Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Diagnostic performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography in cases of histology-unknown abnormal uptake, and parameters associated with breast cancer

Yoko Satoh
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 416;
Yoko Satoh
1Yamanashi PET imaging clinic Chuo Japan
2Radiology Yamanashi University Chuo, Yamanashi Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

416

Objectives: Ring-shaped dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) is one of the available high-resolution molecular breast imaging modalities, and it can detect small breast cancers. It is known to exhibit higher resolution and detectability of small lesions than whole-body positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT) [1, 2]. In addition, the features of F18-fluorodeoxy glucose (FDG) uptake corresponding to known malignancies have been analyzed [1, 3]. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dbPET in cases of histology-unknown abnormal uptake and define parameters associated with malignancy.

Methods: A total of 627 women underwent FDG PET/CT and dbPET at our hospital between April 2015 and September 2017 for pre-therapeutic (n = 46) or post-therapeutic (n = 121) evaluation of breast cancer, further examination of suspicious lesions detected via another modality but not diagnosed as malignant (n = 21), and cancer screening (n = 439). Women with histories of other malignancies (n = 32) and metastasis (n = 15) were excluded. We analyzed 40 cases of abnormal uptake on dbPET in 37 breasts of 35 women, not including lesions in cases of known breast cancers. Two nuclear medicine physicians divided the morphological features of lesions determined on dbPET into one of three categories—focus (or foci), mass, or non-mass without any clinical information. Classification as “focus” indicated that lesions were a punctuate and too small to characterize (5 mm or less), and also included cases of multiple foci with a diffuse distribution. “Mass” indicated a focal uptake larger than focus (over 5 mm). “Non-mass” indicated uptake in an area that was not categorized as mass, and differed from normal surrounding glandular parenchyma and multiple foci with a linear or segmented distribution. In addition, quantitative values including the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVpeak, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of the lesions, and lesion-to-contralateral background ratio (L/B) were also obtained. The PET parameters and clinical factors associated with breast cancers and other lesions were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also performed to define the factors associated with breast cancer.

Results: We explored 40 lesions in 37 breasts of 35women. Four women had a lesion in each of their two breasts, and a woman had two lesions in different segments of the same breast. Of these 40 lesions, 13 (32.5%) were determined to be breast cancers. Of the biopsies of these 13 breast cancers, 11 were ultrasonography (US)-guided, and 2 were stereotactic vacuum-assisted because they were not visible on US. The respective morphological features of the breast cancer group vs. the other group were 76.9% (10/13) vs. 40.7% (11/27) for mass, 15.4% (2/13) vs. 3.7% (1/27) for non-mass, and 7.7% (1/13) vs. 55.6% (15/27) for focus (p = 0.0122). SUVpeak (3.521 ± 2.387 vs. 2.001 ± 0.774, p = 0.0234), TLG (6.238 ± 15.319 vs. 0.851 ± 1.468, p = 0.0017), and MTV (0.977 ± 1.639 vs. 0.331 ± 0.559, p = 0.004), L/B (3.165 ± 2.916, p = 0.0432) also differed significantly between the two groups. Three quantitative parameters of dbPET (SUVpeak, TLG, and MTV) were highly correlated (correlation coefficient over 0.73), so they were assessed one by one in the multivariate analysis in order to avoid multicollinearity. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that morphological categorization on dbPET was independently associated with malignancy. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that morphological features representing the size, number, and distribution of areas of abnormal uptake on dbPET were associated with breast cancers and may be useful for the diagnosis of histology-unknown lesions.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Characteristics of abnormal FDG uptake on dbPET and comparison between breast cancer and others 1

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Characteristics of abnormal FDG uptake on dbPET and comparison between breast cancer and others 2

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of characteristics related to breast cancer

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Characteristics of breast ca. detected by dbPET

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography in cases of histology-unknown abnormal uptake, and parameters associated with breast cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Diagnostic performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography in cases of histology-unknown abnormal uptake, and parameters associated with breast cancer
Yoko Satoh
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 416;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnostic performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography in cases of histology-unknown abnormal uptake, and parameters associated with breast cancer
Yoko Satoh
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 416;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of Gastrin-Releasing-Peptide receptor (GRPr) and Prostate-Specific- Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in primary prostate cancer: comparison with radiolabeled GRPr antagonist (68Ga-RM2) PET/CT
  • Relationship between FDG PETCT imaging and CA 125 levels in treated patients with Ovarian cancers - Can FDG PETCT define and predict the disease burden in clinically suspected recurrence ?
  • Cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance tumor 18F-FDG uptake and contribute to the intratumor heterogeneity of SUVmax
Show more Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Breast Cancer: Detection and Staging

  • Positron Emission Mammography in management of new diagnosed breast cancer routine management
  • Post Injection Pain During Breast Lymphoscintigraphy: Technetium Sulfur Colloid versus Technetium Tilmanocept
Show more Breast Cancer: Detection and Staging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire