Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleOncology

Prospective Clinical Trial of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT for Determining the Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Invasive Ductal and Invasive Lobular Breast Cancers

Gary A. Ulaner, Debra A. Goldman, Adriana Corben, Serge K. Lyashchenko, Mithat Gönen, Jason S. Lewis and Maura Dickler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2017, 58 (7) 1037-1042; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.183335
Gary A. Ulaner
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra A. Goldman
3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adriana Corben
4Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge K. Lyashchenko
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
5Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probes Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mithat Gönen
3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason S. Lewis
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
5Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probes Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
6Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maura Dickler
7Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Time–activity curve for primary breast malignancy in representative patient. 18F-fluciclovine uptake was rapid, peaking at 5–10 min, and then slowly decreased until 30 min.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Reduction in 18F-fluciclovine avidity after neoadjuvant therapy in 52-y-old woman with grade 2 ER−/HER2+ IDC. (A–C) Axial 18F-fluciclovine PET (A), axial CT (B), and axial fused (C) images at baseline show 18F-fluciclovine–avid primary breast mass (solid arrow) and 18F-fluciclovine–avid axillary node metastases (broken arrow). (D–F) Axial 18F-fluciclovine PET (D), axial CT (E), and axial fused (F) images after neoadjuvant therapy show decrease in 18F-fluciclovine avidity of all lesions to background levels. Pathology revealed complete pathologic response, with no residual tumor.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Scatterplot of percentage of change in corrected SUVmax vs. percentage of tumor volume reduction on pathology after neoadjuvant therapy. ρ = Spearman ρ.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient and Tumor Characteristics

    Characteristicn%
    Sex (women)24100
    Race
     White1875
     Black416.7
     Asian14.2
     Hispanic14.2
    Histology
     IDC1875
     ILC625
    Histologic grade
     Low14.2
     Intermediate833.3
     High1562.5
    AJCC tumor stage*
     2B1354.2
     3A520.8
     3B416.7
     3C28.3
    Receptor status
     (ER+ or PR+)/HER2−1145.8
     HER2+729.2
     Triple negative (ER−PER−HER2−)625
    • ↵* Clinical classification according to seventh edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (31).

    • AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer; PR = progesterone receptor.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Numbers of Patients with 18F-Fluciclovine–Avid Breast and Node Lesions and 18F-Fluciclovine Avidity Measurements

    LesionNo. of patientsParameterBefore therapyAfter therapy*
    Primary24Corrected SUVmax5.5 (1.4–15.5)0.1 (0.0–4.3)
    Corrected SUVmax2.5 (1.1–6.0)0.1 (0.0–2.2)
    MTV15.7 (3.2–63.9)1.3 (0.0–26.3)
    TLA55.7 (5.0–371)1.0 (0.0–78.4)
    Axillary lymph node19Corrected SUVmax4.9 (0.6–13.2)0.0 (0.0–2.6)
    Corrected SUVmax2.2 (0.5–6.2)0.0 (0.0–1.3)
    MTV4.1 (1.0–22.1)0.0 (0.0–11.3)
    TLA10.9 (1.0–137)0.0 (0.0–15.0)
    Extraaxillary lymph node3Corrected SUVmax2.0 (1.4–3.2)0.0 (0.0–0.4)
    Corrected SUVmax1.2 (1.0–2.3)0.0 (0.0–0.0)
    MTV1.4 (1.1–1.8)0.0 (0.0–2.5)
    TLA3.2 (2.0–4.6)0.0 (0.0–2.5)
    • ↵* On scans after neoadjuvant therapy, breast lesions in 12 of 24 patients, axillary node lesions in 14 of 19 patients, and extraaxillary node lesions in 2 of 3 patients decreased to background levels. Lesions that decreased to background levels had corrected SUVmax (as well as SUVmean, MTV [in cm3], and TLA) of 0.

    • Data are reported as medians, with ranges in parentheses.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Correlation Between Percentage of Change in Corrected SUVmax of Primary Malignancy and Percentage of Reduction in Tumor Burden on Pathology After Neoadjuvant Therapy

    Change/reduction
    ParameterSUVmaxPathologyρP
    Median−99%−92%0.79<0.001
    Range−33% to −100%−10% to −100%
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Reduction in Corrected SUVmax of Primary Malignancy After Neoadjuvant Therapy

    Patients with reduction to background levelPercentage of reduction
    Tumor characteristicNo. of patientsn%MedianRange
    Histology
     IDC181055.6100.0100.0–38.7
     ILC6233.370.0100.0–32.8
    Receptor status
     ER+/HER2−11436.474.1100.0–32.8
     HER2+7571.4100.0100.0–44.7
     Triple negative635098.8100.0–67.4
    Histologic grade
     1 or 29333.374.1100.0–32.8
     315960100.0100.0–38.7
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (7)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 7
July 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prospective Clinical Trial of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT for Determining the Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Invasive Ductal and Invasive Lobular Breast Cancers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prospective Clinical Trial of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT for Determining the Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Invasive Ductal and Invasive Lobular Breast Cancers
Gary A. Ulaner, Debra A. Goldman, Adriana Corben, Serge K. Lyashchenko, Mithat Gönen, Jason S. Lewis, Maura Dickler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2017, 58 (7) 1037-1042; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.183335

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prospective Clinical Trial of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT for Determining the Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Invasive Ductal and Invasive Lobular Breast Cancers
Gary A. Ulaner, Debra A. Goldman, Adriana Corben, Serge K. Lyashchenko, Mithat Gönen, Jason S. Lewis, Maura Dickler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2017, 58 (7) 1037-1042; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.183335
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Glutamate Transport Proteins and Metabolic Enzymes are Poor Prognostic Factors in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
  • Riluzole suppresses growth and enhances response to endocrine therapy in ER+ breast cancer
  • 18F-Fluciclovine PET Imaging of Glutaminase Inhibition in Breast Cancer Models
  • Head-to-Head Evaluation of 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer
  • Hypoxia-induced switch in SNAT2/SLC38A2 regulation generates endocrine resistance in breast cancer
  • Hypoxia-induced switch in SNAT2/SLC38A2 regulation generates endocrine-resistance in breast cancer
  • Imaging Melphalan Therapy Response in Preclinical Extramedullary Multiple Myeloma with 18F-FDOPA and 18F-FDG PET
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology

  • Comparative PSMA expression at early (1hour) vs late (2hour) in primary and secondary sites of involvement in prostate cancer.
  • Imaging spectrum of peritoneal carcinomatosis associated with various etiologies on 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Hybrid Imaging Features of Musculoskeletal Tumors
Show more Oncology

Clinical

  • Comparative PSMA expression at early (1hour) vs late (2hour) in primary and secondary sites of involvement in prostate cancer.
  • Imaging spectrum of peritoneal carcinomatosis associated with various etiologies on 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Hybrid Imaging Features of Musculoskeletal Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-fluciclovine
  • PET/CT
  • ductal breast cancer
  • lobular breast cancer
  • response
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire