Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleOncology

Androgen and Estrogen Receptor Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients as a Surrogate for Tissue Biopsies

Clasina M. Venema, Lemonitsa H. Mammatas, Carolina P. Schröder, Michel van Kruchten, Giulia Apollonio, Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans, Alfons H.H. Bongaerts, Otto S. Hoekstra, Henk M.W. Verheul, Epi Boven, Bert van der Vegt, Erik F.J. de Vries, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries, Ronald Boellaard, Catharina W. Menke van der Houven van Oordt and Geke A.P. Hospers
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2017, 58 (12) 1906-1912; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.193649
Clasina M. Venema
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lemonitsa H. Mammatas
2Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolina P. Schröder
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michel van Kruchten
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giulia Apollonio
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans
3Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfons H.H. Bongaerts
3Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Otto S. Hoekstra
4Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henk M.W. Verheul
4Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Epi Boven
2Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bert van der Vegt
5Department of Pathology & Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik F.J. de Vries
3Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabeth G.E. de Vries
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Boellaard
3Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catharina W. Menke van der Houven van Oordt
2Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geke A.P. Hospers
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Comparison of immunohistochemistry staining of AR between an AR-negative (0% AR staining) lesion (A, top) and AR-positive (100% staining) lesion (B, top). (Bottom) Horizontal 18F-FDHT PET/CT fusion images. (A, bottom) Physiologic uptake in small intestines and kidneys. Arrow indicates biopsied lesion (rib) with no visual enhanced uptake. (B, bottom) Physiologic uptake in small intestines and high uptake throughout pelvic bones. Arrow indicates biopsied lesion in iliac bone with visually enhanced uptake.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Correlation plot of semiquantitative analysis of receptor status and SUVmax as measured by PET scan for AR (left) and ER (right).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Example of typical 18F-FES (A–C) and 18F-FDHT (D–F) distribution in same patient with multiple bone metastases. (A) Sagittal 18F-FES PET/CT fusion image with physiologic uptake in liver, small intestine, and urinary tract and pathologic uptake in multiple vertebra. (B) 18F-FES PET maximum-intensity-pixel format to allow visualization of biodistribution of 18F-FES tracer. (C) Horizontal 18F-FES PET/CT fusion image with physiologic uptake in small intestine and pathologic uptake throughout pelvic bones. (D) Maximum-intensity-pixel format of 18F-FDHT PET scan, with physiologic uptake in blood pool of heart and liver and excretion via bile to small intestine, and urinary tract. (E) Sagittal 18F-FDHT PET/CT fusion image with physiologic uptake and pathologic uptake in multiple vertebrae. (F) Horizontal 18F-FES PET/CT fusion image with physiologic uptake in large vessels and small intestines and pathologic uptake throughout pelvic bones.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Distribution of SUVmax per lesion per patient measured by 18F-FES PET. Lesions are divided into bone (blue), lymph nodes (red), lung (green), and others (purple). Orange circles are biopsied lesions. Blue boxes indicate ER-positive biopsies (>1% staining); numbers indicate score of biopsy (i.e., intensity times percentage positive cells). Dashed line indicates threshold set based on receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. White boxes indicate negative biopsies (<1% staining).

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Distribution of SUVmax per lesion per patient measured by 18F-FDHT PET. Lesions are divided into bone (blue), lymph nodes (red), lung (green), and others (purple). Orange circles are biopsied lesions. Orange boxes indicate AR-positive biopsies (i.e., >10% staining); white boxes indicate negative biopsies. Numbers in boxes indicate score of biopsy (i.e., intensity times percentage positive cells). Dashed line indicates threshold set based on receiver-operating-characteristic analysis.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Characteristics

    Characteristicn%
    Mean age (y)64
    Sex
     Female1185
     Male215
    Primary tumor characteristics IHC
     ER+/AR+13100
     ER+/AR−0
     ER−/AR+0
     ER−/AR−0
    Primary tumor stage
     T1N0M0431
     T1N1M018
     T2N0M0431
     T2N1M018
     T3N2M0323
    Metastatic tumor characteristics IHC
     ER+/AR+1077
     ER+/AR−18
     ER−/AR+18
     ER−/AR−18
    Treatment at time of 18F-FES and 18F-FDHT PET scans
     Aromatase inhibitor538
     Chemotherapy431
     None431
    • ER+ = ER-positive; AR+ = AR-positive; ER− = ER-negative; AR− = AR-negative; IHC = immunohistochemistry.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 12
December 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Androgen and Estrogen Receptor Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients as a Surrogate for Tissue Biopsies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Androgen and Estrogen Receptor Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients as a Surrogate for Tissue Biopsies
Clasina M. Venema, Lemonitsa H. Mammatas, Carolina P. Schröder, Michel van Kruchten, Giulia Apollonio, Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans, Alfons H.H. Bongaerts, Otto S. Hoekstra, Henk M.W. Verheul, Epi Boven, Bert van der Vegt, Erik F.J. de Vries, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries, Ronald Boellaard, Catharina W. Menke van der Houven van Oordt, Geke A.P. Hospers
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2017, 58 (12) 1906-1912; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193649

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Androgen and Estrogen Receptor Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients as a Surrogate for Tissue Biopsies
Clasina M. Venema, Lemonitsa H. Mammatas, Carolina P. Schröder, Michel van Kruchten, Giulia Apollonio, Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans, Alfons H.H. Bongaerts, Otto S. Hoekstra, Henk M.W. Verheul, Epi Boven, Bert van der Vegt, Erik F.J. de Vries, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries, Ronald Boellaard, Catharina W. Menke van der Houven van Oordt, Geke A.P. Hospers
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2017, 58 (12) 1906-1912; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193649
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Report on the PET/CT Image-Based Radiation Dosimetry of [18F]FDHT in Women, a Validated Imaging Agent with New Applications for Evaluation of Androgen Receptor Status in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Report on the PET/CT Image-Based Radiation Dosimetry of [18F]FDHT in Women, a Validated Imaging Agent with New Applications for Evaluation of Androgen Receptor Status in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Summary: Appropriate Use Criteria for Estrogen Receptor-Targeted PET Imaging with 16{alpha}-18F-Fluoro-17{beta}-Fluoroestradiol
  • Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-Fluoro-5{alpha}-Dihydrotestosterone PET: A Pilot Study
  • Breast Cancer: Evaluating Tumor Estrogen Receptor Status with Molecular Imaging to Increase Response to Therapy and Improve Patient Outcomes
  • Recent Advances in Imaging Steroid Hormone Receptors in Breast Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology

  • Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells Imaging: Clinical Needs and Strategies for Success
  • Metastatic NUT Midline Carcinoma
  • Radionuclides used in Nuclear Therapeutic Medicine: a brief history, properties and main relevant studies of radionuclides with mass number less than 100
Show more Oncology

Translational

  • [99mTc]Tc-MY6349 Probe for Trop2-Targeted SPECT Imaging: From Preclinical to Pilot Clinical Study
  • Imaging Diverse Pathogenic Bacteria In Vivo with 18F-Fluoromannitol PET
  • Modeling Early Radiation DNA Damage Occurring During 177Lu-DOTATATE Radionuclide Therapy
Show more Translational

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • androgen receptor
  • estrogen receptor
  • FDHT PET
  • FES PET
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire