Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Basic Science Track

Species difference of astatine-211 uptakes in the whole body distribution: preclinical study using treated At-solution.

Tadashi Watabe, Kazuko Kaneda-Nakashima, Yuwei Liu, Yoshifumi Shirakami, Atsushi Toyoshima, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Eku Shimosegawa, Mitsuhiro Fukuda, Atsushi Shinohara and Jun Hatazawa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1269;
Tadashi Watabe
4Nuclear Medicine and Tracer Kinetics Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuko Kaneda-Nakashima
5Project Research Center for Fundamental Sciences Osaka University Graduate School of Science Suita Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuwei Liu
4Nuclear Medicine and Tracer Kinetics Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshifumi Shirakami
4Nuclear Medicine and Tracer Kinetics Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atsushi Toyoshima
5Project Research Center for Fundamental Sciences Osaka University Graduate School of Science Suita Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitsuaki Tatsumi
3Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita/ Osaka Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eku Shimosegawa
4Nuclear Medicine and Tracer Kinetics Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitsuhiro Fukuda
2Research Center for Nuclear Physics Osaka University Suita Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atsushi Shinohara
1Graduate School of Science, Osaka Uiversity Osaka Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun Hatazawa
4Nuclear Medicine and Tracer Kinetics Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1269

Objectives: Astatine-211 (211At) is halogen element which can be used for alpha-particle therapy. However, chemical form and dynamics in the body are not sufficiently elucidated because there is no stable isotope of astatine. We have recently shown the enhancement of 211At uptake in the thyroid by using the 211At solution treated with reducing agent possibly due to the fact that the chemical forms were unified. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the species difference of 211At uptakes in the whole body distribution using the treated 211At solution in which chemical form was unified. [Methods] Three male Wistar rats (n=3, body weight=285.9 ± 19.7g) and three nude mice (n=3, body weight=25.2 ± 1.7g) were investigated in this study. 211At solutions treated with ascorbic acid were injected through the tail vein under isoflurane anesthesia (2.72 ± 0.12 MBq in the rats and 0.90 ± 0.08 MBq in the mice). Planar images were acquired at 30 min, 3, 6, and 24 hrs after injection of 211At using E-Cam scanner (Siemens) targeting the X-rays emitted from the daughter nuclide of 211Po. Regions of interest were placed on the neck area, the stomach area and the bladder area using AMIDE software (Ver. 1.0.4). Radioactivity of the major organs were measured by gamma counter after euthanasia and dissection at 24 hrs. Uptakes were normalized by the injected dose (MBq) and body weight (g), and compared between the rats and the mice by Mann-Whitney U test. [Results] Planar images revealed that uptakes were peaked at 3-6 hrs post injection (%ID/g at 3hrs in the rats and the mice: 4.6 ± 2.6 vs 12.6 ± 8.3 in the neck area, 24.3 ± 0.2 vs 19.4 ± 3.4 in the stomach area, and 2.9 ± 2.5 vs 8.9 ± 6.7 in the bladder area, respectively). At 24 hrs after injection, the rats showed significantly higher uptakes in the thyroid gland (23,916 ± 12,110 vs 1,451 ± 232 CPM/Bq), the lung (47.5 ± 7.3 vs 14.4 ± 5.5), the liver (6.4 ± 0.2 vs 2.9 ± 0.6), the stomach (200.9 ± 28.0 vs 77.2 ± 13.0) and the spleen (77.7 ± 32.3 vs 2.4 ± 2.0), and significantly lower uptakes in the submandibular gland (9.6 ± 1.4 vs 167.0 ± 26.8) compared to the mice. No significant difference was observed in the kidney between the rats and the mice (16.3 ± 1.3 vs 19.3 ± 18.3). [Conclusion] There was still a large species difference of 211At uptakes between the rats and the mice using At solution treated with ascorbic acid. It was suggested that attention must be paid about the physiological accumulation of unlabeled 211At in non-target organs, such as the salivary gland, when we start the clinical trials of the targeted radionuclide therapy.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Species difference of astatine-211 uptakes in the whole body distribution: preclinical study using treated At-solution.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Species difference of astatine-211 uptakes in the whole body distribution: preclinical study using treated At-solution.
Tadashi Watabe, Kazuko Kaneda-Nakashima, Yuwei Liu, Yoshifumi Shirakami, Atsushi Toyoshima, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Eku Shimosegawa, Mitsuhiro Fukuda, Atsushi Shinohara, Jun Hatazawa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1269;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Species difference of astatine-211 uptakes in the whole body distribution: preclinical study using treated At-solution.
Tadashi Watabe, Kazuko Kaneda-Nakashima, Yuwei Liu, Yoshifumi Shirakami, Atsushi Toyoshima, Mitsuaki Tatsumi, Eku Shimosegawa, Mitsuhiro Fukuda, Atsushi Shinohara, Jun Hatazawa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1269;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Basic Science Track

  • Imaging adult glioma with 68Ga-citrate PET/MR
  • Evaluation of L-1-[18F]Fluoroethyl-Tryptophan for PET Imaging of Cancer
  • Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy with 225Ac-proteus-DOTA hapten.
Show more Oncology, Basic Science Track

Basic Science Posters (Oncology)

  • Imaging adult glioma with 68Ga-citrate PET/MR
  • Evaluation of L-1-[18F]Fluoroethyl-Tryptophan for PET Imaging of Cancer
  • HER2-targeted SPECT imaging of nude mice with colon cancer xenografts using 125I-Herceptin
Show more Basic Science Posters (Oncology)

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire