Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigations

Biodistribution and PET Imaging of Labeled Bispecific T Cell–Engaging Antibody Targeting EpCAM

Frank J. Warnders, Stijn J.H. Waaijer, Martin Pool, Marjolijn N. Lub–de Hooge, Matthias Friedrich, Anton G.T. Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Petra Deegen, Sabine K. Stienen, Peter C. Pieslor, H.Kam Cheung, Jos G.W. Kosterink and Elisabeth G.E. de Vries
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (5) 812-817; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.168153
Frank J. Warnders
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stijn J.H. Waaijer
2Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Pool
2Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marjolijn N. Lub–de Hooge
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
3Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Friedrich
4Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anton G.T. Terwisscha van Scheltinga
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petra Deegen
4Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabine K. Stienen
4Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter C. Pieslor
5Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.Kam Cheung
5Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jos G.W. Kosterink
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
6Department of Pharmacy, Section of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabeth G.E. de Vries
2Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

AMG 110, a bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) antibody construct, induces T cell–mediated cancer cell death by cross-linking epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) on tumor cells with a cluster of differentiation 3 ε (CD3ε) on T cells. We labeled AMG 110 with 89Zr or near-infrared fluorescent dye (IRDye) 800CW to study its tumor targeting and tissue distribution. Methods: Biodistribution and tumor uptake of 89Zr-AMG 110 was studied up to 6 d after intravenous administration to nude BALB/c mice bearing high EpCAM-expressing HT-29 colorectal cancer xenografts. Tumor uptake of 89Zr-AMG 110 was compared with uptake in head and neck squamous cell cancer FaDu (intermediate EpCAM) and promyelocytic leukemia HL60 (EpCAM-negative) xenografts. Intratumoral distribution in HT-29 tumors was studied using 800CW-AMG 110. Results: Tumor uptake of 89Zr-AMG 110 can be clearly visualized using small-animal PET imaging up to 72 h after injection. The highest tumor uptake of 89Zr-AMG 110 at the 40-μg dose level was observed at 6 and 24 h (respectively, 5.35 ± 0.22 and 5.30 ± 0.20 percentage injected dose per gram; n = 3 and 4). Tumor uptake of 89Zr-AMG 110 was EpCAM-specific and correlated with EpCAM expression. 800CW-AMG 110 accumulated at the tumor cell surface in viable EpCAM-expressing tumor tissue. Conclusion: PET and fluorescent imaging provided real-time information about AMG 110 distribution and tumor uptake in vivo. Our data support using 89Zr and IRDye 800CW to evaluate tumor and tissue uptake kinetics of bispecific T cell engager antibody constructs in preclinical and clinical settings.

  • imaging
  • PET
  • fluorescence
  • BiTE
  • 89Zr

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online Feb. 4, 2016.

  • © 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 5
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biodistribution and PET Imaging of Labeled Bispecific T Cell–Engaging Antibody Targeting EpCAM
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Biodistribution and PET Imaging of Labeled Bispecific T Cell–Engaging Antibody Targeting EpCAM
Frank J. Warnders, Stijn J.H. Waaijer, Martin Pool, Marjolijn N. Lub–de Hooge, Matthias Friedrich, Anton G.T. Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Petra Deegen, Sabine K. Stienen, Peter C. Pieslor, H.Kam Cheung, Jos G.W. Kosterink, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (5) 812-817; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.168153

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Biodistribution and PET Imaging of Labeled Bispecific T Cell–Engaging Antibody Targeting EpCAM
Frank J. Warnders, Stijn J.H. Waaijer, Martin Pool, Marjolijn N. Lub–de Hooge, Matthias Friedrich, Anton G.T. Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Petra Deegen, Sabine K. Stienen, Peter C. Pieslor, H.Kam Cheung, Jos G.W. Kosterink, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (5) 812-817; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.168153
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Longitudinal evaluation of the biodistribution and cellular internalization of the bispecific CD3xTRP1 antibody in syngeneic mouse tumor models
  • Imaging the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic availability of the bispecific CD3xTRP1 antibody in syngeneic mouse tumor models
  • Mesothelin/CD3 Half-Life-Extended Bispecific T-Cell Engager Molecule Shows Specific Tumor Uptake and Distributes to Mesothelin and CD3-Expressing Tissues
  • The Biodistribution of a CD3 and EpCAM Bispecific T-Cell Engager Is Driven by the CD3 Arm
  • Preclinical PET imaging of bispecific antibody ERY974 targeting CD3 and glypican 3 reveals that tumor uptake correlates to T cell infiltrate
  • Molecular Imaging of Radiolabeled Bispecific T-Cell Engager 89Zr-AMG211 Targeting CEA-Positive Tumors
  • CARs versus BiTEs: A Comparison between T Cell-Redirection Strategies for Cancer Treatment
  • Relative Target Affinities of T-Cell-Dependent Bispecific Antibodies Determine Biodistribution in a Solid Tumor Mouse Model
  • Immune Modulation Therapy and Imaging: Workshop Report
  • Dual-Targeted Molecular Imaging of Cancer
  • Theranostics Using Antibodies and Antibody-Related Therapeutics
  • Oncolytic Adenoviral Delivery of an EGFR-Targeting T-cell Engager Improves Antitumor Efficacy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • imaging
  • PET
  • fluorescence
  • BiTE
  • 89Zr
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire