Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Decision making in radiation oncology based on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for primary and recurrent prostate cancer

Leon Will, Stefan Koerber, Clemens Kratochwil, Matthias Haefner, Hendrik Rathke, Klaus Kopka, Walter Mier, Juergen Debus, Uwe Haberkorn and Frederik Giesel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1507;
Leon Will
3Department of Nuclear Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Koerber
4Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
2National Center of Radiation Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemens Kratochwil
3Department of Nuclear Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Haefner
2National Center of Radiation Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg Germany
4Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hendrik Rathke
3Department of Nuclear Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Kopka
1Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Walter Mier
1Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juergen Debus
4Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
2National Center of Radiation Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Haberkorn
3Department of Nuclear Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederik Giesel
3Department of Nuclear Medicine Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1507

Objectives: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is a promising diagnostic tool for staging and restaging of prostate cancer patients and often leads to a change in radiotherapeutic (RT) management. Most data available show the impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on RT management in the setting of recurrent prostate cancer. Therefore, our study evaluates the impact on RT management in a large cohort of patients with primary and recurrent prostate cancer. Methods: 121 men with prostate cancer who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for radiotherapy planning in addition to conventional staging were retrospectively enrolled in this study. 50 patients presented with initial prostate cancer, 11 with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence after surgery and 60 with PSA recurrence after initial therapy. Any changes in TNM staging and/or RT management due to PSMA imaging were analyzed. Results: Overall, TNM staging changed in 40.5% (49/121 patients) (40.5%) and RT management changed in 52.9% (64/121 patients). 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT had a higher impact in patients with recurrent disease (TNM change: 55.0% (33/60 patients); RT concept change: 60.0% (36/60 patients)) compared to men with initial prostate cancer (TNM change: 26.0% (13/50 patients); RT concept change: 44.0% (22/50 patients)). In the group of patients with PSA persistence after initial therapy TNM changed in 27.3% (3/11 patients) and RT concept changed in 54.5% (6/11 patients). Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is able to detect a high proportion of prostate cancer lesions in primary and recurrent disease leading to a change of RT management in up to 60%. This study suggests that the impact of the diagnostic technology might be greater for men with PSA recurrence. However, it also suggests that it has an important impact on the therapy management in patients with initial prostate cancer. Therefore, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT appears to be well suited for individualized radiation oncology.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Decision making in radiation oncology based on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for primary and recurrent prostate cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Decision making in radiation oncology based on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for primary and recurrent prostate cancer
Leon Will, Stefan Koerber, Clemens Kratochwil, Matthias Haefner, Hendrik Rathke, Klaus Kopka, Walter Mier, Juergen Debus, Uwe Haberkorn, Frederik Giesel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1507;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Decision making in radiation oncology based on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for primary and recurrent prostate cancer
Leon Will, Stefan Koerber, Clemens Kratochwil, Matthias Haefner, Hendrik Rathke, Klaus Kopka, Walter Mier, Juergen Debus, Uwe Haberkorn, Frederik Giesel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1507;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of Gastrin-Releasing-Peptide receptor (GRPr) and Prostate-Specific- Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in primary prostate cancer: comparison with radiolabeled GRPr antagonist (68Ga-RM2) PET/CT
  • Relationship between FDG PETCT imaging and CA 125 levels in treated patients with Ovarian cancers - Can FDG PETCT define and predict the disease burden in clinically suspected recurrence ?
  • Cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance tumor 18F-FDG uptake and contribute to the intratumor heterogeneity of SUVmax
Show more Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Prostate Posters

  • Clinical Experience with 18F-fluciclovine (Axumin) in Prostate Cancer Patients with a Rising PSA After Primary Treatment
  • Hematologic safety in patients treated with Radium - 223 in Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota, Colombia , between 2014 - 2017
Show more Prostate Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire