Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleOncology

Equivalent Dose Rate 1 Meter from Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Exiting the Nuclear Medicine Department After Undergoing Imaging

Jules Zhang-Yin, Anne-Sophie Dirand, Myriam Sasanelli, Gwenaelle Corrégé, Aude Peudon, Thierry Kiffel, Valérie Nataf, Jérôme Clerc, Françoise Montravers and Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2017, 58 (8) 1230-1235; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.187138
Jules Zhang-Yin
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France
2Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne-Sophie Dirand
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Myriam Sasanelli
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gwenaelle Corrégé
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aude Peudon
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thierry Kiffel
2Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valérie Nataf
4Radiopharmacy, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jérôme Clerc
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Françoise Montravers
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France
2Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Noël Talbot
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France
2Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Radiopharmaceuticals and Practical Options at Each Center

    Parameter68Ga-DOTATOC18F-FDOPA18F-FDG111In-pentetreotide123I-MIBG
    HospitalTenonTenonTenonCochinCochin
    ModalityPET/CTPET/CTPET/CTSPECT/CTSPECT/CT
    Radiopharmaceutical68Ga-DOTATOC (Iason) and GalliaPharm (Eckert & Ziegler)Iasodopa (Iason)Metatrace (Siemens) or Gluscan (AAA)Octreoscan (Mallinckrodt)123I-MIBG (Mallinckrodt) or Adreview (GE Healthcare)
    Physical half-life (min)681101104,032 (2.8 d)792 (13.2 h)
    Scheduled injected activity1–2 MBq/kg BM2.5–3.5 MBq/kg BM2–3 MBq/kg BM185 MBq185 MBq
    Scheduled interval between injection and imaging (min)45–9010 (MTC) and 6060–1201,440 (24 h)240 and 1,440 (4 and 24 h)
    Photonic ray for imaging (keV)511511511245 and 171159
    • BM = body mass; MTC = medullary thyroid cancer.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Patients, Imaging Characteristics, and EDR-1m According to Radiopharmaceutical

    Parameter68Ga-DOTATOC18F-FDOPA18F-FDG111In-pentetreotide123I-MIBGComparison
    Patients (n)5315131210χ2: NSD in sex repartition
     Male296863
     Female249567
    Age (y)56.7 ± 12.3; 58 (30–76)60.9 ± 12.1; 61 (29–78)64.5 ± 17.0; 66 (37–89)62.1 ± 12.6; 63 (38–81)51.0 ± 10.2; 53 (30–65)ANOVA: NSD
    Body height (m)1.70 ± 0.09; 1.71 (1.53–1.96)1.70 ± 0.09; 1.67 (1.57–1.83)1.66 ± 0.08; 1.69 (1.51–1.77)1.70 ± 0.12; 1.72 (1.45–1.86)1.68 ± 0.10; 1.69 (1.56–1.83)ANOVA: NSD
    Body mass (kg)72.4 ± 13.8; 71 (49–105)72.3 ± 13.5; 75 (50–91)68.4 ± 20.6; 60 (39–120)72.7 ± 13.7; 73.5 (54–95)73.3 ± 11.0; 76.5 (58–88)ANOVA: NSD
    Body mass index (kg⋅m−2)24.9 ± 4.27; 24.5 (17.3–37.1)24.6 ± 4.27; 24.4 (17.2–34.5)24.6 ± 6.01; 23.9 (15.2–38.7)25.1 ± 3.79; 24.4 (18.7–30.7)26.3 ± 4.03; 25.3 (21.3–33.6)ANOVA: NSD
    Injected activity (MBq)121 ± 23; 122 (80–170)199 ± 48; 198 (97–262)176 ± 56; 167 (98–321)170 ± 7; 170 (158–179)186 ± 5; 184 (176–194)68Ga-DOTATOC < all others; KW: P <<0.001
    Injected activity per kg body mass (MBq/kg)1.72 ± 0.42; 1.77 (0.89–2.80)2.74 ± 0.42; 2.83 (1.87–3.27)2.59 ± 0.38; 2.51 (2.23–3.81)2.41 ± 0.48; 2.30 (1.77–3.29)2.58 ± 0.45; 2.43 (2.00–3.27)68Ga-DOTATOC < all others; ANOVA: P < 0.001
    Interval between injection and EDR-1m measurement (min)90 ± 16; 87 (66–126)114 ± 14; 117 (86–130)112 ± 39; 95 (82–220)6.2 ± 3.5; 5 (2–15)5.7 ± 2.6; 5 (3–10)PENT & 123I-MIBG < 68Ga-DOTATOC < 18F-FDOPA & 18F-FDG; KW: P << 0.001
    EDR-1m from sternum (μSv/h)4.73 ± 1.41; 4.75 (2.10–9.10)9.76 ± 3.61; 9.50 (3.92–17.7)9.34 ± 3.51; 8.80 (3.50–18.8)9.56 ± 0.93; 9.43 (8.50–11.0)4.94 ± 0.31; 4.89 (4.45–5.49)68Ga-DOTATOC & 123I-MIBG < all others; KW: P << 0.001
    EDR-1m from bladder (μSv/h)5.04 ± 1.37; 5.10 (2.13–8.20)10.2 ± 3.20; 10.1 (4.57–15.8)10.5 ± 4.28; 9.50 (3.80–21.2)9.21 ± 1.31; 9.30 (5.81–11.2)4.41 ± 0.93; 4.68 (2.80–5.65)68Ga-DOTATOC & 123I-MIBG < all others; KW: P << 0.001
    EDR-1m from sternum per injected MBq (nSv/h/MBq)39.4 ± 10.7; 37.7 (21.9–89.7)51.7 ± 25.1; 45.5 (25.0–116)54.4 ± 13.8; 57.1 (16.5–71.5)56.3 ± 4.6; 55.5 (50–64)26.6 ± 1.5; 26.5 (23.6–29.5)123I-MIBG < 68Ga-DOTATOC & 18F-FDOPA < 18F-FDG & PENT; KW: P << 0.001
    EDR-1m from bladder per injected MBq (nSv/h/MBq)41.9 ± 10.0; 41.0 (25.4–88.5)54.0 ± 23.0; 44.8 (26.1–104)60.4 ± 15.5; 62.1 (17.9–82.9)54.3 ± 7.3; 56.0 (34.1–62.5)23.7 ± 4.9; 25.0 (15.3–29.1)123I-MIBG < 68Ga-DOTATOC < 18F-FDOPA & PENT < 18F-FDG; KW: P << 0.001
    • NSD = no significant difference; KW = Kruskal–Wallis test; PENT = 111In-pentetreotide.

    • Data are mean ± SD, or median followed by range in parentheses.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Studies Reporting Measurement of EDR-1m After Injection of 18F-FDG

    18F-FDGPresent studyFayad et al. (11)Demir et al. (12)Cronin et al. (13)
    Patients (n)1363075
    Injected activity (MBq)550323; 297
     Mean ± SD176 ± 56241 ± 33
     Range98–321130–311
     Median167
    Time between injection and  EDR-1m measurement (min)9590113; 116
     Mean ± SD112 ± 39117 ± 11
    Dose rate detectoridentiFINDERAT1123 (APVL Ingénierie)ESP-2 (Eberline)Series 1000 (Mini-Instruments)
    EDR-1m from sternum (μSv/h)5014.7
     Mean ± SD9.34 ± 3.516.83 ± 1.58
     Range3.50–18.83.5–32
     Median8.8014
    EDR-1m from sternum per  injected MBq (μSv/h/MBq)NA9047
     Mean ± SD54.4 ± 13.8
     Range16.5–71.513–120
     Median57.143
    • NA = not available.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Studies Reporting Measurement of EDR-1m After Injection of 111In-Pentetreotide

    111In-pentetreotidePresent studyFayad et al. (11)Morán et al. (14)Kurtaran et al. (15)
    Patients (n)126216
    Injected activity (MBq)
     Mean ± SD170 ± 7119 ± 67140 ± 40
     Range158–179105–128200–220
    Time between injection and  EDR-1m measurement (min)15
     Mean ± SD6.2 ± 5
     Range230–24010–20
    Dose rate detectorPDS-100GN-IDAT1123 (APVL Ingénierie)MiniTRACE γ (Genitron)LB 133 (Berthold Technologies)
    EDR-1m from sternum  (μSv/h)9.5
     Mean ± SD9.56 ± 0.935.5 ± 0.512.86 ± 1.22
     Range8.50–11.0
     Median9.43
    EDR-1m from sternum per  injected MBq (μSv/h/MBq)NA43NA
     Mean ± SD54.3 ± 7.3
    • NA = not available.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Studies Reporting Measurement of EDR-1m After Injection of 123I-MIBG

    123I-MIBGPresent studyOfluoglu et al. (10)
    Patients (n)1016
    Injected activity* (MBq)186 ± 5340 ± 30
    Time between injection and EDR-1m measurement (min)5.7 ± 2.6*10
    Dose rate detectorPDS-100GN-IDLB 133 (Berthold Technologies)
    EDR-1m* (μSv/h)Sternum: 4.94 ± 0.31; bladder: 4.41 ± 0.933.7 ± 0.7
    • ↵* Data are mean ± SD.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 8
August 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Equivalent Dose Rate 1 Meter from Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Exiting the Nuclear Medicine Department After Undergoing Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Equivalent Dose Rate 1 Meter from Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Exiting the Nuclear Medicine Department After Undergoing Imaging
Jules Zhang-Yin, Anne-Sophie Dirand, Myriam Sasanelli, Gwenaelle Corrégé, Aude Peudon, Thierry Kiffel, Valérie Nataf, Jérôme Clerc, Françoise Montravers, Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2017, 58 (8) 1230-1235; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.187138

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Equivalent Dose Rate 1 Meter from Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Exiting the Nuclear Medicine Department After Undergoing Imaging
Jules Zhang-Yin, Anne-Sophie Dirand, Myriam Sasanelli, Gwenaelle Corrégé, Aude Peudon, Thierry Kiffel, Valérie Nataf, Jérôme Clerc, Françoise Montravers, Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2017, 58 (8) 1230-1235; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.187138
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Reducing Radiation Exposure from PET Patients
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology

  • Role of F18-FDG PET/CT in non-cutaneous melanomas.
  • The role of Lymphoscintigraphy in Breast Cancer Reccurence
  • Utility of bone scans in patients with RCC
Show more Oncology

Clinical

  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Radiation Protection
  • dose rate
  • somatostatin receptor–based PET/CT
  • somatostatin receptor–based SPECT/CT
  • neuroendocrine tumors (NET)
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire