Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Absorbed dose estimation for 18F-FDG PET studies: validation of an SUV-based method for different uptake times.

Gleb Kuzmin, Thada Shantalaxmi and ROBERTO MAASS-MORENO
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1775;
Gleb Kuzmin
2Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M, College Station, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thada Shantalaxmi
3PET, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERTO MAASS-MORENO
1RADIOLOGY, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, Bethesda, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1775

Objectives In a previous study1,2, an initial evaluation of the ratio of actual-to-reference SUV [SUVR] from FDG, PET images appeared to successfully improve traditional FDG dosimetry by accounting for the biodistribution of FDG shown in PET images. Here, we investigate the impact the FDG uptake times at imaging on the validity SUVR method.

Methods FDG kinetics were modeled using a 3-compartment model and time activity curves created for different values of the model's parameters to represent normal and abnormal FDG uptake. The organ accumulated activity was simulated at 60 and 120 min. The anatomic model included three spheres to represent organs of different size and placed at different distances within a torso-sized compartment with activity equal to the blood pool activity, Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations provided the true organ dose for such "anatomy". Corresponding SUVs at 60 and 120min were calculated.

Results Four realizations of the model and corresponding simulations for dose were carried out. One for normal biodistribution and three various levels of abnormal uptake. Using the SUVR, the dose estimates where within 3.5% of the true dose for the normal biodistribution. For the abnormal uptake the % improvement over the traditional method was 79.8%, 71.2% and 45.15%. The % avg error was <20% for both 60 and 120min uptake. Error with no compensation for actual SUV values was on the average >50% and as large as 112%

Conclusions The results confirm that (1) the traditional estimation of dosimetry, i.e. assign average values from the literature - can differ significantly from the true dosimetry and (2) that even with static images at 60 and 120min, the SUVR method can provide accurate individualized estimates.

Research Support NIH Summer Internship Program and the Intramural Research Program of the NIH Clinical Center

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Absorbed dose estimation for 18F-FDG PET studies: validation of an SUV-based method for different uptake times.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Absorbed dose estimation for 18F-FDG PET studies: validation of an SUV-based method for different uptake times.
Gleb Kuzmin, Thada Shantalaxmi, ROBERTO MAASS-MORENO
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1775;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Absorbed dose estimation for 18F-FDG PET studies: validation of an SUV-based method for different uptake times.
Gleb Kuzmin, Thada Shantalaxmi, ROBERTO MAASS-MORENO
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1775;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Assessment of SUV consistency in PET/CT with annulus 68Ge DQA phantom
  • Assessment of Tumor Burden in Lymphoma Patients with Deauville Score 4 Disease on Post Therapy FDG PET
  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

MTA II: Data Analysis & Management Posters

  • Detection of dementia-related hypometabolism using two different age-adjusted reference FDG- PET databases
  • SPECT/CT and MR image registration for 123I-FP-CIT imaging
  • Molecular Imaging And Kinetic Analysis Toolbox (MIAKAT) - A Quantitative Software Package for the Analysis of PET Neuroimaging Data
Show more MTA II: Data Analysis & Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire