7 cases composed “group 2” and 3 patients had highly abnormal anatomy or unclear anatomy at least unilaterally. Examples of patient images are shown in Fig. 1 (a), (b) and (c). Qualitatively, for the 10 cases in group 1, as shown in Fig.1 (d), both manual and automatic segmentation agree well; for the 7 cases in group 2, as shown in Fig. 1 (e), quantification differed due to the limited lung fissure visibility, which posed challenges for both manual and automated approaches. However, none of the segmentation discrepancies would cause misdiagnosis after review by a physician. Quantitatively, for group 1, the mean and standard deviation of Dice scores are 96.47±2.32 for left inferior lobe, 97.68±0.88 for left superior lobe, 96.98±1.08 for right inferior lobe, 94.80±2.32 for right middle lobe, 96.89±1.20 for right superior lobe. For group 2, the mean and standard deviation of Dice scores are 95.41± 1.85 for left inferior lobe, 95.26±2.77 for left superior lobe, 95.06±4.58 for right inferior lobe, 72.17±19.64 for right middle lobe, 83.83±15.15 for right superior lobe. The differences between manual and automatic segmentation increased because of limited lung fissure visibility. The 3 patients with highly abnormal anatomy were excluded from quantitative analysis. Conclusion: The visibility of lung fissures (CT image quality) played a critical role in the accuracy of quantitative analysis in SPECT/CT LungVQ analysis. In some cases of pathological lung anatomy or lack of lung fissure visibility, manual editing of the segmented volume in locations of pathology remains necessary. This evaluation demonstrates that the automatic LungVQ analysis workflow reduces the overall processing time significantly while maintaining similar accuracy as manual lung lobe segmentation.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Automatic Lung Lobe Segmentation for SPECT/CT LungVQ Image Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Automatic Lung Lobe Segmentation for SPECT/CT LungVQ Image Analysis
Fei Gao, Guenther Platsch, Michal Cachovan, Guillaume Chabin, Alexander Vija, Guillaume Nicolas, Alin Chirindel, Damian Wild, Zhoubing Xu, Sasa Grbic, Bruce Spottiswoode, Sven Zuehlsdorff
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 1489;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of Automatic Lung Lobe Segmentation for SPECT/CT LungVQ Image Analysis
Fei Gao, Guenther Platsch, Michal Cachovan, Guillaume Chabin, Alexander Vija, Guillaume Nicolas, Alin Chirindel, Damian Wild, Zhoubing Xu, Sasa Grbic, Bruce Spottiswoode, Sven Zuehlsdorff
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 1489;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
  • Radiolabeled hyaluronic acid (HA) fragments for lymphatic imaging
  • Simplifying and Confirming Ketosis: A Quality Improvement Initiative in Cardiac Sarcoid Assessment
Show more

Infection/Pulmonary/Outcomes (Poster Session)

  • Prognosis predicting value of semiquantitative parameters of visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue of 18F-FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluation of disease extent and response evaluation post therapy in invasive fungal diseases: A tertiary care experience
  • Serial change of respiratory function of non-transplanted lung after unilateral lung transplantation-Comparison of CT volumetric-
Show more Infection/Pulmonary/Outcomes (Poster Session)

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire