Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleCardiology

Impaired Myocardial Sympathetic Innervation Is Associated with Diastolic Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: 11C-Hydroxyephedrine PET Study

Tadao Aikawa, Masanao Naya, Masahiko Obara, Osamu Manabe, Yuuki Tomiyama, Keiichi Magota, Satoshi Yamada, Chietsugu Katoh, Nagara Tamaki and Hiroyuki Tsutsui
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (5) 784-790; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.178558
Tadao Aikawa
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masanao Naya
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masahiko Obara
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Osamu Manabe
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuuki Tomiyama
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keiichi Magota
3Department of Medical Imaging, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satoshi Yamada
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chietsugu Katoh
4Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nagara Tamaki
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroyuki Tsutsui
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Participant flowchart and diastolic dysfunction grading of HFpEF patients. DT = deceleration time; LA = left atrial.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Representative images of 11C-HED PET (A and C) and Doppler echocardiography (B and D) in 2 HFpEF patients (patient 1 with hypertensive heart disease and grade 1 diastolic dysfunction [A and B]). In patient 2 with cardiac amyloidosis and grade 2 diastolic dysfunction (C and D), the polar map of 11C-HED RI (C) shows more extensive impairment of myocardial sympathetic innervation than that of patient 1 (A). Red arrowheads indicate E wave, and yellow arrowheads indicate e′.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Scatterplots of global RI (A) and CVRI (B) for comparison among the 3 groups. Horizontal lines indicate mean value.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Scatterplots of global RI (A) and CVRI (B) for comparison between the 2 HFpEF groups with nonischemic heart disease (n = 28). Horizontal lines indicate mean value.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Scatterplots demonstrate association of LVEF (A and B) and LV mass index (C and D) with global RI and CVRI in study subjects. CI = confidence interval.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Clinical Characteristics of Study Subjects (n = 53)

    HFpEF
    CharacteristicControl (n = 12)DD0–1 (n = 22)DD2–3 (n = 19)P
    Age (y)64 ± 1265 ± 1463 ± 160.94
    Sex0.20
     Male51314
     Female795
    BMI (kg/m2)23.4 ± 4.124.3 ± 5.024.0 ± 4.20.87
    NYHA functional class (I/II/III)6/13/30/11/8<0.02
    Hypertension10 (83%)17 (77%)8 (42%)0.02
    Diabetes0 (0%)10 (45%)†5 (26%)0.02
    Hyperlipidemia7 (58%)15 (68%)11 (58%)0.76
    Atrial fibrillation0 (0%)8 (36%)7 (37%)0.047
    Coronary artery disease0 (0%)6 (27%)7 (37%)0.06
    Prior myocardial infarction0 (0%)6 (27%)7 (37%)0.06
    Heart failure etiologies0.03
     Ischemic cardiomyopathy5 (23%)7 (37%)
     Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy5 (23%)4 (21%)
     Hypertensive heart disease6 (27%)1 (5%)
     Dilated cardiomyopathy0 (0%)5 (26%)
     Other6 (27%)2 (11%)
    Blood data
     Hemoglobin (g/dL)13.0 ± 1.612.9 ± 1.913.5 ± 1.50.46
     Creatinine (mg/dL)0.65 (0.57–0.92)0.81 (0.66–0.99)0.87 (0.70–1.13)0.12
     Estimated glomerular filtration  rate (mL/min/1.73 m2)75.6 ± 19.466.3 ± 17.267.7 ± 33.20.56
     B-type natriuretic peptide (pg/mL)11.5 (8.5–19.0)97.0 (25.2–223.3)*78.8 (34.1–242.0)*<0.001
     Norepinephrine (pg/mL)426 ± 177367 ± 216371 ± 1990.70
     Troponin T (ng/mL)0.004 (0.003–0.009)0.016 (0.009–0.045)*0.038 (0.014–0.058)*<0.001
    Medication
     ACE-Is or ARBs5 (42%)20 (91%)*13 (68%)0.009
     β-blockers1 (8%)14 (64%)*18 (95%)*‡<0.001
     Aldosterone antagonists2 (17%)1 (5%)5 (26%)0.15
     Diuretics1 (8%)7 (32%)9 (47%)0.08
     Calcium-channel blockers7 (58%)10 (45%)6 (32%)0.33
     Statins4 (33%)12 (55%)10 (53%)0.46
     Warfarin0 (0%)2 (9%)5 (26%)0.08
     DOACs0 (0%)6 (27%)3 (16%)0.13
    SHFM mean life expectancy (y)10.6 ± 4.99.7 ± 3.30.50
    • ↵* P < 0.01 vs. control.

    • ↵† P < 0.05 vs. control.

    • ↵‡ P < 0.05 vs. DD0–1.

    • BMI = body mass index; NYHA = New York Heart Association; ACE-Is = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs = angiotensin II receptor blockers; DOACs = direct oral anticoagulants.

    • Data are mean ± SD; n, with percentages in parentheses; or median, with interquartile ranges in parentheses.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Hemodynamics and Echocardiographic Findings

    HFpEF
    ParameterControl (n = 12)DD0–1 (n = 22)DD2–3 (n = 19)P
    Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)121 ± 16109 ± 22107 ± 210.18
    Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)67 ± 1061 ± 1262 ± 120.29
    Heart rate (bpm)58 ± 758 ± 1157 ± 100.96
    LVEF (%)67 (64–69)51 (43–57)*45 (42–58)*<0.001
    LV end-diastolic diameter (mm)46 ± 451 ± 852 ± 90.07
    LV end-systolic diameter (mm)28 ± 237 ± 10†41 ± 10*0.002
    Left atrial end-systolic diameter (mm)37 (33–39)42 (39–49)†43 (34–46)0.03
    LV mass index (g/m2)75 ± 11123 ± 36*133 ± 33*<0.001
    Left atrial volume index (mL/m2)33 (31–38)42 (35–53)43 (31–59)0.10
    E/A0.79 (0.67–0.98)0.61 (0.55–0.77)1.02 (0.85–1.43)‡0.002
    E wave deceleration time (ms)216 (195–242)219 (184–242)182 (167–294)0.69
    Septal e′ (cm/s)7.2 ± 2.46.0 ± 2.44.7 ± 1.3*0.009
    Lateral e′ (cm/s)8.8 ± 1.88.9 ± 3.96.9 ± 2.00.07
    E/e′8.7 (7.9–9.2)9.2 (8.0–11.1)13.0 (10.0–16.3)*‡<0.001
    • ↵* P < 0.01 vs. control.

    • ↵† P < 0.05 vs. control.

    • ↵‡ P < 0.01 vs. DD0–1.

    • LV = left ventricular; E/A = peak velocity of early-diastolic mitral flow (E) to peak atrial velocity (A) ratio; E/e′ = E to mean early diastolic annular velocity (e′) ratio.

    • Data are mean ± SD; n, with percentages in parentheses; or median, with interquartile range in parentheses.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    PET Imaging Results

    HFpEF
    ParameterControl (n = 12)DD0–1 (n = 22)DD2–3 (n = 19)P
    Global RI (min−1)0.123 ± 0.0280.092 ± 0.024*0.075 ± 0.018*†<0.001
    Regional RI (min−1)
     Anterior0.124 ± 0.0280.097 ± 0.028‡0.078 ± 0.019*†<0.001
     Septal0.128 ± 0.0300.099 ± 0.025*0.085 ± 0.024*<0.001
     Inferior0.119 ± 0.0290.087 ± 0.022*0.069 ± 0.019*†<0.001
     Lateral0.119 ± 0.0270.087 ± 0.027*0.067 ± 0.016*†<0.001
    CVRI (%)7.9 ± 1.614.1 ± 4.7*18.4 ± 7.7*†<0.001
    11C-hydroxyephedrine influx rate (mL⋅g−1⋅min−1)0.302 ± 0.0530.231 ± 0.065*0.189 ± 0.053*<0.001
    • ↵* P < 0.01 vs. control.

    • ↵† P < 0.05 vs. DD0–1.

    • ↵‡ P < 0.05 vs. control.

    • Data are mean ± SD.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Logistic Regression Analysis to Identify Clinical Factors Contributing to Presence of DD2–3 in HFpEF Patients

    UnivariateMultivariate model 1Multivariate model 2
    FactorORPORPORP
    Age (per 10 y)0.92 (0.59–1.43)0.72––––
    Sex (male)1.94 (0.53–7.77)0.32––––
    BMI (kg/m2)0.99 (0.86–1.13)0.88––––
    Hypertension0.21 (0.05–0.79)0.020.29 (0.06–1.37)0.120.18 (0.03–0.98)0.048
    Diabetes0.43 (0.11–1.56)0.20––––
    Coronary artery disease1.56 (0.41–6.03)0.51––3.41 (0.59–25.2)0.17
    Atrial fibrillation1.02 (0.28–3.68)0.97––––
    B-type natriuretic peptide (per 100 pg/mL)1.19 (0.87–1.81)0.29––––
    SHFM mean life expectancy (y)0.95 (0.81–1.10)0.49––––
    LVEF (per 5%)0.76 (0.51–1.08)0.131.04 (0.60–1.83)0.891.08 (0.60–2.05)0.80
    LV mass index (per 10 g/m2)1.08 (0.90–1.32)0.39––––
    Global RI (per 0.01 min−1)0.64 (0.41–0.90)0.0080.66 (0.38–0.99)0.0440.62 (0.33–0.98)0.042
    CVRI (per 5%)1.76 (1.06–3.20)0.031.88 (1.01–3.95)0.0461.79 (0.94–3.88)0.08
    • OR = odds ratio; model 1 = including LVEF and stepwise-selected variables; model 2 = including coronary artery disease, LVEF, and stepwise-selected variables; BMI = body mass index.

    • Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 5
May 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impaired Myocardial Sympathetic Innervation Is Associated with Diastolic Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: 11C-Hydroxyephedrine PET Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Impaired Myocardial Sympathetic Innervation Is Associated with Diastolic Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: 11C-Hydroxyephedrine PET Study
Tadao Aikawa, Masanao Naya, Masahiko Obara, Osamu Manabe, Yuuki Tomiyama, Keiichi Magota, Satoshi Yamada, Chietsugu Katoh, Nagara Tamaki, Hiroyuki Tsutsui
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (5) 784-790; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178558

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impaired Myocardial Sympathetic Innervation Is Associated with Diastolic Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: 11C-Hydroxyephedrine PET Study
Tadao Aikawa, Masanao Naya, Masahiko Obara, Osamu Manabe, Yuuki Tomiyama, Keiichi Magota, Satoshi Yamada, Chietsugu Katoh, Nagara Tamaki, Hiroyuki Tsutsui
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (5) 784-790; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178558
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Imaging of the Cardiac Sympathetic Nervous System Has Potential Value in the Evaluation of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Radiotracers to Address Unmet Clinical Needs in Cardiovascular Imaging, Part 1: Technical Considerations and Perfusion and Neuronal Imaging
  • Best Practices in Molecular Breast Imaging: A Guide for Technologists
  • Imaging of the Cardiac Sympathetic Nervous System Has Potential Value in the Evaluation of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Cardiology

  • Evaluating the Effect of Performing Adjunct Low-Level Exercise During Injection of Regadenoson
  • Time from Tc-99m Sestamibi Injection to Imaging Scan for Rest and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Use of Conventional Late Imaging Protocol for Dynamic SPECT Imaging
Show more Cardiology

Clinical

  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • SUVs Are Adequate Measures of Lesional 18F-DCFPyL Uptake in Patients with Low Prostate Cancer Disease Burden
  • Hypermetabolism on Pediatric PET Scans of Brain Glucose Metabolism: What Does It Signify?
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
  • Diastolic dysfunction
  • 11C-hydroxyephedrine
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire