Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and low PSA levels: diagnostic accuracy and PET positivity predictors.

Daniele Giovanni Nicolotti, Roberto Passera, Marilena Bellò, Alessia Guarneri, Sara Bartoncini, Beatrice Lillaz, Andrea Zitella, Umberto Ricardi, Paolo Gontero, Gianni Bisi and Desiree Deandreis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1482;
Daniele Giovanni Nicolotti
4Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Nuclear Medicine Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Passera
4Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Nuclear Medicine Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marilena Bellò
1AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Nuclear Medicine Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessia Guarneri
2Department of Oncology AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Radiation Oncology Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Bartoncini
2Department of Oncology AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Radiation Oncology Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beatrice Lillaz
3AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Urology Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Zitella
3AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Urology Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Umberto Ricardi
5Department of Oncology University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Radiation Oncology Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paolo Gontero
6University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Urology Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gianni Bisi
4Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Nuclear Medicine Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Desiree Deandreis
4Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Division of Nuclear Medicine Turin Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1482

Introduction: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is nowadays the most promising PET tracer in the detection of prostate cancer recurrence. The principal aim of this study is to assess the detection rate of this technique in patients with prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR) with low PSA levels, and then to evaluate which are the predictors of PET positivity in order to identify cost-effectiveness criteria to perform this exam in this subset of patients.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients referred to our Center between November 2016 and December 2017 for BCR, after primary surgical treatment either before or after subsequent adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy (SRT). All patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT according to international procedure guidelines acquisition protocol; in case of PSA >1.5 ng/ml the exam was performed only if previous choline PET/CT or other imaging technique were negative. Clearly positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT findings were considered as true positive; dubious findings were explored by other imaging techniques or monitored and defined as true positive or true negative by a multidisciplinary consensus. The potential clinical, laboratory and histo-pathological determinants for PET postivity were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

Results: A total of 107 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans were performed in 57 (53.3%) patients after radical surgical treatment only and in 50 (46.7%) patients after radical surgery and adjuvant or SRT. Gleason Score (GS) was &#8804;3+4 (ISUP Grade 1-2) in 44 (41.1%), ≥4+3 (ISUP Grade 3-4-5) in 62 (58%) and not known in 1 (0.9%) patients, respectively. T stage was T1c-T2b-c in 53 (49.5%), T3a-b in 51 (47.7%) and not known in 3 (2.8%) patients, respectively. Surgical margins after surgery were positive in 53 (49.5%), negative in 47 (43.9%) and not reported in 7 (6.5%) patients, respectively. Median PSA value at the moment of PET/CT was 0.7 ng/ml (range 0.23-8.90); in particular, PSA was >0.2 and &#8804;0.5 ng/ml in 36 (33.6%), >0.5 e &#8804;1 ng/ml in 38 (35.5%), >1 and &#8804;1.5 ng/ml in 20 (18.7%) and >1.5 ng/ml in 13 (12.2%) patients, respectively. Median PSA doubling time and PSA velocity were 8.6 months (range 0.6-264.8) and 0.6 ng/ml/yr (range 0-30.2), respectively. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was considered positive in 38 patients (35.5%); recurrence was located in prostate bed (n=3), lymph nodes (n=29) and distant sites (n=6). While a significant association was observed for PSA velocity (median 0.9 in PET+ vs 0.4 ng/ml/yr in PET-, p<0.001), the 2 main risk factors for PET positivity were the last absolute PSA value before 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.03-2.48, p=0.038) and a T ≥3 stage (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.40-8.11, p=0.007), both in univariate and multivariate logistic models.

Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT results may be clinically useful to detect prostate cancer recurrence at low PSA values too, when dealing with the most aggressive disease patterns. In this setting, a proper selection of the patients that could really benefit of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is mandatory, in order to reach a more cost-effective profile.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and low PSA levels: diagnostic accuracy and PET positivity predictors.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and low PSA levels: diagnostic accuracy and PET positivity predictors.
Daniele Giovanni Nicolotti, Roberto Passera, Marilena Bellò, Alessia Guarneri, Sara Bartoncini, Beatrice Lillaz, Andrea Zitella, Umberto Ricardi, Paolo Gontero, Gianni Bisi, Desiree Deandreis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1482;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and low PSA levels: diagnostic accuracy and PET positivity predictors.
Daniele Giovanni Nicolotti, Roberto Passera, Marilena Bellò, Alessia Guarneri, Sara Bartoncini, Beatrice Lillaz, Andrea Zitella, Umberto Ricardi, Paolo Gontero, Gianni Bisi, Desiree Deandreis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1482;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of Gastrin-Releasing-Peptide receptor (GRPr) and Prostate-Specific- Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in primary prostate cancer: comparison with radiolabeled GRPr antagonist (68Ga-RM2) PET/CT
  • Relationship between FDG PETCT imaging and CA 125 levels in treated patients with Ovarian cancers - Can FDG PETCT define and predict the disease burden in clinically suspected recurrence ?
  • Cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance tumor 18F-FDG uptake and contribute to the intratumor heterogeneity of SUVmax
Show more Oncology, Clinical Diagnosis Track

Prostate Posters

  • Clinical Experience with 18F-fluciclovine (Axumin) in Prostate Cancer Patients with a Rising PSA After Primary Treatment
  • Hematologic safety in patients treated with Radium - 223 in Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota, Colombia , between 2014 - 2017
  • Decision making in radiation oncology based on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for primary and recurrent prostate cancer
Show more Prostate Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire