Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Deep learning algorithms for automated assessment of total and cancerous prostate gland volume based on PET/CT

Pablo Borrelli, Mike Mortensen, Olof Enqvist, Johannes Ulen, Mads Poulsen, Elin Tragardh, Poul Flemming Hoilund-Carlsen and Lars Edenbrandt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1493;
Pablo Borrelli
7Sahlgrenska University Hospital Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mike Mortensen
8Odense University Hospital Urology Odense Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olof Enqvist
3Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Ulen
4Eigenvision AB Malmö Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mads Poulsen
6Odense University Hosptial Odense Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elin Tragardh
1Malmo Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Poul Flemming Hoilund-Carlsen
5Odense University Hospital Odense C, Funen Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Edenbrandt
2Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine Gothenburg Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1493

Objectives: Uptake of PET tracers in the prostate gland and the size of the gland and a cancerous part of it may serve as guidance for management of patients with prostate cancer. A fast automated analysis of PET/CT studies providing imaging biomarkers reflecting both pathophysiology and anatomy may potentially improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning-based method for analysis of PET/CT studies of the prostate gland.

Methods: The deep learning based method included a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained by means of manually segmented PET/CT studies. The prostate gland, urinary bladder and rectum were segmented in the CT scans and abnormal choline uptake in the prostate was segmented using the PET scans, by experienced radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians. A total of 150 PET/CT studies were used as training group. A CNN, taking both the PET and the CT scans as input, was used to delineate the prostate in the PET scans and a similar model was trained to delineate the prostate in the CT scans. Based on the prostate delineation in the PET scan the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), the volume of abnormal choline uptake in the prostate gland, the mean SUV of that volume and the total lesion uptake defined as the product between this volume and the mean SUV, were automatically calculated. Based on the prostate delineation in the CT scan the prostate gland volume was calculated. After training, the deep learning method was applied to a validation group comprising 52 prostate cancer patients, who had undergone 18F-choline PET/CT prior to radical prostatectomy. Forty-five of these patients were operated within three months of the PET/CT study. The weight of the prostatectomy specimens after removal of the seminal vesicles were compared to the corresponding prostate gland volumes measured automatically in the CT studies. The specimens were processed according to routine department procedures and in agreement with recommendations from the International Society of Urological Pathology. A nuclear medicine specialist recorded “manually” SUVmax in the prostate gland in all PET/CT studies for comparison with the corresponding automatically derived SUVmax scores. The automated analysis was performed in less than a minute for a PET/CT scan.

Results: SUVmax was on average 7.5 (range 2.7-15.5) and the manual and automated SUVmax measurements were the same in 46 of the 52 patients. In the remaining 6 cases, high activity in the urinary bladder or rectum was falsely defined as prostate uptake by the automated

Methods: The prostate weight was on average 50g (range 20g-109g) in the 45 patients with a prostatectomy less than 90 days after the PET/CT scan. The average volume of the prostate gland automatically measured from the CT studies was 51mL (range 27-75mL). The correlation between prostate weight and the automated prostate volume measurements was 0.60.

Conclusions: Our deep learning based method for fast automated analysis of the prostate gland in PET/CT studies showed good agreement with manually obtained measurements and pathology-derived weight of the prostatectomy specimens suggesting that this approach may become a promising adjunct to quantitative assessment of PET/CT studies in prostate cancer patients. The method is now open for validation in future prospective clinical trials.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Deep learning algorithms for automated assessment of total and cancerous prostate gland volume based on PET/CT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Deep learning algorithms for automated assessment of total and cancerous prostate gland volume based on PET/CT
Pablo Borrelli, Mike Mortensen, Olof Enqvist, Johannes Ulen, Mads Poulsen, Elin Tragardh, Poul Flemming Hoilund-Carlsen, Lars Edenbrandt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1493;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Deep learning algorithms for automated assessment of total and cancerous prostate gland volume based on PET/CT
Pablo Borrelli, Mike Mortensen, Olof Enqvist, Johannes Ulen, Mads Poulsen, Elin Tragardh, Poul Flemming Hoilund-Carlsen, Lars Edenbrandt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1493;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of Gastrin-Releasing-Peptide receptor (GRPr) and Prostate-Specific- Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in primary prostate cancer: comparison with radiolabeled GRPr antagonist (68Ga-RM2) PET/CT
  • Relationship between FDG PETCT imaging and CA 125 levels in treated patients with Ovarian cancers - Can FDG PETCT define and predict the disease burden in clinically suspected recurrence ?
  • Cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance tumor 18F-FDG uptake and contribute to the intratumor heterogeneity of SUVmax
Show more Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Prostate Posters

  • Clinical Experience with 18F-fluciclovine (Axumin) in Prostate Cancer Patients with a Rising PSA After Primary Treatment
  • Hematologic safety in patients treated with Radium - 223 in Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota, Colombia , between 2014 - 2017
  • Decision making in radiation oncology based on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for primary and recurrent prostate cancer
Show more Prostate Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire