Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleSupplement

Norepinephrine Transporter as a Target for Imaging and Therapy

Neeta Pandit-Taskar and Shakeel Modak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2017, 58 (Supplement 2) 39S-53S; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.186833
Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shakeel Modak
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Metaiodobenylguanidine (A) and noradrenaline (B).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Imaging with 123I-MIBG and 18F-MFBG. 123I-MIBG whole-body anterior (A) and posterior (B) images show minimal uptake in bilateral femora (arrows). These lesions are better visualized on 18F-MFBG PET/CT imaging (C), which also shows additional lesions (blue arrows) not seen on 123I-MIBG imaging.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    12-y-old with neuroblastoma. 123I-MIBG pretherapy anterior (A) and posterior (B) images show multiple foci of uptake consistent with lesions in skull, right humerus, vertebrae, pelvic bones, and right tibia (arrows). These lesions are not seen in posttherapy scans (C and D) obtained 8 wk after treatment with 21.8 GBq (590 mCi) of 131I-MIBG (dose of 666 MBq [18 mCi]/kg).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Patient with metastatic pheochromocytoma presented with progression of disease. 123I-MIBG pretherapy anterior (A) and posterior (B) images show increased uptake in bilateral lung lesions and intense uptake in large sternal lesion, left adrenal lesion, and sacral lesion (arrows). Patient was eligible for 131I-MIBG and was treated with approximately 8,510 MBq (230 mCi) of 131I-MIBG. (C–G) Posttherapy planar anterior (C) and posterior (D) scans and SPECT/CT fused images at 3 levels (E–G) show good targeting of lesions (arrows). Plasma normetanephrine and total metanephrine levels decreased from greater than 20,000 and 40,000 pg/mL, respectively, at baseline to 14,295 and 14,329 pg/mL, respectively, at 13 wk after treatment.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Selected Publications on MIBG Therapy for Neuroblastoma

    MIBG treatment dose usedPhaseNo. of patientsASCTCombinationSalient resultsReference
    Up-front/induction
     First of 2 doses: 157–804 MBq  (21.7 mCi)/kg; second dose:  113–727 MBq (3–19.6 mCi)/kgRetrospective66NoNoneTolerability established in patients with newly diagnosed stage IV disease (n = 66); after 1 and 2 doses: combined grade 3–4 leucopenia in 9% and 25%, respectively, and thrombocytopenia in 11% and 12%, respectively89
     Single dose after 10 d of  chemotherapy: 5.5–7.4 GBq (7.4– 16.6 mCi)/kg (not more than 200 mCi)Retrospective13YesPrior chemotherapyStages III and IV; newly diagnosed; feasible; responses in patients treated with doses of 444 MBq (12 mCi)/kg and higher90
     2–5 doses: fixed dose of 7.4 GBq (200 mCi)  for dose 1 and 3.7–5.6 GBq (100–150 mCi)  for follow-up treatmentsRetrospective44 (41 evaluable)NoNoneHigh-risk neuroblastoma; OR in 66%; PR in 63% (26/41); greater thrombocytopenia with higher cumulative doses91
     Fixed dose: 3.7–7.4 GBq (100–200 mCi) or  174–563 MBq (4.7–15.2 mCi)/kg for  dose 1 and 244–529 MBq (6.6– 14.3 mCi)/kg for dose 2Retrospective21YesNoneFeasible in 66%; RR: 38%; no stem cell support needed; mild thrombocytopenia92
    Relapsed/refractory
     2 doses (escalation in cohorts); dose 1:  444–777 MBq (12–21 mCi)/kg; dose 2  (based on cumulative body dose):  ≤777 MBq (21 mCi)/kg; tandem; red  marrow radiation index based121YesNoneDoses given 14 d apart; red marrow dose levels: 4.0, 6.0, and 8.0 Gy; mild toxicity; double MIBG therapy feasible36
     Single dose of 555–666 MBq (15–18 mCi)/kg219 with neuroblastoma; 2 with metastatic PGL/PHEOYesArsenic trioxideToxicity of combination manageable; objective RR: 29%72
     Dose escalating from 296 to 666 MBq (8 to  18 mCi)/kg127YesVorinostat (escalation of dose from 180 to 270 mg/m2)High-risk relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma; toxicity of combination manageable; RR: 12%74
     555–666 MBq  (15–18 mCi)/kg; maximum cumulative  dose: 44.4 GBq (1,200 mCi)1/232YesIrinotecan and vincristineAdvanced high-risk neuroblastoma; toxicity of combination manageable; thrombocytopenia and grade 3 diarrhea common toxicities; RR: 32%75
     444–666 MBq  (12–18 mCi)/kg124YesMyeloablative chemotherapyRefractory neuroblastoma; MTD at 444 MBq (12 mCi)/kg; combination feasible; hepatotoxicity encountered; RR: 27%78
     444–666 MBq  (12–18 mCi)/kg (no carrier added)19YesNone131I-MIBG dosimetry study to assess renal, liver, and lung doses before therapy; toxicities similar to those of conventional MIBG therapy; RR: 27%79
     444 MBq (12 mCi)/kg in patients without  stem cell treatment (n = 16); 666 MBq  (18 mCi)/kg in those with stem cell  treatment2164Yes (33%)NoneProgressive, refractory, or relapsed neuroblastoma; RR: 36% (148 patients treated with 666 MBq [18 mCi]/kg; 16 treated with 444 MBq [12 mCi]/kg); CR + PR: 36%; OS: 49% at 1 y and 29% at 2 y80
     1–6 doses: 82–578 MBq (2.2–15.6 mCi)/kgRetrospective47NoNoneRelapsed, refractory, or metastatic neuroblastoma; RR: 46%82
     2.4–12.1 GBq  (65–327 mCi), based on WB dosimetry1/225NoNoneDosimetry-based approach to delivering 1–2.5 Gy of WB absorbed dose; 80% with grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia at 2.5-Gy WB dose; ORR: 33%83
     111–666 MBq/kg (3–18 mCi)/kg130Yes, in someNoneHigh-risk, relapsed neuroblastoma; ASCT required in most patients receiving ≥444 ΜΒq (≥12 mCi)/kg; DLT: 555 MBq (15 mCi)/kg; response in 37%; CR in 1 patient85
     2 doses of 666 MBq (18 mCi)/kg (tandem)  ∼6 wk (up to 100 d) apartRetrospective; safety–efficacy 276 (41 with second treatment)YesNoneExtensively pretreated relapsed neuroblastoma; RR to double MIBG therapy: ∼30%94
     Median dose:  0.44 GBq/kg (11.89 mCi)Retrospective111NoYesStage IV neuroblastoma with refractory disease; better event-free 3-y survival in patients who received MIBG therapy; however, MIBG therapy did not improve survival in patients who had refractory neuroblastoma and were undergoing ASCT96
     1–5 doses: 1.1–4 GBq (30–108 mCi)/treatment226NoNoneStage III–IV refractory, relapsed disease; 8 patients with prior ASCT; palliation of pain in 50%; objective response: 0%98
     2 doses; dose 1: 444 MBq (12 mCi)/kg; dose  2 based on remainder for 4-Gy WB doseFeasibility8YesTopotecanIn vivo dosimetry for 4-Gy WB dose; MIBG doses given 15 d apart; combination feasible; range of measured absorbed WB doses from treatment: 3.7–4.7 Gy126
    • RR = response rate; OR = overall response; PR = partial response; DLT = dose-limiting toxicity; CR = complete response; OS = overall survival; WB = whole body; ORR = objective response rate; MTD = maximum tolerated dose.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Studies of 131I-MIBG Therapy for Pheochromocytoma and PGL

    131I-MIBG therapyOverall response
    ReferenceNo. of patientsDisease statusActivityNo. of dosesTotal activityObjective*BiochemicalSymptomatic responseSurvivalComments
    10948Metastatic PHEO/PGLHigh specific activity: 3.7–14.8 GBq (1.32–5.69 mCi)/kg1–4NA1 PR, no CRNANA; no significant decrease in BP in patients with high systolic BPNANo significant toxicity
    107Group 1: 129/12 secreting555 MBq/dose every 3–4 moMaximum: 10; median: 7Maximum: 66.6 GBq; median: 39.41 CR, 3 PR (33%)5 PR (42%)NA1.9 yNo grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity
    107Group 2: 169/16 secreting7.4–12.95 GBq/dose every 6–8 moMaximum: 6; median: 257.2 GBq (median: 24.1)2 CR, 3 PR (31%)2 CR, 3 PR (31%)NA3 y6 patients had grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia
    11610Metastatic; symptomatic5.6 GBq/dose (n = 9); 3.7 GBq every 4–12 mo (n = 1)1–4 (mean: 2)10–13.2 GBq (mean 11.6 ± 1.6) (310 ± 44.0 mCi)3 PR (30%)5 patients (50%)5 patients (50%)Mean PFS: 17.5 mo (2–47 mo)No grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity
    11850Metastatic; 50% with SDHB mutationPhase 2: high dose; 222–333 MBq (6–9 mCi)/kg1–318,204–145,003 GBq (492–3,919 mCi)27% after first treatment; 50% after second treatment35% after first dose; 71% after second doseNAOS at 5 y: 64%Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity in up to 87%
    11133Metastatic PGL/PHEOMean first dose: 14.47 ± 4.8 GBq (391 ± 130 mCi)1–6Mean: 20.3 ± 11.24 GBq (549 ± 304 mCi); maximum: 1,22338%60%86%Median OS: 56 mo; median survival: 4.7 yBone marrow suppression in 12%
    106116 (compilation of data from multiple studies at 10 institutions)Metastatic PGL/PHEOMean dose: 158 (96–300)1–11 (mean: 3.3)Mean: 490 (96–2,322)30%45%76%5 patients had CR lasting up to 16–58 mo; better responses were seen in those with soft-tissue diseaseMild adverse effects in 41%; 1 patient had fatal marrow aplasia; 45% of the responders had median PFS of 19 mo
    • ↵* Complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR).

    • NA = not available; BP = blood pressure; PFS = progression-free survival; OS = overall survival.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (Supplement 2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue Supplement 2
September 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Norepinephrine Transporter as a Target for Imaging and Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Norepinephrine Transporter as a Target for Imaging and Therapy
Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Shakeel Modak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2017, 58 (Supplement 2) 39S-53S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186833

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Norepinephrine Transporter as a Target for Imaging and Therapy
Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Shakeel Modak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2017, 58 (Supplement 2) 39S-53S; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186833
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS TARGETING NET MECHANISM FOR IMAGING
    • NET TARGETING FOR THERAPY
    • STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING NET TARGETING AND DOSE DELIVERY WITH 131I-MIBG FOR THERAPY
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • First Experience Using 18F-Flubrobenguane PET Imaging in Patients with Suspected Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma
  • PARP-1-Targeted Auger Emitters Display High-LET Cytotoxic Properties In Vitro but Show Limited Therapeutic Utility in Solid Tumor Models of Human Neuroblastoma
  • Does Delayed Excretion of Therapeutic 131I-MIBG Interfere with a 123I-MIBG Diagnostic Scan 6 Weeks After the Therapy?
  • Radiolabeled (4-Fluoro-3-Iodobenzyl)Guanidine Improves Imaging and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Norepinephrine Transporter-Expressing Tumors
  • Theranostic Concepts: More Than Just a Fashion Trend--Introduction and Overview
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Role of Total-Body PET in Drug Development and Evaluation: Status and Outlook
  • Melanin-Targeting Radiotracers and Their Preclinical, Translational, and Clinical Status: From Past to Future
  • Advancing Global Nuclear Medicine: The Role and Future Contributions of China
Show more Supplement

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • MIBG
  • norepinephrine transporter
  • neuroendocrine
  • neuroblastoma
  • 18F-MFBG
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire