Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleTheranostics

64Cu-SARTATE PET Imaging of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Demonstrates High Tumor Uptake and Retention, Potentially Allowing Prospective Dosimetry for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Rodney J. Hicks, Price Jackson, Grace Kong, Robert E. Ware, Michael S. Hofman, David A. Pattison, Timothy A. Akhurst, Elizabeth Drummond, Peter Roselt, Jason Callahan, Roger Price, Charmaine M. Jeffery, Emily Hong, Wayne Noonan, Alan Herschtal, Lauren J. Hicks, Amos Hedt, Matthew Harris, Brett M. Paterson and Paul S. Donnelly
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2019, 60 (6) 777-785; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.217745
Rodney J. Hicks
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Price Jackson
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grace Kong
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert E. Ware
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Hofman
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Pattison
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy A. Akhurst
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Drummond
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Roselt
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason Callahan
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Price
3Medical Technology and Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Washington, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charmaine M. Jeffery
3Medical Technology and Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Washington, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Hong
1Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wayne Noonan
4Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Herschtal
5Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren J. Hicks
6Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amos Hedt
7Clarity Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Eveleigh, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Harris
7Clarity Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Eveleigh, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brett M. Paterson
8School of Chemistry, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul S. Donnelly
9School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Imaging of somatostatin receptor expression is an established technique for staging of neuroendocrine neoplasia and determining the suitability of patients for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. PET/CT using 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs is superior to earlier agents, but the rapid physical decay of the radionuclide poses logistic and regulatory challenges. 64Cu has attractive physical characteristics for imaging and provides a diagnostic partner for the therapeutic radionuclide 67Cu. Based on promising preclinical studies, we have performed a first-time-in-humans trial of 64Cu-MeCOSar-Tyr3-octreotate (64Cu-SARTATE) to assess its safety and ability to localize disease at early and late imaging time-points. Methods: In a prospective trial, 10 patients with known neuroendocrine neoplasia and positive for uptake on 68Ga-DOTA-octreotate (68Ga-DOTATATE) PET/CT underwent serial PET/CT imaging at 30 min, 1 h, 4 h, and 24 h after injection of 64Cu-SARTATE. Adverse reactions were recorded, and laboratory testing was performed during infusion and at 1 and 7 d after imaging. Images were analyzed for lesion and normal-organ uptake and clearance to assess lesion contrast and perform dosimetry estimates. Results: 64Cu-SARTATE was well tolerated during infusion and throughout the study, with 3 patients experiencing mild infusion-related events. High lesion uptake and retention were observed at all imaging time-points. There was progressive hepatic clearance over time, providing the highest lesion-to-liver contrast at 24 h. Image quality remained high at this time. Comparison of 64Cu-SARTATE PET/CT obtained at 4 h to 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT obtained at 1 h indicated comparable or superior lesion detection in all patients, especially in the liver. As expected, the highest early physiologic organ uptake was in the kidneys, liver, and spleen. Conclusion: 64Cu-SARTATE is safe and has excellent imaging characteristics. High late-retention in tumor and clearance from the liver suggest suitability for diagnostic studies and for prospective dosimetry for 67Cu-SARTATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and the half-life of 64Cu would also facilitate good-manufacturing-practice production and distribution to sites without access to 68Ga.

  • radiopharmaceuticals
  • copper-64
  • neuroendocrine tumor
  • peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
  • positron emission tomography
  • theranostics

Footnotes

  • Published online Nov. 15, 2018.

  • © 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 60 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue 6
June 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
64Cu-SARTATE PET Imaging of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Demonstrates High Tumor Uptake and Retention, Potentially Allowing Prospective Dosimetry for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
64Cu-SARTATE PET Imaging of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Demonstrates High Tumor Uptake and Retention, Potentially Allowing Prospective Dosimetry for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
Rodney J. Hicks, Price Jackson, Grace Kong, Robert E. Ware, Michael S. Hofman, David A. Pattison, Timothy A. Akhurst, Elizabeth Drummond, Peter Roselt, Jason Callahan, Roger Price, Charmaine M. Jeffery, Emily Hong, Wayne Noonan, Alan Herschtal, Lauren J. Hicks, Amos Hedt, Matthew Harris, Brett M. Paterson, Paul S. Donnelly
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2019, 60 (6) 777-785; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217745

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
64Cu-SARTATE PET Imaging of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Demonstrates High Tumor Uptake and Retention, Potentially Allowing Prospective Dosimetry for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
Rodney J. Hicks, Price Jackson, Grace Kong, Robert E. Ware, Michael S. Hofman, David A. Pattison, Timothy A. Akhurst, Elizabeth Drummond, Peter Roselt, Jason Callahan, Roger Price, Charmaine M. Jeffery, Emily Hong, Wayne Noonan, Alan Herschtal, Lauren J. Hicks, Amos Hedt, Matthew Harris, Brett M. Paterson, Paul S. Donnelly
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2019, 60 (6) 777-785; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217745
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Efficacy of [67Cu]Cu-EB-TATE Theranostic Against Somatostatin Receptor Subtype-2-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • The Emergence of Somatostatin Antagonist-Based Theranostics: Paving the Road Toward Another Success?
  • 64Cu Treatment Planning and 67Cu Therapy with Radiolabeled [64Cu/67Cu]MeCOSar-Octreotate in Subjects with Unresectable Multifocal Meningioma: Initial Results for Human Imaging, Safety, Biodistribution, and Radiation Dosimetry
  • The Latest Advances in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • First-in-Humans Evaluation of Safety and Dosimetry of 64Cu-LLP2A for PET Imaging
  • Tumor Response to Radiopharmaceutical Therapies: The Knowns and the Unknowns
  • Somatostatin Receptor Imaging and Theranostics: Current Practice and Future Prospects
  • Treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia, are we on the way to personalised medicine?
  • Therapeutic Efficacy of a Bivalent Inhibitor of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Labeled with 67Cu
  • FAPI PET/CT: Will It End the Hegemony of 18F-FDG in Oncology?
  • 64Cu-DOTATATE PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Prospective, Head-to-Head Comparison of Imaging at 1 Hour and 3 Hours After Injection
  • Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 67Cu-CuSarTATE Is Highly Efficacious Against a Somatostatin-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumor Model
  • Harnessing 64Cu/67Cu for a theranostic approach to pretargeted radioimmunotherapy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • Can 177Lu-DOTATATE Kidney Absorbed Doses be Predicted from Pretherapy SSTR PET? Findings from Multicenter Data
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data
  • 177Lu-Labeled Anticlaudin 6 Monoclonal Antibody for Targeted Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
Show more Theranostics

Clinical

  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • SUVs Are Adequate Measures of Lesional 18F-DCFPyL Uptake in Patients with Low Prostate Cancer Disease Burden
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • radiopharmaceuticals
  • copper-64
  • neuroendocrine tumor
  • peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
  • positron emission tomography
  • theranostics
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire