Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleGenitourinary

Functional Renal Imaging with 2-Deoxy-2-18F-Fluorosorbitol PET in Rat Models of Renal Disorders

Rudolf A. Werner, Hiroshi Wakabayashi, Xinyu Chen, Mitsuru Hirano, Tetsuya Shinaji, Constantin Lapa, Steven P. Rowe, Mehrbod S. Javadi and Takahiro Higuchi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (5) 828-832; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.203828
Rudolf A. Werner
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
2Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
3Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Wakabayashi
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinyu Chen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
3Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitsuru Hirano
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
3Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tetsuya Shinaji
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
3Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Constantin Lapa
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven P. Rowe
2Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mehrbod S. Javadi
2Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takahiro Higuchi
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
3Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
5Department of Bio-Medical Imaging, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Research Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Precise regional quantitative assessment of renal function is limited with conventional 99mTc-labeled renal radiotracers. A recent study reported that the PET radiotracer 2-deoxy-2-18F-fluorosorbitol (18F-FDS) has ideal pharmacokinetics for functional renal imaging. Furthermore, 18F-FDS is available via simple reduction from routinely used 18F-FDG. We aimed to further investigate the potential of 18F-FDS PET as a functional renal imaging agent using rat models of kidney disease. Methods: Two different rat models of renal impairment were investigated: induction of acute renal failure by intramuscular administration of glycerol in the hind legs, and induction of unilateral ureteral obstruction by ligation of the left ureter. At 24 h after these procedures, dynamic 30-min 18F-FDS PET data were acquired using a dedicated small-animal PET system. Urine 18F-FDS radioactivity 30 min after radiotracer injection was measured together with coinjected 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid urine activity. Results: Dynamic PET imaging demonstrated rapid 18F-FDS accumulation in the renal cortex and rapid radiotracer excretion via the kidneys in healthy control rats. On the other hand, significantly delayed renal radiotracer uptake (continuous slow uptake) was observed in acute renal failure rats and unilateral ureteral obstruction kidneys. Measured urine radiotracer concentrations of 18F-FDS and 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid correlated well with each other (R = 0.84, P < 0.05). Conclusion: 18F-FDS PET demonstrated favorable kinetics for functional renal imaging in rat models of kidney diseases. 18F-FDS PET imaging, with its advantages of high spatiotemporal resolution and simple tracer production, could potentially complement or replace conventional renal scintigraphy in select cases and significantly improve the diagnostic performance of renal functional imaging.

  • 18F-FDS
  • 99mTc-DTPA
  • PET
  • renal failure
  • unilateral ureteral obstruction
  • glomerular filtration

The best indicator of kidney function is considered to be the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, because the filtration process occurs simultaneously in millions of glomeruli, a direct measurement of GFR is not feasible (1). The filtered agent 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) is widely available as a means to determine split GFR estimation by plotting dynamic renogram time–activity curves from planar images. However, precise regional assessment of renal function is limited by this 2-dimensional approach. Furthermore, Compton scatter and soft-tissue attenuation are major obstacles for reliable quantification. The use of hybrid imaging devices such as SPECT/CT enables 3-dimensional anatomic coregistration; however, the prolonged SPECT acquisition time and the limited temporal resolution reduce the potential of dynamic imaging (2).

Dynamic tomographic imaging with PET has the intrinsic advantage of high temporal and spatial resolution when compared with the 2-dimensional planar approach used with single-photon imaging agents. Furthermore, as previously confirmed in an experimental study on healthy rats, the PET radiotracer 2-deoxy-2-18F-fluorosorbitol (18F-FDS) has emerged as a promising candidate for measuring renal function with high kidney extraction and excretion, low plasma protein binding, and high metabolic stability (3). Given the simple 1-step reduction of the most frequent PET radiotracer, 18F-FDG, the use of 18F-FDS might open the window to the clinical availability of renal PET imaging.

The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the imaging and kinetic characteristics of 18F-FDS for the assessment of renal function in renally impaired rats using models of acute renal failure (ARF) and unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiotracer Production

18F-FDS was synthesized by following a previously described procedure (4). In short, NaBH4 (2 mg, 0.053 mmol) was added to a solution of 18F-FDG in saline, and the resulting mixture was stirred at 35°C for 15 min. After quenching of the reaction, the mixture was adjusted to a pH of 7.4 and filtered through an Alumina-N Sep-Pak cartridge (Waters). The filtrate was then reconstituted in saline and passed through a 0.22-μm Millipore filter into a sterile multidose vial. A radiochemical purity of more than 95% was confirmed for 18F-FDS by radio–thin-layer chromatography (CR 35 Bio; Raytest) (80% acetonitrile with 20% water as eluent) (3).

DTPA kits (Fujifilm RI Pharma) were labeled using generator-produced 99mTc-pertechnetate according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Animal Preparation

Male Wistar rats weighing 200–250 g (n = 18) were used. Experimental protocols were approved by the regional governmental commission of animal protection and conducted in strict accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (5). ARF was induced by intramuscular injection of 50% glycerol (10 mL/kg) in each hind leg after a 24-h water deprivation period (n = 5) (6,7). At 24 h after glycerol injection, experimental tracer studies were conducted. UUO was induced by complete ligation of the left ureter near the renal pelvis (n = 9) (8). At 24 h after the ligation procedure, experimental studies were performed. As controls, experimental studies were also performed on 4 healthy rats.

Small-Animal PET Imaging

The rats were studied with a high-resolution dedicated small-animal PET system (Inveon microPET; Siemens Healthcare) (9). They were maintained under anesthesia by 2% isoflurane during the entirety of the experiments. 18F-FDS (30 MBq) was administered via the tail vein for PET imaging, and 99mTc-DTPA (2 MBq) was coinjected for reference for urine γ-counting and autoradiography. The 30-min list-mode scan was started just before radiotracer injection. The list-mode data were sorted into 3-dimensional sinograms, which were then rebinned with fully 3-dimensional binning to reconstruct dynamic images using 3-dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization. The reconstructed dynamic images consisted of 56 acquired frames (15 frames × 8 s, 26 frames × 30 s, and 15 frames × 60 s).

The obtained PET images were analyzed using an image-processing application (AMIDE imaging software, version 1.0.1) (10). Three-dimensional regions of interests were manually drawn over the entire kidney, including the medulla. The mean concentration of radioactivity within the regions of interests was expressed as the percentage injected dose per cubic centimeter of tissue. Time–activity curves (renography) were generated, and the time points of maximal (Tmax) and half-maximal (T½max) concentration were computed.

Postmortem Analysis

For γ-counting, plasma was collected via the tail artery during the PET acquisition (10 min after tracer delivery). After the PET acquisition (35 min after tracer injection), the rats were euthanized, urine was collected by opening the abdominal cavity, and autoradiography studies were conducted. Plasma (4 ARF rats, 4 controls) and urine (3 ARF rats, 3 controls) were counted for radioactivity in an automated γ-counter (Wizard; PerkinElmer). The radioactivity concentrations, expressed as percentage injected dose per gram, were calculated (3). The kidneys were frozen and cut into 20-μm short-axis slices using a cryostat (Leica). Dual-radiotracer autoradiography was performed to assess both 18F-FDS and 99mTc-DTPA uptake. First, the imaging plate (MultiSensitive Phosphor Screens; PerkinElmer) was exposed for 3 h to visualize the distribution of 18F-FDS with a digital autoradiography system (CR 35 Bio; Raytest). After 18 h to allow for the decay of 18F, a second exposure for 12 h was started to evaluate 99mTc-DTPA uptake. After autoradiography, tissue slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

Statistics

All results are displayed as mean ± SD. The 2-tailed paired Student t test was used to compare differences between 2 dependent groups, and the 2-tailed independent Student t test was used to compare differences between independent groups. For correlative analyses, Pearson coefficients of correlation were calculated. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was done with StatMate III (ATMS Co., Ltd.) and JMP (SAS Institute Inc.).

RESULTS

Small-Animal Imaging

Whole-body dynamic PET imaging demonstrated high radiotracer excretion via the kidneys, with a low hepatobiliary clearance in control animals (Figs. 1 and 2). Blood flow through the inferior vena cava and the arterial vasculature was visualized, followed by a gradual delineation of the renal cortex and transition of the activity into the collecting system and renal pelvis (Fig. 1A). Visual analysis demonstrated that 18F-FDS was excreted solely through the urinary system and subsequently transited into the bladder. No obvious signals from other organs were detected (Fig. 1B). A normal renogram pattern consistent with blood-flow, parenchymal, and excretory phases, with a Tmax of 1.1 ± 0.6 min and a T½max of 12.2 ± 3.0 min, was derived in control rats (Fig. 1C, top). As expected, the bladder demonstrated a continuous radiotracer increase in control rats (Fig. 1C, bottom).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

(A) Coronal dynamic 18F-FDS PET images of left kidney show rapid cortical uptake in control rat but reduced cortical uptake in ARF rat. (B) Coronal dynamic whole-body 18F-FDS PET images show control rats to have high tracer secretion exclusively via kidneys and time-dependent increase in bladder activity, whereas ARF rats have reduced tracer secretion via kidneys and delayed increase in bladder activity. (C) Average time–activity curves for kidneys and bladder by dynamic PET (averaged Tmax of kidneys in ARF rats, 0.5 ± 0.1 min) show low tracer secretion via kidneys in ARF rats. %ID = percentage injected dose.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

(A) Dynamic 18F-FDS PET images of UUO rats show reduced cortical uptake in affected kidney but rapid cortical uptake in contralateral kidney. (B) Dynamic whole-body 18F-FDS PET images show affected kidney to have time-dependent increase in uptake but no tracer excretion, whereas tracer is seen in pelvis of contralateral kidney at 0–5 min. (C) Average time–activity curves for kidneys by dynamic PET (averaged Tmax of kidneys in UUO rats, 22.7 ± 4.5 min) show tracer deposition in cortex of affected kidney. %ID = percentage injected dose.

On PET images, uptake in the renal cortex was significantly less in ARF rats than in controls (Fig. 1A), and radiotracer excretion through the urinary system was lower. In particular, radiotracer transit to the bladder was delayed (Fig. 1B). These findings were further corroborated using averaged radiotracer time–activity curves. The derived renograms showed a nonfunctioning pattern, indicating that glomerular filtration was impaired after glycerol injection (Fig. 1C, top). Tmax was 0.5 ± 0.1 min in ARF rats (P < 0.05, vs. controls), whereas T½max was not reached during the 30-min scan. Additionally, bladder activity was reduced and delayed in the ARF model (Fig. 1C, bottom).

In UUO rats, enlarged PET images of the renal area displayed a weak to moderate radiotracer retention in the renal cortex over time (Fig. 2A). Lower and delayed uptake was observed on the obstructed side, with no transition into the collecting system and renal pelvis (Fig. 2B, left kidney), whereas the contralateral side (Fig. 2B, right kidney) showed results similar to those obtained in control rats. The derived renograms demonstrated a typical pattern for an obstructed kidney: on averaged time–activity curves, the increase in activity on the obstructed side was slow, with no further peak during the parenchymal phase and progressive parenchymal accumulation (Fig. 2C). For the UUO kidneys, Tmax was 22.7 ± 4.5 min (P < 0.0001 vs. controls), whereas T½max was not reached.

γ-Counting and Autoradiography Results

On γ-counting, the 18F-FDS concentrations in plasma (R = 0.77) and urine (R = 0.84) correlated well with the 99mTc-DTPA concentrations (P < 0.05, Table 1). Autoradiography confirmed a similar renal distribution for both radiotracers in control and ARF rats (Fig. 3). With regard to the hematoxylin and eosin staining, retained radioactivity was observed in the inner medullary collecting ducts.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Plasma and Urine Concentrations of Coinjected 18F-FDS and 99mTc-DTPA on γ-Counting Studies

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Coronal autoradiography slices of kidney show comparable distribution pattern for 18F-FDS and 99mTc-DTPA in both control and ARF rats. High radioactivity was observed in inner medulla on hematoxylin- and eosin-stained (H&E) sections.

In Vivo Stability and Plasma Protein Binding

Radio–thin-layer chromatography analysis of rat plasma samples and 18F-FDS solution revealed completely matched single spots in all samples from each group (n = 2), indicating the nonexistence of radiolabeled metabolites in blood 30 min after radiotracer administration. In vivo serum protein binding of 18F-FDS at 30 min after radiotracer administration was quantified as minimal (<0.1%) by separation of free 18F-FDS using ultrafiltration.

DISCUSSION

As the standard of renal function measurement, GFR assessment requires an exogenous marker that behaves similarly to inulin, that is, free filtration without any tubular secretion or absorption (11). Suitable exogenous markers for measuring renal function, such as 51Cr-EDTA, are widely used in clinical practice, and plasma clearance estimated by multiple blood samples increases its diagnostic accuracy, although repeated sampling makes it inconvenient (11). GFR estimation using 99mTc-DTPA planar imaging is biased by the applied method of scintigraphic GFR determination (12), and camera-based techniques depend on the precise assessment of renal depth for soft-tissue attenuation corrections (13). On the other hand, recent efforts have been made to develop novel renal imaging agents focusing on tubular function and renal plasma flow instead of measuring GFR (14,15). With kinetics identical to the gold standard 131I-orthoiodohippurate for measurement of effective renal plasma flow, 99mTc-(CO)3(fluoroethyl)iminodiacetic acid inherits the advantage of improved background activity correction; however, none of the methodology currently in place is able to solve this issue successfully (16,17). In contradistinction, as previously demonstrated in healthy rats and confirmed in the present study, 18F-FDS allows for almost complete elimination of background activity from surrounding organs (3). We observed rapid excretion via the urinary system (without visualized hepatobiliary clearance), high in vivo stability, and low serum protein binding. Furthermore, in 2 different rat models of kidney disease, functional impairment of the injured kidneys was successfully identified: in ARF rats, radiotracer extraction by and excretion through both kidneys was low, and radiotracer accumulation in the bladder was minimal. Imaging-derived renograms showed a bilateral nonfunctioning pattern. In the UUO rat model, radiotracer extraction from the blood pool was reduced, and transit from the cortex to the collecting system in the obstructed kidney was significantly impaired. Renograms demonstrated a typical obstructed pattern on the affected side.

In the present dual-tracer autoradiography study using the γ-camera imaging agent 99mTc-DTPA and the PET tracer 18F-FDS, biodistribution for the two radiotracers was comparable. However, renal PET imaging offers numerous advantages, such as increased spatiotemporal resolution and accurate tomographic 3-dimensional quantitative capability (17). As a competitor for PET renal imaging, 68Ga-EDTA was recently introduced as a substitute for 99mTc-DTPA (18). Compared with its 68Ga-labeled counterpart, 18F-FDS provides a cost-effective approach toward radiotracer production by a simple 1-step reduction of 18F-FDG, and its longer half-life allows for flexibility in study design. Further, it possesses the inherent advantages of lower positron energy along with higher positron yield. Strikingly, as an analog of sorbitol, 18F-FDS has kinetic properties that are theoretically identical to the gold standard inulin (sorbitol–to–inulin clearance ratio, 1.01) (19). However, regardless of which radiotracer is used, the major obstacle of renal PET imaging in a human setting has to been addressed—that is, current PET cameras do not allow imaging of the entire urinary system in a single field of view (18). Hence, it might be necessary to use costly large-field whole-body PET devices or to obtain multiple PET and CT acquisitions, which might hamper diagnostic accuracy.

In light of radiation exposure and higher costs, the clinical situation in which its use in renal radionuclide imaging would be most justified remains a matter of debate. A decade ago, renovascular hypertension and kidney transplant rejection were seen as major clinical indications for renal PET; however, improvements in drug development and the widespread availability of nonradiation methods such as ultrasound have led to a massive decline in such study requests in recent years (20–23). Currently, common clinical indications include monitoring during chemotherapy or assessment of split renal function for various clinical indications, such as before radiotherapy or before live kidney donation (24–26). Because of the superior spatial and temporal resolutions of PET, 18F-FDS could potentially be applied in those clinical situations, especially for determining differential glomerular filtration.

In view of the promising results of recently published randomized clinical trials, treatment of inoperable, metastasized neuroendocrine tumors with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is currently gaining ground (27). However, renal irradiation from peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is most likely to be caused by cross fire of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs from adjacent tubules, and it was hypothesized that serial 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine studies might be a superior indicator for early stages of kidney dysfunction caused by endoradiotherapy (28). However, measurement of tubular extraction rate was unsuitable as an early way to identify an increased probability of later renal failure (29). Hence, a dual-radiotracer approach using somatostatin receptor PET together with 18F-FDS PET could potentially be applied to patients scheduled for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and replace common renography studies in the long term.

Most importantly, creatinine clearance–based estimates of GFR are often used in pediatrics. However, changes in body mass limit the reliability of this method, and accuracy is hampered in children with renal and urologic disorders (17). Moreover, children can also have anatomic abnormalities of the kidney, such as ureteropelvic junction obstruction (30). Ideally, in these difficult clinical situations, 18F-FDS renal PET might set the scene for effective decision making, as it provides simultaneous information about anatomic conditions and about the functional significance of an obstruction (17). Given the increased count rates obtained with 18F-FDS, as compared with conventional imaging agents such as 99mTc-DTPA, a much lower activity of 18F can be administered. Hence, mainly because of the advantages of PET over SPECT, 18F-FDS could potentially minimize radiation exposure in children without sacrificing image quality. Moreover, when a PET/CT study is performed, the additional radiation exposure from the CT component should also be considered. However, use of a low-dose or ultra–low-dose CT scan along with the narrow field of view necessary for renal imaging could further lower radiation exposure to less than 0.25 mSv (2).

CONCLUSION

In 2 rat models of kidney disease, 18F-FDS PET demonstrated favorable kinetics for functional renal imaging. Renal PET/CT has the potential to provide improved spatial and temporal functional data when the clinical situation does not allow relevant information to be easily obtained by other common noninvasive techniques. Because of its superior diagnostic performance and simple production via reduction of 18F-FDG, 18F-FDS might meet this urgent need in renal radionuclide imaging. Strikingly, 18F-FDS could potentially minimize radiation exposure in children without sacrificing image quality. Further confirmatory studies in humans are warranted.

DISCLOSURE

This work was supported by the Competence Network of Heart Failure funded by the Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the German Research Council (DFG grant HI 1789/3-3). This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement 701983. Hiroshi Wakabayashi received a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Research (17K10353). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Dec. 14, 2017.

  • © 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Soveri I,
    2. Berg UB,
    3. Bjork J,
    4. et al
    . Measuring GFR: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64:411–424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hofman MS,
    2. Hicks RJ
    . Gallium-68 EDTA PET/CT for renal imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2016;46:448–461.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wakabayashi H,
    2. Werner RA,
    3. Hayakawa N,
    4. et al
    . Initial preclinical evaluation of 18F-fluorodeoxysorbitol PET as a novel functional renal imaging agent. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1625–1628.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Li ZB,
    2. Wu Z,
    3. Cao Q,
    4. et al
    . The synthesis of 18F-FDS and its potential application in molecular imaging. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008;10:92–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2011.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Singh AP,
    2. Junemann A,
    3. Muthuraman A,
    4. et al
    . Animal models of acute renal failure. Pharmacol Rep. 2012;64:31–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Westenfelder C,
    2. Arevalo GJ,
    3. Crawford PW,
    4. et al
    . Renal tubular function in glycerol-induced acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 1980;18:432–444.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tantawy MN,
    2. Jiang R,
    3. Wang F,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of renal function in mice with unilateral ureteral obstruction using 99mTc-MAG3 dynamic scintigraphy. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13:168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Disselhorst JA,
    2. Brom M,
    3. Laverman P,
    4. et al
    . Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:610–617.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Loening AM,
    2. Gambhir SS
    . AMIDE: a free software tool for multimodality medical image analysis. Mol Imaging. 2003;2:131–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gaspari F,
    2. Perico N,
    3. Remuzzi G
    . Measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int Suppl. 1997;63(suppl):S151–S154.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mulligan JS,
    2. Blue PW,
    3. Hasbargen JA
    . Methods for measuring GFR with technetium-99m-DTPA: an analysis of several common methods. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1211–1219.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Taylor A,
    2. Lewis C,
    3. Giacometti A,
    4. Hall EC,
    5. Barefield KP
    . Improved formulas for the estimation of renal depth in adults. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1766–1769.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Lipowska M,
    2. Klenc J,
    3. Jarkas N,
    4. Marzilli LG,
    5. Taylor AT
    . Monoanionic 99mTc-tricarbonyl-aminopolycarboxylate complexes with uncharged pendant groups: radiosynthesis and evaluation as potential renal tubular tracers. Nucl Med Biol. 2017;47:48–55.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Klenc J,
    2. Lipowska M,
    3. Taylor AT
    . Synthesis and evaluation of 99mTc(CO)3 (FEDA): a new dual-purpose 99mTc/18F renal imaging agent [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(suppl 3):654.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Blaufox MD
    . Renal background correction and measurement of split renal function: the challenge. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:548–549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Blaufox MD
    . PET measurement of renal glomerular filtration rate: is there a role in nuclear medicine? J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1495–1496.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hofman M,
    2. Binns D,
    3. Johnston V,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-EDTA PET/CT imaging and plasma clearance for glomerular filtration rate quantification: comparison to conventional 51Cr-EDTA. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:405–409.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Willie W,
    2. Smith HF,
    3. Smith HW
    . Renal excretion of hexitols (sorbitol, mannitol, and dulcitol) and their derivatives (sorbitan, isomannide, and sorbide) and of endogenous creatinine-like chromogen in dog and man. J Biol Chem. 1940;135:231–250.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Szabo Z,
    2. Xia J,
    3. Mathews WB,
    4. Brown PR
    . Future direction of renal positron emission tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2006;36:36–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.
    1. Taylor AT
    . Radionuclides in nephrourology, part 2: pitfalls and diagnostic applications. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:786–798.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.
    1. Textor SC
    . Current approaches to renovascular hypertension. Med Clin North Am. 2009;93:717–732.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Hanssen O,
    2. Erpicum P,
    3. Lovinfosse P,
    4. et al
    . Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I. In vivo imaging methods. Clin Kidney J. 2017;10:97–105.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Delbeke D,
    2. Segall GM
    . Status of and trends in nuclear medicine in the United States. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(suppl 2):24S–28S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.
    1. Jackson P,
    2. Foroudi F,
    3. Pham D,
    4. et al
    . Short communication: timeline of radiation-induced kidney function loss after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy of renal cell carcinoma as evaluated by serial 99mTc-DMSA SPECT/CT. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:253.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hartlev LB,
    2. Boeje CR,
    3. Bluhme H,
    4. Palshof T,
    5. Rehling M
    . Monitoring renal function during chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1478–1482.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Strosberg J,
    2. El-Haddad G,
    3. Wolin E,
    4. et al
    . Phase 3 trial of 177Lu-dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:125–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Sabet A,
    2. Ezziddin K,
    3. Pape UF,
    4. et al
    . Accurate assessment of long-term nephrotoxicity after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-octreotate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:505–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Werner RA,
    2. Beykan S,
    3. Higuchi T,
    4. et al
    . The impact of 177Lu-octreotide therapy on 99mTc-MAG3 clearance is not predictive for late nephropathy. Oncotarget. 2016;7:41233–41241.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Williams B,
    2. Tareen B,
    3. Resnick MI
    . Pathophysiology and treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Curr Urol Rep. 2007;8:111–117.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  • Received for publication October 17, 2017.
  • Accepted for publication November 27, 2017.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 59 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue 5
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Functional Renal Imaging with 2-Deoxy-2-18F-Fluorosorbitol PET in Rat Models of Renal Disorders
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Functional Renal Imaging with 2-Deoxy-2-18F-Fluorosorbitol PET in Rat Models of Renal Disorders
Rudolf A. Werner, Hiroshi Wakabayashi, Xinyu Chen, Mitsuru Hirano, Tetsuya Shinaji, Constantin Lapa, Steven P. Rowe, Mehrbod S. Javadi, Takahiro Higuchi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (5) 828-832; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.203828

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Functional Renal Imaging with 2-Deoxy-2-18F-Fluorosorbitol PET in Rat Models of Renal Disorders
Rudolf A. Werner, Hiroshi Wakabayashi, Xinyu Chen, Mitsuru Hirano, Tetsuya Shinaji, Constantin Lapa, Steven P. Rowe, Mehrbod S. Javadi, Takahiro Higuchi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (5) 828-832; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.203828
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Infection Imaging: Focus on New Tracers?
  • Assessment of Individual Renal Function Using 99mTc-MAG3 Renography
  • 11C-PABA as a PET Radiotracer for Functional Renal Imaging: Preclinical and First-in-Human Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Genitourinary

  • 11C-PABA as a PET Radiotracer for Functional Renal Imaging: Preclinical and First-in-Human Study
Show more Genitourinary

Basic

  • Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonist PET Tracer Development: Assessment in Nonhuman Primates
  • Optical Navigation of the Drop-In γ-Probe as a Means to Strengthen the Connection Between Robot-Assisted and Radioguided Surgery
  • Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of a 68Ga-Labeled Adnectin, 68Ga-BMS-986192, as a PET Agent for Imaging PD-L1 Expression
Show more Basic

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-FDS
  • 99mTc-DTPA
  • PET
  • renal failure
  • unilateral ureteral obstruction
  • glomerular filtration
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire