Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Post Injection Pain During Breast Lymphoscintigraphy: Technetium Sulfur Colloid versus Technetium Tilmanocept

Allison Thompson, Bart Kimbrell, James Sagar, Robert Whittaker and Deborah Cunningham
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 419;
Allison Thompson
1Radiology Atlantic Radiology Associates Savannah GA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bart Kimbrell
2Radiology Memorial Health Medical Center Savannah GA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Sagar
2Radiology Memorial Health Medical Center Savannah GA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Whittaker
2Radiology Memorial Health Medical Center Savannah GA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah Cunningham
1Radiology Atlantic Radiology Associates Savannah GA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

419

Objectives: bjectives Lymphoscintigraphy is used to map lymphatic drainage and facilitate sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and removal in breast cancer patients. It is an important procedure because it provides information about axillary node status required to properly stage breast cancer. The presence or absence of axillary node metastases carries important prognostic information and guides adjuvant therapy. For lymphoscintigraphy, a radiopharmaceutical agent is intradermally injected and SLNs are identified either preoperatively with a gamma camera or intraoperatively with a gamma probe. Traditionally, 99mTc-sulfur colloid (99mTc-SC) has been the most commonly used radiopharmaceutical for SLN mapping; however, it has been shown to cause significant post-injection site pain. A recently approved radiopharmaceutical, 99mTc-Tilmanocept (99mTc-TM), is a radiotracer that accumulates in lymphatic tissue by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface of dendritic cells and macrophages. 99mTc-TM’s small diameter permits enhanced diffusion into lymph nodes and blood capillaries, resulting in a rapid injection site clearance. 99mTc-TM has a high SLN localization rate of >97% and a low false negative rate of <3%. It has also been reported that patients undergoing lymphoscintigraphy and SLN biopsy with 99mTc-TM report significantly less post-injection site pain. This study assessed the difference in the amount of post-injection site pain experienced by breast cancer patients after receiving an injection of 99mTc-SC or 99mTc-TM. Methods A total of 48 women, aged 18 or older, with a diagnosis of primary breast cancer who were eligible for surgery were enrolled in the study. Patients were sequentially assigned to the two treatments. Initially, all patients received 99mTc-SC (n=21). Subsequently, patients received 99mTc-TM (n=27) when it was made available. Patients received two periareolar superficial injections of approximately 250 uCi each for a total of approximately 525 uCi of either 99mTc-SC (n=21) or 99mTc-TM (n=27). Post-injection site pain was assessed immediately after the radiotracer was administered. Patients were asked to rate their level of discomfort using the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale immediately after injection. This pain scale is based on a numeric pain rating scale ranging from a minimum score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) and includes six cartoon faces with written descriptions ranging from 0 (No Hurt) to 10 (Hurts Worst). Results The mean pain score was significantly lower for patients receiving 99mTc-TM (2.5 ± 2.5) compared to patients receiving 99mTc-SC (7.2 ± 2.5), P<0.01. Thirty three percent (33%) of the patients receiving 99mTc-SC reported pain scores of 10 (worst pain imaginable) while no patients receiving 99mTc-TM reported pain scores higher than 8. Thirty percent (30%) of the patients receiving 99mTc-TM reported pain scores of 0 (no pain) while no patients receiving 99mTc-SC reported pain scores lower than 1.

Conclusions: Women receiving 99mTc-TM experienced significantly less post-injection site pain compared to those receiving 99mTc-SC when undergoing injection of a radiopharmaceutical for lymphoscintigraphy prior to SLN biopsy and breast cancer surgery.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Post Injection Pain During Breast Lymphoscintigraphy: Technetium Sulfur Colloid versus Technetium Tilmanocept
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Post Injection Pain During Breast Lymphoscintigraphy: Technetium Sulfur Colloid versus Technetium Tilmanocept
Allison Thompson, Bart Kimbrell, James Sagar, Robert Whittaker, Deborah Cunningham
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 419;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Post Injection Pain During Breast Lymphoscintigraphy: Technetium Sulfur Colloid versus Technetium Tilmanocept
Allison Thompson, Bart Kimbrell, James Sagar, Robert Whittaker, Deborah Cunningham
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 419;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of Gastrin-Releasing-Peptide receptor (GRPr) and Prostate-Specific- Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in primary prostate cancer: comparison with radiolabeled GRPr antagonist (68Ga-RM2) PET/CT
  • Relationship between FDG PETCT imaging and CA 125 levels in treated patients with Ovarian cancers - Can FDG PETCT define and predict the disease burden in clinically suspected recurrence ?
  • Clinical Experience with 18F-fluciclovine (Axumin) in Prostate Cancer Patients with a Rising PSA After Primary Treatment
Show more Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Breast Cancer: Detection and Staging

  • Positron Emission Mammography in management of new diagnosed breast cancer routine management
  • Diagnostic performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography in cases of histology-unknown abnormal uptake, and parameters associated with breast cancer
Show more Breast Cancer: Detection and Staging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire