Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Developing freehand PET - status and challenges

Benjamin Frisch, Amit Shah, Etiennette Auffray, Paul Lecoq, Rene Laugier, John Prior, Markus Schwaiger and Nassir Navab
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1948;
Benjamin Frisch
6Technische Universitaet Muenchen Garching Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amit Shah
6Technische Universitaet Muenchen Garching Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Etiennette Auffray
2CERN Geneva Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Lecoq
2CERN Geneva Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rene Laugier
1Gastroenterology Department, La Timone Hospital Assistance Publique – Hopitaux de Marseille Marseilles France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Prior
4Lausanne University Hospital La Conversion Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Schwaiger
5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nassir Navab
3Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1948

Objectives The use of positron emitting radiotracers for whole-body PET has proven to be a valuable tool for cancer diagnosis and staging. There is however no established method to transfer this information to an interventional setting to provide live radioguidance, such as to identify cancerous tissue during surgery. Indeed, while diagnostic systems are limited by their most common gantry-based design as well as their long acquisition time, the surgeon mostly relies on cognitive fusion of preinterventional image information with the surgical reality. We suggest the development of a dedicated system, where a light-weight handheld PET detector is combined with an external plate for the live acquisition of PET images. The design of the handheld detector, which should be brought as close as possible to the region of interest, also allows an endoscopic application and consequent increase in sensitivity. The work presented in this submission demonstrates the feasibility of freehand PET (fhPET) with a detector prototype and a first phantom study.

Methods This pilot system is based on matrices of 4x4 LYSO:Ce crystals with an individual size of 3.5x3.5x15 cubic mm coupled to arrays of 4x4 SiPMs. The plate consists in 256 matrices grouped by 4 and read out by 64-channel STiC-ASICs, of which 16 are hosted by each of the 4 front-end boards. The plate is held by a mechanical arm that allows its placement and fixation. The endoscope is made out of 2 matrices read out by a TOFPET ASIC on a front-end board. Each frontend board contains the FPGAs that concentrate event data and transmit it via an HDMI cable to a PCIe data acquisition card, where further event handling and coincidence creation are handled. The position of the plate and endoscope are tracked by an optical tracking system. An iterative MLEM algorithm reconstructs the image. We conduct 3 experiments with a phantom made out of four Eppendorf tubes filled with 5 MBq of 18F-FDG each. We acquire data by rotating the detectors by 360, 180 and 90 degrees around the phantom to study the influence of full versus partial angular information. The acquisition time was fixed to 100s. The energy spectra are recorded. The number of iterations in the reconstruction is varied.

Results Energy peaks are clearly identifiable for both detectors. While image quality decreases with reduced angular coverage, all images clearly showed four hotspots. 5 iterations are sufficient to provide an image.

Conclusions This submission presents first results acquired on phantoms with a freehand PET system, giving a first hint at image quality that can be achieved. Few iterations are sufficient to identify all sources, allowing for a reduction of the total reconstruction time in view of live interventional fhPET. Further developments and experiments are ongoing towards including excellent time-of-flight performance such as to provide a system that can distinguish smallest radioactive hotspots in a noisy environment.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Developing freehand PET - status and challenges
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Developing freehand PET - status and challenges
Benjamin Frisch, Amit Shah, Etiennette Auffray, Paul Lecoq, Rene Laugier, John Prior, Markus Schwaiger, Nassir Navab
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1948;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Developing freehand PET - status and challenges
Benjamin Frisch, Amit Shah, Etiennette Auffray, Paul Lecoq, Rene Laugier, John Prior, Markus Schwaiger, Nassir Navab
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1948;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

  • Deep Learning Based Kidney Segmentation for Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement Using Quantitative SPECT/CT
  • The Benefit of Time-of-Flight in Digital Photon Counting PET Imaging: Physics and Clinical Evaluation
  • Preclinical validation of a single-scan rest/stress imaging technique for 13NH3 cardiac perfusion studies
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

MTA II: Instrumentation Posters

  • Optimizing multi-stage CdZnTe Compton camera for real-time proton range determination in proton radiotherapy
  • Optimized 82Rb infusion profile for flow quantification with low count-rate PET system using a physical flow phantom
Show more MTA II: Instrumentation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire